RESUMEN
This study aimed to investigate the knowledge, attitudes, and behaviors of family physicians (FPs), pediatricians (PPs), and obstetricians and gynecologists (OGs) regarding vaccine administration during pregnancy in Turkey as factors that contribute to decision-making. The survey was distributed among FPs, OGs, and PPs, and participants were asked to rate their knowledge on specific topics using a five-point scale ranging from "Not Effective" to "Effective". The tetanus and diphtheria (Td) vaccine was highly recommended by 94.9% of physicians and considered very effective. Among the physicians surveyed, 80% of PPs and 66.0% of OGs were aware of the disease burden of pertussis. We also found that 74.5% of FPs and 77.2% of PPs believed they needed more information about vaccination during pregnancy. All physicians surveyed agreed or strongly agreed that explaining the disease risks and benefits of vaccination increases the vaccine acceptance rate. The results of this survey study indicate that the knowledge and awareness of physicians need to be improved to increase vaccination rates during pregnancy in Turkey, and it is essential to incorporate influenza and tetanus, diphtheria, and pertussis (TdaP) vaccines into the standard maternal immunization schedule for newborns.
RESUMEN
Purpose: Hand, foot and mouth disease (HFMD) is a viral contagious disease of children caused by human enteroviruses (EVs) and coxsackieviruses (CVs). There is no specific treatment option for HFMD. EPs® 7630's anti-infective and immunomodulatory properties have previously been demonstrated in several in vitro and in vivo studies; however, the use of this herbal medicine in children with HFMD has not previously been investigated. Methods: This prospective randomized multicenter clinical study included 208 children with HFMD. The diagnosis was made by pediatricians. The patients who were within the first 48â h of symptom onset (according to the first onset of fever and skin findings) were enrolled. The study participants were assigned into 2 groups as EPs® 7630 and control groups. All patients were followed up twice more, 48â h after the first admission and on the 5th-7th day. Another phone evaluation was conducted for those with continued complaints from the previous visit. Results: The median age was 27 (12-112) months. The male-female ratio was 0.98. One hundred thirty one (63%) of 190 patients had no history of household contact. EPs® 7630 group included 94 and control group included 96 patients. A significant difference was found between the groups in terms of complaint scores at the visits made at the 48thâ h of the treatment and on days 5-7 (p < 0.001). The mean ± SD disease duration of EPs® 7630 users was significantly shorter 6.07 ± 0.70 days (95% CI: 5.92-6.21)] than the control group [8.58 ± 0.94 days (95% CI: 8.39-8.77)] (p < 0.001). Besides, the hospitalization rate among the EPs® 7630 users were significantly lower (p = 0.019). No side effects were observed, except for unpleasant taste, which was reported in 5 patients (EPs® 7630 group). Conclusion: Considering its efficacy and safety profile EPs® 7630 may represent a feasible herbal-based treatment option for children with HFMD. Clinical Trial Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov, identifier (NCT06353477).
RESUMEN
This study- a secondary analysis of data from a randomized, observer-blinded, non-inferiority study among volunteers between 18-55 y old in Türkiye- evaluated the impact of previous SARS-CoV-2 infection before the first dose of inactive TURKOVAC on post-vaccine local and systemic adverse events (AEs) comparing with CoronaVac. Of 1266 participants analyzed, 27.7% had a previous COVID-19 history. Local and systemic AEs were observed in 37.3% and 39% of the participants. The frequency of AEs was slightly higher in the first 30 minutes and 24 hours among participants with a COVID-19 history; none were severe. 1203 participants had a second dose vaccination, and 27.3% had a history of COVID-19. The frequencies of local and systemic AEs after the second dose were similar between those with and without a COVID-19 history. The TURKOVAC and CoronaVac showed similar frequencies of local and systemic AEs in the first 30 minutes after vaccination.
