Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 2 de 2
Filtrar
Más filtros










Base de datos
Intervalo de año de publicación
1.
Clin Transplant ; 36(1): e14507, 2022 01.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34634164

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Chronic lung allograft dysfunction (CLAD) limits long-term survival after lung transplantation. Of the two subtypes, restrictive allograft syndrome (RAS) is characterized by a larger lung volume decrease and worse prognosis than bronchiolitis obliterans syndrome (BOS). We used computed tomography (CT) volumetry to classify CLAD subtypes and determined their clinical impact. METHODS: Adult primary lung transplants performed 2003-2015 (n = 167) were retrospectively evaluated for CLAD and subclassified with CT volumetry. Lung volume decrease of < 15% from baseline resulted in BOSCT-vol and ≥15% resulted in RASCT-vol diagnosis. Clinical impact of CLAD subtypes was defined, and the prognostic value of different lung function, radiological, and lung volume parameters present at the time of CLAD diagnosis were compared. RESULTS: CLAD affected 43% of patients and was classified with CT volumetry as BOSCT-vol in 89% and RASCT-vol in 11%. Median graft survival estimate in RASCT-vol was significantly decreased compared to BOSCT-vol (1.6 vs. 9.7 years, P = .038). At CLAD onset, RASCT-vol diagnosis (P = .05), increased lung density (P = .007), and more severe FEV1 (P = .004) decline from baseline, increased graft loss risk in multivariate analysis. CONCLUSIONS: CT volumetry serves to identify lung transplant patients with a poor clinical outcome but should be validated in prospective trials.


Asunto(s)
Bronquiolitis Obliterante , Trasplante de Pulmón , Disfunción Primaria del Injerto , Adulto , Aloinjertos , Bronquiolitis Obliterante/diagnóstico por imagen , Bronquiolitis Obliterante/etiología , Estudios de Seguimiento , Humanos , Pulmón/diagnóstico por imagen , Trasplante de Pulmón/efectos adversos , Disfunción Primaria del Injerto/diagnóstico por imagen , Disfunción Primaria del Injerto/etiología , Estudios Prospectivos , Estudios Retrospectivos , Tomografía Computarizada por Rayos X
2.
Eur J Cardiothorac Surg ; 57(3): 504-511, 2020 03 01.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31596497

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVES: Unilateral pulmonary oedema (UPO) is a severe complication of minimally invasive cardiac surgery. UPO rates and UPO-related mortality vary considerably between different studies. Due to lack of consistent diagnostic criteria for UPO, the aim of this study was to create a reproducible radiological classification for UPO. Also, risk factors for UPO after robotic and minimally invasive mitral valve operations were evaluated. METHODS: Two hundred and thirty-one patients who underwent elective minimally invasive mitral valve surgery between January 2009 and March 2017 were evaluated. Chest radiographs of the first postoperative morning were categorized into 3 UPO grades based on the severity of radiological signs of pulmonary oedema described in this study. The radiographs were analysed by 2 independent radiologists and interobserver agreement was evaluated. The clinical significance of the classification was evaluated by comparing postoperative PaO2/FiO2 values and total ventilation times between the different UPO grades. Also, multivariable logistic regression analysis was employed to identify risk factors for UPO. RESULTS: Interobserver agreement was substantial (Kappa = 0.780). Median total ventilation times were significantly longer with increasing severity of UPO, 15 (interquartile range 12-18) h for no UPO, 18 (interquartile range 15-24) h for grade I UPO and 25 (interquartile range 21-31) h for grade II UPO. Pulmonary hypertension [adjusted odds ratios (AOR) 2.51, 95% confidence intervals (CI) 1.43-4.40; P = 0.001], moderate or severe heart failure (AOR 2.88, 95% CI 1.27-6.53; P = 0.011), body mass index (AOR 1.14, 95% CI 1.02-1.28; P = 0.017) and cardiopulmonary bypass time (AOR 1.02, 95% CI 1.01-1.03; P < 0.001) were identified as independent risk factors for UPO and robotic approach (AOR 0.27, 95% CI 0.12-0.62; P = 0.002) as protective against UPO. CONCLUSIONS: Due to the variability of the diagnostic criteria for UPO in previous studies, a radiological classification for UPO is required to reliably assess the rates and risk factors for UPO. The radiological classification described in this study demonstrated high interobserver agreement and correlated with total ventilation times and postoperative PaO2/FiO2 values.


Asunto(s)
Procedimientos Quirúrgicos Cardíacos , Edema Pulmonar , Procedimientos Quirúrgicos Robotizados , Humanos , Procedimientos Quirúrgicos Mínimamente Invasivos/efectos adversos , Válvula Mitral/diagnóstico por imagen , Válvula Mitral/cirugía , Complicaciones Posoperatorias/diagnóstico por imagen , Complicaciones Posoperatorias/epidemiología , Complicaciones Posoperatorias/etiología , Edema Pulmonar/epidemiología , Edema Pulmonar/etiología , Estudios Retrospectivos , Procedimientos Quirúrgicos Robotizados/efectos adversos , Resultado del Tratamiento
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA