Progressive multifocal leukoencephalopathy outcomes in patients with multiple sclerosis treated with dimethyl fumarate.

Background and objectives: Dimethyl fumarate (DMF), an oral disease-modifying therapy with an established benefit and well-described safety profile, is among the most commonly used therapies for relapsing forms of multiple sclerosis. As of 31 December 2021, >560,000 patients have been treated with DMF, representing >1,190,000 person-years of exposure. Of these, 6413 patients (14,292 person-years) were from clinical trials. Methods and results: Progressive multifocal leukoencephalopathy (PML) has occurred in the setting of lymphopenia (<0.91 × 109/L) in patients treated with DMF. We present detailed clinical characteristics and outcomes of the 12 confirmed PML cases occurring in MS patients on DMF as of 21 July 2021. The PML incidence in DMF-treated patients is 1.07 per 100,000 person-years of DMF exposure. Lymphopenia is the common risk for PML in DMF treatment. Discussion: DMF-related PML is rare but has occurred in the setting of lymphopenia, supporting the current recommendations for absolute lymphocyte count monitoring in all patients, regardless of age and time on therapy.

The Patient and Clinician Assessment of Gastrointestinal (GI) Related Adverse Events Associated with Oral Disease-Modifying Therapies in Multiple Sclerosis: A Qualitative Study.

INTRODUCTION: Current guidelines for relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis (RRMS) call for treatment with disease-modifying therapies (DMTs) early in the disease to prevent relapses and accumulation of neurologic impairment and disability. However, patients taking certain oral DMTs may experience gastrointestinal (GI)-related adverse events (AEs), particularly at dose titration. We conducted qualitative research with healthcare professionals (HCPs) and patients in Canada to contextualize their experiences with three oral DMTs: dimethyl fumarate (Tecfidera®), fingolimod (Gilenya®), and teriflunomide (Aubagio®). The objectives of this study were to (1) gather qualitative data to better understand the patient and HCP experience of GI AEs in oral MS DMT treatment in Canada and (2) determine to what extent two patient-reported outcome (PRO) instruments used in recent oral DMT trials capture what is important to patients regarding GI AEs in oral MS DMT treatment (content validity) and to provide qualitative data to help interpret PRO scores. METHODS: This was a qualitative, non-interventional, descriptive, cross-sectional study comprising HCP and patient interviews conducted in English and French, using a 1:1 semi-structured interview approach. RESULTS: Patients reported 16 unique GI AE concepts related to oral DMTs. The most commonly reported symptoms were diarrhea, indigestion, and nausea. While patients acknowledged the negative impact associated with GI-related AEs, most characterized the treatment experience as positive, focusing on preference for oral administration, perceived efficacy of DMTs in terms of lack of MS relapses, slowed progression of their disease, and improvement in MS symptoms. Results supported the content validity (relevance, comprehension, and comprehensiveness) of the two PROs assessed. HCP feedback reinforced patient perspectives on both GI concepts and the two PRO instruments. CONCLUSION: Outcomes of these research activities include experiential data on the symptom and impact experience of oral DMTs in MS from both patients and HCPs that contribute to the process of determining therapeutic value.

Health-Related Quality of Life with Diroximel Fumarate in Patients with Relapsing Forms of Multiple Sclerosis: Findings from Qualitative Research Using Patient Interviews.

INTRODUCTION: Diroximel fumarate (DRF) is an oral fumarate for relapsing multiple sclerosis (MS). Clinical and real-world studies of DRF have demonstrated improved gastrointestinal (GI) tolerability and low (< 1%) GI-related treatment discontinuation versus dimethyl fumarate (DMF) and high rates of treatment adherence. Our aim was to conduct a concept elicitation study to identify treatment-related concepts most meaningful to patients and to evaluate how these concepts shape the patient perspective of DRF. METHODS: In-depth qualitative interviews were conducted with patients from October to December 2020. US adults who had been prescribed DRF through routine clinical care and had taken DRF for ≥ 3 weeks in the past 6 months were eligible to participate. Semi-structured interviews explored patient perceptions on treatment selection and impact. RESULTS: Seventeen patients participated in the study. Mean (SD) age was 49.3 (12.0) years. Sixteen patients reported prior disease-modifying therapy, while 10 (58.8%) had prior DMF. DRF treatment duration ranged from ~ 6 weeks to 10 months. Four key concepts emerged: (1) overall wellness and quality of life, (2) ease of administration, (3) minimal and manageable side effects, and (4) patient optimism due to MS treatments. Mode of administration (82.4%), no/mild side effects (70.6%), convenience over injectable/infusion medications (58.8%), and effectiveness (64.7%) were cited as positive aspects of DRF treatment. Frequent dosing (52.9%) and food requirements (41.2%) were cited as negative attributes; however, 94.1% had no dietary changes since starting treatment. CONCLUSION: The patient perspective is a key aspect when considering a disease-modifying therapy for MS, given the multitude of options currently available. Overall wellness, ease of administration, and minimal and manageable side effects were DRF-related concepts most meaningful to patients on therapy. Acknowledging these patient perceptions in shared decision-making may lead to greater patient adherence and optimal treatment outcomes.