Asunto(s)
Vacunas contra la COVID-19 , COVID-19 , Vacunas de Productos Inactivados , Humanos , COVID-19/prevención & control , Vacunas contra la COVID-19/efectos adversos , Vacunas contra la COVID-19/administración & dosificación , Adulto , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Femenino , Adulto Joven , Adolescente , Vacunas de Productos Inactivados/efectos adversos , Vacunas de Productos Inactivados/administración & dosificación , SARS-CoV-2/inmunología , Vacunación/efectos adversosRESUMEN
Vaccine-induced immunity wanes over time and warrants booster doses. We investigated the long-term (32 weeks) immunogenicity and safety of a third, homologous, open-label booster dose of TURKOVAC, administered 12 weeks after completion of the primary series in a randomized, controlled, double-blind, phase 2 study. Forty-two participants included in the analysis were evaluated for neutralizing antibodies (NAbs) (with microneutralization (MNT50) and focus reduction (FRNT50) tests), SARS-CoV-2 S1 RBD (Spike S1 Receptor Binding Domain), and whole SARS-CoV-2 (with ELISA) IgGs on the day of booster injection and at weeks 1, 2, 4, 8, 16, 24, and 32 thereafter. Antibody titers increased significantly from week 1 and remained higher than the pre-booster titers until at least week 4 (week 8 for whole SARS-CoV-2) (p < 0.05 for all). Seroconversion (titers ≥ 4-fold compared with pre-immune status) persisted 16 weeks (MNT50: 6-fold; FRNT50: 5.4-fold) for NAbs and 32 weeks for S1 RBD (7.9-fold) and whole SARS-CoV-2 (9.4-fold) IgGs. Nine participants (20.9%) tested positive for SARS-CoV-2 RT-PCR between weeks 8 and 32 of booster vaccination; none of them were hospitalized or died. These findings suggest that boosting with TURKOVAC can provide effective protection against COVID-19 for at least 8 weeks and reduce the severity of the disease.
RESUMEN
OBJECTIVES: Septic arthritis (SA) is a serious bacterial infection that must be treated efficiently and timely. The large number of culture-negative cases makes local epidemiological data important. Accordingly, this study aimed to evaluate the etiology, clinical characteristics, and therapeutic approach of SA in children in Turkiye, emphasizing the role of real-time polymerase chain reaction (PCR) techniques in the diagnosis. METHODS: In this multi-center, prospective study, children hospitalized due to SA between February 2018 and July 2020 in 23 hospitals in 14 cities in Turkiye were included. Clinical, demographic, laboratory, and radiological findings were assessed, and real-time PCR was performed using synovial fluid samples. RESULTS: Seventy-five children aged between 3 and 204 months diagnosed with acute SA were enrolled. Joint pain was the main complaint at admission, and the most commonly involved joints were the knees in 58 patients (77.4%). The combination of synovial fluid culture and real-time PCR detected causative bacteria in 33 patients (44%). In 14 (18.7%) patients, the etiological agent was demonstrated using only PCR. The most commonly isolated etiologic agent was Staphylococcus aureus, which was detected in 22 (29.3%) patients, while Streptococcus pyogenes was found in 4 (5.3%) patients and Kingella kingae in 3 (4%) patients. Streptococcus pyogenes and Kingella kingae were detected using only PCR. Most patients (81.3%) received combination therapy with multiple agents, and the most commonly used combination was glycopeptides plus third-generation cephalosporin. CONCLUSIONS: Staphylococcus aureus is the main pathogen in pediatric SA, and with the use of advanced diagnostic approaches, such as real-time PCR, the chance of diagnosis increases, especially in cases due to Kingella kingae and Streptococcus pyogenes.
RESUMEN
Pertussis, caused by Bordetella pertussis, remains one of the most widespread, contagious, and vaccine-preventable diseases. It results in notable morbidity and mortality as well as severe medical, social, and economic burden. Despite high global vaccine coverage, pertussis continues to be a significant epidemiologic problem, with outbreak episodes every few years just as in the pre-vaccination era. In Türkiye, there is a lack of comprehensive data on the current burden of pertussis in different age and risk groups, leading to underdiagnosis and underreporting of the disease, especially in adults who are often not considered at risk. Available data from Türkiye also reveal inadequate levels of protective antibodies in preterm newborns, emphasizing the need for additional preventive measures. Authors stated that improving physician awareness of pertussis symptoms in patients with prolonged cough, increasing access to routine pertussis tests, and conducting surveillance studies would aid in accurate diagnosis and reporting in Türkiye. As the Turkish Ministry of Health Antenatal Care Management Guide suggests routine second and third pregnancy check-up visits at weeks 18-24 and 28-32 correspondingly, this period can be considered the ideal vaccination time for Türkiye. Introducing a booster dose of Tdap at around 10 years of age or during national military service would reduce transmission and protect susceptible individuals. Identifying individuals at high risk of severe pertussis and prioritizing them for a booster dose is also crucial in Türkiye. Enhancing surveillance systems, increasing healthcare professionals' awareness through training, and organizing catch-up visits for missed vaccinations during the COVID-19 pandemic are mentioned as additional strategies to improve pertussis prevention in Türkiye. This review focuses on the global and regional burden of pertussis and obstacles to effective prevention and evaluates existing strategies to achieve lifelong pertussis prevention. Literature and current strategies were also discussed from a Turkish national standpoint.
