RESUMEN
OBJECTIVE: To investigate time spent in hormone-sensitive and castration-resistant disease states in men with advanced prostate cancer in Sweden, and the associated health economic impact. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Registry study (NCT03619980) of the Prostate Cancer data Base Sweden with data from the National Prostate Cancer Register, including the Patient-overview Prostate Cancer (PPC) and other national healthcare registries. The primary endpoint was time in each disease state. Secondary endpoints were co-medications, comorbidities and healthcare resource utilization (HRU) and cost in each disease state. RESULTS: In total, 1,869 men with advanced prostate cancer registered in PPC between 2014 and 2016, with data on the start of androgen deprivation therapy, were identified. Median time to progression and median survival were 4 and 11 years, respectively, for men with non-metastatic (nm) hormone-sensitive prostate cancer (HSPC); 1 and 7 years for men with metastatic (m) HSPC; and 1 and 8.5 years for men with nm castration-resistant prostate cancer (CRPC). Median survival for men with mCRPC was 4 years. Total annual mean costs for HRU per patient increased with increasing severity of disease, from 41,064 Swedish krona (SEK) for nmHSPC to 288,242 SEK for mCRPC. CONCLUSION: Progression time from mHSPC and nmCRPC to the mCRPC state was short and survival in the mCRPC state was approximately 4 years. Survival times were longer than expected, likely due to the selection of long-term survivors among prevalent cases. Healthcare costs were high for men with mCRPC. Further studies are needed to confirm our pilot study findings.
Asunto(s)
Costo de Enfermedad , Duración de la Terapia , Neoplasias de la Próstata/economía , Neoplasias de la Próstata/terapia , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Estadificación de Neoplasias , Proyectos Piloto , Neoplasias de la Próstata/patología , Neoplasias de la Próstata Resistentes a la Castración/economía , Neoplasias de la Próstata Resistentes a la Castración/patología , Neoplasias de la Próstata Resistentes a la Castración/terapia , Sistema de Registros , SueciaRESUMEN
Aim: To describe treatment patterns in Denmark, Norway and Sweden for patients receiving overactive bladder (OAB) pharmacotherapy.Methods: This was a prospective, multinational, registry-based study involving three nationwide prescribed drug registries (sample size 6000 patients per country), performed between 1 January and 30 June 2014. Patients were followed prospectively for 12 months after first pick-up of index medication. The primary objective was to evaluate the proportion of patients picking up first refill of index medication. Secondary objectives included evaluation of the average number of pick-ups collected during 1 year and time to discontinuation of index medication.Results: A high proportion of patients in the three Nordic countries picked up a first refill of OAB medication: 64-75% for mirabegron and 84-95% for individual antimuscarinics. Amongst treatment-naïve patients, the proportion picking up their first mirabegron refill was 60-64%; for individual antimuscarinics it was 30-63%. Mean number of pick-ups during 1 year ranged from 3.5-5.0 for mirabegron across the countries and for individual antimuscarinics from 3.8-12.3. Median time to discontinuation for mirabegron ranged from 140 (Denmark) to 207 days (Norway) and, for individual antimuscarinics (solifenacin), from 182 (Denmark) to 355 days (Sweden). At 12 months, the proportion of patients still on treatment with mirabegron and antimuscarinics was 21% and 38%, respectively.Conclusions: Treatment patterns in patients with OAB picking up a mirabegron or antimuscarinic prescription in Denmark, Norway and Sweden indicate that persistence remains a challenge.
Asunto(s)
Acetanilidas/uso terapéutico , Agonistas de Receptores Adrenérgicos beta 3/uso terapéutico , Antagonistas Muscarínicos/uso terapéutico , Tiazoles/uso terapéutico , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Compuestos de Bencidrilo/uso terapéutico , Benzofuranos/uso terapéutico , Dinamarca , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Ácidos Mandélicos/uso terapéutico , Persona de Mediana Edad , Noruega , Pautas de la Práctica en Medicina , Estudios Prospectivos , Pirrolidinas/uso terapéutico , Sistema de Registros , Succinato de Solifenacina/uso terapéutico , Suecia , Tartrato de Tolterodina/uso terapéutico , Vejiga Urinaria HiperactivaRESUMEN
BACKGROUND Improved understanding of the impact of kidney transplantation on healthcare resource use/costs and loss of productivity could aid decision making about funding allocation and resources needed for the treatment of chronic kidney disease in stage 5. MATERIAL AND METHODS This was a retrospective study utilizing data from Swedish national health registers of patients undergoing kidney transplantation. Primary outcomes were renal disease-related healthcare resource utilization and costs during the 5 years after transplantation. Secondary outcomes included total costs and loss of productivity. Regression analysis identified factors that influenced resource use, costs, and loss of productivity. RESULTS During the first year after transplantation, patients (N=3120) spent a mean of 25.7 days in hospital and made 21.6 outpatient visits; mean renal disease-related total cost was 66,014. During the next 4 years, resource use was approximately 70% (outpatient) to 80% (inpatient) lower, and costs were 75% lower. Before transplantation, 62.8% were on long-term sick leave, compared with 47.4% 2 years later. Higher resource use and costs were associated with age <10 years, female sex, graft from a deceased donor, prior hemodialysis, receipt of a previous transplant, and presence of comorbidities. Higher levels of sick leave were associated with female sex, history of hemodialysis, and type 1 diabetes. Overall 5-year graft survival was 86.7% (95% CI 85.3-88.2%). CONCLUSIONS After the first year following transplantation, resource use and related costs decreased, remaining stable for the next 4 years. Demographic and clinical factors, including age <10 years, female sex, and type 1 diabetes were associated with higher costs and resource use.
