RESUMEN
INTRODUCTION: In total knee arthroplasty (TKA), choosing the correct implant size is important. There is lack of data on accuracy of templating on haemophilic knees. Our aim was to test the accuracy of 2D digital templating for TKA on haemophilic arthropathy (HA) of knee. MATERIALS AND METHODS: TKAs performed on HA between January 2011 and January 2022 were screened. Osteoarthritis (OA) group was created as control group by a one-to-one matching regarding type of implant used. Intra- and interobserver correlations were measured in HA, then correlation between templated and implanted sizes was investigated in four assessments (femur AP, femur lateral, tibia AP, tibia lateral), then compared with OA group. Fifty-eight knees in each group included. RESULTS: Regarding intraobserver correlation in HA, there was excellent correlation for femur AP [.93 (.73-.98)], femur lateral [.98 (.91-.99)], and tibia AP (1.0) templating. Regarding interobserver correlation in HA, excellent correlation was observed for femur lateral [.93 (.74-.98)] and tibia AP templating [.90 (.65-.97)]. Regarding correlation of templated and applied sizes in HA; tibia AP, tibia lateral and femur lateral templating showed good correlation [.81 (.70-.89), .86 (.77-.91), .79 (.67-.87) while femur AP templating showed moderate correlation [.67 (.50-.79)]. Comparing HA and OA, there was no difference in correlation levels regarding femur AP, femur lateral, tibia AP and tibia lateral templating (p = .056, p = .781, p = .761, p = .083, respectively). CONCLUSION: Although 2D digital templating shows comparable correlation in HA and OA, clinical applicability of templating on HA appears to be limited in its current state.
Asunto(s)
Artroplastia de Reemplazo de Rodilla , Hemofilia A , Humanos , Artroplastia de Reemplazo de Rodilla/métodos , Masculino , Hemofilia A/complicaciones , Persona de Mediana Edad , Femenino , Adulto , Anciano , Articulación de la Rodilla/cirugía , Articulación de la Rodilla/diagnóstico por imagen , Prótesis de la RodillaRESUMEN
ABSTRACT: Fitusiran, a subcutaneous investigational small interfering RNA therapeutic, targets antithrombin to rebalance hemostasis in people with hemophilia A or B (PwHA/B), irrespective of inhibitor status. This phase 3, open-label study evaluated the efficacy and safety of fitusiran prophylaxis in males aged ≥12 years with hemophilia A or B, with or without inhibitors, who received prior bypassing agent (BPA)/clotting factor concentrate (CFC) prophylaxis. Participants continued their prior BPA/CFC prophylaxis for 6 months before switching to once-monthly 80 mg fitusiran prophylaxis for 7 months (onset and efficacy periods). Primary end point was annualized bleeding rate (ABR) in the BPA/CFC prophylaxis and fitusiran efficacy period. Secondary end points included spontaneous ABR (AsBR) and joint ABR (AjBR). Safety and tolerability were assessed. Of 80 enrolled participants, 65 (inhibitor, n = 19; noninhibitor, n = 46) were eligible for ABR analyses. Observed median ABRs were 6.5 (interquartile range [IQR], 2.2-19.6)/4.4 (IQR, 2.2-8.7) with BPA/CFC prophylaxis vs 0.0 (IQR, 0.0-0.0)/0.0 (IQR, 0.0-2.7) in the corresponding fitusiran efficacy period. Estimated mean ABRs were substantially reduced with fitusiran by 79.7% (P = .0021) and 46.4% (P = .0598) vs BPA/CFC prophylaxis, respectively. Forty-one participants (63.1%) experienced 0 treated bleeds with fitusiran vs 11 (16.9%) with BPAs/CFCs. Median AsBR and AjBR were both 2.2 with BPA/CFC prophylaxis and 0.0 in the fitusiran efficacy period. Two participants (3.0%) experienced suspected or confirmed thromboembolic events with fitusiran. Once-monthly fitusiran prophylaxis significantly reduced bleeding events vs BPA/CFC prophylaxis in PwHA/B, with or without inhibitors, and reported adverse events were generally consistent with previously identified risks of fitusiran. This trial was registered at www.ClinicalTrials.gov as #NCT03549871.
Asunto(s)
Hemofilia A , Hemofilia B , Hemorragia , Humanos , Masculino , Hemofilia B/tratamiento farmacológico , Hemofilia B/complicaciones , Adulto , Hemofilia A/tratamiento farmacológico , Hemofilia A/complicaciones , Persona de Mediana Edad , Adolescente , Adulto Joven , Hemorragia/inducido químicamente , Hemorragia/prevención & control , Niño , ARN Interferente Pequeño/administración & dosificación , ARN Interferente Pequeño/uso terapéutico , Factores de Coagulación Sanguínea/uso terapéutico , Factores de Coagulación Sanguínea/administración & dosificación , AncianoAsunto(s)
Hemofilia A , Humanos , Hemofilia A/diagnóstico , Sinovectomía , Rifampin/efectos adversos , RecurrenciaRESUMEN
INTRODUCTION: Recombinant porcine factor VIII (rpFVIII; susoctocog alfa) is predicted to provide functional FVIII activity in patients with congenital haemophilia A with inhibitors (CHAWI). AIMS: To evaluate the efficacy and safety of rpFVIII in patients with CHAWI undergoing invasive procedures. METHODS: This phase 3, multicentre, single-arm, open-label study (NCT02895945) enrolled males aged 12-75 years with severe/moderately severe CHAWI who required surgical/invasive procedures. Patients received a loading dose of rpFVIII 1-2 h before surgery. The primary outcome was the proportion of all procedures with a 'good' or 'excellent' response (treatment success) on the global haemostatic efficacy assessment score. RESULTS: Of the eight dosed patients, five completed the study. Six of seven surgeries (85.7%; 95% confidence interval, 42.1-99.6) achieved treatment success; five were rated 'excellent', one was rated 'good'. Seven surgery-related bleeding episodes occurred in three patients during the study, with none requiring additional surgical intervention. Overall, six of eight patients experienced 17 treatment-emergent adverse events. Three patients developed de novo inhibitors to rpFVIII. Five patients reported anamnestic reactions, three to both human (h) FVIII (i.e., alloantibodies to exogenous FVIII detected with anti-hFVIII assays) and rpFVIII, and two to hFVIII only. Four serious adverse events were considered related to rpFVIII (three anti-rpFVIII antibody positive; one anamnestic reaction to hFVIII and rpFVIII). CONCLUSION: Good haemostasis was achieved with rpFVIII during the immediate perioperative period. The study was terminated early because the study sponsor and health authorities determined that the risk of anamnestic reactions outweighs the benefits in this study population.
Asunto(s)
Factor VIII , Hemofilia A , Masculino , Humanos , Porcinos , Animales , Factor VIII/uso terapéutico , Hemofilia A/tratamiento farmacológico , Hemostasis , Periodo Perioperatorio , Resultado del Tratamiento , Proteínas Recombinantes/uso terapéuticoRESUMEN
INTRODUCTION: Knees affected by haemophilic arthropathy exhibit distinct differences in both bone morphology and soft tissue behaviour. This study aims to analyse the morphological characteristics of the distal femur and patellofemoral joint in patients with haemophilia in comparison to normal healthy population. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Study was conducted as pair-matched case-control study with 43 individuals in both the haemophilia group and the control group. Patellar luxation, patellar tilt (PT), length of the patella in both axis (pAP, pML), depth and angle of trochlear sulcus (SD, SA), lateral trochlear inclination (LTI), medial and lateral femoral facet length (mFL, LFL), intercondylar depth (ID), transepicondylar axis (TEA) and lateral condyle length (LCL) were assessed on knee MRI. Correlation between Pettersson score and measured variables were also analysed. RESULTS: PT was medial sided in 10 (23.2%) cases in haemophilic group. Mean values of pAP, pML, PT were significantly lower in haemophilia group (p < .001, p: .007, p = .001 respectively). There were no significant changes in SA (p = .628), SD (p = .340), LTI (p = .685), LFL (p = .241) and MFC-LFC (p = .770) whilst mFL was significantly longer in haemophilia group (p = .009). ID (p < .001), TEA (p = .007) and LCL (p = .001) were all shorter in haemophilia group. Pettersson score was inversely correlated with pAP, pML, ID, TEA, LCL, pML/SA and ID/LCL. CONCLUSION: Morphological changes in haemophilic arthropathy involve a smaller and medially-tilted patella, narrowed lateral condyle and transepicondylar axis, combined with reduced intercondylar depth. These alterations must keep in mind especially in pre- and intraoperative assessments for arthroplasty procedures.