RESUMEN
The immunogenicity of vaccines decreases over time, causing a need for booster doses. This study aimed to present the long-term (Day 84) immunogenicity results of the double-blind, randomized, controlled, phase II Hybrid COV-RAPEL TR Study (NCT04979949), in which the TURKOVAC or CoronaVac vaccines were used as a booster after the second dose of primary vaccination with CoronaVac. A total of 190 participants from the Hybrid COV-RAPEL TR Study, who had both Day 28 and Day 84 immunogenicity results, were included. The immunogenicity on Day 84, regarding the neutralizing antibody positivity (Wuhan and Delta variants) and anti-spike immunoglobulin (Ig) G (IgG) antibody positivity, was compared between TURKOVAC and CoronaVac vaccine arms according to sex and age groups. Overall, antibody positivity showed a slight decrease on Day 84 vs. Day 28, but was not different between TURKOVAC and CoronaVac arms either for sexes or for age groups. However, TURKOVAC produced better antibody response against the Delta variant than CoronaVac, while CoronaVac was superior over TURKOVAC regarding neutralizing antibody positivity in the 50-60 years age group, regardless of the variant. A single booster dose, after the completion of the primary vaccination, increases antibody positivity on Day 28 which persists until Day 84 with a slight decrease. However, an additional booster dose may be required thereafter, since the decrease in antibody titer may be faster over time.
RESUMEN
BACKGROUND: The prevalence of community-acquired methicillin-resistant S. aureus (CA-MRSA) has been increasing worldwide. We aimed to investigate the prevalence of MRSA in community-acquired S. aureus infections, the risk factors for CA-MRSA infection and the clinical features of CA-MRSA. METHODS: A multi-center study with prospective and retrospective sections was conducted. Patients ≥ 3 months old and ≤18 years of age who were diagnosed with community-acquired S. aureus infections were included in this study and the patients` information were reviewed from the medical and microbiological database of the hospital. A standard question form about living conditions and exposure risk factors was administered to the parents of patients. The CA-MRSA infections were compared with the methicillin-susceptible S. aureus (CAMSSA) infections in terms of the queried risk factors and clinical variables. RESULTS: We identified 334 pediatric patients with S. aureus infection, 58 (17.4%) had an infection with CAMRSA. The refugee rate was higher in the CA-MRSA group. There was no significant difference regarding the exposure risk. The treatment modalities and outcomes were similar. CONCLUSIONS: The study was not able to show reliable clinical variables or epidemiological risk factors except for being a refugee for CA-MRSA infections. Empirical antibiotic treatment should therefore be determined according to the local CA-MRSA prevalence in patients presenting with a possible staphylococcus infection.
Asunto(s)
Infecciones Comunitarias Adquiridas , Staphylococcus aureus Resistente a Meticilina , Infecciones Estafilocócicas , Humanos , Niño , Lactante , Staphylococcus aureus , Estudios Retrospectivos , Estudios Prospectivos , Meticilina/uso terapéutico , Antibacterianos/uso terapéutico , Infecciones Comunitarias Adquiridas/microbiología , Infecciones Estafilocócicas/tratamiento farmacológicoRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Antibiotic-associated diarrhea is one of the most frequent side effects of antimicrobial therapy. We assessed the epidemiological data of antibiotic-associated diarrhea in pediatric patients in our region. METHODS: The prospective multi-center study included pediatric patients who were initiated an oral antibiotic course in outpatient clinics and followed in a well-established surveillance system. This follow-up system constituded inclusion of patient by the primary physician, supply of family follow-up charts to the family, passing the demographics and clinical information of patient to the Primary Investigator Centre, and a close telephone follow-up of patients for a period of eight weeks by the Primary Investigator Centre. RESULTS: A result of 758 cases were recruited in the analysis which had a frequency of 10.4% antibiotic-associated diarrhea. Among the cases treated with amoxicillin-clavulanate 10.4%, and cephalosporins 14.4% presented with antibiotic-associated diarrhea. In the analysis of antibiotic-associated diarrhea occurrence according to different geographical regions of Turkey, antibiotic-associated diarrhea episodes differed significantly (p = 0.014), particularly higher in The Eastern Anatolia and Southeastern Anatolia. Though most commonly encountered with cephalosporin use, antibiotic-associated diarrhea is not a frequent side effect. CONCLUSION: This study on pediatric antibiotic-associated diarrhea displayed epidemiological data and the differences geographically in our region.
