The Use of Cyclin-Dependent Kinase 4/6 Inhibitors in Elderly Breast Cancer Patients: What Do We Know?

BACKGROUND: Breast cancer (BC) incidence increases with age, particularly in HR-positive/HER2-negative subtypes. Cyclin-dependent kinase 4 and 6 inhibitors (CDK 4/6is) alongside endocrine therapy (ET) have emerged as promising treatments for HR-positive/HER2-negative advanced and early BC. However, their efficacy, safety, and impact on quality of life (QoL) in older and frail patients remain underexplored. METHODS: This position paper assesses the existing literature from 2015 to 2024, focusing on CDK4/6is use in patients aged 65 years and older with HR-positive/HER2-negative BC. RESULTS: Our analysis methodically addresses critical questions regarding the utilization of CDK4/6is in the elderly BC patient population, organizing findings from the metastatic and adjuvant settings. In the metastatic setting, CDK4/6is significantly improve progression-free survival (PFS), paralleling benefits observed in younger patients, and suggest potential overall survival (OS) benefits, warranting further investigation. Despite an increased incidence of grade ≥ 3 adverse events (AEs), such as neutropenia and asthenia, CDK4/6is present a markedly lower toxicity profile compared to traditional chemotherapy, with manageable side effects. QoL analysis indicates that integrating CDK4/6is into treatment regimens does not significantly impact elderly BC patients' daily life and symptom management. Special attention is given to frail subgroups, and personalized approaches are recommended to balance efficacy and adverse effects, such as starting with ET alone and introducing CDK4/6is upon progression in patients with a low disease burden. Transitioning to the adjuvant setting, early results, particularly with abemaciclib, indicate positive effects on disease-free survival (DFS), emphasizing the need for continued analysis to validate these findings and assess long-term implications. However, data on older patients are insufficient to conclude whether they truly benefit from this treatment. CONCLUSION: Overall, CDK4/6is present a favorable benefit-risk profile in older BC patients, at least in advanced BC; however, further research is warranted to optimize treatment strategies and improve outcomes in this population.

Uterine adenosarcoma: Clinical significance of histological classification and SNP array analysis.

Mullerian adenosarcoma is a rare malignant biphasic tumor. The mesenchymal component may be low or high grade, with or without sarcomatous overgrowth (SO). Little is known about the molecular heterogeneity of these tumors. In this study, we aim to reclassify a large retrospective monocentric cohort of uterine adenosarcomas according to tumor grade and SO, to evaluate the clinical significance of pathological classification and to correlate with copy-number variations inferred from single nucleotide polymorphism array. Of the 67 uterine adenosarcomas, 18 (26.9%) were low grade without SO, 7 (10.4%) low grade with SO, 8 (11.9%) high grade without SO and 34 (50.7%) high grade with SO. SO, necrosis and RMS were more frequent in high grade than low grade adenosarcomas (p < 0.001). Low-rank test showed that recurrence-free survival was significantly shortened in high grade than low grade adenosarcomas (p = 0.035) and SO was associated with shortened overall and recurrence-free survival (p = 0.038 and p = 0.009, respectively). High-grade tumors displayed complex genomic profiles with multiple segmental losses including TP53, ATM and PTEN genes. The median genomic index was significantly higher in high grade than low grade tumors (27 [3-60] vs 5,3 [0-16], p < 0.0001) and was significantly higher in presence of SO in low grade tumors (12,8 [10-16] vs 2,6 [0-10], p = 0.0006). We propose to report sarcomatous overgrowth with the tumor grade for prognostication in adenosarcoma and representative sampling is crucial for evaluation of these histological criteria.

Evaluation of the satisfaction and experiences of oncology patients and doctors using teleconsultation during the COVID-19 pandemic.

