Prevalence of Myofascial Pain Syndrome and Efficacy of Trigger Point Injection in Patients with Incurable Cancer: A Multicenter, Prospective Observational Study (MyCar Study).

OBJECTIVE: Myofascial pain syndrome (MPS) is caused by overload or disuse of skeletal muscles. Patients with cancer are often forced to restrict their movement or posture for several reasons. The study was conducted to investigate the prevalence and risks of MPS in patients with incurable cancer. The efficacy of trigger point injection (TPI) was also explored. METHODS: This was a multicenter, prospective observational study. Patients with incurable cancer who started receiving specialist palliative care were enrolled. We investigated the MPS in this population and accompanying risk factors for restricting body movement. Pre- and post-TPI pain was also evaluated using a Numerical Rating Scale (NRS) in patients who received TPI. The primary outcome was the prevalence of MPS. RESULTS: A total of 101 patients were enrolled from five institutions in Japan. Most of the patients (n = 94, 93.1%) had distant metastases, and half of the patients (50, 49.5%) received anticancer treatment. Thirty-nine (38.6%) patients had MPS lesions at 83 sites. Multivariate analysis revealed that the significant risk factor for MPS was poor Performance Status (PS) (odds ratio 3.26; 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.18-9.02, P = .023). We performed TPI for 40 out of 83 MPS lesions. Mean NRS for MPS before TPI was 7.95, which improved to 4.30 after TPI (P < .001). CONCLUSIONS: MPS was common in patients with incurable cancer and the risk factor identified in this study was poor performance status. TPI could be a treatment option.

The Usefulness of the Armchair Sign for the Diagnosis of Psychosomatic-Prone Myofascial Pain Syndrome in Patients with Incurable Cancer: A Secondary Analysis of a Prospective Multicenter Observational Clinical Study.

Background: Because psychosomatic diseases are pathological conditions, it is difficult to identify their degrees. The armchair sign is a test used to assess voluntary muscle relaxation. Objective: We aimed to evaluate the usefulness of the armchair sign for the diagnosis of psychosomatic-prone myofascial pain syndrome (MPS) in patients with incurable cancer. Design: This was a secondary analysis of a prospective multicenter observational clinical study. Setting/Patients: Patients with incurable cancer who were referred to palliative care services at five institutions in Japan between March 2018 and December 2018. Results: A total of 101 patients were enrolled, of whom 44 met MPS diagnostic criteria. Of these, 27 patients (61.3%) had psychosomatic-prone MPS. There was a significant association between the armchair sign and psychosomatic-prone MPS (p = 0.002). Sensitivity and specificity were 40.7% (95% confidence interval [CI]: 18.0-63.4) and 100.0%, respectively. The area under the curve score was 0.704 (95% CI: 0.553-0.855). Conclusions: The armchair sign may be useful as an ancillary test for the diagnosis of psychosomatic-prone MPS in patients with incurable cancer. Trial Registration: UMIN000031338. Registered February 16, 2018.

Prevalence of myofascial pain syndrome in patients with incurable cancer.

BACKGROUND: Myofascial pain syndrome (MPS) is a condition that involves skeletal muscles. It is caused by overload or disuse of muscles and is characterized by extreme tenderness in the muscles with taut bands. Treatment for MPS is different from that for cancer-related pain. Cancer patients have many factors that cause restriction of body movement and posture. Although cancer patients appear to demonstrate risk factors for MPS, its prevalence has not been reported in patients with incurable cancer. This study was conducted to investigate the prevalence of MPS in patients with incurable cancer. METHODS: A retrospective chart review. The data for patients with incurable cancer who received palliative care at our department between September 2015 and March 2016 were investigated. We examined the prevalence of MPS, which was diagnosed on the basis of the Rivers criteria (RC) and Simons criteria (SC). We also examined the following factors associated with MPS: performance status (PS), use of medical devices, and primary cancer sites. The primary outcome was the prevalence of MPS based on RC. Secondary outcomes included the prevalence of MPS based on SC and the relationship between MPS and either PS or medical devices. RESULTS: Thirty-four patients with incurable cancer were identified. MPS based on RC or SC was detected in 10 (29%) and 20 (59%) patients, respectively. Twenty-two of 34 patients who complained of pain, 10 (45%) had MPS based on RC and 20 (90%) had MPS based on SC. Age and central venous port were risk factors for MPS by multivariate analysis. CONCLUSION: A very high prevalence of MPS was detected in our study population. MPS should be considered when patients with incurable cancer complain of pain.

Orthotropic live transplantation for cirrhosis from hepatitis C virus leads to correction of factor IX deficiency allowing for ankle arthroplasty without factor replacement in a patient with moderate haemophilia B.

: Liver transplantation is one of the treatments for haemophilic patients having severe liver cirrhosis who are infected with the hepatitis C virus. Patients with haemophilia can develop arthroplasty requiring surgical intervention, and the surgical outcomes of patients undergoing such procedures after liver transplant has not been reported. Treatment for arthropathy is important for improving the quality of life for patients who survive after liver transplantation. We report the first case of ankle arthroscopic arthrodesis in a patient with haemophilia B after undergoing living donor liver transplantation. We carefully monitored the patient's factor IX (FIX) plasma levels during his perioperative period, and we successfully performed his arthroscopic ankle arthrodesis without administration of any additional FIX concentrates. Our case has demonstrated the feasibility of joint surgery after liver transplantation without administration of additional clotting factors while monitoring FIX activity.

Cancer Transitional Care for Terminally Ill Cancer Patients Can Reduce the Number of Emergency Admissions and Emergency Department Visits.

BACKGROUND: Emergency admissions and emergency department visits (EAs/EDVs) have been used as quality indicators of home care in terminally ill cancer patients. We established a cancer transitional care (CTC) program to monitor and manage terminally ill cancer patients receiving care at home. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the effectiveness of CTC by the frequency of EAs/EDVs. METHODS: In a retrospective chart review, we identified 133 patients with cancer admitted to our department, of whom 56 met study eligibility criteria. The CTC consisted of at least 1 or more following components: (1) a 24-hour hotline for general physicians or home care nurses to reach hospital-based physicians, (2) periodic phone calls from an expert hospital-based oncology nurse to home care medical staff, and (3) reports sent to our department from home care medical staff. The primary outcome variable was the frequency of EAs/EDVs. RESULTS: There were 32 EAs/EDVs and 69 planned admissions during the observation period. In the last 30 days of life, 16 patients (28.6%) had 1 EA/EDV and none had multiple EAs/EDVs. Compared with previous studies, our study found a similar or lower frequency of EAs/EDVs. CONCLUSION: Our findings suggest that the implementation of CTC reduces the number of EAs/EDVs by replacing them with planned admissions. Further prospective studies to evaluate CTC are warranted.