Asunto(s)
Antibacterianos , Pacientes Ambulatorios , Niño , Humanos , Estudios Prospectivos , Antibacterianos/efectos adversos , Combinación Amoxicilina-Clavulanato de Potasio/efectos adversos , Cefalosporinas/efectos adversos , Diarrea/inducido químicamente , Diarrea/epidemiología , Diarrea/tratamiento farmacológicoRESUMEN
BACKGROUND/OBJECTIVE(S)/INTRODUCTION: TURKOVAC™ is a whole-virion inactivated COVID-19 vaccine, which was developed and recently granted emergency use authorization (conditional marketing authorization) in Türkiye. The objective of this study is to assess the spectrum and the distribution of adverse events reported following the administration of the first 150,000 doses as primary and booster vaccine doses in 22 state hospitals of 17 provinces in Türkiye. PATIENTS/MATERIALS AND METHODS: In this cohort study, a verbal survey was conducted via telephone calls between 10 January and 17 January 2022, utilizing a structured questionnaire algorithm on a sample group of 20,000 persons on the third- and seventh-days following vaccination. The algorithm consisted of two parts focusing on both systemic and local adverse effects. Other adverse events reported by the participants were also recorded. 6023 people and 5345 people agreed to participate in the telephone survey on the 3rd- and 7th- days of having received the first dose of the vaccine, respectively. RESULTS: Thirty-six-point-six percent of the participants on the 3rd day and 22.5% of the participants on the 7th day reported any adverse event following the first dose of the vaccine. On both follow-up days, the most commonly reported (29.7% for Day 3 and 13.1% for Day 7) adverse events were on the injection site. Among the local adverse events, the most frequently reported one was the pain on the injection site (27.9% for Day 3 and 12.4% for Day 7), induration (4.8% for Day 3 and 2.7% for Day 7) and swelling (3.5% for Day 3 and 2.0% for Day 7). Fatigue/weakness (9.6% for Day 3 and 8.3% for Day 7) and headache (7.9% for Day 3 and 8.0% for Day 7) were the most frequent systemic adverse events. Younger age, vaccine dose, and female sex were associated with having any adverse event and pain (on the injection site). Female sex was associated with more swelling (on the injection site), induration (on the injection site), fever, and a higher impact on daily living. CONCLUSION(S): In this study, we conducted a rapid assessment of adverse events following the first dose of the TURKOVAC vaccine. The vaccine appears to have a good safety profile in the first 7 days following vaccination. Younger age, vaccine dose, and female sex are associated with any adverse event and pain (on the injection site). These results present valuable information for the community and may contribute to increasing vaccine confidence.KEY MESSAGESAs a whole-virion inactivated SARS-CoV-2 vaccine, the TURKOVAC™ vaccine, which has a favorable safety profile, can be an alternative to other COVID-19 vaccines including mRNA and viral vector vaccines.
Asunto(s)
Vacunas contra la COVID-19 , COVID-19 , Femenino , Humanos , Anticuerpos Antivirales , Estudios de Cohortes , COVID-19/prevención & control , Vacunas contra la COVID-19/efectos adversos , Dolor , SARS-CoV-2 , TeléfonoRESUMEN
TURKOVAC™ is a whole-virion inactivated COVID-19 vaccine which was developed and granted emergency use and conditional marketing authorization in December 2021 in Türkiye. The objective of this study is to assess the distribution and the severity of allergic adverse events following the administration of the vaccine as the primary or the booster dose in 15 provinces in Türkiye. In this cohort study, between February and May 2022, in the selected 15 provinces having an adequate number of health care personnel in the community health centers to conduct the study, 32,300 people having the first, the second, or the booster dose of the vaccine were invited to the survey. A total of 29,584 people voluntarily agreed to participate to the survey and were given a structured questionnaire after a minimum of 10 days following the vaccination. In our study, only 0.5% of the participants (142 persons) reported to experience any allergic reaction, and 12 of them (8.5%) reported to be given medical treatment in a health center. Male predominance (55.6%) was observed among participants reported to experience any allergic reaction. No hospitalization was recorded. Of the participants, 4.4% (1315 people) reported to have a history of allergy. The most reported allergens were drugs. Among the participants without a known history of allergy (n = 28,269), 0.4% of them (110 people) reported to experience an allergic reaction following the vaccination, and 5.4% of the allergic reactions (six people) were reported to be treated in a health center. The percentage of the participants given any medical treatment among the participants without a known history of allergy is 0.02%. No immediate or anaphylactic reaction was reported. Among the participants with a known history of allergy (n = 1315), 32 people (2.4% of them) reported to experience an allergic reaction following the vaccination, and 18.7% of the allergic reactions (six people) were reported to be prescribed a medical treatment. The percentage of the participants given any medical treatment among the participants with a known history of allergy is 0.4%. A known history of allergy increased the risk of having an allergic experience by approximately six times following vaccination. As a whole-virion inactivated SARS-CoV-2 vaccine, the TURKOVAC™ vaccine, with a low allergic reaction-related adverse event profile, can be an alternative to other COVID-19 vaccines.
RESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Development of safe and effective vaccine options is crucial to the success of fight against COVID-19 pandemic. Herein, we report interim safety and immunogenicity findings of the phase 1&2 trials of ERUCoV-VAC, an inactivated whole virion SARS-CoV-2 vaccine. METHODS: Double-blind, randomised, single centre, phase 1 and 2 trials included SARS-CoV-2 seronegative healthy adults aged 18-55 years (18-64 in phase 2). All participants, except the first 4 in phase 1 who received ERUCoV-VAC 3 µg or 6 µg unblinded and monitored for 7 days for safety purposes, were assigned to receive two intramuscular doses of ERUCoV-VAC 3 µg or 6 µg (an inactivated vaccine containing alhydrogel as adjuvant) or placebo 21 days apart (28 days in phase 2) according to computer-generated randomisation schemes. Both trials are registered at ClinicalTrials.gov (phase 1, NCT04691947 and phase 2, NCT04824391). RESULTS: Forty-four participants (3 µg [n:17], 6 µg [n:17], placebo [n:10]) in phase 1 and 250 (3 µg [n:100], 6 µg [n:100], placebo [n:50]) in phase 2 received ≥1 dose. In phase 1 trial, 25 adverse events AEs (80â¯% mild) occured in 15 participants (34.1â¯%) until day 43. There was no dose-response relationship noted in safety events in ERUCoV-VAC recipients (pâ¯=â¯0.4905). Pain at injection site was the most common AE (9/44;20.5â¯%). Both doses of ERUCoV-VAC 3 µg and 6 µg groups were comparable in inducing SARS-CoV-2 wild-type neutralising antibody (MNT50): GMTs (95â¯%CI) were 8.3 (6.4-10.3) vs. 8.6 (7.0-10.2) at day 43 (pâ¯=â¯0.7357) and 9.7 (6.0-13.4) vs. 10.8 (8.8-12.8) at day 60 (pâ¯=â¯0.8644), respectively. FRNT50 confirmed MNT50 results: SARS-CoV-2 wild-type neutralising antibody GMTs (95â¯%CI) were 8.4 (6.3-10.5) vs. 9.0 (7.2-10.8) at day 43 (pâ¯=â¯0.5393) and 11.0 (7.0-14.9) vs. 12.3 (10.3-14.5) at day 60 (pâ¯=â¯0.8578). Neutralising antibody seroconversion rates (95â¯%CI) were 86.7â¯% (59.5-98.3) vs 94.1â¯% (71.3-99.8) at day 43 (pâ¯=â¯0.8727) and 92.8â¯% (66.1-99.8) vs. 100â¯% (79.4-100.0) at day 60 (pâ¯=â¯0.8873), in ERUCoV-VAC 3 µg and 6 µg groups, respectively. In phase 2 trial, 268 AEs, (67.2â¯% moderate in severity) occured in 153 (61.2â¯%) participants. The most common local and systemic AEs were pain at injection site (23 events in 21 [8.4â¯%] subjects) and headache (56 events in 47 [18.8â¯%] subjects), respectively. Pain at injection site was the only AE with a significantly higher frequency in the ERUCoV-VAC groups than in the placebo arm in the phase 2 study (pâ¯=â¯0.0322). ERUCoV-VAC groups were comparable in frequency of AEs (pâ¯=â¯0.4587). ERUCoV-VAC 3 µg and 6 µg groups were comparable neutralising antibody (MNT50): GMTs (95â¯%CI) were 30.0 (37.9-22.0) vs. 34.9 (47.6-22.1) at day 43 (pâ¯=â¯0.0666) and 34.2 (23.8-44.5) and 39.6 (22.7-58.0) at day 60, (pâ¯=â¯0.2166), respectively. FRNT50 confirmed MNT50 results: SARS-CoV-2 wildtype neutralising antibody GMTs were 28.9 (20.0-37.7) and 30.1 (18.5-41.6) at day 43 (pâ¯=â¯0.3366) and 34.2 (23.8-44.5) and 39.6 (22.7-58.0) at day 60 (pâ¯=â¯0.8777). Neutralising antibody seroconversion rates (95â¯%CI) were 95.7â¯% (91.4-99.8) vs. 98.9â¯% (96.9-100.0) at day 43 (pâ¯=â¯0.8710) and 96.6â¯% (92.8-100.0) vs 98.9â¯% (96.7-100.0) at day 60 (pâ¯=â¯0.9129) in ERUCoV-VAC 3 µg and 6 µg groups, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Two-dose regimens of ERUCoV-VAC 3 µg and 6 µg 28 days both had an acceptable safety and tolerability profile and elicited comparable neutralising antibody responses and seroconversion rates exceeding 95â¯% at day 43 and 60 after the first vaccination. Data availability Data will be made available on request.
