Usefulness of cardiac magnetic resonance for early detection of cancer therapeutics-related cardiac dysfunction in breast cancer patients.

BACKGROUND: Prognosis of breast cancer patients has been improved along with the progress in cancer therapies. However, cancer therapeutics-related cardiac dysfunction (CTRCD) has been an emerging issue. For early detection of CTRCD, we examined whether native T1 mapping and global longitudinal strain (GLS) using cardiac magnetic resonance (CMR) and biomarkers analysis are useful. METHODS: We prospectively enrolled 83 consecutive chemotherapy-naïve female patients with breast cancer (mean age, 56 ± 13 yrs.) between 2017 and 2020. CTRCD was defined based on echocardiography as left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) below 53% at any follow-up period with LVEF>10% points decrease from baseline after chemotherapy. To evaluate cardiac function, CMR (at baseline and 6 months), 12­lead ECG, echocardiography, and biomarkers (at baseline and every 3 months) were evaluated. RESULTS: A total of 164 CMRs were performed in 83 patients. LVEF and GLS were significantly decreased after chemotherapy (LVEF, from 71.2 ± 4.4 to 67.6 ± 5.8%; GLS, from -27.9 ± 3.9 to -24.7 ± 3.5%, respectively, both P < 0.01). Native T1 value also significantly elevated after chemotherapy (from 1283 ± 36 to 1308 ± 39 msec, P < 0.01). Among the 83 patients, 7 (8.4%) developed CTRCD. Of note, native T1 value before chemotherapy was significantly higher in patients with CTRCD than in those without it (1352 ± 29 vs. 1278 ± 30 msec, P < 0.01). The multivariable logistic regression analysis revealed that native T1 value was an independent predictive factor for the development of CTRCD [OR 2.33; 95%CI 1.15-4.75, P = 0.02]. CONCLUSIONS: These results indicate that CMR is useful to detect chemotherapy-related myocardial damage and predict for the development of CTRCD in breast cancer patients.

Psychiatric intervention for Japanese Nationals in New York.

This study examined the characteristics of Japanese patients who required psychiatric intervention through the Consulate-General Japan in New York. The findings show that 61.5% of cases were tourists in contrast with 38.5% who were residents. Seventy three point one percent of all cases had psychiatric disorders prior to traveling to the United States. Seventy one point two had schizophrenia, and 48.1% required intervention within one week stay in the United States. The study indicated cultural elements had little influence on their psychiatric crises. The dominant cases, which were schizophrenics who traveled because of their delusional symptoms, were consistent with cases of "voyage pathologique". It was also suggested that cases with personality disorders are increasing in number. And we inferred that cases with substance-related disorders, particularly among young illegal residents, must be present in greater numbers.