INTRODUCTION: During the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic, the Gustave Roussy Cancer Center introduced teleconsultation via telephone, as an alternative to face-to-face consultation to reduce patient hospital visits. This study was designed to assess patient and doctor satisfaction with this modality of care in oncology patient care during the period of the pandemic and beyond. METHODS: We designed two questionnaires based on validated scores to assess satisfaction from teleconsultation in patients (EORTC OUT-PATSAT 35 and Telemedicine Satisfaction Questionnaire [TSQ] scores) and doctors (Telehealth Usability Questionnaire [TUQ]), and anxiety levels in both groups (anxiety section of the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale [HADS], HADS-A). These were electronically sent to patients and doctors with experience of at least one remote consultation during the first wave of the COVID-19 pandemic. RESULTS: 239 patients and 32 doctors were eligible for the analyses. In the patient group, the mean satisfaction scores were 79.5 (SD 18.1) and 74.92 (SD 15.3) for EORTC OUT-PATSAT 35 and TSQ, respectively. In the doctor group, the mean satisfaction scores were 67.1 (SD 12.7) and 64.9 (SD 13.9) for TUQ and TUQ for Skype for Business, respectively. 65.7% of patients and 81.2% of doctors had no/low anxiety. Univariable analyses in patients showed correlation of the EORTC OUT-PATSAT 35 and TSQ scores with anxiety and gender, with lower mean scores in women compared to men. Multivariable analysis showed correlation of the EORTC OUT-PATSAT 35 and TSQ scores to anxiety in both patients and doctors. CONCLUSIONS: Teleconsultation via telephone is an acceptable modality of care for oncology patients, with high satisfaction from its implementation during the pandemic reported by patients and doctors. This was consistent across responder groups with different characteristics. An individualized approach to patients should be implemented for the safe and effective use of teleconsultation in oncology beyond the pandemic.

[Current post-surgical treatment strategies in first-line ovarian cancer]. / Stratégies thérapeutiques post-chirurgicales actuelles dans les cancers de l'ovaire en première ligne de traitement.

Although the management of epithelial ovarian cancer has evolved significantly over the past few years, it remains a public health issue, as most patients are diagnosed at an advanced stage and relapse after first line treatment. Chemotherapy remains the standard adjuvant treatment for International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics (FIGO) stage I and II tumors, with some exceptions. For FIGO stage III/IV tumors, carboplatin- and paclitaxel-based chemotherapy are the standard of care, in combination with targeted therapies, especially bevacizumab and/or poly-(ADP-ribose) polymerase inhibitors, that have become a key milestone of first-line treatment. Our decision making for the maintenance therapy is based on the FIGO stage, tumor histology, timing of surgery (i.e. primary or interval debulking surgery), residual tumor, response to chemotherapy, BRCA mutation and homologous recombination (HR) status.

Circulating Tumor DNA from Ascites as an alternative to tumor sampling for genomic profiling in ovarian cancer patients.

Genomic testing is crucial for the management of ovarian cancer. DNA from biopsies at diagnostic laparoscopies or interval debulking surgery after neoadjuvant chemotherapy, has a high failure rate. At relapse, biopsies may not be feasible. The aim of our study was to evaluate the feasibility and usefulness of measuring genomic instability score (GIS) on cell-free DNA (cfDNA) from ascites.Patients enrolled in a prospective study (NCT03010124) consented to analysis of biological samples. CfDNA was extracted from 1 to 4 ml of double-centrifuged fresh ascites. Targeted Next-generation sequencing (NGS) including TP53 mutation (TP53m) was performed on cfDNA to confirm the presence of tumor cfDNA. Single Nucleotide Polymorphism Array estimating somatic copy number alterations (SCNA) was performed to calculate GIS for Homologous-Recombination deficiency (HRD).Twenty nine ascites were collected from 20 patients with suspected or confirmed OC. 93% (27/29) samples had detectable cfDNA (median 1120 ng [24-5732]) even when obtained during chemotherapy. A deleterious mutation was identified in 100%, with high allelic frequencies (median 60% [3.3-87%]), confirming that cfDNA was tumoral. SCNA analyses on 17 patients showed 11 high GIS, and 6 low GIS. 4 patients with confirmed BRCA mutation had a high GIS on ascites. When available from the same patient, SCNA profiles on ascites and tumor were superimposable.Ascites is frequent at diagnosis and relapse and yields large amounts of tumoral cfDNA. SCNA analysis on ascitic cfDNA is feasible and can detect the same HRD scar as tumor testing. Ascites could provide an alternative to tumor sampling for HRD and BRCA testing.