Asunto(s)
Vacunas contra la COVID-19 , COVID-19 , Adulto , Humanos , Anticuerpos Neutralizantes , Anticuerpos Antivirales , COVID-19/prevención & control , Vacunas contra la COVID-19/efectos adversos , Método Doble Ciego , Inmunogenicidad Vacunal , Dolor , Pandemias/prevención & control , SARS-CoV-2 , Vacunas de Productos Inactivados , Adolescente , Adulto Joven , Persona de Mediana Edad , Ensayos Clínicos Fase I como Asunto , Ensayos Clínicos Fase II como Asunto , Ensayos Clínicos Controlados Aleatorios como AsuntoRESUMEN
Protective neutralizing antibody titers reduce in time after COVID-19 vaccinations, as in individuals who have had COVID-19. This study aimed to evaluate the safety and immunogenicity of CoronaVac and TURKOVAC vaccines used as a booster dose after CoronaVac primary vaccination. This double-blind, randomized, controlled, phase II, multicenter study included healthy male and female adults (18-60 years) who were vaccinated with two doses of CoronaVac vaccine and did not exceed the duration of at least 90 days and a maximum of 270 days from the second dose of vaccination. Among 236 eligible volunteers, 222 were recruited for randomization between July 12, 2021 and September 10, 2021; 108 and 114 were randomized to the TURKOVAC and CoronaVac arms, respectively. The primary endpoint was adverse events (AEs) (ClinicalTrials.gov; Identifier: NCT04979949). On day 28, at the neutralizing antibody threshold of 1/6, the positivity rate reached 100% from 46.2% to 98.2% from 52.6% in the TURKOVAC and CoronaVac arms, respectively, against the Wuhan variant and the positivity rate reached 80.6% from 8.7% in the TURKOVAC arm vs. 71.9% from 14.0% in the CoronaVac arm against the Delta variant. IgG spike antibody positivity rate increased from 57.3% to 98.1% and from 57.9% to 97.4% in the TURKOVAC and CoronaVac arms, respectively. The TURKOVAC and CoronaVac arms were comparable regarding the frequency of overall AEs. Both vaccines administered as booster yielded higher antibody titers with acceptable safety profiles.
What is the context? The timing of the primary and booster doses for each vaccine differs.We aimed to evaluate the safety and immunogenicity of CoronaVac and TURKOVAC vaccines used as homologous booster dose after CoronaVac primary vaccination.What is new? The neutralizing antibody titers against the Wuhan variant decreased below 1/6- the seropositivity threshold value- in more than 55% of the participants 4 months after administration of two doses of CoronaVac vaccine.Immunogenicity was re-stimulated and the neutralizing antibody titers increased rapidly and markedly with the administration of the CoronaVac or TURKOVAC as a booster dose 4 months after the second dose.While the increase in neutralizing antibodies against the Wuhan variant was similar with both CoronaVac and TURKOVAC, more antibodies developed against the Delta variant with TURKOVAC.What is the impact? With the Hybrid COV-RAPEL TR study, after the primary vaccination consisting of two doses of inactivated vaccine, antibody titers decreased in the long term; however, higher antibody titers are achieved than the primary vaccination after the booster dose administered after 46 month interval.Booster application with TURKOVAC provides antibodies at least as much as the CoronaVac booster dose, with an acceptable safety profile.
