18F-Fluorocholine PET/CT Is More Sensitive Than 11C-Methionine PET/CT for the Localization of Hyperfunctioning Parathyroid Tissue in Primary Hyperparathyroidism.

Preoperative molecular imaging is paramount to direct surgery in primary hyperparathyroidism (pHPT). We investigated the diagnostic performance of 18F-fluorocholine (18F-FCH) PET/CT compared with 11C-methionine (11C-MET) PET/CT for localization of hyperfunctioning parathyroid tissue in patients with pHPT and negative or inconclusive 99mTc-sestaMIBI (99mTc-MIBI) SPECT findings. Methods: Fifty-eight patients with biochemical evidence of pHPT and negative or inconclusive 99mTc-MIBI SPECT findings were referred for presurgical detection and localization of hyperfunctioning parathyroid tissue by 11C-MET and 18F-FCH PET/CT. The PET/CT results were classified into 3 categories (positive, inconclusive, or negative) based on the nodular aspect of tracer uptake and the visualization of corresponding nodules on CT. The PET/CT results were correlated with the surgical and histopathologic findings, which were used as the gold standard. Results: Fifty-three patients were included for analysis. 18F-FCH PET/CT was positive in 39 patients (74%), inconclusive in 5 (9%), and negative in 9 (17%), compared with 25 (47%), 12 (23%), and 16 (30%), respectively, for 11C-MET PET/CT. 18F-FCH localized 11 additional foci (6 positive and 5 inconclusive), compared with 11C-MET. Twenty-six patients (sex ratio, 10/16 M/F) underwent surgery, with resection of 31 lesions (22 adenomas, 6 hyperplastic glands, and 3 carcinomas) and 1 normal gland. At follow-up, 21 patients (81%) were considered cured after surgery, whereas 3 patients (12%) had persistence of hypercalcemia. With inconclusive cases being considered negative, 18F-FCH PET/CT correctly localized 26 lesions in 24 of 26 patients (92%), compared with 16 lesions in 15 of 26 patients (58%) localized by 11C-MET PET/CT. Per-patient-based sensitivity and positive predictive value were 96% and 96%, respectively, for 18F-FCH and 60% and 94%, respectively, for 11C-MET (P < 0.0001). Per-lesion-based sensitivity and positive predictive value were 84% and 90%, respectively, for 18F-FCH and 52% and 94%, respectively, for 11C-MET (P < 0.0001). Conclusion: In the presence of biochemical evidence of pHPT with negative or inconclusive 99mTc-MIBI SPECT findings, 18F-FCH PET/CT performs better than 11C-MET PET/CT for the detection of pathologic parathyroid tissue, allowing localization of parathyroid adenoma or hyperplasia in 96% of patients.

Abdominal Attenuation Values on Virtual and True Unenhanced Images Obtained With Third-Generation Dual-Source Dual-Energy CT.

OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study is to investigate the magnitude of differences between attenuation values measured on virtual unenhanced images and true unenhanced images obtained using third-generation dual-source dual-energy CT (DECT). SUBJECTS AND METHODS: A total of 83 patients requiring thoracoabdominal CT for cancer workup were included in this prospective study. CT examinations included true unenhanced acquisitions (tube potential, 120 kVp) and arterial and portal phase dual-energy CT (DECT) acquisitions (tube potential, 100 kVp and Sn 150 kVp [where Sn denotes the interposition of a tin filter in the high-energy beam]; tube current-exposure time product, 190 and 95 mAs). Virtual unenhanced images were created using two commercially available DECT postprocessing algorithms, one of which was designed to create liver images (hereafter referred to as VNC1 images) and the other of which was designed to create images of organs containing minor amounts of fat (hereafter referred to as VNC2 images). Attenuation values on the liver, spleen, paraspinal muscles, retroperitoneal fat, renal cortex and medulla, and gallbladder and bladder lumens were measured. RESULTS: The attenuation values of all tissues were significantly different between virtual unenhanced and true unenhanced images (p = < 0.001-0.042), except for the liver and spleen in the portal phase and muscles in both phases. When statistically significant, correlations between these differences and body mass index (weight in kilograms divided by the square of height in meters) depended on the tissue imaged and algorithm used. The percentage of cases in which these differences were 10 HU or greater was 1% for the liver and approximately 5% for the spleen and muscles, regardless of the algorithm and phase, but on VNC1 images it reached approximately 30% for the kidney, 70% for the gallbladder and bladder, and depending on the phase, 40-70% for fat. On VNC2 images, the percentage of cases in which these differences were 20 HU or greater was approximately 90% for fat. CONCLUSION: Abdominal virtual unenhanced images obtained with third-generation dual-source DECT still should not replace true unenhanced images because of substantial differences in attenuation measurements for fluid, fat, and renal tissues.

