RESUMEN
BACKGROUND & AIMS: The aim of this study was to assess the long-term effectiveness and safety of risankizumab maintenance treatment in a large real-world cohort of patients with Crohn's Disease (CD). METHODS: From May 2021 to August 2023, all consecutive patients with CD treated with risankizumab in 25 GETAID centers have been retrospectively included. The primary endpoint was steroid-free clinical remission (Harvey Bradshaw Index [HBI] <5) at 52 weeks. RESULTS: Of the 174 patients included, 99%, 93%, and 96% had been previously exposed to anti-TNF, vedolizumab, and ustekinumab, respectively. All patients had received ≥3 biologics, and 108 (62%) had previous intestinal resection. Median follow-up was 13.7 months (interquartile range, 10.0-18.1 months). The rates of steroid-free clinical remission and clinical remission at week 26 were 47% (72/152) and 52% (79/152), and 46% (58/125), and 48% (60/125) at week 52, respectively. Risankizumab persistence rates were 94%, 89%, and 79% at weeks 12, 26, and 52, respectively. At the end of follow-up, 45 (45/174; 26%) patients had discontinued risankizumab (loss of response, 42%; primary failure, 37%; intolerance, 13%). Thirty-six patients (36/174; 20.9%) were hospitalized, and 22 (22/174; 12.6%) required intestinal resection. Fifty-one patients (29%) had an adverse event, including 26 (15%) serious adverse events (CD flare, n = 17). One death (myocardial infarction) and one cancer (papillary thyroid carcinoma) were observed. CONCLUSION: This is the first real-life study to report long-term outcomes in patients with refractory CD treated with risankizumab. One-half of the patients achieved steroid-free clinical remission after 1 year, and the safety profile was consistent with the literature.
RESUMEN
BACKGROUND & AIMS: Colonoscopic surveillance is recommended in patients with colonic inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) given their increased risk of colorectal cancer (CRC). We aimed to develop and validate a dynamic prediction model for the occurrence of advanced colorectal neoplasia (aCRN, including high-grade dysplasia and CRC) in IBD. METHODS: We pooled data from 6 existing cohort studies from Canada, The Netherlands, the United Kingdom, and the United States. Patients with IBD and an indication for CRC surveillance were included if they underwent at least 1 follow-up procedure. Exclusion criteria included prior aCRN, prior colectomy, or an unclear indication for surveillance. Predictor variables were selected based on the literature. A dynamic prediction model was developed using a landmarking approach based on Cox proportional hazard modeling. Model performance was assessed with Harrell's concordance-statistic (discrimination) and by calibration curves. Generalizability across surveillance cohorts was evaluated by internal-external cross-validation. RESULTS: The surveillance cohorts comprised 3731 patients, enrolled and followed-up in the time period from 1973 to 2021, with a median follow-up period of 5.7 years (26,336 patient-years of follow-up evaluation); 146 individuals were diagnosed with aCRN. The model contained 8 predictors, with a cross-validation median concordance statistic of 0.74 and 0.75 for a 5- and 10-year prediction window, respectively. Calibration plots showed good calibration. Internal-external cross-validation results showed medium discrimination and reasonable to good calibration. CONCLUSIONS: The new prediction model showed good discrimination and calibration, however, generalizability results varied. Future research should focus on formal external validation and relate predicted aCRN risks to surveillance intervals before clinical application.
Asunto(s)
Colonoscopía , Neoplasias Colorrectales , Enfermedades Inflamatorias del Intestino , Humanos , Neoplasias Colorrectales/epidemiología , Neoplasias Colorrectales/diagnóstico , Neoplasias Colorrectales/patología , Masculino , Femenino , Enfermedades Inflamatorias del Intestino/complicaciones , Persona de Mediana Edad , Adulto , Medición de Riesgo/métodos , Anciano , Estudios de Cohortes , Canadá/epidemiologíaRESUMEN
Aim: Drug repurposing, utilizing electronic healthcare records (EHRs), offers a promising alternative by repurposing existing drugs for new therapeutic indications, especially for patients lacking effective therapies. Intestinal fibrosis, a severe complication of Crohn's disease (CD), poses significant challenges, increasing morbidity and mortality without available pharmacological treatments. This article focuses on identifying medications associated with an elevated or reduced risk of fibrosis in CD patients through a population-wide real-world data and artificial intelligence (AI) approach. Methods: Patients aged 65 or older with a diagnosis of CD from 1996 to 2019 in the Danish EHRs were followed for up to 24 years. The primary outcome was the need of specific surgical procedures, namely proctocolectomy with ileostomy and ileocecal resection as proxies of intestinal fibrosis. The study explored drugs linked to an increased or reduced risk of the study outcome through machine-learning driven survival analysis. Results: Among the 9179 CD patients, 1029 (11.2%) underwent surgery, primarily men (58.5%), with a mean age of 76 years, 10 drugs were linked to an elevated risk of surgery for proctocolectomy with ileostomy and ileocecal resection. In contrast, 10 drugs were associated with a reduced risk of undergoing surgery for these conditions. Conclusion: This study focuses on repurposing existing drugs to prevent surgery related to intestinal fibrosis in CD patients, using Danish EHRs and advanced statistical methods. The findings offer valuable insights into potential treatments for this condition, addressing a critical unmet medical need. Further research and clinical trials are warranted to validate the effectiveness of these repurposed drugs in preventing surgery related to intestinal fibrosis in CD patients.