PARP inhibitors (PARPi) prolongation after local therapy for oligo-metastatic progression in relapsed ovarian cancer patients.

BACKGROUND: PARP inhibitors (PARPi) have revolutionized the management of high-grade epithelial ovarian cancer (HGOC) treatment. However, a significant number of patients relapse or progress under PARPi, leading to the introduction of a new line of systemic therapy such as chemotherapy. In patients with a limited number of metastatic sites at progression, -referred to as an oligometastatic progression- a potential indication for local therapy followed by re-introduction or continuation of PARPi treatment rather than initiating a new line of chemotherapy could be proposed. However, the impact of such strategies on progression free survival (PFS) in these patients remains unknown. METHODS: This international multicenter retrospective study evaluated the efficacy of PARPi continuation or re-introduction in patients with HGOC after local treatment for oligometastatic progression. The main objective was to assess PFS under PARPi after local therapy (PFS post-LT). Secondary objectives included safety and overall survival (OS). RESULTS: 74 patients were identified in 20 centers between April 2020 and November 2021. 65% of patients were BRCA mutated and 92% had received ≥2 lines of prior systemic chemotherapy before the initial introduction of PARPi. Main progression sites were lymph nodes (42%), peritoneum (27%), liver (16%), other visceral (16%) and abdominal wall (4%). Local therapies included radiotherapy (45%), surgery (43%), both (7%), percutaneous thermal ablation (4%) or chemoembolization (1%). Median PFS post-LT was 11.5 months [95% CI 7.4; 17.2]. After a median follow up of 14.8 months, 6 patients (8.1%) discontinued PARPi due to toxicity. The 1-year overall survival rate was 90.7% [95% CI 79.1; 96.0]. CONCLUSIONS: With close to one year without progression or introduction of a new line of systemic therapy, this study reports the feasibility and potential benefit of this original strategy in patients with oligometastatic progression under PARPi.

Clinical Relevance of BRCA1 Promoter Methylation Testing in Patients with Ovarian Cancer.

PURPOSE: Homologous recombination deficiency (HRD) is closely related to PARP inhibitor (PARPi) benefit in ovarian cancer. The capacity of BRCA1 promoter methylation to predict prognosis and HRD status remains unclear. We aimed to correlate BRCA1 promoter methylation levels in patients with high-grade ovarian cancer to HRD status and clinical behavior to assess its clinical relevance. EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN: This is a retrospective monocentric analysis of patients centrally tested for genomic instability score (GIS) by MyChoice CDx (Myriad Genetics). The detection of BRCA1 promoter methylation and quantification of methylation levels were performed by quantitative droplet digital PCR methodology. High BRCA1 methylation was defined as ≥70% and deemed to be associated with homozygous silencing. RESULTS: Of 100 patients, 11% harbored a deleterious BRCA1/2 mutation. GIS was considered positive (score ≥ 42) for 52 patients and negative for 48 patients. Using a 70% cutoff, 19% (15/79) of BRCA wild-type ovarian cancer had high BRCA1 methylation levels. All of the highly methylated tumors were classified as HRD, achieving a positive predictive value of 100%. We detected 14% (11/79) low-methylated tumors (1%-69%), and all of them were also classified as HRD. Mean GIS was 61.5 for BRCAmut, 66.4 for high-BRCAmeth, 58.9 for low-BRCAmeth, and 33.3 for BRCAwt unmethylated (P < 0.001). Low methylation levels detected in samples previously exposed to chemotherapy appeared to be associated with poor outcome post-platinum. CONCLUSIONS: Patients with ovarian cancer with high levels of BRCA1 hypermethylation are very likely to have high GIS and therefore represent good candidates for PARPi treatment. These results may be highly relevant to other tumor types for HRD prediction. See related commentary by Garg and Oza, p. 2957.

Olaparib First-Line Maintenance Monotherapy in BRCA-Mutated Epithelial Ovarian Cancer: Descriptive Analysis of the First French Real-World Data Study.