In Vivo Differentiation of Uric Acid Versus Non-Uric Acid Urinary Calculi With Third-Generation Dual-Source Dual-Energy CT at Reduced Radiation Dose.

OBJECTIVE: The objective of our study was to evaluate in vivo urinary calculus characterization with third-generation dual-source dual-energy CT (DECT) at reduced versus standard radiation dose. SUBJECTS AND METHODS: One hundred fifty-three patients requiring unenhanced CT for suspected or known urolithiasis were prospectively included in our study. They underwent two acquisitions at reduced-dose CT (90 kV and 50 mAsref; Sn150 kV and 31 mAsref, where Sn denotes the interposition of a tin filter in the high-energy beam) and standard-dose CT (90 kV and 50 mAsref; Sn150 kV and 94 mAsref). One radiologist interpreted the reduced-dose examinations before the standard-dose examinations during the same session. Among 103 patients (23 women, 80 men; mean age ± SD, 50 ± 15 years; age range, 18-82 years) with urolithiasis, dedicated DECT software measured the maximal diameter and CT numbers, calculated the DECT number ratio, and labeled with a color code each calculus visualized by the radiologist as uric acid (UA) or non-UA. Volume CT dose index (CTDIvol) and dose-length product (DLP) were recorded. RESULTS: The radiologist visualized 279 calculi on standard-dose CT and 262 on reduced-dose CT; 17 calculi were missed on reduced-dose CT, all of which were ≤ 3 mm. Among the 262 calculi visualized at both doses, the CT number ratio was obtained with the software for 227 calculi and was not different between the doses (p = 0.093). Among these 262 calculi, 197 were labeled at both doses; 194 of the 197 labeled calculi were labeled with the same color code. Among the 65 remaining calculi, 48 and 61 (all ≤ 5 mm) were not labeled at standard-dose and reduced-dose CT (p = 0.005), respectively. At reduced-dose CT, the mean CTDIvol was 2.67 mGy and the mean DLP was 102.2 mGy × cm. CONCLUSION: With third-generation dual-source DECT, a larger proportion of calculi ≤ 5 mm are not characterized as UA or non-UA at a reduced dose.

FDG uptake at the bronchial stump after curative lobectomy for non-small cell lung cancer.

PURPOSE: Focal areas of FDG uptake may occur at the bronchial stump following curative lobectomy for non-small-cell lung carcinoma (NSCLC), even in the absence of suspicious CT changes. The purpose of our study was to investigate the significance of such PET/CT findings. METHODS: FDG-PET/CT scans performed in 54 patients after lobectomy for NSCLC were reviewed. The presence of focal areas of FDG uptake at the bronchial stump, associated CT abnormalities, SUVmax, and normalized SUV (SUVnorm = SUVmax/mean liver SUV) were recorded. Final diagnosis was based on biopsy or imaging follow-up. RESULTS: Focal areas of FDG uptake at the bronchial stump were detected in 30 patients (56 %). Mean SUVmax was 4.0 ± 1.9 (range; 2.2-12.1) and mean SUVnorm was 1.8 ± 0.8 (range; 0.9-4.5). Biopsy showed recurrence in two patients. In these patients, SUVnorm was respectively 4.4 and 4.5 (with SUVmax of 8.8 and 12.1), whereas SUVnorm was lower than 4.0 in those without recurrence, with mean SUVnorm of 1.6 ± 0.5 (range; 0.9-3.4) and mean SUVmax of 3.6 ± 0.9 (range; 2.2-5.8). The CT component of the PET/CT revealed ill-defined peribronchial soft tissue opacity only in both patients with recurrence. CONCLUSION: FDG uptake at the bronchial stump is a frequent finding after pulmonary lobectomy. Moderate levels of FDG uptake (i.e., SUVnorm < 4.0) without corresponding abnormal CT findings might be a dual criterion for diagnosing benign post-surgical changes.

