Effect of Sacubitril/Valsartan on Patients Having Heart Failure With Preserved Left Ventricular Ejection Fraction Undergoing Hemodialysis: A Long-term Observational Study.

BACKGROUND/AIM: Sacubitril/valsartan (SV), a novel pharmacological class of angiotensin receptor neprilysin inhibitors, is effective in treating heart failure (HF) by inhibiting the degradation of natriuretic peptides and the renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system. However, no studies have observed the long-term effects of SV on patients with HF and preserved left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) undergoing hemodialysis (HD) over a long period. PATIENTS AND METHODS: This single-center retrospective study of 21 months duration involved consecutive patients with HF and preserved LVEF undergoing HD, who received 50-200 mg/day. All patients were followed up regularly, and clinical, biochemical, and echocardiographic parameters were recorded at baseline and during follow-up. The efficacy and safety of SV were also analyzed. RESULTS: This longitudinal study included nine patients, with a median age of 76 years. The median HD duration was 7 years. At baseline, the mean brain natriuretic peptide (BNP) was 133±73.6 pg/ml and that of LVEF was 66%±9%. After SV therapy, the systolic blood pressure, diastolic blood pressure, and heart rate decreased, albeit without statistical significance. BNP levels, LVEF, left atrial anteroposterior dimension, and left ventricular mass index did not change, compared to baseline values. No adverse effects were observed in any of the patients. CONCLUSION: SV tended to decrease blood pressure and heart rate in patients with HF and preserved LVEF undergoing HD but did not alter cardiac function assessments, such as BNP or echocardiography.

Effects of Oral Semaglutide on Renal Function in Diabetic Kidney Disease: A Short-term Clinical Study.

BACKGROUND/AIM: In the SUSTAIN-6 trial, semaglutide reduced the risk of worsening nephropathy in patients with type 2 diabetes. The objective of this retrospective study was to elucidate the effect and safety of oral semaglutide (Rybelsus®) in patients with diabetic kidney disease (DKD). PATIENTS AND METHODS: Six patients with DKD received 3 mg/day semaglutide orally. The observation period was 9.0±5.0 months. Changes in estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR), urinary protein, fasting blood glucose, and hemoglobin A1c were studied from 6 months before the administration of oral semaglutide until 6 months after administration. RESULTS: The change in eGFR over the 6 months prior to semaglutide administration was -1.2±1.6 ml/min/1.73 m2, showing a trend for a decrease; although not statistically significant, the change at 6 months after oral semaglutide initiation showed improved eGFR (1-50.7±1.8 ml/min/1.73 m2). Proteinuria was not reduced after treatment with oral semaglutide. No significant adverse effects (including retinopathy) were observed in any patient during the study. CONCLUSION: Despite the small sample size and short observation period, oral semaglutide was found to be a relatively well-tolerated drug for patients with DKD.

Effect of finerenone on diabetic kidney disease outcomes with estimated glomerular filtration rate below 25 mL/min/1.73 m2.

Background: In the Finerenone in Reducing Cardiovascular Mortality and Morbidity in Diabetic Kidney Disease trial, finerenone reduced the risk of cardiovascular events in patients with chronic kidney disease (CKD) and type 2 diabetes, while in the Finerenone in Reducing Kidney Failure and Disease Progression in Diabetic Kidney Disease trial, it improved renal and cardiovascular outcomes in patients with advanced CKD. However, no previous studies have assessed patients with CKD and type 2 diabetes with an estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) below 25 mL/min/1.73 m2. Methods: Nine patients with CKD and type 2 diabetes who received finerenone 10 mg/day were analyzed retrospectively. Changes in eGFR, urinary protein, and serum potassium levels were studied from 1 year before administration of finerenone until 6 months after administration. Results: The mean baseline eGFR slope was -7.63 ± 9.84 (mL/min/1.73 m2/year). After finerenone treatment, the mean eGFR slope significantly improved -1.44 ± 3.17 (mL/min/1.73 m2/6 months, P=0.038). However, finerenone treatment did not significantly reduce proteinuria. Furthermore, finerenone did not increase serum potassium levels. Conclusions: Patients treated with finerenone showed a significantly slower decline in eGFR. Furthermore, aside from the present study, no reports have indicated the effectiveness of finerenone in patients with advanced CKD with an eGFR below 25 mL/min/1.73 m2. As confirmed in our clinical trials, the finding that finerenone is effective in a wide range of renal functions can be generalized to clinical practice. However, sample size in this study was small. Thus, further large-scale investigations will be needed.