Effect of Modafinil on Cognitive Function in Intensive Care Unit Patients: A Retrospective Cohort Study.

Modafinil therapy, a nonamphetamine cognition-enhancing agent, holds the potential to improve recovery from cognitive impairment after intensive care unit (ICU) admission. To date, however, there is a paucity of data on modafinil use in the ICU setting. The purpose of this study was to explore the role of modafinil for improvement in cognition in ICU patients. This retrospective cohort study evaluated a total of 60 ICU patients with any ventilatory support who started on modafinil during their ICU stay from January 1, 2010, to March 19, 2016. The requirements of opioids and sedatives, as well as the lowest and average scores of the Glasgow Coma Scale (GCS) and Riker Sedation-Agitation Scale (SAS), were recorded during 48 hours before and after the start of modafinil therapy in 6-hour periods. The average daily modafinil dose of 170 mg was given for a median duration of 9 days. Modafinil administration was associated with a small, nonsignificant increase in GCS by 0.34 points after controlling for age, baseline severity of illness, and changes in sedation and analgesia over time (95%CI, -0.34 to 0.73 points; P = .0743). No major modafinil-associated adverse effects were observed. Modafinil administration did not significantly improve cognitive function in ICU patients within 48 hours of initiation. However, because of lack of robust evidence, the impact of modafinil on overall patient outcomes in the ICU remains unclear and needs further investigation.

Continuous Lidocaine Infusion as Adjunctive Analgesia in Intensive Care Unit Patients.

Despite a paucity of data, the role of intravenous lidocaine (IVLI) as adjunctive analgesia in the intensive care unit (ICU) seems promising due to a low potential to contribute to respiratory depression. A retrospective chart review was conducted to evaluate the safety and effectiveness of IVLI for the treatment of pain in ICU patients with varying degrees of organ dysfunction from March 2014 to March 2016. The primary outcomes included the time to a ≥20% reduction in pain scores after the initiation of IVLI and the difference in opioid requirements as well as pain scores prior to and during IVLI therapy. Other variables included the presence of IVLI-related adverse events and the dosage and duration of IVLI. A total of 21 ICU patients were included from 2 different hospitals. The mean time to a ≥20% reduction in pain scores from the start of IVLI was 3.3 hours (SD = 2.2). The median morphine dose equivalents required during 6, 12, and 24 hours pre-IVLI were significantly higher compared to the same time periods after IVLI (18.3 vs 10 mg, P = .002; 41.8 vs 18.3 mg, P = .002; 93.5 vs 30.5 mg, P = .037). Neurological adverse effects of lidocaine were noted in 3 patients, but the effects were reversed on IVLI discontinuation. This report suggests that IVLI as an adjunctive agent in the treatment of acute pain may be a potential option in ICU patients who are refractory to opioids or those in whom opioid-induced respiratory depression is a concern.

Barbiturates for the treatment of alcohol withdrawal syndrome: A systematic review of clinical trials.

PURPOSE: To perform a systematic review of the clinical trials concerning the use of barbiturates for the treatment of acute alcohol withdrawal syndrome (AWS). MATERIALS AND METHODS: A literature search of MEDLINE, EMBASE, and the Cochrane Library, together with a manual citation review was conducted. We selected English-language clinical trials (controlled and observational studies) evaluating the efficacy and safety of barbiturates compared with benzodiazepine (BZD) therapy for the treatment of AWS in the acute care setting. Data extracted from the included trials were duration of delirium, number of seizures, length of intensive care unit and hospital stay, cumulated doses of barbiturates and BZDs, and respiratory or cardiac complications. RESULTS: Seven studies consisting of 4 prospective controlled and 3 retrospective trials were identified. Results from all the included studies suggest that barbiturates alone or in combination with BZDs are at least as effective as BZDs in the treatment of AWS. Furthermore, barbiturates appear to have acceptable tolerability and safety profiles, which were similar to those of BZDs in patients with AWS. CONCLUSIONS: Although the evidence is limited, based on our findings, adding phenobarbital to a BZD-based regimen is a reasonable option, particularly in patients with BZD-refractory AWS.