BACKGROUND: Olaparib, a poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase inhibitor, was approved by the European Commission in June 2019, following the results of the SOLO-1/GOG 3004 trial as maintenance monotherapy in adult patients with BRCA-mutated epithelial ovarian cancer. OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to provide a descriptive analysis of the first real-world data from patients with BRCA-mutated ovarian cancer who received olaparib as first-line maintenance monotherapy in the French cohort Temporary Authorisation for Use (Autorisation Temporaire d'Utilisation de cohorte, ATUc) programme from 11 March, 2019 to 16 January, 2020. METHODS: Eligible patients were aged 18 years and over with confirmed epithelial ovarian, primary peritoneal or Fallopian tube cancer and a deleterious or suspected deleterious germline or somatic BRCA 1/2 mutation. Patients were in complete or partial clinical response at the end of first-line platinum-based chemotherapy. Olaparib maintenance therapy was initiated within 8 weeks of the patients' last dose of chemotherapy. Real-world data were collected through treatment access request forms completed by physicians. Clinical and safety data were collected monthly until the end of the ATUc programme. RESULTS: A total of 107 centres in metropolitan France and the French Overseas Departments and Territories requested the inclusion for 238 patients, of whom 194 received maintenance olaparib. In total, 87.6% of the primary tumour locations were ovary, the most common histology was high-grade serous (93.0%) and the most common International Federation of Gynaecology and Obstetrics (Fédération Internationale de Gynécologie et d'Obstétrique) stage was IIIC (56.8%). BRCA testing was performed in routine practice, prior to inclusion into the ATUc programme. All patients had a BRCA mutation: 52.5% had a somatic mutation, 38.4% had a germinal mutation and 9.1% had germinal and somatic mutations. Twenty-four (12%) patients experienced serious adverse drug reactions at the last safety follow-up (17 February, 2020). The most common were anaemia (12 [6%] patients), neutropenia (3 [2%] patients) and thrombocytopenia (3 [2%] patients). CONCLUSIONS: The rapid enrolment into the ATUc programme highlighted the strong unmet need for patients with ovarian cancer and a BRCA mutation in first-line maintenance treatment. Olaparib was well tolerated and no new safety signals were observed in this real-world patient population.

Career and Professional Development for Young Oncologists.

Young oncologists around the globe face many challenges when it comes to their career and professional development. Aspects such as time management, work-life balance, career progression, and educational opportunities are only some of them. Professional societies have identified these challenges in this professional group and designed programs to tackle them specifically. The importance of this strategy cannot be overstated, as young oncologists, defined by most societies as oncologists under 40 years of age, compose almost 50% of the oncology workforce. On the other hand, recent surveys have shown that many young oncologists are considering alternative career paths due to burnout issues aggravated by the COVID-19 pandemic, on top of all other challenges. The virtual setting that has been forcedly introduced into our professional life has shortened distances between professionals and might have contributed to more accessible access to information and opportunities that some young oncologists could not profit from due to their traveling constraints. On the other hand, this virtual setting has shown us the asymmetries in opportunities for these professionals. Knowledgeable of all this, we summarize in this article some of the career and professional development offers available to all young oncologists, which we consider could help them deal with current and future challenges.

Analysis of the association between prospectively collected immune-related adverse events and survival in patients with solid tumor treated with immune-checkpoint blockers, taking into account immortal-time bias.