Asunto(s)
Artritis , Enfermedades Hematológicas , Hemofilia A , Articulación Patelofemoral , Enfermedades Vasculares , Humanos , Estudios de Casos y Controles , Fémur/cirugía , Articulación de la RodillaRESUMEN
INTRODUCTION: Hereditary factor X (FX) deficiency (HFXD) is an autosomal recessive rare bleeding disorder that leads to defects in the FX protein. Depending on the degree of deficiency, patients may be at risk of life-threatening bleeding episodes. Historical treatments for FX deficiency include prothrombin complex concentrates, which can increase the risk of thrombosis, and fresh frozen plasma, which can cause volume overload and transfusion reactions. Plasma-derived FX (pdFX), a single-factor, high-purity, high-potency human FX treatment, was approved in 2015 in the United States and in 2016 in Europe for on-demand treatment and prophylaxis of bleeding episodes and perioperative management of patients with HFXD. METHODS: Five studies that examined the use of pdFX in patients with mild (plasma FX activity [FX:C] ≥5 IU/dL), moderate (FX:C ≥1 and <5 IU/dL), or severe (FX:C < 1 IU/dL) HFXD were reviewed: TEN01, TEN02 and TEN03 were prospective, open-label, multicentre, nonrandomised studies, and TEN05 and TEN06 were multicentre retrospective studies. RESULTS: When used as an on-demand treatment, pdFX was judged by investigators to be successful in treating 41/42 (97.6%), 2/3 (66.6%) and 79/79 (100%) bleeds in TEN01, TEN02 and TEN05, respectively. When used prophylactically, pdFX was judged 'excellent' for the prevention of bleeds in nine (100%) and eight (100%) patients in TEN02 and TEN05, respectively. Perioperative treatment and pharmacokinetics were also assessed. pdFX was safe and well tolerated. CONCLUSIONS: Together, these studies support the use of pdFX for on-demand treatment of bleeding, routine prophylaxis, and perioperative management of bleeding in patients with HFXD.
Asunto(s)
Deficiencia del Factor X , Factor X , Humanos , Factor X/uso terapéutico , Factor X/efectos adversos , Deficiencia del Factor X/complicaciones , Deficiencia del Factor X/tratamiento farmacológico , Estudios Prospectivos , Estudios Retrospectivos , Hemorragia/etiología , Hemorragia/prevención & control , PlasmaRESUMEN
ABSTRACT: Subcutaneous emicizumab enables prophylaxis for people with hemophilia A (HA) from birth, potentially reducing risk of bleeding and intracranial hemorrhage (ICH). HAVEN 7 (NCT04431726) is the first clinical trial of emicizumab dedicated to infants, designed to investigate the efficacy, safety, pharmacokinetics, and pharmacodynamics of emicizumab in those aged ≤12 months with severe HA without factor VIII (FVIII) inhibitors. Participants in this phase 3b trial received emicizumab 3 mg/kg maintenance dose every 2 weeks for 52 weeks and are continuing emicizumab during the 7-year long-term follow-up. Efficacy end points included annualized bleed rate (ABR): treated, all, treated spontaneous, and treated joint bleeds. Safety end points included adverse events (AEs), thromboembolic events (TEs), thrombotic microangiopathies (TMAs), and immunogenicity (anti-emicizumab antibodies [ADAs] and FVIII inhibitors). At primary analysis, 55 male participants had received emicizumab (median treatment duration: 100.3; range, 52-118 weeks). Median age at informed consent was 4.0 months (range, 9 days to 11 months 30 days). Model-based ABR for treated bleeds was 0.4 (95% confidence interval, 0.30-0.63), with 54.5% of participants (n = 30) having zero treated bleeds. No ICH occurred. All 42 treated bleeds in 25 participants (45.5%) were traumatic. Nine participants (16.4%) had ≥1 emicizumab-related AE (all grade 1 injection-site reactions). No AE led to treatment changes. No deaths, TEs, or TMAs occurred. No participant tested positive for ADAs. Two participants were confirmed positive for FVIII inhibitors. This primary analysis of HAVEN 7 indicates that emicizumab is efficacious and well tolerated in infants with severe HA without FVIII inhibitors.
Asunto(s)
Anticuerpos Biespecíficos , Anticuerpos Monoclonales Humanizados , Hemofilia A , Microangiopatías Trombóticas , Lactante , Humanos , Masculino , Recién Nacido , Factor VIII , Hemorragia/inducido químicamente , Hemorragia/prevención & control , Hemorragia/tratamiento farmacológico , Anticuerpos Biespecíficos/efectos adversos , Microangiopatías Trombóticas/tratamiento farmacológico , Hemorragias IntracranealesRESUMEN
Cerebral venous thrombosis (CVT) is a rare cerebrovascular disorder characterized by the obstruction of venous channels in the brain. Genetic factors play a significant role in CVT development, and recent studies have identified gain-of-function mutations in coagulation factors, including factor IX (FIX). This case report focuses on a unique neonatal case of CVT, where an X-chromosome duplication involving the F9 gene resulted in increased FIX activity. The neonate presented with feeding difficulties, weight loss, nystagmus, and seizures. Imaging and laboratory tests confirmed a 554-kb X-chromosome duplication encompassing the F9 gene. This genetic abnormality likely contributed to the elevated FIX activity level and subsequent CVT development. Understanding the relationship between coagulation factor abnormalities and CVT risk expands our knowledge of thrombophilia's genetic basis and may aid in the development of targeted treatment strategies for CVT management.