Morphological Retrospective Study of Peritoneal Biopsies from Patients with Encapsulating Peritoneal Sclerosis: Underestimated Role of Adipocytes as New Fibroblasts Lineage?

Background. Encapsulating peritoneal sclerosis (EPS) is a rare but serious complication of peritoneal dialysis (PD). Besides the endothelial-to-mesenchymal transition (EMT), recently peritoneal adipocytes emerged as a potential source of fibrosis. We performed immunohistochemistry to approach EMT and to localize peritoneal adipocytes in peritoneal biopsies from PD-related EPS patients. Material and Methods. We investigated tissue expression of podoplanin, cytokeratin AE1/AE3 (mesothelium), calretinin (adipocytes), alpha-smooth muscle actin [α-SMA] (mesenchymal cells), interstitial mononuclear cell inflammation, and neoangiogenesis (CD3, CD4, CD8, CD20, CD68, and CD31 immunostainings, resp.). Results. Three patients (1 man/2 women; 17, 64, and 39 years old, resp.) developed EPS after 21, 90, and 164 months of PD therapy. In patients with EPS, we observed (1) loss of AE1/AE3 cytokeratin+ mesothelial cells without any evidence of migration into the interstitium, (2) disappearance of adipose tissue, (3) diffuse infiltration of calretinin+ cells in the areas of submesothelial fibrosis with a huge number of α-SMA and calretinin+ fusiform cells, and (4) increased vascular density. Conclusion. We report that the involvement of EMT in peritoneal fibrosis is difficult to demonstrate and that the calretinin+ adipocytes might be an underestimated component and a new source of myofibroblasts in peritoneal remodeling during PD-related EPS.

Colonoscopic Findings in Patients With Incidental Colonic Focal FDG Uptake.

OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to investigate the nature of FDG-avid and non-FDG-avid lesions detected at colonoscopy in patients presenting with incidental focal colonic FDG uptake at PET/CT. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Among 9073 patients who underwent PET/CT over a 4-year period, 82 patients without a history of colonic disease had focal colonic FDG uptake and underwent colonoscopy. In consensus, a radiologist and a nuclear physician read images from these PET/CT examinations. They recorded the location of focal FDG uptake in the colon and associated CT abnormalities and measured maximum standardized uptake value (SUVmax) and metabolic volume (MV). Readings were performed twice--first without and second with knowledge of lesion location at colonoscopy. The final diagnosis was based on colonoscopic findings and histopathologic results categorized into benign, premalignant, or malignant. RESULTS: One hundred seven foci of colonic FDG uptake at PET/CT and 150 lesions at colonoscopy were detected. Among 107 foci of FDG uptake, 65 (61%) corresponded to a lesion at colonoscopy (true-positive findings), and 42 (39%) did not (false-positive findings). Among 150 lesions found at colonoscopy, 85 (57%) were not FDG avid (false-negative findings). The MV of true-positive findings was lower than that of false-positive findings (4.0 ± 0.4 cm(3) vs 6.2 ± 0.7 cm(3); p = 0.006), but SUVmax did not differ (7.4 ± 0.5 vs 7.7 ± 0.5; p = 0.649). Considering the histopathologic categories of the lesions and the false-positive findings, there was no difference in SUVmax (p = 0.103), but MV was lower in premalignant lesions than in false-positive findings (p = 0.005). CONCLUSION: Focal colonic FDG uptake may indicate the presence of a benign, pre-malignant, or malignant lesion. Subsequent colonoscopy should not be restricted to the colonic site of FDG uptake.

