Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 6 de 6
Filtrar
Más filtros










Base de datos
Intervalo de año de publicación
2.
Transpl Infect Dis ; 23(2): e13500, 2021 Apr.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33174284
3.
Transplantation ; 103(7): 1494-1503, 2019 07.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30130325

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: An increasing number of patients are requiring multiple retransplants. We assessed outcomes of third and fourth kidney transplants, to aid decision making on the most suitable donor type. METHODS: Data were collected retrospectively for 2561 transplants, including 69 third and 8 fourth, performed from 2000 to 2017. Demographics and outcomes for the combined third/fourth group were compared to first and second transplants. Within the third/fourth kidney transplant group, comparisons were made between deceased donors (n = 39), live donor HLA-compatible (n = 23) and -incompatible (n = 13) transplants, as well as between standard (n = 25) and extended-criteria (n = 14) deceased donor transplants. RESULTS: Patient survival did not differ significantly by transplant number (P = 0.532), whereas death-censored graft survival declined progressively, from 89% at 5 years in first, 85% in second and 74% in the third/fourth transplant group (P < 0.001). Within the combined third/fourth transplant subgroup, 5-year graft survival was found to be 100% in recipients of HLA-compatible live donors, compared to 75% in deceased donors and 53% in HLA-incompatible live donors, although this difference did not reach statistical significance (P = 0.083). No significant difference in patient survival (P = 0.356) or complication rates (P = 0.757) were detected between these groups. For recipients of deceased donors in the third/fourth transplant group, there were no significant differences between standard versus extended-criteria donors for any of the outcomes considered. CONCLUSIONS: Despite variable functional outcomes, third and fourth kidney transplant recipients experience comparable patient survival rates to first and second transplants, regardless of the donor type. In selected patients, HLA-incompatible live donors and extended-criteria deceased donors should be considered.


Asunto(s)
Selección de Donante , Histocompatibilidad , Trasplante de Riñón , Reoperación , Donantes de Tejidos , Sistema del Grupo Sanguíneo ABO , Adulto , Incompatibilidad de Grupos Sanguíneos/inmunología , Causas de Muerte , Femenino , Rechazo de Injerto/inmunología , Rechazo de Injerto/prevención & control , Supervivencia de Injerto , Antígenos HLA/inmunología , Humanos , Inmunosupresores/uso terapéutico , Isoanticuerpos/sangre , Trasplante de Riñón/efectos adversos , Trasplante de Riñón/mortalidad , Donadores Vivos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Reoperación/efectos adversos , Estudios Retrospectivos , Medición de Riesgo , Factores de Riesgo , Factores de Tiempo , Resultado del Tratamiento
4.
Anticancer Res ; 39(1): 499-504, 2019 Jan.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30591501

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND/AIM: The Fistula Risk Score (FRS), as other risk scores, is a validated model predicting the development of a clinically relevant post-operative pancreatic fistula (CR-POPF) after pancreaticoduodenectomy (PD). We evaluated risk factors related with CR-POPF and correlated four predictive scores with the likelihood of developing CR-POPF in our cohort. PATIENTS AND METHODS: The records of 107 patients who underwent PD from 2007 to 2015 were obtained from a prospectively maintained database and reviewed. CR-POPFs were categorized by the International Study Group of Pancreatic Fistula (ISGPF) standards. Firstly, a univariate and multivariate analysis of risk factors related to CR-PPOPF was performed, and then the data were correlated with FRS, Wellner's, Robert's and Yamamoto's scores. RESULTS: In total, 30 patients developed a CR-POPF. On multivariate analysis, abdominal thickness (OR=1.02, p=0.010), Wirsung's duct diameter (OR=0.57, p=0.029), pancreatic consistency (OR=3.18, p=0.011) and histological diagnosis of the lesion (OR=1.65, p=0.012) represented independent predictive factors of CR-POPF. FRS (R2=0.596, p=0.001), Wellner's score (R2=0.285, p=0.005) and Roberts' score (R2=0.385, p=0.002) correlated with the likelihood of developing CR-POPF. CONCLUSION: Abdominal thickness, Wirsung's duct diameter, pancreatic consistency and histological diagnosis were independent predictive factors of CR-POPF. Predictive scores reflected the likelihood of CR-POPF, FRS being the score with the highest predictive value.


Asunto(s)
Páncreas/cirugía , Fístula Pancreática/fisiopatología , Pancreaticoduodenectomía/efectos adversos , Complicaciones Posoperatorias/fisiopatología , Adulto , Anciano , Anastomosis Quirúrgica/efectos adversos , Femenino , Humanos , Modelos Logísticos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Páncreas/fisiopatología , Conductos Pancreáticos/fisiopatología , Conductos Pancreáticos/cirugía , Fístula Pancreática/epidemiología , Fístula Pancreática/cirugía , Complicaciones Posoperatorias/epidemiología , Estudios Retrospectivos , Medición de Riesgo , Factores de Riesgo
6.
Int J Nephrol ; 2010: 529080, 2011 Jan 18.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-21331315

RESUMEN

Renal transplantation confers improvement in quality of life and survival when compared to patients on dialysis. There is a universal shortage of organs, and efforts have been made to overcome this shortage by exploring new sources. One such area is the use of kidneys containing small tumours after resection of the neoplasm. This paper looks at the current evidence in the literature and reviews the feasibility of utilizing such a source.

SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA
...