Infant car seat use in Japan after the antepartum distribution of an educational leaflet: A prospective, nonrandomized controlled trial with a questionnaire survey.

Objective: To determine whether an antepartum educational leaflet distributed to parents before infant delivery affected the rate of infant car-seat (ICS) use 1 month after delivery, because to the best of our knowledge, only few reports have evaluated systematic attempts to improve the rate of always ICS use by mothers driving infantsMethods: A multicenter questionnaire survey targeting pregnant Japanese women seeking antenatal care at the outpatient clinics of eight hospitals was designed. Women enrolled during the first half of the study period did not receive leaflets describing ICS safety guidelines (control group). Women enrolled during the latter half of the study period received the leaflet between gestational week 35 and 37 (intervention group). All women were requested to anonymously respond to the questionnaires within 1 month postpartum. The rates of ICS use, position, and direction after delivery were compared between both groups.Results: Of the 3534 women who responded to the questionnaire survey (response rate, 81.9%), 1772 women (50.1%) were assigned to the intervention group and 1762 (49.9%) women to the control group. The rates of ICS attachments (86.8% vs. 82.4% in the intervention and control groups, respectively, p = 0.0003), always ICS use (80.5% vs. 76.2%, respectively, p = 0.0019), ICS placement on the rear seat (78.6% vs. 74.1%, respectively, p = 0.0020), and ICS placement in a rear-facing position (62.2% vs. 56.7%, respectively, p = 0.0008) were significantly higher in the intervention group than those in the control group. The motor vehicle accident (MVA) rates within 1 month postpartum were similar between the intervention and control groups (0.51% vs. 0.57%, respectively, p = 0.8229).Conclusions: Antepartum minimal intervention via the distribution of an educational leaflet recommending ICS safety guidelines was associated with increased rates of ICS attachments, always ICS use, and ICS placement on the rear seat and in rear-facing positions; however, it did not contribute to reduced MVA rates after delivery.

Glycemic control and fetal growth of women with diabetes mellitus and subsequent hypertensive disorders of pregnancy.

Pregnant women with diabetes mellitus (DM) are at high risk for hypertensive disorder of pregnancy (HDP). Women with poor control DM sometimes have heavy-for-dates infants. However, women with HDP sometimes have light-for-dates infants. We aim to clarify the relationship between glycemic control and fetal growth in women with DM and/or subsequent HDP. Of 7893 women gave singleton birth at or after 22 gestational weeks, we enrolled 154 women with type 1 DM (T1DM) or type 2 DM (T2DM) whose infants did not have fetal abnormalities. Among women with T1DM or T2DM, characteristics of the three groups (with HDP, without HDP, and with chronic hypertension [CH]) were compared. No women with T1DM had CH, but 19 (17.4%) of 109 with T2DM did. HDP incidence was similar between women with T1DM (22.2%) and T2DM without CH (16.7%). Among women with T1DM, the incidences of fetal growth restriction (FGR) with and without HDP were similar. However, among women with T2DM without CH, this incidence was significantly higher among those with HDP (33.3%) than among those without HDP (5.3%), was significantly more common with HbA1c levels at first trimester ≥ 7.2% (33.3%) than with those < 7.2% (5.6%), and significantly more numerous without pre-pregnancy therapies for DM (23.3%) than with them (3.3%). Among women with T2DM and HDP, those with FGR had smaller placenta SDs and higher insulin dosages at delivery than those without light-for-dates. In multivariate analysis, the presence of diabetic nephropathy was a predictor of T1DM and HDP (P = 0.0105), whereas HbA1c levels ≥ 7.2% before pregnancy was a predictor of T2DM and HDP (P = 0.0009). Insulin dosage ≥ 50U/day at delivery (P = 0.0297) and the presence of HDP (P = 0.0116) independently predicted T2DM, HDP, and FGR development. Insufficient pre-pregnancy treatment of DM increased the risk of HDP.

Liver dysfunction in women with pregnancy-induced antithrombin deficiency.

AIM: The aim of this study was to determine whether women with pregnancy-induced antithrombin deficiency (PIATD) had higher risk of liver dysfunction in the absence of thrombocytopenia. METHODS: We carried out a retrospective observational study at five centers in all 129 women with incidentally found PIATD among 5249 maternities and 129 control women without PIATD matched for number of fetuses and gestational week at delivery. PIATD was diagnosed in women with antenatal antithrombin (AT) activities of ≤75% followed by a further decrease to ≤65% peripartum. Liver dysfunction was defined as serum aspartate aminotransferase >  45 IU/L concomitant with lactate dehydrogenase >  400 IU/L. Thrombocytopenia was defined as platelet count < 120 × 109 /L. RESULTS: Thrombocytopenia (22% [28/129] vs 5.4% [7/129], P =  0.0001) and liver dysfunction (16% [20/129] vs 0.0% [0/129], P =  0.0000) occurred significantly more often in PIATD than in control women. Of the 20 women with liver dysfunction, 15 (75%) had PIATD, but not thrombocytopenia. Thus, even in the absence of thrombocytopenia, liver dysfunction occurred significantly more often in PIATD than in control women (15% [15/101] vs 0.0% [0/122], respectively, P =  0.0000). The relative risk (95% confidence interval) of liver dysfunction was 28.6 (1.64-500) for women with AT activity of 60-65% and 52.4 (3.17-865) for women with AT activity of <60%, compared to women with AT activity ≥66%. CONCLUSION: PIATD can occur in the absence of thrombocytopenia and PIATD women had higher risk of liver dysfunction even in the absence of thrombocytopenia.

Seatbelt use and seat preference among pregnant women in Sapporo, Japan, in 2013.

AIM: This study was performed to determine the rate of pregnant occupants in motor vehicle accidents (MVA) and the frequency of seatbelt use in pregnancy in Japan. METHODS: A questionnaire survey was conducted at seven centers located in Sapporo, targeting all 3952 women in gestational weeks 35-37 during the study period between June 2013 and January 2014. Information was collected on parity, driver's license, seatbelt use, seat preference, carrying Mother and Child Health Handbook when going out, and experience of occupant MVA during current pregnancy. Women who reported always using a seatbelt were classified as always seatbelt users (ASU). RESULTS: A total of 2420 women who were given questionnaires provided responses (response rate, 61%). Seventy women (2.9%) reported having experienced an occupant MVA during the current pregnancy. MVA rate was significantly lower for ASU than non-ASU (2.6% [55/2097] vs 4.6% [15/323], respectively, P < 0.0001), and for ASU women preferring the rear seat than for other women (1.3% [6/451] vs 3.3% [64/1969], respectively, P = 0.0282). MVA rate tended to be lower for women preferring the rear seat than the front seat (1.7% [10/575] vs 3.3% [60/1845], respectively, P = 0.0637). The number of ASU, 94% (2286/2420) before pregnancy, decreased significantly to 87% (2097/2420) after the current pregnancy (P < 0.0001). CONCLUSION: The careful attitude of pregnant women toward driving safety may be associated with reduced risk of MVA in pregnancy. There is a need for an intensified campaign to promote seatbelt use among pregnant women.