Asunto(s)
COVID-19 , Vacunas , Adulto , Femenino , Masculino , Humanos , COVID-19/prevención & control , SARS-CoV-2 , Anticuerpos Neutralizantes , Inmunoglobulina G , Anticuerpos Antivirales , Inmunogenicidad VacunalAsunto(s)
COVID-19 , Vacunas , Humanos , Vacunas contra la COVID-19 , COVID-19/prevención & control , SARS-CoV-2 , Personal de Salud , VacunaciónRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Healthcare professionals' vaccine recommendation is the most effective method to increase vaccination rates of the community. The vaccine counseling and recommendation behavior of pharmacists, who are among the easily accessible healthcare professionals, are influenced by their knowledge and attitudes about vaccines. AIM: It was aimed to investigate community pharmacists' knowledge, attitudes, and practices regarding commonly used vaccines. METHODS: A cross-sectional study was conducted as an online survey with a sample of 1100 community pharmacists in Turkey. Pharmacists were invited to participate in the study by phone calls. A structured survey, which consists of 40 questions to assess the knowledge, attitudes, and practices regarding vaccines, was sent to the e-mail addresses of pharmacists who volunteered to participate in the study. FINDINGS: A total of 430 pharmacists completed the survey. Thirty percent of pharmacists had lack of knowledge about vaccination during pregnancy, whereas 52.2% and 31.4% of pharmacists believed that tetanus and influenza vaccines should be provided during pregnancy, respectively. Nearly 89% of pharmacists recommended vaccines to patients, mainly for influenza vaccine (83.9%). Only 31.5% of pharmacists had been vaccinated against influenza in the last season, whereas 50.5% had never been vaccinated. Pharmacists who had been vaccinated with influenza vaccine had a high rate of recommending influenza vaccines to the patients. CONCLUSION: The present study found that vaccination among pharmacists in Turkey and their knowledge on vaccination during pregnancy were low. Further education of pharmacists to improve their knowledge and attitudes toward vaccines is needed.
Asunto(s)
Vacunas contra la Influenza , Estudios Transversales , Femenino , Conocimientos, Actitudes y Práctica en Salud , Humanos , Farmacéuticos/psicología , Embarazo , Encuestas y Cuestionarios , Vacunación/psicologíaRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Acute otitis media (AOM) is one of the most common childhood infections. Ear pain, the main symptom of AOM, results in parents frequently seeking medical assistance for their children. The aim of this study was to compare the effectiveness of topical 1% lidocaine ear drops administered with oral analgesics with that of oral analgesics alone. METHODS: This multicenter randomized, open-labeled study was conducted at 15 centers with 184 pediatric AOM patients with bilateral ear pain (aged 1-5 years) between May 1, 2016, and June 31, 2018. All patients received oral paracetamol or ibuprofen and topical 1% lidocaine, which was administered to each ear according to the randomization list. The ear pain score was evaluated within 48 h using the Face, Legs, Activity, Cry, and Consolability (FLACC) scale, and the patients were followed up for 10 days. RESULTS: The median age was 31.8 months (min-max, 12-84.2 months). Of those patients enrolled, 22.3% received paracetamol, and 24.5% received paracetamol with lidocaine ear drops; 23.4% received ibuprofen, and 29.9% received ibuprofen with lidocaine ear drops. Lower pain scores were significantly measured at baseline and 10th minutes by a reduction 25% (RR 13.64, 95% CI 4.47-41.63, p = 0.001, RR 0.14, 95% CI 0.06-0.35, p = 0.001) and 50% (RR 4.76, 95% CI 1.63-13.87, p = 0.004, RR 0.14, 95% CI 0.05-0.4, p = 0.001) in the paracetamol and lidocaine versus paracetamol groups and the ibuprofen and lidocaine versus ibuprofen groups, respectively. No serious side effects were evident during follow-up. CONCLUSION: This randomized study suggests that topical 1% lidocaine ear drops with paracetamol or ibuprofen seems to provide effective and rapid relief for children presenting with ear pain attributed to AOM.
Asunto(s)
Acetaminofén , Otitis Media , Acetaminofén/uso terapéutico , Enfermedad Aguda , Analgésicos/uso terapéutico , Antibacterianos/uso terapéutico , Niño , Preescolar , Dolor de Oído/diagnóstico , Dolor de Oído/tratamiento farmacológico , Dolor de Oído/etiología , Humanos , Ibuprofeno/uso terapéutico , Lidocaína/uso terapéutico , Otitis Media/complicaciones , Otitis Media/tratamiento farmacológico , Dolor/tratamiento farmacológicoRESUMEN
Introduction Severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2)-specific humoral immune persistence has been proposed to be affected by patients' characteristics. Moreover, available conflicting assay results are needed to be settled through comparative research with defined clinical specimens. Methods This prospective study investigated SARS-CoV-2-specific antibodies among 43 adults and 34 children at a mean of 12 weeks after the onset of COVID-19 symptoms using six serological assays and compared their performance. We used two Euroimmun (Euroimmun, Luebeck, Germany), two automated Roche Elecsys (Basel, Switzerland), and two rapid immuno-chromatographic Ecotest (Matrix Diagnostics, Assure Tech. (Hangzhou) Co., L, China) assays to investigate SARS-CoV-2 antibodies. Results The findings showed that the Roche Elecsys anti-S total test yielded the best positivity/sensitivity (children 94.1% and adults 93.0%; p = 0.877) while five immunoglobulin IgG targeting assays had similar positivity/sensitivity between children (88.2% to 94.1%) and adults (88.4% to 93.0%) (p > 0.05). Although IgM positivity was relatively low (p < 0.001), it was found in the majority of our pediatric and adult patients (67.6% and 86.0%, respectively; p = 0.098). SARS-CoV-2 S IgG titers were found to be higher among males in pediatric and adult groups compared to females (p = 0.027 and p = 0.041, respectively). Furthermore, we observed significantly higher antibody titers among pneumonia patients (p = 0.001). Conclusion Overall, we concluded SARS-CoV-2 antibody persistence over an average of 12 weeks after the onset of COVID-19 symptoms. While automated Roche Elecsys total antibody assays yielded the best sensitivity (> 90%) and five assays targeting IgG had acceptable performance. Patients with pneumonia and males have higher antibody titers. The effect of antibody persistence on re-infections should be monitored in longitudinal studies.
