Exploring Immune-Related Adverse Events: A Case of Febrile Neutropenia in a Melanoma Patient Receiving Immunotherapy.

Introduction: The introduction of immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) has opened a new chapter in cancer treatment. Nevertheless, their use may result in immune-related adverse events (irAEs) with multifactorial determinants, complex mechanisms, and varying clinical implications. In specific cancer types, like melanoma, irAEs exhibit a complex relationship with patient outcomes. Case Presentation: We present a case of febrile neutropenia following ICI therapy in a patient with metastatic melanoma, underscoring the intricate clinical landscape associated with irAEs in the context of cancer immunotherapy. More specifically, a 68-year-old man was diagnosed with metastatic malignant melanoma and administered a combination of nivolumab and ipilimumab. However, after a single dose, the patient was hospitalized due to febrile neutropenia. The patient eventually recovered, but a diagnosis of myelosuppression related to prior immunotherapy led to treatment discontinuation. Subsequently, the patient transitioned to a second-line therapy. Conclusion: This case contributes to our comprehension of rare yet potentially severe hematological irAEs and their influence on immunotherapy outcomes. Such insights will guide future diagnostic and therapeutic strategies in the field of immunotherapy.

Hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy for management of gastrointestinal and biliary tract malignancies: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized trials.

Background: Cytoreductive surgery (CRS) combined with hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC) promised to transform the management of peritoneal carcinomatosis (PC). Forty years since the introduction of the technique, published data from randomized controlled trials (RCTs) remain scarce. We assessed the cumulative comprehensive available evidence on the use of HIPEC in gastrointestinal (GI) and biliary tract malignancies and established the current benchmark for GI HIPEC research in both the prevention and treatment of peritoneal metastases. Methods: RCTs were identified through a systematic search of Medline, Cochrane and Embase databases. Overall survival and progression-free survival were the outcomes of interest. Results: The search resulted in 13 RCTs for gastric cancer (10 on prophylactic and 3 on therapeutic HIPEC), 4 for colorectal cancer (2 on prophylactic and 2 on therapeutic HIPEC), and 1 for pancreatic cancer. No RCTs were identified that included other types of GI or biliary tract cancers. Current randomized evidence does not support any overall survival benefit from the use of HIPEC in the adjuvant setting for gastric cancer or for colorectal cancer in any setting. Despite the survival benefit noticed in the treatment of PC from gastric cancer (risk ratio 0.85, 95% confidence interval 0.77-0.93; P<0.001), the results were derived from only 190 patients. Conclusions: The current evidence from RCTs does not support the use of HIPEC in the treatment/prevention of PC in GI and biliary tract malignancies. HIPEC should continue to be considered experimental until level 1 evidence from properly designed international multicenter studies becomes available.

TAMs and PD-1 Networking in Gastric Cancer: A Review of the Literature.

BACKGROUND: Gastric cancer (GC) is one of the most common and aggressive types of cancer. Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) have proven effective in treating various types of cancer. The use of ICIs in GC patients is currently an area of ongoing research. The tumor microenvironment (TME) also seems to play a crucial role in cancer progression. Tumor-associated macrophages (TAMs) are the most abundant population in the TME. TAMs are capable of displaying programmed cell death protein 1 (PD-1) on their surface and can form a ligand with programmed death ligand 1 (PD-L1), which is found on the surface of cancer cells. Therefore, it is expected that TAMs may significantly influence the immune response related to immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs). AIM OF THE STUDY: Understanding the role of TAMs and PD-1/PD-L1 networking in GC. METHODS: A systematic review of published data was performed using MEDLINE (PubMed), Embase, and Cochrane databases. We retrieved articles investigating the co-existence of TAMs and PD-1 in GC and the prognosis of patients expressing high levels of PD-1+ TAMs. RESULTS: Ten articles with a total of 2277 patients were included in the systematic review. The examined data suggest that the expression of PD-L1 has a positive correlation with the infiltration of TAMs and that patients who express high levels of PD-1+ TAMs may have a worse prognosis than those who express low levels of PD-1+ TAMs. CONCLUSIONS: TAMs play a pivotal role in the regulation of PD-1/PD-L1 networking and the progression of GC cells. Nevertheless, additional studies are needed to better define the role of TAMs and PD-1/PD-L1 networking in GC.

The value of p16 and HPV DNA in non-tonsillar, non-base of tongue oropharyngeal cancer.

