Childcare needs as a barrier to healthcare among women in a safety-net health system.

BACKGROUND: Childcare needs are an understudied social determinant of health. The effect of childcare needs on access to healthcare must be understood to inform health system interventions and policy reform. This study sought to characterize childcare needs, access to childcare, and prior experience with navigating childcare needs in healthcare settings among women in a safety-net population. METHODS: We conducted a cross-sectional study of patient-reported survey data collected in-person between April and October 2019. Surveys were administered in waiting rooms of ambulatory services in a large, urban safety-net health system in Dallas, Texas. Survey respondents were derived from a random convenience sample of women waiting for outpatient appointments. Participants were screened for having children under the age of 13 and/or childcare responsibilities for inclusion in the sample. Outcomes of interest included self-reported delayed or missed care, reasons for delayed or missed care, perceived difficulty in accessing childcare, prior methods for managing childcare during healthcare appointments, and prior experience with childcare centers. RESULTS: Among the 336 respondents (96.7% response rate), 121 (36.0%) reported delaying or missing a mean 3.7 appointments/year. Among women with delayed or missed care, 54.5% reported childcare barriers as the primary reason for deferral of care, greater than transportation (33%) or insurance (25%) barriers. Respondents rated childcare access as more difficult than healthcare access. Delayed or missed care due to childcare was more common among White (68.8%) and Black (55.0%) women compared to Hispanic women (34.3%). Common methods of navigating childcare needs during scheduled appointments included bringing children to appointments (69.1%) and re-scheduling or missing the scheduled appointment (43.0%). 40.6% of patients reported leaving an appointment before completion due to childcare needs. CONCLUSIONS: Childcare needs are a leading barrier to healthcare among women accessing care in safety-net settings. Unmet childcare needs result in deferral of care, which may impact health outcomes. Childcare access is perceived as more challenging than healthcare access itself. Health system and policy interventions are needed to address childcare as a social determinant of health.

Pregnancy Outcomes After Laparoscopic Radiofrequency Ablation of Uterine Leiomyomas Compared With Myomectomy.

OBJECTIVE: To compare pregnancy outcomes after laparoscopic radiofrequency ablation and myomectomy. METHODS: The ULTRA (Uterine Leiomyoma Treatment With Radiofrequency Ablation) study is an ongoing multicenter prospective cohort study with longitudinal follow-up up to 5 years comparing outcomes of radiofrequency ablation with myomectomy in premenopausal women older than age 21 years with symptomatic uterine leiomyomas. Participants were queried every 6 months after surgery to assess the incidence of pregnancy and pregnancy outcomes. RESULTS: Among 539 women enrolled in ULTRA, a total of 37 participants (mean age at first pregnancy 35.0±4.7 years) conceived 43 times as of March 2023 (22 radiofrequency ablation, 21 myomectomy). The average length of follow-up time after all procedures was 2.5±1.0 years. The baseline miscarriage rate in the study population was 33.3%. In participants who underwent radiofrequency ablation, 9 of 22 pregnancies (40.9%, 95% CI, 20.3-61.5%) ended in first-trimester miscarriage, 11 resulted in live births (50.0%, 95% CI, 29.1-70.9%), one resulted fetal death at 30 weeks of gestation, and one resulted in uterine rupture during miscarriage treatment with misoprostol 10 weeks after radiofrequency ablation. Among the live births in the radiofrequency ablation group, 45.5% were by vaginal delivery. In the myomectomy group, 9 of 21 pregnancies (42.9%, 95% CI, 21.7-64.0%) ended in first-trimester miscarriage and 12 resulted in live births (57.1%, 95% CI, 36.0-78.3%). There were no significant differences in the likelihood of live birth or miscarriage between the study groups. CONCLUSION: Full-term pregnancy and vaginal delivery are achievable after radiofrequency ablation of leiomyomas. However, in this interim analysis, the miscarriage rate in both radiofrequency ablation and myomectomy groups was higher than expected for women in this age group. Long-term data collection in the ongoing ULTRA study aims to further understand pregnancy outcomes after radiofrequency ablation compared with myomectomy. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov , NCT0210094.

Association between Endometriosis and Surgical Complications among Benign Hysterectomies.

STUDY OBJECTIVE: To investigate the effect of endometriosis on perioperative outcomes in patients undergoing hysterectomy for benign disease. DESIGN: A retrospective cohort study. SETTING: The American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program database. PATIENTS: A total of 127 556 hysterectomies performed for benign gynecologic indications INTERVENTIONS: Differences in the primary outcomes were compared between patients with and without endometriosis after adjustment for group differences in covariates using inverse probability of treatment weighting approach. MEASURES AND MAIN RESULTS: Of the 127 556 hysterectomies identified, 19 618 (15.4%) had a diagnosis of endometriosis. Patients with endometriosis were younger with a lower prevalence of chronic comorbidities but had higher rates of concurrent pelvic inflammatory disease and previous abdominal operations. The incidence of postoperative complications was higher in patients with endometriosis (9.9% vs 8.1%; odds ratio [OR], 1.25; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.17-1.34). The incidence of 30-day mortality (0.1% vs 0.03%; OR, 1.98; 95% CI, 0.69-5.65) and reoperations (1.50% vs 1.36%; OR, 1.18; 95% CI, 0.98-1.42) were not different in patients with and without endometriosis. CONCLUSION: Postoperative complications are more likely in hysterectomies involving endometriosis than those without endometriosis, likely owing to anatomic distortion incurring increased surgical complexity. Patients and surgeons should be aware of the increased risk of complications and plan for mitigating these increased risks before and during surgery for suspected endometriosis.

Radiofrequency Ablation for Treatment of Leiomyomas: Review of the Manufacturer and User Facility Device Experience (MAUDE) Database.

Radiofrequency ablation (RFA) is a relatively novel, increasingly popular treatment option for leiomyomas. We studied medical device-related reports of leiomyoma RFA devices to determine whether there are emerging device-related issues. The Food and Drug Administration's Manufacturer and User Facility Device Experience (MAUDE) database was queried from 2012 through November 2022. Sixty unique reports, including adverse events and device malfunctions, were analyzed for both laparoscopic and transcervical RFA devices. Forty-three injury reports were reviewed. The most common adverse event was infection. Of the injury cases, 34.9% required additional surgical intervention. Although the details of each event are limited, these reports highlight the importance of postmarket surveillance of new technologies and the necessity of improving the current system of implementation and monitoring.

Radiofrequency Ablation of Leiomyomas.

Radiofrequency ablation (RFA) of leiomyomas represents a significant advancement in the treatment of this common uterine condition. In the appropriately selected patient, both laparoscopic and transcervical options provide effective treatment for bleeding and bulk symptoms in a uterine-sparing manner. Compared with other minimally invasive leiomyoma treatment options, RFA procedures have comparable or favorable safety profiles, recovery timelines, and reintervention rates. Data on future fertility and pregnancy are limited, although early reports are promising.

Ice-POP: Ice Packs for Postoperative Pain: A Randomized Controlled Trial.

STUDY OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the benefit of ice packs as a supplement to standard pain management following laparoscopic hysterectomy (LH). DESIGN: This Institutional Review Board-approved randomized controlled trial involved patients undergoing LH for benign conditions. Subjects were randomized to receive standard enhanced recovery after surgery pain management or standard enhanced recovery after surgery plus ice packs. SETTING: Two academic tertiary care centers PATIENTS: Patients undergoing planned outpatient LH with the minimally invasive gynecologic surgery team between February 2019 and November 2020 were considered. Patients with chronic pain, current opioid use ≥1 week, or planned overnight hospitalizations were excluded. Primary outcome data were available for 51 subjects (24 control, 27 intervention). INTERVENTIONS: Ice packs were placed on the abdomen in the operating room. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: Pain was assessed at multiple time points throughout the study using a visual analogue scale (VAS). Opioid requirement was assessed using morphine milligram equivalent. There was no difference between the groups on any demographic variables. Morphine milligram equivalent requirements were also not different between the groups (p = .63). Postoperative day 1 (POD#1) VAS scores were not different (p = .89). Eighty-five percent of subjects reported feeling that their pain was controlled. Subjects who reported that they did not feel their pain was controlled did not use more opioids on POD#1 (p = .37), nor did they have higher POD#1 VAS scores (p = .55). Eighty-seven percent of the intervention subjects said they would use ice again, and 82.6% of them said they would recommend ice to others. There were no adverse events related to ice. All subjects were prescribed 20 tablets oxycodone and averaged 2.9 (SD 3.4) tablets used after discharge. CONCLUSION: Ice packs are an acceptable supplement for postoperative pain control, but they do not reduce postoperative pain or opioid usage compared to standard pain management without ice packs.

