Is simultaneous bariatric surgery and ventral hernia repair a safe and effective approach?

BACKGROUND: There is currently a lack of consensus regarding the timing of ventral hernia repair relative to bariatric surgery. OBJECTIVES: To compare outcomes between patients undergoing simultaneous and selectively deferred ventral hernia repair and bariatric surgery. SETTING: High volume UPPER gastrointestinal and Bariatric Unit. Sydney, Australia. METHODS: A retrospective case series from a single institution's prospectively collected database (2003-21) was performed to determine the characteristics and outcomes in patients having simultaneous and deferred hernia repair relative to their bariatric surgery. RESULTS: In our patient cohort (N = 134), 111 patients underwent simultaneous repair and 23 had a deferred procedure. Of the simultaneous patients, 95 (85.6%) underwent resection bariatric surgery. The median operative time in the simultaneous versus deferred groups was 155 versus 287 minutes and the length of stay was 3 versus 7 days. There has been one (.9%) mesh infection requiring explant, in an open, simultaneous repair undertaken in a gastric band patient, 3 (2.8%) infected seromas, 1 (.9%) surgical site infection, and 8 (7.5%) hernia recurrences in the simultaneous group. The deferred group has had no mesh infections, no hernia recurrence, and 2 (9.5%) infected seromas to date. There was 1 mortality in the simultaneous cohort (simultaneous gastric bypass group), from a massive Pulmonary Embolism (<30 days postoperatively) and one in the deferred group from an interval small bowel obstruction. CONCLUSIONS: Simultaneous ventral hernia repair with bariatric surgery had a low rate of infection and a low mesh explant rate, even when coupled with resection bariatric surgery in this series. A combined approach may be safe, even in the clean-contaminated surgical context.

The concept of recovery kinetics: an observational study of continuous post-operative monitoring in spine surgery.

Background: The spine surgeon's understanding of an individual patient's burden of disease and functional disability in daily life is shaped by patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs). Although PROMs are useful in understanding the patient's perception of their disease, the use of PROMs constitutes a "snapshot" approach of single timepoint data capture, omitting day-to-day fluctuations in functional status. We introduce the concept of kinetics when considering continuous and objective postoperative patient monitoring with wearable sensors. Methods: A prospective single-centre series was performed using patients either undergoing lumbar decompression for lumbar spinal stenosis (LSS) (n=12), or posterior lumbar fusion for degenerative spondylolisthesis (n=12). The Oswestry Disability Index (PROM) was conducted preoperatively and 12-weeks postoperatively. During this timeframe, continuous measurements of step count and distance travelled were made using a wrist-based wearable accelerometer. Results: Over the 12-week study period, mean daily step count for all participants improved from 4,700 to 7,700 steps per day (P=0.013), following an initial dip in total steps taken. The mean daily distance travelled improved from 3,300 to 5,300 meters per day (P=0.003). Decompression group recovered at a faster rate than the fusion group. Conclusions: Although overall improvement was similar between the decompression and fusion groups, the recovery kinetics varied. The recovery kinetics approach of continuous postoperative monitoring provides additional insight to postoperative patient progress.