Mycobacterium fortuitum and Polymicrobial Peritoneal Dialysis-Related Peritonitis: A Case Report and Review of the Literature.

Mycobacterium fortuitum is a ubiquitous, rapidly growing nontuberculous mycobacterium (NTM). It is the most commonly reported NTM in peritoneal dialysis (PD) associated peritonitis. We report a case of a 52-year-old man on PD, who developed refractory polymicrobial peritonitis necessitating PD catheter removal and shift to hemodialysis. Thereafter, M. fortuitum was identified in the PD catheter culture and in successive cultures of initial peritoneal effluent and patient was treated with amikacin and ciprofloxacin for six months with a good and sustained clinical response. Months after completion of the course of antibiotics, the patient successfully returned to PD. To our knowledge, this is the first reported case of M. fortuitum peritonitis in the field of polymicrobial PD peritonitis. It demonstrates the diagnostic yield of pursuing further investigations in cases of refractory PD peritonitis. In a systematic review of the literature, only 20 reports of M. fortuitum PD peritonitis were identified. Similar to our case, a delay in microbiological diagnosis was frequently noted and the Tenckhoff catheter was commonly removed. However, the type and duration of antibiotic therapy varied widely making the optimal treatment unclear.

Cystic fibrosis: unenhanced CT description of the appendix in asymptomatic adults.

OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to describe the unenhanced CT appearance of the appendix in adults with cystic fibrosis. SUBJECTS AND METHODS: Among adults with cystic fibrosis undergoing follow-up at our hospital, 71 patients (35 women, 36 men; mean age, 33 years; range, 18-59 years) without a history of appendectomy or current abdominal pain were prospectively included in this study and underwent unenhanced abdominopelvic MDCT. Two readers coded visualization of the appendix, measured the diameter of the appendix, and described the attenuation of its contents in relation to the intestinal wall. They also coded the presence of colonic wall redundancy, pancreatic fatty replacement, and cirrhosis. Lung transplant status and CFTR gene mutations were recorded. Analysis of variance, linear regression analysis, Student t test, and Pearson test were used. RESULTS: The appendix was detected in all patients. The mean diameter was recorded as 10.6 ± 3.5 mm. The mean diameter was larger when the appendix contained hyperattenuating material (p = 0.001). There was no association between diameter and the other coded CT findings (p = 0.076-0.466), transplant status (p = 0.788), or CFTR mutation (p = 0.078). In 75% of the patients, the appendix contained hyperattenuating material with a higher proportion in homozygous ΔF508 mutation (p = 0.029) without any significant effect of the other CT features (p = 0.056-0.392), or transplant status (p = 1.000). CONCLUSION: The appendix is larger in adults with cystic fibrosis than in those without it and appears hyperattenuating at unenhanced CT in 75% of patients, more commonly in those with ΔF508 homozygous mutation.

Gonococcal aneurysm of the ascending aorta: case report and review of Neisseria gonorrhoeae endovascular infections.

We present the case of a man with a bicuspid aortic valve who presented with persistent fever. Blood cultures yielded Neisseria gonorrhoeae, and the diagnosis of infected mycotic aneurysm was confirmed by detection of the bacterial genome in the aortic wall. The patient was cured with surgery and intravenous ceftriaxone.

MDCT for suspected acute appendicitis in adults: impact of oral and IV contrast media at standard-dose and simulated low-dose techniques.

