Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 3 de 3
Filtrar
Más filtros










Base de datos
Intervalo de año de publicación
1.
J Appl Lab Med ; 5(6): 1337-1344, 2020 11 01.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32674128

RESUMEN

INTRODUCTION: To facilitate best possible patient care, reference intervals (RIs) adopted by a laboratory must be appropriate for the population demographics and, where applicable, the analytical principle and/or the analytical instrument used. While guidelines from the Clinical and Laboratory Standard Institute (CLSI) recommend a validation process for discrete RIs, there are no current recommendations for the validation process for continuous RIs. This study aimed to validate recently published, HAPPI Kids continuous RIs, in a routine laboratory. METHODS: Initially, the difference in test results between the primary study laboratory that contributed to previous RIs development and a routine laboratory was assessed using specimens from 77 children tested in both laboratories using the Siemens ADVIA 1800 or Centaur/XP/XPT. Later, validation of the HAPPI Kids RIs was undertaken using 279 pediatric samples tested on the same analyzer type in the routine laboratory. The previously published RIs were validated if more than 90% of results in the routine laboratory were within the RIs. RESULTS: There was minimal evidence of clinically significant differences in test results between the primary and routine laboratories. The continuous RIs were validated after initial analysis for 16 of the 18 biochemistry analytes tested, and after secondary analysis for the remaining 2 analytes. CONCLUSION: This study validates the HAPPI Kids RIs in a routine laboratory, satisfying the laboratory accreditation requirements for evaluation, implementation, and sourcing of RIs. In addition, this study presents a modification of the current CLSI method for validation of continuous RIs that will benefit routine laboratories in general.


Asunto(s)
Servicios de Laboratorio Clínico , Técnicas de Laboratorio Clínico , Factores de Edad , Niño , Humanos , Laboratorios , Valores de Referencia
2.
Clin Chem ; 65(10): 1317-1326, 2019 10.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31481458

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Age-specific reference intervals (RIs) have been developed for biochemistry analytes in children. However, the ability to interpret results from multiple laboratories for 1 individual is limited. This study reports a head-to-head comparison of reference values and age-specific RIs for 30 biochemistry analytes for children across 5 analyzer types. METHODS: Blood was collected from healthy newborns and children 30 days to <18 years of age. Serum aliquots from the same individual were analyzed on 5 analyzer types. Differences in the mean reference values of the analytes by the analyzer types were investigated using mixed-effect regression analysis and by comparing maximum variation between analyzers with analyte-specific allowable total error reported in the Westgard QC database. Quantile regression was used to estimate age-specific RIs using power variables in age selected by fractional polynomial regression for the mean, with modification by sex when appropriate. RESULTS: The variations of age-specific mean reference values between analyzer types were within allowable total error (Westgard QC) for most analytes, and common age-specific reference limits were reported as functions of age and/or sex. Analyzer-specific reference limits for all analytes on 5 analyzer types are also reported as functions of age and/or sex. CONCLUSIONS: This study provides quantitative and qualitative measures of the extent to which results for individual children can or cannot be compared across analyzer types, and the feasibility of RI harmonization. The reported equations enable incorporation of age-specific RIs into laboratory information systems for improving evidence-based clinical decisions in children.


Asunto(s)
Análisis Químico de la Sangre , Valores de Referencia , Adolescente , Factores de Edad , Australia , Niño , Preescolar , Estudios Transversales , Femenino , Humanos , Lactante , Recién Nacido , Masculino , Estudios Prospectivos
3.
BMJ Open ; 9(4): e025897, 2019 04 03.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30948591

RESUMEN

INTRODUCTION: The clinical interpretation of laboratory tests is reliant on reference intervals. However, the accuracy of a reference interval is dependent on the selected reference population, and in paediatrics, the ability of the reference interval to reflect changes associated with growth and age, as well as sex and ethnicity. Differences in reagent formulations, methodologies and analysers can also impact on a reference interval. To date, no direct comparison of reference intervals for common analytes using different analysers in children has been published. The Harmonising Age Pathology Parameters in Kids (HAPPI Kids) study aims to establish age-appropriate reference intervals for commonly used analytes in the routine clinical care of neonates and children, and to determine the feasibility of paediatric reference interval harmonisation by comparing age-appropriate reference intervals in different analysers for multiple analytes. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: The HAPPI Kids study is a prospective cross-sectional study, collecting paediatric blood samples for analysis of commonly requested biochemical, immunological and haematological tests. Venous blood samples are collected from healthy premature neonates (32-36 weeks of gestation), term neonates (from birth to a maximum of 72 hours postbirth) and children aged 30 days to ≤18 years (undergoing minor day surgical procedures). Blood samples are processed according to standard laboratory procedures and, if not processed immediately, stored at -80°C. A minimum of 20 samples is analysed for every analyte for neonates and then each year of age until 18 years. Analytical testing is performed according to the standard operating procedures used for clinical samples. Where possible, sample aliquots from the same patients are analysed for an analyte across multiple commercially available analysers. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: The study protocol was approved by The Royal Children's Hospital, Melbourne, Ethics in Human Research Committee (34183 A). The study findings will be published in peer-reviewed journals and shared with clinicians, laboratory scientists and laboratories.


Asunto(s)
Pruebas Hematológicas , Pruebas Inmunológicas , Proyectos de Investigación , Adolescente , Factores de Edad , Fenómenos Bioquímicos , Niño , Preescolar , Estudios Transversales , Femenino , Humanos , Lactante , Recién Nacido , Masculino , Estudios Prospectivos , Valores de Referencia
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA