Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
: 20 | 50 | 100
1 - 4 de 4
1.
Dtsch Arztebl Int ; 108(12): 191-6, 2011 Mar.
Article En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-21505600

BACKGROUND: Eliminating measles in Europe by 2015 is a WHO health goal. In Germany, physicians are legally required to report measles cases, yet it seems likely that reporting is less than universal. The goal of this study is to compare the number of measles cases that are reflected by data from the statutory health insurance (SHI) carriers with the number of physician-reported cases during and after a recent outbreak in the German state of North Rhine-Westphalia (NRW). METHODS: We analyzed the billing data of SHI carriers relating to measles in 2006 and 2007, as well as the measles cases that were reported in NRW over this period as required by law. We calculated the incidence of measles as the number of measles cases per 100 000 insurees (SHI carrier data) or per 100 000 persons in the overall population (reporting data). RESULTS: The measles outbreak in the first half of 2006 comprised 1713 measles cases according to the SHI data and 1665 cases that were reported as required by law (ratio, 1.02:1). From mid-2006 to the end of 2007, the SHI data reflected 821 cases, but only 349 cases were reported (ratio, 2.35:1). Younger patients were more commonly found among the cases reflected in the SHI data than among the reported cases. CONCLUSION: Our study confirms that the system of legally mandated reporting underestimates the true number of measles cases, particularly in times when most cases are sporadic, and particularly in children who are less than 5 years old.


Disease Notification/statistics & numerical data , Disease Outbreaks/statistics & numerical data , Measles/epidemiology , Adolescent , Adult , Child , Child, Preschool , Cross-Sectional Studies , Disease Notification/legislation & jurisprudence , Female , Germany , Humans , Incidence , Male , Medicine/statistics & numerical data , National Health Programs/statistics & numerical data , Sentinel Surveillance , Young Adult
2.
Dtsch Arztebl Int ; 107(48): 845-50, 2010 Dec.
Article En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-21173931

BACKGROUND: The German Standing Committee on Vaccination recommends annual vaccination for persons in high-risk groups in order to lower the disease burden associated with seasonal influenza. The stated target is 75% vaccination coverage of people over age 60 by the year 2010. We present statistics based on billing data of the German associations of statutory health insurance physicians regarding vaccination coverage for influenza in the three seasons from 2004/05 to 2006/07. METHODS: We analyzed anonymous data from 14 of the 17 associations of statutory health insurance physicians in Germany. The study population consisted of all persons covered by statutory health insurance in the geographical areas under study (61.5 million persons, or 86% of the total population of these areas). Vaccination coverage was calculated as the number of vaccinated persons divided by the number of persons covered by statutory health insurance. RESULTS: The influenza vaccination coverage of the overall study population was 19% in 2004/05, 22% in 2005/06, and 21% in 2006/07. The coverage of persons over age 60 was 45% in 2004/05, 50% in 2005/06, and 49% in 2006/07 and was higher in areas that were formerly part of East Germany than in the rest of the country. More than a third of all vaccinated persons were vaccinated in all three seasons, as were almost half of the vaccinated persons over age 60. CONCLUSION: There was no secular increase in influenza vaccination coverage over the period 2005/06 to 2006/07. The stated target of 75% vaccination coverage for persons over age 60 by the year 2010 would thus seem to represent a major challenge for all persons involved. The analysis of data of the associations of statutory health insurance physicians enables continuous monitoring of influenza vaccination coverage.


Influenza Vaccines/therapeutic use , Influenza, Human/epidemiology , Influenza, Human/prevention & control , Insurance Claim Reporting/statistics & numerical data , Insurance, Health, Reimbursement/statistics & numerical data , Mass Vaccination/statistics & numerical data , Adolescent , Adult , Aged , Child , Child, Preschool , Germany/epidemiology , Humans , Infant , Influenza Vaccines/economics , Influenza, Human/economics , Insurance, Health, Reimbursement/economics , Male , Mass Vaccination/economics , Middle Aged , Young Adult
3.
BMC Public Health ; 10: 502, 2010 Aug 19.
Article En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-20723217

