RESUMEN
Purpose: There is limited data on the midterm results of endovascular treatment for acute type B aortic dissection (TBAD) with malperfusion syndrome (MS), particularly in Asia. This study aimed to investigate the clinical outcomes of endovascular treatment of acute TBAD with MS. Materials and Methods: We retrospectively analyzed 27 patients who underwent endovascular treatment for acute TBAD with MS. Results: Among the 27 patients with TBAD and MS, malperfusion was observed in the isolated renal (44.4%), visceral (7.4%) and iliofemoral (25.9%) arteries, as well as their combinations (22.2%). The patients underwent thoracic endovascular aortic repair (TEVAR) only (25.9%), selective stenting only in arteries affected by malperfusion (22.2%), or combined treatment with TEVAR and selective stenting (51.9%). Primary technical success was achieved in all the patients. No inhospital mortality or early death within 30 days after operation occurred. The rates of stroke, limb ischemia, acute kidney injury, and reintervention at 30 days were 7.4%, 3.7%, 25.9%, and 3.7%, respectively. The mean follow-up period was 4.3±3.1 years. During the follow-up, the rates of death, stroke, maintenance hemodialysis, aneurysmal change, and reintervention were 0%, 3.7%, 7.4%, 7.4%, and 7.4%, respectively. Two patients required reintervention due to limb ischemia and aneurysmal changes in the distal portion of the stent graft. Computed tomography scans revealed a significant increase in aortic diameters in patients who underwent selective stenting compared to those who underwent TEVAR over a 3-year period, with changes in aortic area measuring 878.9 mm2 vs. 188.4 mm2 at the middle of the lesion (P=0.037), 303.7 mm2 vs. 22.8 mm2 at the level of the celiac trunk (P=0.025), and 442.9 mm2 vs. 37.3 mm2 at the level of the renal artery (P=0.019). Conclusion: The endovascular treatment of acute TBAD with MS demonstrated a high primary technical success rate and promising short- and midterm clinical outcomes.
RESUMEN
BACKGROUND: We investigated the effect of nicorandil on infarct size, cardiac function assessed by cardiac magnetic resonance imaging (CMR) and outcomes in ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) patients undergoing primary percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). METHODS: In a prospective, randomised, controlled trial, 83 patients with STEMI receiving primary PCI were randomised into the nicorandil (n =â 40) or placebo (nâ =â 43) groups. Nicorandil was administered in the emergency room before primary PCI as an intravenous bolus of 4 mg followed by a continuous infusion of 6 mg/h for 24 h and as 2-mg intracoronary injections prior to balloon dilatation and coronary stenting. Nicorandil was continued orally at 10-20 mg/d for 6 months. Infarct size and cardiac function were measured by CMR at 5 d and 6 months after primary PCI. Furthermore, major adverse cardiac events (MACEs) including all-cause death, nonfatal myocardial infarction (MI), any revascularisation, stroke, and definite/probable stent thrombosis (ST) were compared. RESULTS: There were no significant differences in baseline clinical characteristics between the groups. Infarct size at baseline and 6 months as well as infarct size changes during 6 months as measured by CMR were similar between the groups. Similarly, other CMR parameters were comparable at baseline and 6 months between the groups. MACEs occurred in four patients (4.8%) during 6 months. No significant difference in the risk of MACEs was observed between the groups. CONCLUSIONS: Treatment with nicorandil for 6 months after primary PCI was not associated with any improvement in infarct size, CMR-determined cardiac function, and outcomes in STEMI patients.
