A challenging case of severe bilateral septic arthritis with osteomyelitis of the sternoclavicular joint in a patient with end-stage renal disease.

Septic arthritis of the sternoclavicular joint (SCJ) is a rare condition that comprises <1% of all joint infections. We report a case of severe bilateral septic arthritis of the SCJ in a patient with end-stage renal disease on peritoneal dialysis. A 44-year-old female presented with right SCJ infection 1 month after recovering from a tenckhoff catheter exit-site infection. She completed 6 weeks of antibiotics however this progressed to bilateral SCJ septic arthritis with osteomyelitis necessitating multiple surgical debridement and excision of bilateral clavicular heads. Further imaging showed signs of renal osteodystrophy and degenerative joint changes resembling calcium pyrophosphate deposition. Patients with end-stage renal disease have multiple risk factors including immune system dysfunction, renal osteodystrophy and dialysis access sites that increase susceptibility to bacteraemia and seeding. Therefore in such patients, prompt assessment is necessary to ensure expeditious diagnosis and treatment of this potentially debilitating condition. A multidisciplinary team involving various specialties is crucial for the holistic care for such patients and to reduce the risk of recurrence.

Occult Antenatal Fetal Abdominal Emergencies Resulting in Unplanned Preterm Delivery.

Acute abdomen in the fetus can present as nonspecific fetal distress, and occasionally necessitate emergency cesarean section for the mother and subsequent emergency neonatal surgery. Often, preoperative diagnosis in utero is challenging. The authors herein report two cases, a case of primary segmental antenatal intestinal volvulus resulting in the mother presenting at 35 wk with symptoms and decreased fetal movements, and another case of a rapidly distending fetal abdominal mass at 31 wk manifesting as fetal hydrops. The postdelivery newborn management issues are presented. Early identification by the maternal and neonatal team allows for early neonatal surgery and can reduce morbidity and mortality. This can be facilitated by advanced maternal and child health services and efficient patient transport systems.

Systematic review of the efficacy of a hybrid operating theatre in the management of severe trauma.

BACKGROUND: Hybrid operating theatres (OT) allow for simultaneous interventional radiology and operative procedures, serving as a one-stop facility for the treatment of severely injured patients. Several countries have adopted the use of the hybrid OT however their clinical impact in improving efficiency and quality of care remains unclear. This study systematically reviews the clinical impact of the hybrid OT for treatment of the severely injured. METHODS: A literature review of the PubMed, Embase and Cochrane databases was performed to identify all published articles in English, from 1st January 2000 to 31st December 2020, reporting on the impact of a hybrid OT for severe trauma. Articles were also reviewed for references of interest. RESULTS: Five studies reporting the clinical impact of the hybrid OT, in a total of 951 patients, were shortlisted. All were cohort studies that compared patient outcomes in the hybrid OT versus a conventional group. Out of 3 studies that assessed timeliness to intervention, one reported shorter time associated with the hybrid OT, while the other two reported no difference. Mortality outcomes were reported in 4 studies and showed no significant difference associated with treatment in the hybrid OT. Two studies revealed shorter total procedure times associated with the hybrid OT. Two out of 3 studies that evaluated blood transfusion requirements reported decreased transfusion rates in the hybrid OT group. Only 1 study examined complication rates and demonstrated morbidity benefits associated with the hybrid OT. CONCLUSION: Establishment of a hybrid OT requires a significant capital investment as well as a highly functioning multi-disciplinary team. The cost-benefit ratio remains unclear. Future studies, preferably in the form of clinical trials, are required to evaluate its usefulness in improving timeliness to definitive haemorrhage control and outcomes in severe trauma.

Systematic review of current prognostication systems for primary gastrointestinal stromal tumors.

BACKGROUND: The advent of tyrosine kinase inhibitors as adjuvant therapy has revolutionized the management of GIST and emphasized the need for accurate prognostication systems. Numerous prognostication systems have been proposed for GIST but at present it remains unknown which system is superior. The present systematic review aims to summarize current prognostication systems for primary treatment-naive GIST. METHODS: A literature review of the Pubmed and Embase databases was performed to identify all published articles in English, from the 1st January 2002 to 28th Feb 2017, reporting on clinical prognostication systems of GIST. RESULTS: Twenty-three articles on GIST prognostication systems were included. These systems were classified as categorical systems, which stratify patients into risk groups, or continuous systems, which provide an individualized form of risk assessment. There were 16 categorical systems in total. There were 4 modifications of the National Institute of Health (NIH) system, 2 modifications of Armed Forces Institute of Pathology (AFIP) criteria and 3 modifications of Joensuu (modified NIH) criteria. Of the 7 continuous systems, there were 3 prognostic nomograms, 3 mathematical models and 1 prognostic heat/contour maps. Tumor size, location and mitotic count remain the main variables used in these systems. CONCLUSION: Numerous prognostication systems have been proposed for the risk stratification of GISTs. The most widely used systems today are the NIH, Joensuu modified NIH, AFIP and the Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center nomogram. More validation and comparison studies are required to determine the optimal prognostication system for GIST.

Laparoscopic wedge resection for suspected large (≥5 cm) gastric gastrointestinal stromal tumors.

BACKGROUND: Laparoscopic wedge resection (LWR) for small gastric gastrointestinal stromal tumors (GIST) is now widely accepted, but its application for large GISTs remains controversial. This study aims to evaluate the feasibility and safety of LWR for suspected large (≥5 cm) gastric GISTs. METHODS: Retrospective review of 82 consecutive patients who underwent attempted LWR for suspected gastric GIST. LWR for large (≥5 cm) (n = 23) tumors was compared with LWR for small (<5 cm) tumors (n = 59). The 23 patients with LWR for large tumors were also compared to 36 consecutive patients who underwent open wedge resection (OWR) for large tumors. RESULTS: Comparison between patients who underwent LWR for large versus small tumors demonstrated that resection of large tumors was associated with a longer operating time. There was no difference in other perioperative outcomes, and oncological outcomes such as frequency of close margins (≤1 mm) and recurrence-free survival. Comparison between patients who underwent LWR versus OWR for large tumors showed that LWR was associated with decreased median time to fluid or solid diet, shorter postoperative stay but longer operating times. There was no difference in oncological outcomes. CONCLUSION: LWR for suspected large gastric GIST is feasible and safe. It is associated with similar short-term outcomes with LWR for small tumors and favorable short-term outcomes over OWR for large tumors without compromising on oncological outcomes.