BACKGROUND: Numerous retrospective studies and reviews have reported a positive association between immune-related adverse events (irAEs) and survival in non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) and melanoma patients treated with immune checkpoint blockers (ICBs). However, some results are controversial and the studies, whose results converge, should be interpreted cautiously because most of them do not deal appropriately with the immortal-time bias. Here, we report an observational real-life study of the association between prospectively collected irAEs and survival of patients treated with ICBs while dealing with the immortal-time bias. METHODS: Data from patients treated at Gustave Roussy from June 2014 to October 2017 with anti-PD-(L)1 antibodies for a melanoma or NSCLC have been prospectively collected in the REISAMIC database, a pharmacovigilance registry dedicated to irAEs. Adverse events of grade 2 and higher were collected prospectively. To study the association between the occurrence of irAEs and survival, we used both a landmark analysis and a Cox regression model with time-dependent covariate. RESULTS: 577 patients were treated with anti-PD-(L)1 antibodies for melanoma (60.3 %) or NSCLC (39.7 %). The occurrence of an irAE was significantly associated with improved overall survival (OS): HR 0.56, 95 % CI [0.41; 0.75], p = 0.0001 and progression-free survival (PFS): HR 0.63, 95 % CI [0.47; 0.83], p = 0.001 using a Cox regression model with time-dependent covariate. In a 12-week landmark analysis, median OS was 21.2 months (95 % CI, 12.2 to 35.7) and 16.4 months (95 % CI, 12.4 to 21.3) p = 0.26 and median PFS was 14.3 months (95 % CI, 9.5 to 24.6) and 13.4 months (95 % CI, 10.2 to 18.3) p = 0.66, for patients with and without irAEs, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: In our real-life study of patients with melanoma and NSCLC treated with anti-PD-(L)1 antibodies, we confirm that irAEs are associated with improved survival using a time-varying Cox regression model. Analysis with a landmark method showed no difference in OS or PFS between patients who experienced irAE during the first 12 weeks of treatment and those who did not. Retrospective analysis and reviews including studies that do not deal with the immortal-time bias and studies insufficiently powered for a landmark analysis should be interpreted with caution.

[Impact of the use of systemic corticosteroid therapy on the effectiveness of immune checkpoint inhibitors]. / Impact de l'utilisation de la corticothérapie systémique sur l'efficacité des inhibiteurs de points de contrôle immunitaire.

Immunotherapy, which consists in using molecules targeting the immune system, has existed for many years in oncology (vaccines, interleukins, monoclonal antibodies) but has recently expanded due to the development of immune checkpoint inhibitors. These monoclonal antibodies help to restore the immunity against cancer by specifically targeting some immune checkpoints such as CTLA-4, PD-1 and PD-L1. Furthermore, in oncology, it is common to use systemic corticosteroids in the management of symptoms linked to the natural history of the disease (pain, spinal cord compression, cerebral edema) and toxicities linked to anticancer treatment. The impact of corticosteroids on the efficacy of immune checkpoint inhibitors is still poorly understood and they should be used cautiously. According to previously published studies, there seems to be a deleterious effect of corticosteroid therapy on the efficacy of immune checkpoint inhibitors when administered before or at the initiation of immunotherapy, while this effect does not seem present when corticosteroids are administered to patients already undergoing immunotherapy. The aim of this work is to analyze the existing data evaluating the impact of corticosteroid use of on the efficacy of immune checkpoint inhibitors.

Impact of aging on immune-related adverse events generated by anti-programmed death (ligand)PD-(L)1 therapies.

BACKGROUND: Aging is an important risk factor for cancers and is associated with poor prognosis. Weakness of the immune system, also called immunosenescence may occur with older age. The impact of aging on efficacy and safety of immune checkpoint blockers, such as anti-programmed death (ligand) PD-(L)1, remains undetermined. This study aims to evaluate the incidence of immune-related adverse events (irAEs) in patients aged 70 years or older than their younger counterparts. METHODS: Patients with advanced solid tumors treated at Gustave Roussy with an anti-PD-(L)1 monotherapy between June 2014 and October 2017 were prospectively included within the dedicated irAEs pharmacovigilance registry REISAMIC (Registre des Effets Indésirables Sévères des Anticorps Monoclonaux Immunomodulateurs en Cancérologie). The incidence of irAEs of grade ≥II was compared between patients aged ≥70 (old patients, OP) versus patients aged < 70 years (young patients, YP) using a chi-squared test. Survivals were estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method. RESULTS: Among the 603 patients treated by anti-PD(L)1, 191 were ≥70 y.o (OP) and 424 < 70 y.o (YP). The median (range) age of OP and YP were respectively 77 (70-93) and 59 years old (17-69). A total of 165 irAEs occurred in these patients (103 grade II and 58 grade III-IV). The overall incidence of grade ≥II irAEs was higher in OP than in YP (33% versus 25%, p = 0.03). In addition, OP were more prone of having multiples irAEs compared with YP (p = 0.037). Skin toxicities were more frequent in OP than in YP (p = 0.007) but endocrine toxicities were less frequent in OP than in YP (p = 0.044). This higher level of irAEs seems to be responsible for a higher rate of treatment discontinuation in OP (p = 0.2). There was no statistical difference in median time to toxicity, exposure to steroids or survival between the two groups. CONCLUSION: Although anti-PD-(L)1 immunotherapies remain an acceptable treatment option for older patients, prescribers should be aware that irAEs are more frequent in the elderly. Further translational studies are warranted to better understand the relationship between aging and irAEs.