RESUMEN
BACKGROUND AND AIMS: Pragmatic studies designed to test interventions in everyday clinical settings can successfully complement the evidence from registration and explanatory clinical trials. The European consensus project PRACTICE-IBD was developed to identify essential criteria and address key methodological issues needed to design valid comparative pragmatic studies in inflammatory bowel diseases (IBDs). METHODS: Statements were issued by a panel of 11 European experts in IBD management and trial methodology on four main topics: (I) study design; (II) eligibility, recruitment and organization, flexibility; (III) outcomes; (IV) analysis. The consensus process followed a modified Delphi approach, involving two rounds of assessment and rating of the level of agreement (1 to 9; cut-off ≥7 for approval) with the statements by 18 additional European experts in IBD. RESULTS: At the first voting round, 25 out of the 26 statements reached a mean score ≥7. Following the discussion that preceded the second round of voting, it was decided to eliminate two statements and to split one into two. At the second voting round, 25 final statements were approved: 7 for study design, 6 for eligibility, recruitment and organization, flexibility, 8 for outcomes, and 4 for analysis. CONCLUSIONS: Pragmatic randomized clinical trials can address important questions in IBD clinical practice, and may provide complementary high-level evidence, as long as they follow a methodologically rigorous approach. These 25 statements intend to offer practical guidance in the design of high-quality pragmatic clinical trials that can aid decision making in choosing a management strategy for IBDs.
RESUMEN
OBJECTIVES: The use of secondary databases has become popular for evaluating the effectiveness and safety of interventions in real-life settings. However, the absence of important confounders in these databases is challenging. To address this issue, the high-dimensional propensity score (hdPS) algorithm was developed in 2009. This algorithm uses proxy variables for mitigating confounding by combining information available across several healthcare dimensions. This study assessed the methodology and reporting of the hdPS in comparative effectiveness and safety research. STUDY DESIGN AND SETTING: In this methodological review, we searched PubMed and Google Scholar from July 2009 to May 2022 for studies that used the hdPS for evaluating the effectiveness or safety of healthcare interventions. Two reviewers independently extracted study characteristics and assessed how the hdPS was applied and reported. Risk of bias was evaluated with the Risk Of Bias In Non-randomised Studies - of Interventions (ROBINS-I) tool. RESULTS: In total, 136 studies met the inclusion criteria; the median publication year was 2018 (Q1-Q3 2016-2020). The studies included 192 datasets, mostly North American databases (n = 132, 69%). The hdPS was used in primary analysis in 120 studies (88%). Dimensions were defined in 101 studies (74%), with a median of 5 (Q1-Q3 4-6) dimensions included. A median of 500 (Q1-Q3 200-500) empirically identified covariates were selected. Regarding hdPS reporting, only 11 studies (8%) reported all recommended items. Most studies (n = 81, 60%) had a moderate overall risk of bias. CONCLUSION: There is room for improvement in the reporting of hdPS studies, especially regarding the transparency of methodological choices that underpin the construction of the hdPS.
Asunto(s)
Algoritmos , Investigación sobre la Eficacia Comparativa , Puntaje de Propensión , Humanos , Proyectos de InvestigaciónRESUMEN
BACKGROUND AND AIMS: Small bowel (SB) capsule endoscopy (CE) is a first line procedure for exploring the SB. Endoscopic GastroIntestinal PlacemenT (EGIPT) of SB CE is sometimes necessary. While the experience of EGIPT is large in pediatric populations, we aimed to describe the safety, efficacy and outcomes of EGIPT of SB CE in adult patients. METHODS: The international CApsule endoscopy REsearch (iCARE) group set up a retrospective multicenter study. Patients over 18 year-old who underwent EGIPT of SB CE before May 2022 were included. Data were collected from medical records and capsule recordings. The primary endpoint was the technical success rate of the EGIPT procedures. RESULTS: 630 patients were included (mean age 62.5 years old, 55.9% female) from 39,565 patients (1.6%) issued from 29 centers. EGIPT technical success was achieved in 610 procedures (96.8%). Anesthesia (moderate/deep sedation or general anesthesia) and centers with intermediate or high procedure loads were independent factors of technical success. Severe adverse events occurred in three (0.5%) patients. When technically successful, EGIPT was associated with a high SB CE completion rate (84.4%) and with a substantial diagnostic yield (61.1%). Completion rate was significantly higher when the capsule was delivered in the SB compared to when delivered in the stomach. CONCLUSION: EGIPT of SB CE is highly feasible, safe and comes with high completion rate and diagnostic yield. When indicated, it should rather be performed under anesthesia and the capsule should be delivered in the duodenum rather than in the stomach, for better SB examination outcomes.
RESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Although ulcerative proctitis [UP] can dramatically impair quality of life, treatment efficacy has been poorly investigated in UP as it was historically excluded from phase 2/3 randomised controlled trials in ulcerative colitis. Our aim was to assess the effectiveness and safety of tofacitinib for the treatment of UP. METHODS: We conducted a retrospective, multicentre study in 17 GETAID centres, including consecutive patients with UP treated with tofacitinib. The primary endpoint was steroid-free remission between Week 8 and Week 14, defined as a partial Mayo score of 2 [and no individual subscore above 1]. Secondary outcomes included clinical response and steroid-free remission after induction and at 1 year. RESULTS: All the 35 enrolled patients previously received anti-tumour necrosis factor [TNF] therapy and 88.6% were exposed to at least two lines of biologics. At baseline, the median partial Mayo score was 7 (intequartile range [IQR] [5.5-7]). After induction [W8-W14], 42.9% and 60.0% of patients achieved steroid-free remission and clinical response, respectively. At 1 year, the steroid-free clinical remission and clinical response rates were 39.4% and 45.5%, respectively, and 51.2% [17/33] were still receiving tofacitinib treatment. Survival without tofacitinib withdrawal was estimated at 50.4% (95% confidence interval [CI] [35.5-71.6]) at 1 year. Only a lower partial Mayo at baseline was independently associated with remission at induction (0dds ratio [OR]â =â 0.56 for an increase of 1, (95% CI [0.33-0.95], pâ =â 0.03). Five [14.3%] adverse events were reported, with one leading to treatment withdrawal [septic shock secondary to cholecystitis]. CONCLUSION: Tofacitinib may offer a therapeutic option for patients with refractory UP.
Asunto(s)
Piperidinas , Proctitis , Pirimidinas , Inhibidores del Factor de Necrosis Tumoral , Humanos , Inhibidores del Factor de Necrosis Tumoral/uso terapéutico , Estudios Retrospectivos , Calidad de Vida , Proctitis/tratamiento farmacológicoRESUMEN
BACKGROUND & AIMS: Tumor necrosis factor inhibitors (anti-TNF) are effective therapies for several immune-mediated inflammatory diseases (IMIDs). However, case reports have identified the paradoxical occurrence of IMIDs in patients treated with anti-TNF. We studied the risk of rheumatoid arthritis, psoriasis, and hidradenitis suppurativa after the initiation of anti-TNF therapy for inflammatory bowel disease (IBD). METHODS: We conducted 2 nationwide cohort studies comprising all patients with IBD in Denmark (2005-2018) and France (2008-2018). We obtained individual-level information on exposure to anti-TNF, diagnoses of IMIDs including rheumatoid arthritis, psoriasis, and hidradenitis suppurativa, and potential confounders from healthcare registers in the respective countries. We used Cox models to estimate hazard ratios (HRs) for the association between anti-TNF exposure and IMIDs and then pooled the estimates from the 2 cohorts. To test the robustness of our results, we performed an active comparator analysis of anti-TNF monotherapy vs azathioprine monotherapy. RESULTS: The Danish and French cohorts comprised 18,258 and 88,786 subjects with IBD, respectively, contributing a total of 516,055 person-years of follow-up. Anti-TNF was associated with an increased risk of rheumatoid arthritis, psoriasis, and hidradenitis suppurativa in both the Danish (HR, 1.66; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.34-2.07) and the French cohort (HR, 1.78; 95% CI, 1.63-1.94), with a pooled HR of 1.76 (95% CI, 1.63-1.91). Anti-TNF was also associated with an increased risk of the outcomes when compared with azathioprine (pooled HR, 2.94; 95% CI, 2.33-3.70). CONCLUSIONS: In 2 nationwide cohorts of IBD patients, anti-TNF therapy was associated with an increased risk of rheumatoid arthritis, psoriasis, and hidradenitis suppurativa.
