Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 3 de 3
Filtrar
Más filtros










Base de datos
Intervalo de año de publicación
1.
JNMA J Nepal Med Assoc ; 59(233): 31-34, 2021 Jan 31.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34508455

RESUMEN

INTRODUCTION: Traumatic dental injury is an injury inflicted on the dentoalveolar system. It has a physical as well as a psychological impact. Despite this concern, epidemiological data regarding its prevalence is insufficient in the literature of Nepal. Hence, this study's objective was to investigate the prevalence of traumatic dental injuries for the patients visiting Universal College of Medical Sciences, Bhairahawa, Nepal, over five years. METHODS: A descriptive cross-sectional study was conducted using records from the medical record section for the patients presenting at the dental emergency outpatient department of the Universal College of Medical Sciences, Bhairahawa, Nepal, between April 2014 and April 2019. Ethical approval was taken from the Institutional Review Committee of the Universal College of Medical Sciences. Patient demographic data, type of traumatic dental injuries, and etiologies were evaluated from the record section. RESULTS: Out of 10,080 patients registered during the study period, 793 patients (7.86%) were due to traumatic dental injury, out of which 628 (79.2%) were male, and 165 (20.8%) were female. The most vulnerable age group was 20-29 years (42.4%). Most frequently, injuries occurred in June (16%). Road traffic accidents (57.8 %) were the most common mode, and complicated crown-root fracture (23.3%) was the most common type of traumatic dental injury. CONCLUSIONS: The frequency of 7.86% of traumatic dental injury indicates that dental traumatology needs special attention for policy planning and professional training.


Asunto(s)
Servicio de Urgencia en Hospital , Traumatismos de los Dientes , Adulto , Estudios Transversales , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Prevalencia , Centros de Atención Terciaria , Traumatismos de los Dientes/epidemiología , Adulto Joven
2.
Dent Traumatol ; 37(1): 103-107, 2021 Feb.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32946680

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Previous studies have shown that the position and presence of mandibular third molars is associated with a high risk of mandibular angle fractures. The aim of this study was to assess the relationship between the position and presence of mandibular third molars and mandibular angle fractures. MATERIAL AND METHODS: A retrospective study consisting of 256 patients who were admitted for treatment of mandibular fractures between January 2016 and January 2018 was undertaken. Patients' data and orthopantomogram radiographs were obtained from their medical record. The predictor variable was the presence and position of mandibular third molars. The position of the third molars was grouped based on the Pell and Gregory classification. The outcome variable was the presence of an angle fracture. Other study variables included age, gender, mechanism of injury, and fracture location. RESULTS: Patients with mandibular third molars had a 2.7 times greater chance of an angle fracture than patients without third molars. Patients with their third molars present at occlusal position C and ramus position level 3 had a higher risk of angle fracture in comparison with other groups. There was a statistically significant variation in the risk of an angle fracture, depending on mandibular third molar position (P < .001). CONCLUSION: Patients with mandibular third molars have an increased risk of angle fractures. The risk for an angle fracture varied depending on the third molar position.


Asunto(s)
Fracturas Mandibulares , Diente Impactado , Humanos , Mandíbula/diagnóstico por imagen , Fracturas Mandibulares/diagnóstico por imagen , Fracturas Mandibulares/epidemiología , Tercer Molar/diagnóstico por imagen , Estudios Retrospectivos , Factores de Riesgo , Diente Impactado/diagnóstico por imagen
3.
Clin Cosmet Investig Dent ; 12: 41-48, 2020.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32110114

RESUMEN

INTRODUCTION: Airway management in patients with panfacial fracture remains a challenge to anesthesiologists and surgeons. Submental intubation is an effective and less invasive alternative to tracheostomy during intraoperative airway management where orotracheal and nasotracheal intubation are not appropriate options. In addition, submental intubation allows proper access to oronasal airways and occlusion during intraoperative management. METHODS: The descriptive retrospective study was carried out and evaluated the outcomes of submental intubation in the management of panfacial fracture, complex maxillary or mandible fracture associated with nasal bone fracture and naso-orbito-ethmoid (NOE) fracture. The medical records of 23 patients who received submental endotracheal intubation were reviewed at UCMS College of Dental Surgery, Bhairahawa, Rupandehi, Nepal from March 2014 to December 2018. The following parameters were evaluated: mode of trauma, time required for intubation, accidental extubation, accidental perforation of the pilot balloon during its insertion, period of hospital stay, post-operative complications, such as the healing of submental scars both intraorally and extraorally. RESULTS: The submental intubation was successfully done in all patients with minimal obvious post-operative complications. The mode of trauma for majority of cases of panfacial fracture who underwent submental intubation was road traffic accident (69.56%). The mean time required for intubation was 8.43 (±0.84) minutes. No accidental extubations occurred. Accidental perforation of the pilot balloon was seen in one patient (4.35%) during tube manipulation which was managed successfully by changing the tube. The healing of submental scars was uneventful intraorally and extraorally in almost every case. The mean period of hospital stay in patients with submental intubation was 7.95 (±1.49) days. DISCUSSION: Submental intubation is an effective and safe method as it is not associated with complications of tracheostomy during management of panfacial fracture, NOE fracture and craniofacial fracture. In addition, it does not interfere with IMF during intraoperative period.

SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA
...