Third- and second-generation oral contraceptives are associated with similar risk estimates for venous thromboembolism.

A scientific discussion between 1995 and 1999 addressed the question whether second- and third-generation oral contraceptives (OCs) were associated with different risks of venous thromboembolism (VTE). Results from three epidemiological studies became available in the course of 1995, in which such differences were observed. Although it was unclear at that time whether these observations reflected causality or were induced by bias and/or confounding, some regulatory bodies in Europe restricted the indication for use of third-generation oral contraceptives. Immediate media attention generated a pill scare in those, but also other, countries. Indications for the influence of bias were observed in the initial studies of 1995 and further substantiated in subsequent utilization and prescribing surveys. The most important bias seemed to be related to differences in age and duration of use between third- and second-generation OC users. A number of new studies as well as new analyses in two of the 1995 databases included measures to limit the effect of the identified biases/confounders. These studies observed similar risks of venous thromboembolism with second- and third-generation oral contraceptives. Two other recently published studies did not or could not include the same level of control for confounding and reported similar results as the 1995 studies, thus reconfirming the relevance of the identified confounders. Population data show that the massive switch in the UK from third-generation OCs to second-generation OCs in 1995 has not resulted in a reduction of the incidence of VTE in OC users after 1995, illustrating that the risk of VTE is not determined by the type of low-dose pill used. In addition, data from trend analyses, spontaneous reporting and studies addressing hemostatic mechanisms in pill-users also do not support a potential difference in risk of VTE between users of second- and third-generation OCs.

A randomized multicenter study comparing the efficacy and bleeding pattern of a single-rod (Implanon) and a six-capsule (Norplant) hormonal contraceptive implant.

To compare the contraceptive efficacy, tolerability, and bleeding patterns, 200 healthy female volunteers received, in an open, comparative, randomized, multicenter study in China, either a single-rod (Implanon) or a six-capsule (Norplant) contraceptive implant for 2 years with an optional extension of up to 4 years. Women were exposed to Implanon for 341.6 woman-years and Norplant for 329.1 woman-years. There were no pregnancies during the study. Per 90-day reference period, the median number of bleeding/spotting days with Implanon decreased from 33.5 in the first period to 19.0-21.5 days in the last year. Similarly, with Norplant, the median number of bleeding/spotting days decreased from 34.5 to 18.0-23.0 days, respectively. The number of bleeding/spotting episodes during year 1 was 2.0 per 90-day reference period with Implanon and 3.0 per period with Norplant (p < 0.05 for periods 1-4). For the remaining 90-day periods, there was no statistical difference between the two groups. In general, there was less frequent bleeding with Implanon compared with Norplant, whereas the incidences of amenorrhea and infrequent bleeding were higher with Implanon than with Norplant. The mean overall incidence of prolonged bleeding fell markedly during the study, from 66.0% in reference period 1 to 27.3% in period 16 with Implanon and from 69.0% to 21.7% with Norplant, respectively. The most common adverse events were related to disturbed bleeding patterns, which were also the major reasons for discontinuation (Implanon n = 8; Norplant n = 14). Normal menses returned in almost all subjects within 3 months after removal of the implants. Implanon was inserted in a mean time of 0.61 min and Norplant in 3.90 min (p < 0.001). Similarly, the mean time required to remove the implant was significantly shorter for Implanon than for Norplant (2.18 min vs 11.25 min, p < 0.001). The maximum time required for removal of the implant was 10 min for the Implanon group and 60 min for the Norplant group. In both groups, blood pressure and hemoglobin were not affected, whereas body weight tended to increase. It can be concluded that both contraceptive systems demonstrated excellent contraceptive efficacy and were well tolerated. Compared with Norplant, there was less frequent bleeding with Implanon, whereas the incidence of infrequent bleeding and amenorrhea was higher. Implanon was significantly quicker to insert and to remove than was the multiple capsule system.

PIP: This study compares the contraceptive efficacy and bleeding patterns of a single-rod (Implanon) and a six-capsule (Norplant) contraceptive implant for 2 years, with an optional extension of up to 4 years, among 200 healthy female volunteers in China. Women were administered with Implanon for 341.6 woman-years and Norplant for 329.1 woman-years. No pregnancies occurred during the study, demonstrating excellent contraceptive efficacy. The median number of bleeding/spotting (B/S) days with Implanon decreased from 33.5 in the first period to 19.0-21.5 days in the last year. With Norplant, the median number of B/S days decreased from 34.5 to 18.9-23.0 days. There was less frequent bleeding with Implanon than with Norplant. The most common adverse effects were related to disturbed bleeding patterns, which were also the main reasons for discontinuation (Implanon, n = 8; Norplant, n = 14). Normal menses returned in almost all subjects within 3 months after removal of the implants. Lastly, Implanon required less time for insertion and removal as compared to Norplant.

A long-term study of the efficacy and acceptability of a single-rod hormonal contraceptive implant (Implanon) in healthy women in China.

OBJECTIVE: To investigate the contraceptive efficacy, cycle control and acceptability of Implanon, a new single-rod, progestogen-only contraceptive implant. METHODS: In a non-comparative, open, multicenter study, a contraceptive implant containing the progestogen etonogestrel was inserted into 200 healthy women. The study duration was 2 years, with an optional extension up to 4 years. RESULTS: Women were exposed to Implanon for 644.6 woman-years. There were no pregnancies during the study. Per 90-day reference period, the median number of bleeding-spotting days ranged between 18 and 21 and the median number of bleeding-spotting episodes was two. The mean overall incidence of prolonged bleeding fell markedly during the study, from 69% in the first reference period to 26% in the 16th period. The most common adverse events were related to disturbed bleeding pattern and amenorrhea. Heavy or prolonged bleeding caused 18 subjects to withdraw from the study. Only a few subjects discontinued the study early due to irregular bleeding (2%) or amenorrhea (2%). A slight increase in mean body weight was observed. The implant was removed in an average time of 2.9 min. CONCLUSIONS: Implanon demonstrated excellent contraceptive efficacy for 4 years of use and was well tolerated. The incidences of prolonged bleeding and amenorrhea both fell markedly with continued implant use. Because of its single-rod design, Implanon was quickly removed with few complications and proved to be a highly acceptable method of contraception.