Asunto(s)
Trombosis Intracraneal , Trombofilia , Trombosis de la Vena , Recién Nacido , Humanos , Factor IX/genética , Duplicación de Gen , Trombosis de la Vena/genética , Duplicación Cromosómica , Trombofilia/complicaciones , Trombofilia/diagnóstico , Trombofilia/genética , Trombosis Intracraneal/genética , Factores de RiesgoRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Fitusiran, a subcutaneous investigational siRNA therapeutic, targets antithrombin with the goal of rebalancing haemostasis in people with haemophilia A or haemophilia B, regardless of inhibitor status. We aimed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of fitusiran prophylaxis in people with severe haemophilia without inhibitors. METHODS: This multicentre, open-label, randomised phase 3 study was conducted at 45 sites in 17 countries. Male participants aged at least 12 years with severe haemophilia A or B without inhibitors, who had previously been treated on-demand with clotting factor concentrates, were randomly assigned in a 2:1 ratio to receive 80 mg subcutaneous fitusiran prophylaxis once per month or to continue on-demand clotting factor concentrates for a total of 9 months. Randomisation was stratified by the number of bleeding events in the 6 months before screening (≤10 bleeds and >10 bleeds) and by haemophilia type (haemophilia A or B). The primary endpoint was annualised bleeding rate, analysed in the intention-to-treat analysis set. Safety and tolerability were assessed in the safety analysis set. This trial is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT03417245, and is complete. FINDINGS: Between March 1, 2018, and July 14, 2021, 177 male participants were screened for eligibility and 120 were randomly assigned to receive fitusiran prophylaxis (n=80) or on-demand clotting factor concentrates (n=40). Median follow-up was 7·8 months (IQR 7·8-7·8) in the fitusiran group and 7·8 months (7·8-7·8) in the on-demand clotting factor concentrates group. The median annualised bleeding rate was 0·0 (0·0-3·4) in the fitusiran group and 21·8 (8·4-41·0) in the on-demand clotting factor concentrates group. The estimated mean annualised bleeding rate was significantly lower in the fitusiran prophylaxis group (3·1 [95% CI 2·3-4·3]) than in the on-demand clotting factor concentrates group (31·0 [21·1-45·5]; rate ratio 0·101 [95% CI 0·064-0·159]; p<0·0001). In the fitusiran group, 40 (51%) of 79 treated participants had no treated bleeds compared with two (5%) of 40 participants in the on-demand clotting factor concentrates group. Increased alanine aminotransferase concentration (18 [23%] of 79 participants in the safety analysis set) was the most common treatment-emergent adverse event in the fitusiran group and hypertension (four (10%) of 40 participants) was the most common in the on-demand clotting factor concentrates group. Treatment-emergent serious adverse events were reported in five (6%) participants in the fitusiran group (cholelithiasis [n=2, 3%], cholecystitis [n=1, 1%], lower respiratory tract infection [n=1, 1%], and asthma [n=1, 1%]) and five (13%) participants in the on-demand clotting factor concentrates group (gastroenteritis, pneumonia, suicidal ideation, diplopia, osteoarthritis, epidural haemorrhage, humerus fracture, subdural haemorrhage, and tibia fracture [all n=1, 3%]). No treatment-related thrombosis or deaths were reported. INTERPRETATION: In participants with haemophilia A or B without inhibitors, fitusiran prophylaxis resulted in significant reductions in annualised bleeding rate compared with on-demand clotting factor concentrates and no bleeding events in approximately half of participants. Fitusiran prophylaxis shows haemostatic efficacy in both haemophilia A and haemophilia B, and therefore has the potential to be transformative in the management of all people with haemophilia. FUNDING: Sanofi.