High Prevalence of Somatic Oncogenic Driver Alterations in Patients With NSCLC and Li-Fraumeni Syndrome.

INTRODUCTION: Actionable somatic molecular alterations are found in 15% to 20% of NSCLC in Europe. NSCLC is a tumor observed in patients with germline TP53 variants causing Li-Fraumeni syndrome (LFS), but its somatic molecular profile is unknown. METHODS: Retrospective study of clinical and molecular profiles of patients with NSCLC and germline TP53 variants. RESULTS: Among 22 patients with NSCLC and LFS (n = 23 lung tumors), 64% were women, median age was 51 years, 84% were nonsmokers, 73% had adenocarcinoma histological subtype, and 84% were diagnosed with advanced-stage disease. These patients harbored 16 distinct germline TP53 variants; the most common was p.R158H (5/22; three in the same family). Personal and family histories of cancer were reported in 71% and 90% of patients, respectively. In most cases (87%, 13/15), lung cancer was diagnosed with a late onset. Of the 21 tumors analyzed, somatic oncogenic driver mutations were found in 19 of 21 (90%), EGFR mutations in 18 (exon 19 deletion in 12 cases, L858R in three cases, and G719A, exon 20 insertion, and missing mutation subtype, each with one case), and ROS1 fusion in one case. A PI3KCA mutation was concurrently detected at diagnosis in three EGFR exon 19-deleted tumors (3/12). The median overall survival was 37.3 months in 14 patients treated with EGFR inhibitors; seven developed resistance, five (71%) acquired EGFR-T790M mutation, and one had SCLC transformation. CONCLUSIONS: Driver oncogenic alterations were observed in 90% of the LFS tumors, mainly EGFR mutations; one ROS1 fusion was also observed. The germline TP53 variants and lung cancer carcinogenesis driven by oncogenic processes need further evaluation.

Are Older Patients with Cervical Cancer Managed Differently to Younger Patients? An International Survey.

Although a quarter of cervical cancers occur after the age of 65 years, there is no treatment consensus for these patients. The aim of this work was to survey how physicians treat patients with advanced cervical cancer, focusing on treatment adjustments according to age and frailty status. Specialists were invited to an online survey. Data collected included information on respondent and treatment strategy in four cases (FIGO IIb, FIGO IVa, FIGO IVb, metastatic recurrence) with three age scenarios (45-year-old, 75-year-old and fit, 75-year-old and unfit). We received 237 responses of which 117 were fully completed. Thirty-four percent of respondents reported they had available access to a geriatric team and 25% used a frailty screening tool in routine. Therapeutic strategies did not differ between young and old fit patients. However, treatment modalities and intensity were different for old and unfit patients. Physicians answered that they would treat old fit patients as their younger counterparts but would reduce treatment intensity for old unfit patients. However, even if they were willing to adapt their treatment strategy based on frailty status, most of them do not use the tools that would allow distinguishing "fit" and "unfit" older patients, leaving room for improving accurate geriatric evaluation.

[Toxicities of immune checkpoint inhibitors and their management]. / Les limites des inhibiteurs de points de contrôle immunitaire et la gestion de leur toxicité.

Immunotherapeutic strategies, notably immune checkpoint inhibitors, have become a standard of care for the treatment of advanced cancers, with a growing spectrum of activity. These monoclonal antibodies target the co-inhibitory signals between tumor cells or antigen-presenting cells and T cells, thereby enhancing antitumour T cell activity. However, the occurrence of immune-related adverse events, that can affect all organ-system, represents a major limiting factor to the clinical development of these antibodies. Management of such toxicity requires a close collaboration between oncologists and organ-specialists, by using glucocorticoids and/or other immunosuppressive therapies, with the common objective not alter anti-tumor response.