Multiple sclerosis (MS), an immune-related disease, may present with neurological symptoms that come and go. Diroximel fumarate (DRF) is a next-generation oral treatment for MS, which has been shown in clinical trials to have fewer gastrointestinal side effects compared to dimethyl fumarate (DMF), another oral treatment. Patients' perspective can shed light on what they value when choosing a treatment, so we interviewed 17 people with MS about how DRF treatment affects their daily life and work. The study participants (49.3 years old on average) received DRF for ~ 6 weeks to 10 months. Around 5 in 10 people had positive feelings about their current health following treatment with DRF. Most felt there was either improvement or no negative change in quality of life since starting DRF treatment; DRF did not affect their work or daily obligations. Treatment characteristics of DRF that were perceived as most important included ease of administration, minimal and manageable side effects, and the facilitation of overall wellness and quality of life. While the oral dosing of DRF was more convenient than injectable or infusion therapy options, about half of the respondents preferred a less frequent treatment regimen than the twice daily dosing of DRF which needs to be taken with food. However, those who switched to DRF from DMF (or other oral medications for MS) expressed that the transition was smooth. Understanding factors that are important to patients can guide treatment choices and help patients stay on treatment longer and have better MS outcomes.

Efficacy and Safety Outcomes with Diroximel Fumarate After Switching from Prior Therapies or Continuing on DRF: Results from the Phase 3 EVOLVE-MS-1 Study.

INTRODUCTION: Diroximel fumarate (DRF) is an oral fumarate for relapsing multiple sclerosis (MS) with the same active metabolite as dimethyl fumarate (DMF). DRF has a safety/efficacy profile similar to DMF but with improved gastrointestinal (GI) tolerability and low (< 1%) treatment discontinuation due to GI adverse events (AEs). Efficacy and safety outcomes in patients who switched to DRF from other disease-modifying therapies (DMTs) have not been evaluated. METHODS: EVOLVE-MS-1 is an ongoing, 2-year, open-label, phase 3 study of DRF in adults with relapsing-remitting MS. Patients either entered as newly enrolled to DRF trials, or from the 5-week, randomized, head-to-head, phase 3 EVOLVE-MS-2 study of DRF and DMF. This analysis evaluated safety and GI tolerability in patients continuing on DRF (DRF-rollover) or switching from DMF (DMF-rollover) following EVOLVE-MS-2. Safety and efficacy were evaluated in a subset of newly enrolled patients who had received prior glatiramer acetate (GA; GA/DRF) or interferons (IFN; IFN/DRF) as their most recent DMT, prior to switching to DRF in EVOLVE-MS-1. RESULTS: As of September 1, 2020, 1057 patients were enrolled in EVOLVE-MS-1, including 166, 182, 239, and 225 patients in the GA/DRF, IFN/DRF, DRF-rollover, and DMF-rollover groups, respectively. Treatment discontinuation due to GI AEs was < 1% in all groups. GA/DRF and IFN/DRF patients experienced improvements from baseline in clinical and radiological efficacy outcomes, including significantly reduced annualized relapse rates. Rollover patients had low rates of new or recurrent GI AEs (DRF-rollover, 26.8%/4.2%; DMF-rollover, 27.1%/4.9%). CONCLUSION: After 2 years of DRF exposure, patients with prior GA, IFN, or fumarate treatment had safety outcomes consistent with previous fumarate studies. Efficacy in patients with prior GA or IFN treatment was consistent with previous fumarate studies. The data suggest that transition to DRF from GA, IFN, or DMF is a reasonable treatment strategy, with low rates of discontinuation due to GI AEs. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT02634307). INFOGRAPHIC.

Real-world effectiveness of dimethyl fumarate versus fingolimod in a cohort of patients with multiple sclerosis using standardized, quantitative outcome metrics.