OBJECTIVE: The objective of this study was to prospectively investigate the influence of oral, IV, and oral and IV contrast media on the information provided by MDCT at standard and simulated low radiation doses in adults suspected of having acute appendicitis. SUBJECTS AND METHODS: One hundred thirty-one consecutive patients (80 women, 51 men; age range, 18-87 years; mean age, 37 years) suspected of having appendicitis were randomly assigned to either ingest or not ingest iodinated contrast material. Thereafter, all patients underwent IV unenhanced and enhanced abdominopelvic MDCT with a 4 x 2.5 mm collimation at 120 kVp and 100 mAs(eff). Dose reduction corresponding to 30 mAs(eff) was simulated. Two radiologists independently read scans during separate sessions, assessed appendix visualization, and proposed a diagnosis (i.e., appendicitis or an alternative diagnosis). The final diagnosis was based on either surgical findings or clinical follow-up. Data were analyzed by factorial analysis of multiple correspondences followed by an ascending hierarchic classification method. RESULTS: Factorial analysis and ascending hierarchic classification revealed that, in terms of diagnostic correctness, reader influence predominated over the influence of IV and oral contrast media use and radiation dose but that correctness was also influenced by the patient's sex (p = 0.048) and was lower in cases of alternative diseases (p < 0.001). Visualization of the appendix depended predominantly on the reader rather than on the use of IV, oral, or oral and IV contrast agents or on radiation dose. CONCLUSION: Diagnostic correctness is much more influenced by the reader than by the use of contrast medium (oral, IV, or both) or of simulated low-radiation-dose technique.

Normal appendix in adults: reproducibility of detection with unenhanced and contrast-enhanced MDCT.

OBJECTIVE: The purposes of this study were to investigate whether readers' interpretations are reproducible and whether readers are confident in identifying a normal appendix with CT and to assess the influence of patient characteristics and IV contrast enhancement on visualization of the appendix. SUBJECTS AND METHODS: One hundred two patients without a history of abdominal surgery underwent unenhanced and contrast-enhanced CT for the evaluation of cancer. Three radiologists with varying degrees of experience read scans twice in separate sessions. They were asked to identify the appendix, to score their confidence in identification, and to mark the appendix on the images. Intraabdominal fat volume was measured with a computer-assisted method. Independent experts compared the readers' markings and indicated whether the findings were reproducible. RESULTS: Reproducibility differed significantly between reading sessions (p < 0.001) and readers (p = 0.003). On the images of 71% of the patients, there was perfect intrareader and interreader agreement with statistically significant and positive influences of patient body mass index (p = 0.005) and intraabdominal fat volume (p = 0.001). Contrast enhancement influenced intrareader reproducibility only for the reader who made less-reproducible interpretations (p = 0.033). Intrareader and interreader agreement in categorizing confidence in identification of the appendix ranged from fair to good (kappa = 0.221-0.620). Confidence was not influenced by contrast enhancement (p = 0.433-0.953), body mass index, or intraabdominal fat volume (p = 0.058-0.798). CONCLUSION: Reproducibility in identifying a normal appendix is reader dependent. Perfect intrareader and interreader agreement in marking the appendix occurs approximately 70% of the time and increases with patient body mass index and intraabdominal fat volume. Contrast enhancement does not influence the rate of identification of the appendix or reader confidence but may influence the reproducibility of findings.

Multidetector CT in patients suspected of having lumbar disk herniation: comparison of standard-dose and simulated low-dose techniques.

PURPOSE: To compare standard-dose and simulated low-dose multidetector computed tomography (CT) in patients suspected of having lumbar disk herniation. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The institutional review board approved the research protocol with a waiver of patient informed consent. Sixty consecutive patients underwent multidetector CT with four detector rows at 1 mm collimation at 140 kVp, with tube current-time product adapted to body mass index (BMI): 200 (BMI< 22 kg/m(2)), 300 (BMI > or =22 to <30 kg/m(2)), and 400 effective mAs (BMI > or =30 kg/m(2)). Simulated doses at 65%, 50%, 35%, and 20% of the dose were used for acquisition. During two separate sessions, three independent radiologists coded each of three caudal disks as normal, bulging, or herniated and graded canal and foramen compromise. Median numbers of discrepancies between the standard and reduced doses were compared with Friedman and Wilcoxon tests. Agreements within and between readers were evaluated through kappa statistics. RESULTS: Dose reduction had no effect on a reader's ability to identify bulging disks (P = .128) and left and right foramen compromises (P = .413 and .665, respectively). However, for normal disks (P = .002), herniated disks (P = .004), and canal compromise (P = .002), dose reduction did have a significant effect. For normal disks and canal compromise, a reduction dose effect was not detected at 65% (P = .121 and .250, respectively) but appeared at 50% (P = .004 and .008, respectively). For herniation, a dose reduction effect was detected at 35% (P = .031). Agreements within and between readers ranged from poor to excellent and tended to decrease with dose reduction. CONCLUSION: For patients suspected of having lumbar disk herniation, tube charge settings could be reduced to 65% of the standard dose adapted to the BMI.