BACKGROUND: Oropharyngeal squamous cell carcinoma (OPSCC) is dominated by tonsillar and tongue base carcinomas (TSCC/BOTSCC), but there are carcinomas at other sites, such as uvula/soft palate/pharyngeal wall here defined as other OPSCC. Human papillomavirus (HPV) positive TSCC/BOTSCC have favorable outcome, and the TNM-classification separates OPSCC into HPV mediated (p16INK4a overexpressing, p16+) and HPV unrelated OPSCC (p16INK4a non-overexpressing, p16-) cancer, but the prognostic role of p16+ in other OPSCC is unclear. AIMS/OBJECTIVES: This study therefore aimed to further investigate the prognostic role of p16+, presence of HPV DNA, or both combined in other OPSCC. MATERIAL AND METHODS: 195 other OPSCC, from patients diagnosed 2000-2018 were tested for p16, and/or presence of HPV DNA and the data correlated to outcome. RESULTS: Neither overall survival, nor disease free survival correlated to presence of p16+ or HPV DNA in other OPSCC. p16+ and HPV DNA presence were correlated (p < .0001), but the sensitivity of p16 as a surrogate marker for presence of HPV DNA was low (49%). CONCLUSIONS AND SIGNIFICANCE: The data suggest that p16+ (and p16+/HPV DNA) positive other OPSCC should be analyzed cautiously and possibly separately from the HPV mediated OPSCC staging group.

Cancer pain who cares? International and national patterns of evidence-based global guidelines recommendations for physicians on the Web (2011 vs. 2018).

PURPOSE: Although pain is a common event during treatment of cancer, its assessment and management remains suboptimal in everyday clinical practice at global level. METHODS: Considering both the important role of internet in daily life and that clinical guidelines are important for translating evidence in clinical practice, we performed a prospective study to scrutinize the magnitude of updated evidence-based cancer-pain guideline recommendation for physicians on the web. Changes over-time at a global level were scrutinized at two time points: 2011 for baseline and 2018 at first follow-up. Both anesthesiology and oncology societies were analyzed. RESULTS: In 2011 we scrutinized 181,00 WebPages and 370 eligible societies were identified; 364 of these were eligible for analyses both in 2011 and 2018. The magnitude of cancer pain updated and evidence-based guideline recommendations on the web for health care providers was extremely low at global level and at any time point considered: 1.1% (4/364) in 2011 and 4.7% (17/364) in 2018. Continental and intercontinental patterns, National's highest developmental index, oncology tradition and economic-geographic areas were not found to influence cancer pain web-guideline provision. In 2018, pain & supportive care societies provided the highest rate of updated evidence-based cancer-pain guidelines for clinicians. Only 3/25 medical oncology societies and 1/34 radiation oncology societies, provided own or e-link (to other societies') evidence-based guidelines in their websites. CONCLUSIONS: Major medical oncology and radiation oncology societies - at global level - fail to produce updated cancer pain recommendations for their physicians, with most of these providing no or inconsistent or outdated guidelines.

Global coverage and consistency of guideline recommendations for cancer cachexia on the Web in 2011 and 2018.

INTRODUCTION: Cancer cachexia is a common associate of cancer and has a negative impact on both patients' quality of life and overall survival. Nonetheless its management remains suboptimal in clinical practice. Provision of medical recommendations in websites is of extreme importance for medical decision making and translating evidence into clinical practice. AIM OF THE STUDY: To scrutinize the magnitude, consistency and changes over time of cancer-cachexia recommendations for physicians on the Web among oncology related societies. Intercontinental, continental, national and socioeconomic variations were further analyzed. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Web identification of oncology related societies and prospective analyses of relative Web guideline recommendations for physicians on cancer-cachexia at different time-points. RESULTS: In June 2011, we scrutinized 144,000 Web pages. We identified 275 societies, of which 270 were eligible for analyses: 67 were international (African, American, Asian, European, Oceania and Intercontinental), 109 belonged to the top 10 countries with the highest development index and 94 pertained to 10 countries with a long lasting tradition in medical oncology. CONCLUSIONS: The magnitude of cancer cachexia recommendations for physicians on the Web at a global level was scant both for coverage and consistency, and at any time-point considered: 3.7% (10/270) in 2011 and 8.1% (22/270) in 2018. The proportion of societies giving evidence-based and updated recommendations for cancer cachexia for physicians was only 1.1% (3/270) in 2011 and 2.96% (8/270) in 2018. Continent, national highest developmental index, oncology tradition and economic-geographic areas were not found to influence Web guideline provision.