BACKGROUND: Prior studies suggest comparable effectiveness of dimethyl fumarate (DMF) and fingolimod (FTY) in multiple sclerosis (MS) using relapse, Expanded Disability Status Score (EDSS), and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) lesion metrics. OBJECTIVE: Compare the real-world effectiveness of DMF versus FTY using quantitative, validated neuroperformance tests, MRI, and serum neurofilament light chain (sNfL) outcomes while controlling for between-group differences. METHODS: Patients were eligible if on DMF or FTY when first enrolled in the MS Partners Advancing Technology and Health Solutions (MS PATHS) network and had ≥1-year follow-up in MS PATHS. Sensitivity analysis included a subgroup who started DMF/FTY ≤2 years from enrolment. After propensity score weighting, differences in means and in mean 1-year change of neuroperformance and MRI outcomes were compared. sNfL levels were assessed. This was a non-randomized comparison. RESULTS: In the overall cohort, no significant differences were observed between DMF (n = 702) and FTY (n = 600) in neuroperformance or MRI outcomes including brain volume loss; mean time (SD) since treatment initiation was 1.98 (0.68) years for DMF and 2.02 (0.75) years for FTY. A sensitivity analysis controlling for DMF and FTY treatment duration yielded similar results. CONCLUSION: In this study, DMF and FTY demonstrated similar effects on physical and cognitive neuroperformance and MRI outcomes. Direct comparisons to other fumarates and S1P receptor modulators were not conducted.

Long-term safety and efficacy of dimethyl fumarate for up to 13 years in patients with relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis: Final ENDORSE study results.

BACKGROUND: Dimethyl fumarate (DMF) demonstrated favorable benefit-risk in relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis (RRMS) patients in phase-III DEFINE and CONFIRM trials, and ENDORSE extension. OBJECTIVE: The main aim of this study is assessing DMF safety/efficacy up to 13 years in ENDORSE. METHODS: Randomized patients received DMF 240 mg twice daily or placebo (PBO; Years 0-2), then DMF (Years 3-10; continuous DMF/DMF or PBO/DMF); maximum follow-up (combined studies), 13 years. RESULTS: By January 2020, 1736 patients enrolled/dosed in ENDORSE (median follow-up 8.76 years (ENDORSE range: 0.04-10.98) in DEFINE/CONFIRM and ENDORSE); 52% treated in ENDORSE for ⩾6 years. Overall, 551 (32%) patients experienced serious adverse events (mostly multiple sclerosis (MS) relapse or fall; one progressive multifocal leukoencephalopathy); 243 (14%) discontinued treatment due to adverse events (4% gastrointestinal (GI) disorders). Rare opportunistic infections, malignancies, and serious herpes zoster occurred, irrespective of lymphocyte count. For DMF/DMF (n = 501), overall annualized relapse rate (ARR) remained low (0.143 (95% confidence interval (CI), 0.120-0.169)), while for PBO/DMF (n = 249), ARR decreased after initiating DMF and remained low throughout (ARR 0-2 years, 0.330 (95% CI, 0.266-0.408); overall ARR (ENDORSE, 0.151 (95% CI, 0.118-0.194)). Over 10 years, 72% DMF/DMF and 73% PBO/DMF had no 24-week confirmed disability worsening. CONCLUSION: Sustained DMF safety/efficacy was observed in patients followed up to 13 years, supporting DMF's positive benefit/risk profile for long-term RRMS treatment.

Dimethyl fumarate treatment shifts the immune environment toward an anti-inflammatory cell profile while maintaining protective humoral immunity.

BACKGROUND: Delayed-release dimethyl fumarate (DMF) demonstrates sustained efficacy and safety for relapsing forms of MS. Absolute lymphocyte count (ALC) is reduced initially, then stabilizes on treatment. OBJECTIVE: PROCLAIM, a 96-week, prospective, open-label, phase 3b study, assessed lymphocyte subsets and immunoglobulin (Ig) levels during 48 and 96 weeks (W) of DMF treatment. METHODS: Patients received 240 mg DMF BID. Endpoints: lymphocyte subset count changes (primary); Ig isotypes and ALC changes (secondary); adverse events and relationship between ALC changes and ARR/EDSS (exploratory); and neurofilament assessment (ad hoc). RESULTS: Of 218 patients enrolled, 158 (72%) completed the study. Median ALC decreased 39% from baseline to W96 (BL-W96), stabilizing above the lower limit of normal (baseline: 1.82 × 109/L; W48: 1.06 × 109/L; W96: 1.05 × 109/L). CD4 + and CD8 + T cells correlated highly with ALC from BL-W96 (p < 0.001). Relative to total T cells, naive CD4 + and CD8 + T cells increased, whereas CD4 + and CD8 + central and effector memory T cells decreased. Total IgA, IgG, IgM, and IgG1-4 subclass levels remained stable. Adverse event rates were similar across ALC subgroups. ARR, EDSS, and neurofilament were not correlated with ALCs. CONCLUSION: Lymphocyte decreases with DMF were maintained over treatment, yet immunoglobulins remained stable. No increase in infection incidence was observed in patients with or without lymphopenia. SUPPORT: Biogen.