Asunto(s)
Hemofilia A , Hemofilia B , Masculino , Humanos , Hemofilia A/complicaciones , Hemofilia A/tratamiento farmacológico , Hemofilia B/complicaciones , Hemofilia B/tratamiento farmacológico , Hemorragia/etiología , Hemorragia/prevención & control , Hemorragia/tratamiento farmacológico , Factores de Coagulación Sanguínea/uso terapéutico , ARN Interferente Pequeño/uso terapéuticoRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Fitusiran, a subcutaneous investigational small interfering RNA therapeutic, targets antithrombin to rebalance haemostasis in people with haemophilia A or haemophilia B, irrespective of inhibitor status. We evaluated the efficacy and safety of fitusiran prophylaxis in people with haemophilia A or haemophilia B with inhibitors. METHODS: This multicentre, randomised, open-label phase 3 study was done at 26 sites (primarily secondary or tertiary centres) in 12 countries. Men, boys, and young adults aged 12 years or older with severe haemophilia A or haemophilia B with inhibitors previously treated with on-demand bypassing agents were randomly assigned (2:1) to receive once-a-month 80 mg subcutaneous fitusiran prophylaxis (fitusiran prophylaxis group) or to continue with bypassing agents on-demand (bypassing agents on-demand group) for 9 months. The primary endpoint was mean annualised bleeding rate during the efficacy period in the intention-to-treat population estimated by negative binomial model. Safety was assessed as a secondary endpoint in the safety population. This trial is complete and is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT03417102. FINDINGS: Between Feb 14, 2018, and June 23, 2021, 85 participants were screened for inclusion, of whom 57 (67%; 57 [100%] men; median age 27·0 years [IQR 19·5-33·5]) were randomly assigned: 19 (33%) participants to the bypassing agent on-demand group and 38 (67%) participants to the fitusiran prophylaxis. Negative binomial model-based mean annualised bleeding rate was significantly lower in the fitusiran prophylaxis group (1·7 [95% CI 1·0-2·7]) than in the bypassing agents on-demand group (18·1 [10·6-30·8]), corresponding to a 90·8% (95% CI 80·8-95·6) reduction in annualised bleeding rate in favour of fitusiran prophylaxis (p<0·0001). 25 (66%) participants had zero treated bleeds in the fitusiran prophylaxis group versus one (5%) in the bypassing agents on-demand group. The most frequent treatment-emergent adverse event in the fitusiran prophylaxis group was increased alanine aminotransferase in 13 (32%) of 41 participants in the safety population; there were no increased alanine aminotransferase treatment-emergent adverse events in the bypassing agents on-demand group. Suspected or confirmed thromboembolic events were reported in two (5%) participants in the fitusiran prophylaxis group. No deaths were reported. INTERPRETATION: Subcutaneous fitusiran prophylaxis resulted in statistically significant reductions in annualised bleeding rate in participants with haemophilia A or haemophilia B with inhibitors, with two-thirds of participants having zero bleeds. Fitusiran prophylaxis might show haemostatic efficacy in participants with haemophilia A or haemophilia B with inhibitors; therefore, the therapeutic might have the potential to improve the management of people with haemophilia. FUNDING: Sanofi.
Asunto(s)
Hemofilia A , Hemofilia B , Masculino , Adulto Joven , Humanos , Adulto , Femenino , Hemofilia A/complicaciones , Hemofilia A/tratamiento farmacológico , Hemofilia B/complicaciones , Hemofilia B/tratamiento farmacológico , Alanina Transaminasa , Hemorragia/epidemiología , ARN Interferente Pequeño/uso terapéuticoRESUMEN
Chronic myeloid leukemia (CML) is very rare during childhood. Tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKI) provide very good results in terms of survival. The medical records of 15 chronic phase (CP)-CML patients in a university hospital pediatric hematology department between 1997 and 2022 were reviewed retrospectively. Complete hematological response was documented in all patients between 20 and 68 (median 30) days of treatment. Major molecular response was achieved in seven patients within 6 months. Median follow-up for the study group was 79 (range 3-330) months and overall survival was 100%. Three patients (2 blastic transformation, 1 therapy resistant) underwent bone marrow transplantation (BMT) and one with blastic transformation is scheduled to undergo BMT. TKI were discontinued in three patients after a median of 86 (range 73-177) months. The complete molecular remission maintenance period before discontinuation of TKI was 81 (range 62-122) months. While no molecular relapse was seen before the last follow-up, the median overall follow-up period was 152 (range 131-300) months. In conclusion, recent advances have led to a very good prognosis for children with CP-CML. With TKI treatment, most patients continue their lives without disease progression. Additionally, in selected patients TKI can be discontinued without molecular relapse.