Addressing childcare as a barrier to healthcare access through community partnerships in a large public health system.

OBJECTIVE: In our public health system, a survey of reproductive-aged women identified lack of childcare as the most common reason for missing or delaying healthcare. Community-based organisations (CBOs) in our county identified a similar need, so we partnered to develop a hospital-based childcare centre for patients to use during appointments. METHODS: In a large academic public health system, a partnership with a non-profit childcare CBO was formed to address lack of childcare as a barrier to accessing healthcare. Pilot clinics where no-cost childcare would be offered included obstetrics, gynaecology and medical oncology. Transparent communication from the CBO within the electronic medical record was built to minimally impact clinic workflows. Visual and electronic outreach, including patient portal questionnaires, were created to introduce patients to the services. Personalised clinic staff in-services were performed to introduce the service to clinics and leadership. Continual assessments of workflow were conducted and adjusted based on patient and staff feedback and quality checks. At 12 months, overall utilisation of the service was collected. RESULTS: In the first 12 months that no-cost childcare was offered, 175 patients enrolled 271 children into the programme. Ninety-seven percent were women, primarily Hispanic (87/175 (50%)) or black (64/175 (37%)), with an average age of 31.8 years. Of the enrollees, 142/175 (81%) patients made 637 childcare appointments and 119/175 (68%) patients used at least one reservation for 191 children. Most patients were verbally referred by clinic staff for childcare or self-referred for childcare from clinic signage or paperwork. Childcare was requested most frequently for obstetrics and gynaecology appointments.

Preparing for the Fundamentals of Laparoscopic Surgery Exam: A Survey of Residents in Obstetrics & Gynecology.

OBJECTIVE: To describe the actual work-load and experience for first-time resident test takers preparing to meet the new high stakes cognitive and technical skills testing requirement for board certification in Obstetrics and Gynecology. DESIGN: A retrospective observational study. Participating residents completed a 2 page questionnaire about their preparation for the exam. Results are reported in aggregate. SETTING: This study was conducted at the University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, an academic medical school affiliated with both a private and public tertiary hospitals. PARTICIPANTS: Residents in obstetrics and gynecology who have completed their Fundamentals of Laparoscopic Surgery (FLS) certification exam between September 1, 2018 and September 31, 2019. Thirty-three PGY-2 and PGY-3 residents completed the survey. RESULTS: Participants spent an average of 6.7 ± 3.1 hours viewing online modules over an average of 3.6 ± 2.1 nonconsecutive days. Utilizing the campus simulation center, residents spent an average of 2.1 ± 2.1 hours on each of the 5 tasks to practice to the established proficiency score. Twenty-two out of 31 residents rated the ligating loop the easiest skill to master and 13/31 residents rated the precision cut the most difficult. The pass rate for the technical skills portion was 100% (33/33 residents) and for the cognitive portion was 93% (31/33 residents). CONCLUSIONS: Our data suggest that residents spent upward of 10 hours practicing to proficiency on the simulation tasks, in addition to time spent watching FLS-provided training videos. The 100% pass rate for the technical skills portion at our program may be impacted by a required technical skills curriculum that residents must complete prior to registering for the FLS exam. Obstetrics and gynecology residents and training programs will benefit from understanding the time and resources required for first-time resident test takers preparing to take the Fundamentals of Laparoscopic Surgery exam.

Academic Medicine Faculty Perceptions of Work-Life Balance Before and Since the COVID-19 Pandemic.