RESUMEN
BACKGROUND: The continual course of the pandemic points to the importance of studies on the rate and durability of protective immunity after infection or vaccination. AIMS: In this study, we aimed to monitor anti-nucleocapsid (N) and anti-spike (S) antibodies against SARS-CoV-2 nearly 9 months duration after infection. METHODS: Anti-nucleocapsid (N) (at 11-15-20-29-38 weeks) and anti-spike antibodies (at 11 and 38 weeks) against SARS-CoV-2 were monitored during 38 weeks after the initial symptoms of COVID-19. RESULTS: Of 37 cases between 18 and 57 years old, 54% were women. The findings showed that anti-N antibodies decreased significantly after the 15th week (between 15 and 20 weeks, p = 0.016; 20-29 weeks, p = 0.0009; and 29-38 weeks, p = 0.049). At the 38th week, mean antibody levels decreased 35% compared to the 11th week, and 8% of the cases turned negative results. Anti-N antibody average level was 56.48 on the 11th week (the cut-off index threshold ≥ 1). It was estimated statistically that it would decrease to an average of 20.48 in weeks 53-62. In females, average antibody levels of all measurements were lower than males (p > 0.05). Anti-S antibody levels 14% increased at 38th week compared to 11th week (quantitative positivity threshold ≥ 0.8 U/ml), and no cases were negative at 38th week. CONCLUSIONS: Patients had ≥ 90% positivity after at least 9 months of symptoms, both anti-N and anti-S antibodies. In all samples, both anti-N and anti-S antibody levels were lower in females. The findings suggest that the quantitative values of anti-S antibodies remained high for at least 9 months and could provide protection.
Asunto(s)
COVID-19 , Masculino , Humanos , Femenino , Adolescente , Adulto Joven , Adulto , Persona de Mediana Edad , SARS-CoV-2 , Glicoproteína de la Espiga del Coronavirus , Proteínas de la Nucleocápside , Anticuerpos AntiviralesAsunto(s)
Enfermedad de Castleman , Ectima Contagioso , Factores de Intercambio de Guanina Nucleótido , Virus del Orf , Enfermedad de Castleman/complicaciones , Enfermedad de Castleman/diagnóstico , Factores de Intercambio de Guanina Nucleótido/deficiencia , Factores de Intercambio de Guanina Nucleótido/genética , HumanosRESUMEN
INTRODUCTION: Enterococci are microbiota microorganisms that normally have low virulence; however, under some conditions they may cause community-acquired urinary tract and even hospital-acquired serious infections. Vancomycin-resistant enterococci (VRE) can cause aggressive infections in immunosuppressive patients; especially in newborns in intensive care units. Asymptomatic gastrointestinal system carriers are important sources of VRE. Asymptomatic patients colonized by VRE can infect both other patients and the environment. Prevention of gastrointestinal colonization of VRE is an important issue to prevent VRE infection, and for rational use of hospital source. METHOD: This study was carried out at Hacettepe University, Faculty of Medicine in Newborn Intensive Care Unit between November 2015 and March 2017. The newborn infants who were find as colonized by VRE during weekly surveillance VRE rectal stool culture screening were taken into the study. A single dose of one million colonies of Lactobacillus rhamnosus GG (LGG®) was given to the study group daily. The probiotic supplement continued until consecutive three negative cultures were detected or maximum 6 months. Control group received conventional treatment. RESULTS: In the study group, VRE eradication was successful in 21 patients out of 22 within 6 months and 1 patient was still VRE positive at 6 months. In the control group, VRE was eradicated in 12 patients out of 23 and 11 patients continued to be colonized by VRE at 6 months. There was a statistically significant difference between the groups (p <.05). CONCLUSION: Lactobacillus rhamnosus GG use is associated with early clearance of vancomycin-resistant enterococcus in newborn patients.