Asunto(s)
Leucemia Mielógena Crónica BCR-ABL Positiva , Leucemia Mieloide de Fase Crónica , Humanos , Niño , Estudios Retrospectivos , Inhibidores de Proteínas Quinasas , Leucemia Mielógena Crónica BCR-ABL Positiva/tratamiento farmacológico , RecurrenciaRESUMEN
Haemophilia is an X-linked lifelong congenital bleeding disorder that is caused by insufficient levels of factor VIII (FVIII; haemophilia A) or factor IX (FIX; haemophilia B) and characterized by spontaneous and trauma-related bleeding episodes. The cornerstone of the treatment, factor replacement, constitutes several difficulties, including frequent injections due to the short half-life of recombinant factors, intravenous administration and the risk of inhibitor development. While extended half-life factors and subcutaneous novel molecules enhanced the quality of life, initial successes with gene therapy offer a significant hope for cure. Although adeno-associated viral (AAV)-based gene therapy is one of the most emerging approaches for treatment of haemophilia, there are still challenges in vector immunogenicity, potency and efficacy, genotoxicity and persistence. As the approval for the first gene therapy product is coming closer, eligibility criteria for patient selection, multidisciplinary approach for optimal delivery and follow-up and development of new pricing policies and reimbursement models should be concerned. Therefore, this review addresses the unmet needs of current haemophilia treatment and explains the rationale and principles of gene therapy. Limitations and challenges are discussed from a global and national perspective and recommendations are provided to adopt the gene therapies faster and more sufficient for the haemophilia patients in developing countries like Turkey.
RESUMEN
INTRODUCTION: The development of inhibitors with factor VIII (FVIII) replacement therapy is one of the most common and challenging complications of haemophilia A (HA) treatment, jeopardising treatment efficacy and predisposing patients to high risks of morbidity and mortality. The management of patients with inhibitors is particularly challenging in countries where resources are limited. AIM: To provide a comprehensive summary of the management of HA with inhibitors while focusing on differences in practice between Western and non-Western countries and how resource scarcity can impact HA management, leading to suboptimal outcomes in patients with inhibitors. METHODS: Summary of key evidence and regional expert opinion. RESULTS: We address, particularly, the diagnosis of and testing for inhibitors, as well as the epidemiology of inhibitors, including incidence, prevalence and disease burden. Secondly, we provide an overview of the current treatment landscape in HA with inhibitors regarding the eradication of inhibitors with immune tolerance induction and the treatment and prevention of bleeding with bypassing agents, non-factor replacement agents and other experimental therapies. This is complemented with insights from the authors around the applicability of, and challenges associated with, such therapies in their settings of practice. CONCLUSIONS: We conclude by proposing some key steps towards bridging the gaps in the management of HA with inhibitors in resource-limited countries, including: (1) the collection of quality data that can inform healthcare reforms and policies; (2) improving disease knowledge among healthcare practitioners and patients with the aim of standardising disease management across centres and (3) working towards promoting equal access to HA care and therapies for everyone.
Asunto(s)
Hemofilia A , Hemostáticos , Humanos , Hemofilia A/tratamiento farmacológico , Factor VIII , Tolerancia Inmunológica , Hemorragia , Reacciones CruzadasRESUMEN
Background: N8-GP (turoctocog alfa pegol; Esperoct) is a glycoPEGylated human recombinant factor VIII (FVIII). Objectives: Pathfinder8 (NCT01480180) was a phase 3, multinational, open-label, nonrandomized trial to investigate the long-term safety and efficacy of N8-GP in people of all ages with severe hemophilia A previously treated with N8-GP. Patients/Method: Patients were recruited from the completed phase 3 pathfinder2 and pathfinder5 trials to receive intravenous N8-GP prophylaxis for up to 104 weeks, administered every 7 days, twice weekly, or three times weekly. Primary and secondary end points were the number of adverse events (AEs) reported and efficacy of treatment, respectively. Results: Overall, 160 patients were exposed to N8-GP for a mean of 179 exposure days and 681 calendar days (≈1.9 years) per patient. In total, 119 patients experienced 510 AEs, corresponding to a rate of 1.71 AEs per patient-year of exposure; 97.5% of AEs were mild or moderate in severity, and no AEs led to withdrawal. No patients developed FVIII inhibitors during the trial. The Poisson estimate of mean annualized bleeding rate for all bleeds (excluding surgery) and across all regimens was 1.10 (median, 0.00), and for spontaneous bleeds was 0.61 (median, 0.00). Most (55.6%) patients experienced no bleeds that required FVIII treatment (excluding perioperative bleeds). The estimated hemostatic success rate for the treatment of 322 bleeding episodes (excluding surgery) was 95.8%, including missing values as failure. Conclusions: Long-term prophylactic use of N8-GP appeared safe and efficacious across all age groups in people with severe hemophilia A previously treated with N8-GP.