Importance: How the COVID-19 pandemic has affected academic medicine faculty's work-life balance is unknown. Objective: To assess the association of perceived work-life conflict with academic medicine faculty intention to leave, reducing employment to part time, or declining leadership opportunities before and since the COVID-19 pandemic. Design, Settings, and Participants: An anonymous online survey of medical, graduate, and health professions school faculty was conducted at a single large, urban academic medical center between September 1 and September 25, 2020. Main Outcomes and Measures: Self-assessed intention to leave, reducing employment to part time, or turning down leadership opportunities because of work-life conflict before and since the COVID-19 pandemic. Results: Of the 1186 of 3088 (38%) of faculty members who answered the survey, 649 (55%) were women and 682 (58%) were White individuals. Respondents were representative of the overall faculty demographic characteristics except for an overrepresentation of female faculty respondents and underrepresentation of Asian faculty respondents compared with all faculty (female faculty: 649 [55%] vs 1368 [44%]; Asian faculty: 259 [22%] vs 963 [31%]). After the start of the COVID-19 pandemic, faculty were more likely to consider leaving or reducing employment to part time compared with before the pandemic (leaving: 225 [23%] vs 133 [14%]; P < .001; reduce hours: 281 [29%] vs 206 [22%]; P < .001). Women were more likely than men to reduce employment to part time before the COVID-19 pandemic (153 [28%] vs 44 [12%]; P < .001) and to consider both leaving or reducing employment to part time since the COVID-19 pandemic (leaving: 154 [28%] vs 56 [15%]; P < .001; reduce employment: 215 [40%] vs 49 [13%]; P < .001). Faculty with children were more likely to consider leaving and reducing employment since the COVID-19 pandemic compared with before the pandemic (leaving: 159 [29%] vs 93 [17%]; P < .001; reduce employment: 213 [40%] vs 130 [24%]; P < .001). Women with children compared with women without children were also more likely to consider leaving since the COVID-19 pandemic than before (113 [35%] vs 39 [17%]; P < .001). Working parent faculty and women were more likely to decline leadership opportunities both before (faculty with children vs without children: 297 [32%] vs 84 [9%]; P < .001; women vs men: 206 [29%] vs 47 [13%]; P < .001) and since the COVID-19 pandemic (faculty with children vs faculty without children: 316 [34%] vs 93 [10 %]; P < .001; women vs men: 148 [28%] vs 51 [14%]; P < .001). Conclusions and Relevance: In this survey study, the perceived stressors associated with work-life integration were higher in women than men, were highest in women with children, and have been exacerbated by the COVID-19 pandemic. The association of both gender and parenting with increased perceived work-life stress may disproportionately decrease the long-term retention and promotion of junior and midcareer women faculty.

Current and Future Surgical and Interventional Management Options for Adenomyosis.

Historically, hysterectomy has been the recommended treatment for patients with adenomyosis. However, in the past two decades, various uterine-sparing treatment methods have emerged. These range from excisional techniques such as adenomyomectomy or wedge resection to uterine artery embolization, radiofrequency thermal ablation, hysteroscopic excision, endometrial ablation, and high-intensity focused ultrasound. While largely investigative for the treatment of adenomyosis, these procedures have demonstrated improvement in symptoms including abnormal uterine bleeding, dysmenorrhea, pelvic pain, and overall quality of life. However, long-term data including fertility and obstetric outcomes are needed. Future research is needed to better understand the impact of these uterine-preserving techniques to expand our armamentarium for the treatment of adenomyosis.

Assessing quality and resources during campus-wide simulation integration.

INTRODUCTION: Our simulation center, supported by four departments (Surgery, OB/GYN, Urology, and Anesthesiology), is accredited as a comprehensive Accredited Educational Institute (AEI) and is now expanding to accommodate all departments on campus. METHODS: A 61-point questionnaire was administered to 44 stakeholders, representing all of UME and GME. Data were compared for AEI vs. non-AEI activities. RESULTS: Responses were collected from all 44 groups (100% response rate). Overall, 43 simulation activities were hosted within the AEI and 40 were hosted by non-AEI stakeholders. AEI activities were more likely to be mandatory (93% vs. 75%, p = 0.02), have written learning objectives (79% vs 43%, p < 0.001), and use validated assessment metrics (33% vs. 13%, p = 0.03). CONCLUSION: These data suggest that the AEI courses are more robust in terms of structured learning and assessment compared to non-AEI courses. Campus-wide application of uniform quality standards is anticipated to require significant faculty, course, and program development.

Mass lesions of the myometrium: interpretation and management of unexpected pathology.

