Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
: 20 | 50 | 100
1 - 5 de 5
2.
J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol ; 31(10): 2730-2736, 2020 10.
Article En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32713017

BACKGROUND: Chronic left bundle branch block (LBBB) can lead to LBBB-mediated cardiomyopathy from left ventricular dysynchrony. His-bundle pacing (HBP) results in direct electrical synchrony using the native His-Purkinje system, providing a novel treatment for this cardiomyopathy. OBJECTIVE: To assess the feasibility of HBP for cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) in LBBB-mediated cardiomyopathy patients. METHODS: Retrospective database review was conducted on patients who underwent CRT by the HBP capable provider at Indiana University Health and Eskenazi Hospital from August 2015 to August 2017. A subset of patients who met the predefined syndrome criteria of LBBB-mediated cardiomyopathy who underwent HBP were identified. Clinical, echocardiographic, and electrocardiographic variables were extracted at baseline and follow-up. RESULTS: Nine patients had cardiomyopathy and LBBB. Among those two were lost to follow-up. Seven patients were included in the analysis. The average time from device implantation to the last follow-up was 14.5 months. Left ventricular ejection fraction improved on average from 25% to 50% (p = .0001). The left ventricular end-systolic dimension decreased from 47 to 37 mm (p = .003) and the left ventricular end-diastolic dimension decreased from 55 to 48 mm (p = .03). QRS duration with HBP-CRT decreased from 152 to 115 ms. New York Heart Association classification improved from an average of 2.7-2. CONCLUSION: HBP is a viable technique for pursuing CRT in patients with LBBB-mediated cardiomyopathy.


Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy , Cardiomyopathies , Heart Failure , Bundle of His/diagnostic imaging , Bundle-Branch Block/diagnosis , Bundle-Branch Block/therapy , Cardiomyopathies/diagnostic imaging , Cardiomyopathies/therapy , Electrocardiography , Heart Failure/therapy , Humans , Indiana , Retrospective Studies , Stroke Volume , Treatment Outcome , Ventricular Function, Left
3.
JACC Case Rep ; 2(12): 1932-1936, 2020 Oct.
Article En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34317083

A 70-year-old male with prior orthotopic heart transplant developed left bundle branch block followed by new-onset left ventricular systolic dysfunction. He underwent His bundle pacing for cardiac resynchronization therapy with complete normalization of his ejection fraction. This is the first reported case of left bundle branch block-induced cardiomyopathy in a transplanted heart. (Level of Difficulty: Advanced.).

4.
Vasc Med ; 22(4): 307-315, 2017 08.
Article En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28693409

The impact of heart failure (HF) on long-term survival in patients with critical limb ischemia (CLI) has not been well described. Outcomes stratified by left ventricular ejection fraction (EF) are also unknown. A single center retrospective chart review was performed for patients who underwent treatment for CLI from 2006 to 2013. Baseline demographics, procedural data and outcomes were analyzed. HF diagnosis was based on appropriate signs and symptoms as well as results of non-invasive testing. Among 381 CLI patients, 120 (31%) had a history of HF and 261 (69%) had no history of heart failure (no-HF). Within the HF group, 74 (62%) had HF with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF) and 46 (38%) had HF with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF). The average EF for those with no-HF, HFpEF and HFrEF were 59±13% vs 56±9% vs 30±9%, respectively. The likelihood of having concomitant coronary artery disease (CAD) was lowest in the no-HF group (43%), higher in the HFpEF group (70%) and highest in the HFrEF group (83%) ( p=0.001). Five-year survival was on average twofold higher in the no-HF group (43%) compared to both the HFpEF (19%, p=0.001) and HFrEF groups (24%, p=0.001). Long-term survival rates did not differ between the two HF groups ( p=0.50). There was no difference in 5-year freedom from major amputation or freedom from major adverse limb events between the no-HF, HFpEF and HFrEF groups, respectively. Overall, the combination of CLI and HF is associated with poor 5-year survival, independent of the degree of left ventricular systolic dysfunction.


Endovascular Procedures , Heart Failure/complications , Ischemia/therapy , Peripheral Arterial Disease/therapy , Stroke Volume , Ventricular Dysfunction, Left/complications , Ventricular Function, Left , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Amputation, Surgical , California , Critical Illness , Disease-Free Survival , Endovascular Procedures/adverse effects , Endovascular Procedures/mortality , Female , Heart Failure/diagnosis , Heart Failure/mortality , Heart Failure/physiopathology , Humans , Ischemia/complications , Ischemia/mortality , Ischemia/physiopathology , Kaplan-Meier Estimate , Limb Salvage , Male , Middle Aged , Peripheral Arterial Disease/complications , Peripheral Arterial Disease/mortality , Peripheral Arterial Disease/physiopathology , Registries , Retrospective Studies , Risk Factors , Time Factors , Treatment Outcome , Ventricular Dysfunction, Left/diagnosis , Ventricular Dysfunction, Left/mortality , Ventricular Dysfunction, Left/physiopathology
...