RESUMEN
PURPOSE\AIM: Hemophilia affects the blood clotting process, is a genetic disease characterized by recurrent bleeding. The hemophilia early arthropathy detection with ultrasound (HEAD-US) procedure and scoring method were designed for the detection of early changes in affected joints of patients. In this article, it was aimed to detect early arthropathic changes in the joints of hemophilia patients with the HEAD US scoring system and to investigate its clinical contribution. It was aimed to investigate the effectiveness of HEAD-US scoring in showing early joint damage in subclinical hemophilia cases and its contribution to treatment. METHODS: The present study included 50 hemophilia patients who were admitted to Departments of Pediatric and Adult Hematology for routine follow-up. During routine follow-up controls, patients were scored by physical examination and HJHS 2.1 and by ultrasonography and HEAD US. Statistical tests were used to analyze joint health status and the results of US examination in the patient group. RESULTS: A total of 294 joints (elbow n = 100, knee n = 94, ankle n = 100) were evaluated by ultrasonography. The mean HJHS and HEAD-US scores of the patients were 14.94 ± 15.18 and 15.6 ± 12.6, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: HEAD-US is accepted to be more sensitive than HJHS in detecting early signs of arthropathy. Detection of early abnormalities by ultrasonography will enable the development of individualized treatment protocols and to the prevention of arthropathy development.
Asunto(s)
Artritis , Hemofilia A , Artropatías , Adulto , Niño , Hemofilia A/complicaciones , Hemofilia A/diagnóstico , Hemofilia A/terapia , Hemorragia , Humanos , Artropatías/diagnóstico por imagen , Ultrasonografía/métodosRESUMEN
Despite current therapies, there remains an unmet need for treatment for patients with hemophilia. The main parts of two phase 2 trials established clinical proof-of-concept for once-daily, subcutaneous concizumab prophylaxis in patients with hemophilia A/B with inhibitors (HAwI/HBwI; explorer4) and severe hemophilia A without inhibitors (HA; explorer5). Here, we present results from extension parts of these trials, included to evaluate longer term safety and efficacy. Both trials included main (≥24 weeks) and extension (52-102 weeks) parts, with patients receiving concizumab 0.15 mg/kg with potential dose escalation to concizumab 0.20 or 0.25 mg/kg if they experienced ≥3 treated spontaneous bleeding episodes within 12 weeks. Endpoints included annualized bleeding rate (ABR), adverse events (AEs), and occurrence of antidrug antibodies. Thromboembolic events were AEs of special interest. Thirty-six patients with HA, 15 with HAwI, and 10 with HBwI were exposed to concizumab. Estimated ABRs during the main + extension parts at last dose level were 4.8 (95% confidence interval [CI], 3.2-7.2) and 6.4 (95% CI, 4.1-9.9) in explorer4 and explorer5, respectively (spontaneous ABRs were 1.8 [95% CI, 1.2-2.6] and 2.1 [95% CI, 1.3-3.3]). Most AEs were mild, with no deaths, events leading to withdrawal, or thromboembolic events. Anti-drug antibodies developed in 25% of patients and were low titer and transient, with no observed clinical effect in most cases. Results of the main + extension parts of these trials were consistent with results of the main parts. Ongoing phase 3 trials will further evaluate concizumab as a once-daily, subcutaneous treatment across hemophilia subtypes. These trials were registered at www.clinicaltrials.gov as #NCT03196284 and #NCT03196297.
Asunto(s)
Anticuerpos Monoclonales Humanizados , Hemofilia A , Hemofilia B , Anticuerpos Monoclonales Humanizados/efectos adversos , Ensayos Clínicos como Asunto , Hemofilia A/tratamiento farmacológico , Hemofilia B/tratamiento farmacológico , Hemorragia/inducido químicamente , HumanosRESUMEN
INTRODUCTION: For children with haemophilia, early initiation of prophylaxis is crucial to prevent life-threatening bleeds and maintain joint health throughout life. Options for prophylaxis have recently increased from replacement therapy with standard or extended half-life coagulation factor products to include other haemostasis products, such as the non-replacement therapy emicizumab. AIM: To review key factors that determine the choice of prophylaxis in young children. METHODS: Key clinical questions on the implementation of prophylaxis for haemophilia in children were identified and PubMed was searched for evidence supporting guidance on the implementation of prophylaxis. RESULTS: The results of the literature search and the practical experience of the authors were used to build consensus on when to start prophylaxis, the pros and cons of the products available to guide the choice of product, and practical aspects of starting prophylaxis to guide the choice of regimen. CONCLUSIONS: In this era of increasing therapeutic choices, available information about the range of treatment options must be considered when initiating prophylaxis in young children. Parents or care givers must be sufficiently informed to allow informed shared decision making. Although plentiful data and clinical experience have been gathered on prophylaxis with clotting factor replacement therapy, its use in young children brings practical challenges, such as the need for intravenous administration. In contrast, our relatively brief experience and limited data with subcutaneously administered non-replacement therapy (i.e., emicizumab) in this patient group imply that starting emicizumab prophylaxis in young children requires careful consideration, despite the more convenient route of administration.