Asunto(s)
Utilización de Instalaciones y Servicios/tendencias , Costos de la Atención en Salud/tendencias , Trasplante de Riñón/economía , Ausencia por Enfermedad/tendencias , Adolescente , Adulto , Anciano , Niño , Preescolar , Utilización de Instalaciones y Servicios/economía , Utilización de Instalaciones y Servicios/estadística & datos numéricos , Femenino , Estudios de Seguimiento , Supervivencia de Injerto , Costos de la Atención en Salud/estadística & datos numéricos , Humanos , Lactante , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Evaluación de Resultado en la Atención de Salud , Estudios Retrospectivos , Ausencia por Enfermedad/economía , Ausencia por Enfermedad/estadística & datos numéricos , Suecia , Adulto JovenRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: This study investigated medication adherence in kidney transplant patients (KTPs) converted from immediate-release tacrolimus (IR-T) to prolonged-release tacrolimus (PR-T)-based immunosuppression in routine practice. METHODS: Noninterventional, observational, multicenter study in Norway. Included adult KTPs with stable graft function, converted from IR-T (baseline) to PR-T (1 mg:1 mg) in routine practice. Data were collected at baseline, and months 1, 3, 6, and 12 postconversion. Primary endpoint: adherence using the Basel Assessment of Adherence to Immunosuppressive Medication Scale. Secondary assessments: tacrolimus dose and trough levels (target, 3-7 ng/mL), clinical laboratory parameters (eg, estimated glomerular filtration rate [Modified Diet in Renal Disease]), and adverse events. RESULTS: Ninety-one KTPs (mean ± SD age 47.7 ± 14.3 years) were analyzed. Mean ± SD change in PR-T dose from baseline (4.4 ± 2.4 mg/d) to month 12 was -0.1 ± 0.9 mg/d; mean tacrolimus trough levels remained within target. Overall medication adherence increased from 45.6% at baseline to 58.1% at month 1, but was similar to baseline thereafter; taking and timing adherence followed a similar pattern. Odds ratio (OR) for adherence at month 1 (but not at other time points) was greater versus baseline for overall (OR, 1.71; P = 0.0205), taking (OR, 3.38; P = 0.0004), and timing (OR, 1.77, P = 0.0252) dimensions. Mean ± SD Basel Assessment of Adherence to Immunosuppressive Medication Scale visual analogue scale score at baseline was 96.4 ± 5.5%, and increased postconversion. Estimated glomerular filtration rate remained stable (month 12, 61.6 ± 17.7 mL/min per 1.73 m2), as did other laboratory parameters. Two (2.2%) patients had adverse events considered probably/possibly treatment-related. CONCLUSIONS: There was disparity between high, patient-perceived and low, actual adherence. Converting stable KTPs from IR-T to PR-T in routine practice did not impact long-term adherence to immunosuppression; renal function remained stable.
RESUMEN
Treating male lower urinary tract symptoms (LUTS) by targeting the prostate would have limited effect on overactive bladder (OAB) symptoms. This study assessed perceived symptoms and quality of life (QoL) of male patients with OAB treated with an α-blocker plus solifenacin in daily clinical practice. Male patients aged ≥40 years were included after the decision was made to initiate treatment with an α-blocker for LUTS plus solifenacin for OAB symptoms. The primary endpoint was change in patient perception of bladder condition (PPBC) questionnaire score over 6 months. Other assessments included the OAB-questionnaire short form (OAB-q SF) and International Prostate Symptom Score (IPSS). Interpretation of the study data was hindered by not meeting the enrollment target and a high dropout rate. In 36 evaluable patients, mean (SD) PPBC score improved from 4.3 (0.93) at baseline ("moderate" to "severe" problems) to 3.5 (1.06) at month 6 ("minor" to "moderate" problems). OAB-q SF scores and total IPSS also improved. In this patient population, treatment with solifenacin and an α-blocker resulted in improvements in male patient perception of their LUTS and QoL, although the results should be interpreted with caution due to the low number of patients with complete data.