TITLE: Les limites des inhibiteurs de points de contrôle immunitaire et la gestion de leur toxicité. ABSTRACT: L'immunothérapie représente désormais un des piliers de la prise en charge du cancer, notamment avec l'arrivée des inhibiteurs de points de contrôle (checkpoint) immunitaire (ICI, immune checkpoint inhibitors). Ces anticorps thérapeutiques ciblent ces co-signaux inhibiteurs entre cellules tumorales ou cellules présentatrices d'antigènes et lymphocytes T, activant ou réactivant ainsi une immunité cellulaire T anti-tumorale. Mais la survenue d'une toxicité immunologique, qui peut concerner tous les organes, représente le facteur limitant dans le développement clinique de ces anticorps. La gestion de cette toxicité nécessite une collaboration étroite entre oncologues et spécialistes d'organe, et repose sur l'utilisation de corticoïdes et/ou d'autres immunosuppresseurs, avec l'objectif de contrôler la dysimmunité induite sans perdre l'efficacité anti-tumorale.

The Emerging Role of CD8+ Tissue Resident Memory T (TRM) Cells in Antitumor Immunity: A Unique Functional Contribution of the CD103 Integrin.

Cancer immunotherapy is aimed at stimulating tumor-specific cytotoxic T lymphocytes and their subsequent trafficking so that they may reach, and persist in, the tumor microenvironment, recognizing and eliminating malignant target cells. Thus, characterization of the phenotype and effector functions of CD8+ T lymphocytes infiltrating human solid tumors is essential for better understanding and manipulating the local antitumor immune response, and for defining their contribution to the success of current cancer immunotherapy approaches. Accumulating evidence indicates that a substantial subpopulation of CD3+CD8+ tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes are tissue resident memory T (TRM) cells, and is emerging as an activated tumor-specific T-cell subset. These TRM cells accumulate in various human cancer tissues, including non-small-cell lung carcinoma (NSCLC), ovarian and breast cancers, and are defined by expression of CD103 [αE(CD103)ß7] and/or CD49a [α1(CD49a)ß1] integrins, along with C-type lectin CD69, which most likely contribute to their residency characteristic. CD103 binds to the epithelial cell marker E-cadherin, thereby promoting retention of TRM cells in epithelial tumor islets and maturation of cytotoxic immune synapse with specific cancer cells, resulting in T-cell receptor (TCR)-dependent target cell killing. Moreover, CD103 integrin triggers bidirectional signaling events that cooperate with TCR signals to enable T-cell migration and optimal cytokine production. Remarkably, TRM cells infiltrating human NSCLC tumors also express inhibitory receptors such as programmed cell death-1, the neutralization of which, with blocking antibodies, enhances CD103-dependent TCR-mediated cytotoxicity toward autologous cancer cells. Thus, accumulation of TRM cells at the tumor site explains the more favorable clinical outcome, and might be associated with the success of immune checkpoint blockade in a fraction of cancer patients.

[Immune checkpoints inhibitors: Recent data from ASCO's meeting 2017 and perspectives]. / Actualités autour des inhibiteurs de checkpoints immunitaires : enseignements issus du congrès ASCO 2017 et perspectives.

Immune checkpoint inhibitors anti-PD-1, anti-PD-L1 and anti-CTLA-4 have been in development in several indications and have changed the face of cancer patients' management. Cancer immunotherapy was central in ASCO's meeting 2017. The identification of patients who could benefit most from immune checkpoint inhibitors is essential. The predictive value of PD-L1 status remains insufficient to select patients who could respond to immunotherapy. An extended search for new biomarkers predictive of response (INF-γ, mutational load) is ongoing, in order to better select responders. Immune checkpoint inhibitors have mainly been developed as monotherapy. However, the low response rate, between 10 and 30%, and the occurrence of resistance, contributes to the increment of new therapeutic strategies. This review summarizes the results of combination trials of two immune checkpoint inhibitors, combination of immunotherapy with conventional chemotherapy, radiotherapy or targeted therapies active on the oncogenic addiction pathway.