Asunto(s)
Hemofilia A , Factores de Coagulación Sanguínea/uso terapéutico , Niño , Preescolar , Factor VIII/uso terapéutico , Semivida , Hemofilia A/tratamiento farmacológico , Hemorragia , Terapia de Reemplazo de Hormonas , HumanosRESUMEN
OBJECTIVE: Hemophilia A is the second most common bleeding disorder causing patients to have lifelong follow-up and treatment. Despite being a rare disease, hemophilia A has a high economic burden on individuals and the public. The purpose of this study was to estimate the total disease cost of hemophilia A in Turkey. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Data used in this analysis were collected through literature review, including studies conducted in Turkey in December 2018. A disease burden analysis was performed by modeling hemophilia A-related costs among patients, their relatives, and the social security system. Two expert panels were held to evaluate real-world data sources and to provide further information. All direct medical and non-medical costs were calculated annually from the Social Security Institution of the Republic of Turkey perspective, while indirect costs were estimated from the patient and community perspective. RESULTS: For the calendar year of 2018, the number of hemophilia A patients in Turkey were estimated to be 5,055, with an average weight of 64.7 kg. The average annual direct medical, direct non-medical, and indirect costs of hemophilia A were calculated as 93,268 ($109,286; âº502,717), 2,533 ($2,968; âº13,655), and 7,957 ($9,323; âº42,888) per patient, respectively, with a total annual cost of 103,759 ($121,578; âº559,259). For the management of patients with inhibitors (4.9%), the average annual total cost was calculated to be 325,439 ($381,330; âº1,754,117) per patient. The total annual disease burden of hemophilia A in 2018 was estimated to be about 524 million ($614 million; âº2.82 billion), which corresponded to 1.6% of the total health expenditure in Turkey. CONCLUSION: The most important reason hemophilia A has a significant economic burden in Turkey is that replacement therapy is expensive. The major cost contributor was identified as factor replacement therapy. With inhibitor development, the average annual cost increased more than 3-fold.
Asunto(s)
Costo de Enfermedad , Hemofilia A , Costos de la Atención en Salud , Gastos en Salud , Hemofilia A/tratamiento farmacológico , Hemofilia A/epidemiología , Humanos , Turquía/epidemiologíaRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Coagadex is a high-purity plasma-derived factor X concentrate (pdFX) developed to treat hereditary factor X deficiency (FXD). OBJECTIVE: Evaluate the efficacy and safety of pdFX administered to patients with hereditary FXD. METHODS: This was an open-label, multicenter, retrospective analysis of patients receiving pdFX for compassionate use. Efficacy end points included treatments administered, the number and treatment of bleeds, and investigator assessments. Adverse drug reactions (ADRs) were monitored. RESULTS: Fifteen patients were included: seven received routine prophylaxis, seven received on-demand treatment, and one alternated. Most were aged ≥12 years (n = 13) and had severe hereditary FXD (n = 12). The median follow-up time was 19.2 months (range, 3.5-48.8). The number of infusions per patient per month was higher for the routine prophylaxis group (median [range], 5.4 [1.4-10.1]) than for the on-demand group (0.8 [0.1-2.3]), as was the dose per infusion (27.9 [21.9-53.6] IU/kg vs 20.0 [13.6-27.7] IU/kg). Patients experienced 88 bleeds (34 minor, 7 major, 47 unclassified). The monthly bleed rate per patient was 0.04 in the routine prophylaxis group (based on 17 bleeds in four patients) and 0.8 in the on-demand group (based on 71 bleeds in eight patients). pdFX was used to treat 79 bleeds and was rated effective in all instances. In an overall assessment, investigators rated pdFX as excellent for 14 patients (93.3%) and good for 1 patient (6.3%). No ADRs or safety concerns were reported. CONCLUSIONS: This analysis supports the use of pdFX as a safe, effective treatment for hereditary FXD. Routine prophylaxis with pdFX may reduce bleed frequency.