The impact of instrumented lumbar fusion surgery on psychiatric problems in elderly patients with degenerative spinal stenosis: The observational study.

This is a prospective cohort study to investigate the effects of instrumented lumbar fusion surgery on psychiatric problems, including anxiety, insomnia, and depression, in patients with degenerative spinal stenosis, as well as on pain and the activities of daily living. Surgery was performed in the patients with Schizas grade C or D spinal stenosis with; if a patient's quality of life was impaired for at least 3 months or if patient had neurologic deficits. Finally, 69 patients were reviewed. Beck anxiety inventory, insomnia severity index, geriatric depression scale short form-Korean, visual analog scale for back pain, visual analog scale for leg pain, and Oswestry disability index was measured on the day surgery was decided on (T1), the day before surgery (T2), the day before discharge (T3), and 6 months after surgery (T4). The patients had mild degrees of anxiety, insomnia, and depression at T1, and Beck anxiety inventory, insomnia severity index, visual analog scale for back pain, visual analog scale for leg pain, and Oswestry disability index improved significantly by T4. In elderly patients with degenerative spinal stenosis, instrumented lumbar fusion surgery improves not only pain and activities of daily living, but also anxiety and insomnia. However, there was no improvement in depression over the 6-month follow-up period.

Efficacy of Minimally Invasive Reduction With Cerclage Fixation in Spiral or Oblique Subtrochanteric Femoral Fractures: A Retrospective Cohort Study Comparing Cables and Wires.

OBJECTIVES: To compare the outcomes of a minimally invasive reduction (MIR) technique using a cable and wire in spiral or oblique subtrochanteric femoral fractures (SFFs). DESIGN: Retrospective cohort study. SETTING: Two University Hospitals. PATIENT SELECTION CRITERIA: Skeletally mature patients with spiral or oblique SFFs (OTA/AO 32A1 and 32A2) treated with intramedullary nailing and MIR with a cerclage wire passer using either a single-loop cable or cerclage wire or MIR without cable or wire between May 2016 and November 2021 were included. OUTCOME MEASURES AND COMPARISONS: Coronal and sagittal interfragmentary gap, neck-shaft angle, coronal and sagittal angulation, fracture union, time to union, and Radiographic Union Score for Hip (RUSH) at 6 months post operation were compared. RESULTS: A total of 46 patients were included, with 16 each in the cable and wire groups and 14 in the non-wiring group. There were no differences in demographics ( P > 0.05), fracture classification ( P = 0.710), or operative data ( P > 0.05) between the three groups. The cable group showed significantly better coronal ( P = 0.003) and sagittal ( P = 0.003) interfragmentary gap, shorter union time ( P < 0.001), and higher 6-month RUSH score ( P < 0.001) among the three groups. There were no significant differences in outcome measures between the wire and non-wiring groups (all P > 0.05). No mechanical complications or reoperations were observed in all three groups. CONCLUSIONS: Minimally invasive reduction using a cable is more effective than wire or non-wiring reduction to improve reduction quality and promote bone union in the SFFs. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Therapeutic Level III. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.