Comparison of US and unenhanced multi-detector row CT in patients suspected of having acute appendicitis.

PURPOSE: To prospectively compare the diagnostic performance of ultrasonography (US) and unenhanced multi-detector row computed tomography (CT) in patients suspected of having acute appendicitis by using surgery or clinical follow-up as the reference standard. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The institutional review board approved the research protocol. Written informed consent was obtained from all patients or, for those who were adolescents, from their parents. Ninety-four patients (59 female and 35 male patients) aged 16-81 years (mean, 38 years) who were suspected of having acute appendicitis underwent both US and unenhanced multi-detector row CT of the entire abdomen. The examinations were performed within 1-2 hours of each other. US and CT images were obtained and prospectively interpreted by a different radiologist from a group of abdominal radiologists or a group of residents and general radiologists. Radiologists proposed an overall diagnosis and an alternative diagnosis. Data from US and CT were compared, and the definite diagnosis was established with surgical findings (n = 40) or results of clinical follow-up (n = 54) as the reference standard. Comparisons were made for each group of radiologists and the patient's age, body mass index (BMI), and sex. Proportion comparisons were made by using the Pearson chi2 test or the Fisher exact test. Continuous variables were compared between groups with the Mann-Whitney U test. RESULTS: Thirty patients had definite appendicitis. The sensitivity, specificity, positive and negative predictive values, and accuracy were not significantly different between US and CT or between groups of radiologists (P values ranged from .389 to >.99), regardless of the patient's BMI (P values ranged from .073 to >.99). Misclassifications were compared with the definite alternative diagnosis and were not significantly different between US and CT or between groups of radiologists (P = .061-.592), regardless of patient age (P = .875) or sex (P = .151 and >.99 for male and female patients, respectively). The frequency of inconclusive examinations, however, was significantly higher with US than with CT, regardless of radiologist experience (P = .020 and <.001, respectively). CONCLUSION: Although the diagnostic performances of US and multi-detector row CT are comparable, more inconclusive images were obtained with US.

Acute appendicitis: comparison of low-dose and standard-dose unenhanced multi-detector row CT.

PURPOSE: To prospectively compare low- and standard-dose unenhanced multi-detector row computed tomography (CT) in patients suspected of having acute appendicitis. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Ninety-five consecutive patients underwent two unenhanced multi-detector row CT examinations with 4 x 2.5-mm collimation, 120 kVp, and 30 and 100 effective mAs. Two radiologists independently read the images obtained at each dose during two sessions. Readers recorded visualization of the appendix and presence of gas in its lumen, appendicolith, periappendiceal fat stranding, cecal wall thickening, and abscess or phlegmon to measure the diameter of the appendix and to propose diagnosis (appendicitis or alternative). Data were compared according to dose and reader, with definite diagnosis established on basis of surgical findings (n = 37) or clinical follow-up. chi(2) tests and logistic regression were used. Measurement agreements were assessed with Cohen kappa statistics. RESULTS: Twenty-nine patients had a definite diagnosis of appendicitis. No difference was observed between the frequency of visualization of the appendix (P =.874) neither in its mean diameter (P =.101-.696, according to readers and sessions) nor in the readers' overall diagnosis (P =.788) at each dose. Sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, negative predictive value, and accuracy of each sign were not different between doses. Fat stranding, appendicolith, and diameter were the most predictive signs, regardless of dose, yielding approximately 90% of correct diagnoses. The ability to propose a correct alternative diagnosis was not influenced by the dose. CONCLUSION: Low-dose unenhanced multi-detector row CT has similar diagnostic performance as standard-dose unenhanced multi-detector row CT for the diagnosis of acute appendicitis.