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: Uterine leiomyomas are the most common benign uterine smooth muscle tumors. On the basis of imaging, these masses are often presumed to be benign conventional leiomyomas and surgical excision is a common treatment choice. After myomectomy or hysterectomy for presumed leiomyomas, the surgical pathology report may reveal an unexpected diagnosis of another type of mesenchymal tumor. These can range from a variant of benign smooth muscle tumors to smooth muscle tumors of uncertain malignant potential to malignant sarcomas. This review describes these variant pathologies and reviews data on recurrence risk and postoperative management. RECENT FINDINGS: The majority of benign smooth muscle tumors will be classified as leiomyomas. Cellular, bizarre nuclei, mitotically active, epitheliod, myxoid, and dissecting are all terms that describe pathologic variants of benign leiomyomas. Smooth muscle tumors of uncertain malignant potential contain both benign and malignant features and should be referred to Gynecologic Oncology for follow-up. Leiomyosarcomas and low-grade endometrial stromal sarcomas may present preoperatively as benign tumors but are malignant with a high risk of recurrence and should be referred to Gynecologic Oncology. SUMMARY: We advocate for the continued benefits of minimally invasive procedures in appropriately selected patients. Despite these measures, unexpected pathologic diagnoses can occur and should be managed appropriately.

Introduction to Open Surgical Skills Curriculum: Randomized Trial of Self-Paced vs Group Video Tutorial Viewing.

OBJECTIVE: At our residency program, incoming interns are traditionally taught fundamental open surgical skills like suturing and knot tying in a group setting by viewing 12 instructional videos consecutively followed by individual baseline skill testing. We sought to evaluate if introduction to open surgical skills via self-paced viewing of video tutorials, as opposed to traditional group viewing, results in improved surgical skill acquisition in Obstetrics and Gynecology (OBGYN) interns as measured by higher proficiency score with decreased workload stress and anxiety. DESIGN, SETTING, PARTICIPANTS: A randomized control trial was conducted in which OBGYN PGY-1 residents in 2015 and 2016 (N = 35) were introduced to basic open surgical skills, such as knot tying and suturing, by viewing 12 video tutorials produced at UTSW (https://youtu.be/4w3hyL9muVU) for a surgical skills curriculum. Residents were randomized to 2 groups: group viewing vs self-paced viewing. Performance scores were calculated based on time and accuracy while workload and anxiety were measured by preand post-testing surveys using the National Aeronautics and Space Administration-Task Load Index and Spielberger State-Trait Anxiety Inventory 6 item questionnaires. RESULTS: There was no significant difference in proficiency score between the group vs self-paced viewing in 8 out of 12 tasks using the Wilcoxon signed rank test (p > 0.10). There was no statistically significant differences in workload stress based on the National Aeronautics and Space Administration-Task Load Index questionnaire (p = 0.399) or self-reported anxiety based on the Spielberger State-Trait Anxiety Inventory 6 item questionnaire (p = 0.607). CONCLUSIONS: Contrary to recent educational data suggesting self-paced learning may improve outcomes, viewing instructional videos in a group setting continues to be a time efficient method to introduce basic open surgical skills to incoming OBGYN interns.

Preoperative Evaluation for Minimally Invasive Gynecologic Surgery: What Is the Best Evidence and Recommendations for Clinical Practice.

Preoperative evaluation for elective benign gynecologic procedures is a necessary step in reducing perioperative complications. Although a thorough history and physical examination are the foundation of this assessment, much evidence exists that physicians rely on unnecessary laboratory and diagnostic testing. Our goal was to perform a systematic review of the available literature regarding preoperative evaluation to better inform preoperative test selection and to identify deficiencies in the current literature. There is very limited data specific to preoperative testing for patients undergoing gynecologic surgeries. Abnormal test results are common when routine, unselected testing is applied. Using a protocol to guide preoperative testing improves patient care by eliminating unnecessary tests without compromising the efficacy of predicting adverse perioperative events or case cancellation and modifications.

Measuring Quality in Minimally Invasive Gynecologic Surgery: What, How, and Why?

In healthcare, the goal of maximizing value by improving the quality of care and lowering costs has been notoriously challenging to achieve. The fee-for-service model in gynecology and other fields has historically promoted the reduction of nonsurgical or minimally invasive approaches in favor of complex, often morbid procedures. In this review, we seek to define quality and value in the healthcare field and describe strategies that promote quality over production. We then discuss national, non-specialty-based efforts in the context of Surgical Care Improvement Project measures to improve quality of care. Finally, we present a case study through the Kaiser Permanente Minimally Invasive Hysterectomy Initiative, one such model that successfully built on the quality metrics of the foregoing strategies to improve patient care.