BACKGROUND: Since July 2004, routine varicella vaccination is recommended by the German Standing Vaccination Committee in Germany. Health Insurance Funds started to cover vaccination costs at different time points between 2004 and 2006 in the Federal States. Nationwide representative data on vaccination coverage against varicella of children under two years of age are not available. We aimed to determine varicella vaccination coverage in statutory health insured children under two years of age in twelve German Federal States using data from associations of statutory health insurance physicians (ASHIPs), in order to investigate the acceptance of the recommended routine varicella vaccination programme. METHODS: We analysed data on varicella vaccination from 13 of 17 ASHIPs of the years 2004 to 2007. The study population consisted of all statutory health insured children under two years of age born in 2004 (cohort 2004) or 2005 (cohort 2005) in one of the studied regions. Vaccination coverage was determined by the number of children vaccinated under 2 years of age within the study population. RESULTS: Varicella vaccination coverage of children under two years of age with either one dose of the monovalent varicella vaccine or two doses of the measles, mumps, rubella, and varicella vaccine increased from 34% (cohort 2004) to 51% (cohort 2005) in the studied regions (p < 0.001). More than half of the vaccinated children of cohort 2004 and two third of cohort 2005 were immunised at the recommended age 11 to 14 months. The level of vaccination coverage of cohort 2004 was significantly associated with the delay in introduction of cost coverage since the recommendation of varicella vaccination (p < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Our study shows increasing varicella vaccination coverage of young children, indicating a growing acceptance of the routine varicella vaccination programme by the parents and physicians. We recommend further monitoring of vaccination coverage using data from ASHIPs to investigate acceptance of the routine vaccination programmes over time.


Chickenpox Vaccine/therapeutic use , Immunization Programs/statistics & numerical data , Chickenpox/prevention & control , Cohort Studies , Databases, Factual , Germany , Humans , Infant
4.
J Travel Med ; 15(3): 162-71, 2008.
Article En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-18494693

BACKGROUND: Malaria chemoprophylaxis is a mainstay of malaria prevention in travelers. Adequate pretravel advice forms the basis for efficient malaria prophylaxis. This study assessed the determinants for seeking pretravel advice and evaluated the quality of advice from each source and its influence on the patterns and outcome of malaria prophylaxis intake. METHODS: In March and April 2004, a self-administered questionnaire was distributed by cabin crews to passengers flying back to Germany from three popular tourist destinations: Kenya, Senegal, and Thailand. To evaluate the quality of advice and actual intake, figures were assessed against the official recommendations of the German Society of Travel Medicine and International Health (DTG). RESULTS: A total of 1,001 passengers were included in the study (Kenya, 492; Senegal, 131; and Thailand, 378), of which 81% had sought any kind of pretravel health advice. Travelers' age and time of pretravel consultation were associated with the source of information consulted. Seventy-five percent of travelers from Senegal and Kenya received DTG compliant advice compared to only 17% of travelers from areas with low malaria risk in Thailand. Travelers returning from Kenya and Senegal had used correct chemoprophylaxis in only 65 and 47% of trips, respectively. In multivariate analysis, the factors determining correct intake among Senegal and Kenya travelers were receiving pretravel advice (from nonmedical professionals: OR 4.4, 95% CI 1.9-10.0 and from medical professionals: OR 15.4, 95% CI 7.3-32.4), a correct risk perception (OR 2.9, 95% CI 1.9-4.5), 2 to 3 weeks of travel abroad (vs a duration >3 wk: OR 2.2, 95% CI 1.3-3.8), and travel to Kenya (OR 1.9, 95% CI 1.1-3.1). CONCLUSIONS: Malaria prevention among a large proportion of German travelers to tropical destinations is inadequate. Public health efforts should be made to raise awareness among travelers, travel agencies, and medical institutions in Germany.


Communicable Disease Control/statistics & numerical data , Health Behavior , Health Knowledge, Attitudes, Practice , Malaria/prevention & control , Patient Acceptance of Health Care/statistics & numerical data , Patient Compliance/statistics & numerical data , Travel/statistics & numerical data , Adult , Antimalarials/therapeutic use , Chemoprevention , Confidence Intervals , Female , Germany/epidemiology , Humans , Kenya , Male , Middle Aged , Odds Ratio , Patient Education as Topic/statistics & numerical data , Senegal , Surveys and Questionnaires , Thailand
...