Asunto(s)
Artritis Reumatoide , Hidradenitis Supurativa , Enfermedades Inflamatorias del Intestino , Psoriasis , Humanos , Inhibidores del Factor de Necrosis Tumoral/efectos adversos , Azatioprina/efectos adversos , Hidradenitis Supurativa/tratamiento farmacológico , Hidradenitis Supurativa/inducido químicamente , Factor de Necrosis Tumoral alfa , Enfermedades Inflamatorias del Intestino/epidemiología , Artritis Reumatoide/tratamiento farmacológico , Psoriasis/tratamiento farmacológico , Psoriasis/epidemiología , Agentes InmunomoduladoresRESUMEN
AIM: Patients with Crohn's disease (CD) are at higher risk of small bowel adenocarcinoma (SBA). We aimed to identify radiological predictors of SBA in CD. METHODS: We conducted a retrospective case-control study at two tertiary inflammatory bowel disease centers and identified CD patients diagnosed with SBA between 2003 and 2019. Patients were matched with up to four controls. Pre-operative imaging (magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) or computed tomography (CT)) were reviewed by three gastrointestinal radiologists. RESULTS: Nineteen patients with CD-associated SBA with a mean age of 54.9 and 32 matched controls were included. Mean length of small bowel involvement was 216 (± 188) mm in the SBA group versus 156 (± 167) mm in the control group (p = 0.76). Only 11.8 % of cases had a diagnosis of SBA made preoperatively. In univariate analysis, focal loss of mural stratification (odds ratio [OR], 11; 95%CI, 2.43-49.5, p = 0.002), and wall thickening (OR, 1.32; 95%CI, 1.05-1.66, p = 0.02) were significantly associated with SBA. After adjustment, focal loss of mural stratification was the only independent risk factor (OR, 11; 95 % CI, 2.43-49.5, p = 0.002). CONCLUSIONS: Focal loss of mural stratification was identified as a predictor of CD-associated SBA, which should be described in imaging reports and further validated.
Asunto(s)
Adenocarcinoma , Enfermedad de Crohn , Neoplasias Duodenales , Neoplasias del Íleon , Humanos , Enfermedad de Crohn/complicaciones , Enfermedad de Crohn/diagnóstico por imagen , Estudios Retrospectivos , Estudios de Casos y Controles , Intestino Delgado/diagnóstico por imagen , Intestino Delgado/patología , Neoplasias del Íleon/diagnóstico por imagen , Neoplasias del Íleon/etiología , Neoplasias del Íleon/patología , Neoplasias Duodenales/patología , Imagen por Resonancia Magnética , Adenocarcinoma/patologíaRESUMEN
Acute severe ulcerative colitis (ASUC) occurs in up to 25% of patients with ulcerative colitis (UC). Therapeutic approaches have evolved during the past years with the increasing bio exposure of admitted patients and the extension of the number of approved drugs for UC. In this review, we aimed to summarize the latest evidence in short-term and long-term medical strategies for ASUC. In addition to general principles such as venous thromboembolism prophylaxis, screening for triggering and worsening factors and close monitoring, first-line therapy for ASUC remains intravenous corticosteroids. In naive patients, the optimum maintenance strategy for steroid-responding patients does not necessarily include biologics. Second-line therapy includes infliximab or calcineurin inhibitors (CNIs) with similar short- and long-term colectomy rates. Despite its pathophysiological relevance, there is insufficient evidence to promote intensified induction with infliximab. Prior treatment exposure is a cornerstone for guiding therapeutic choice of short- and long-term therapies in the context of ASUC: in anti-TNF exposed patients, CNIs may be favored as a bridge therapy to vedolizumab or ustekinumab. Third-line salvage therapy could be a therapeutic option in selected patients referred to expert centers. Additionally, evidence is accumulating regarding the use of tofacitinib in ASUC.
Asunto(s)
Colitis Ulcerosa , Humanos , Colitis Ulcerosa/diagnóstico , Colitis Ulcerosa/tratamiento farmacológico , Infliximab/uso terapéutico , Inhibidores del Factor de Necrosis Tumoral/uso terapéutico , Resultado del Tratamiento , Esteroides/uso terapéuticoRESUMEN
BACKGROUND AND AIMS: While post-inflammatory polyps (PIPs) have historically been a risk factor for colorectal neoplasia (CRN), histologic activity may explain this association. We aimed to assess the impact of histologic activity on CRN occurrence in IBD patients with colonic PIPs. METHODS: Patients with PIPs on surveillance colonoscopy at Saint-Antoine hospital between 1 January 1996 and 31 December 2020 were included and subsequent colonoscopies were assessed. Histologic IBD activity was assessed by the Nancy histologic index. Survival and Cox regression analysis were performed to assess the strength of the association of PIPs and other patient variables with progression to CRN. RESULTS: A total of 173 patients with at least two surveillance colonoscopies with PIPs at index colonoscopy were compared to a similar group of 252 patients without PIPs. In survival analysis, the presence or PIPs at index colonoscopy did not impact the risk of CRN in patients with histological inflammation (p = 0.83) and in patients without histological inflammation (p = 0.98). The risk of CRN was associated with increasing Nancy index score of 3 or 4 (HR: 4.16; 95% CI 1.50-11.52 and HR: 3.44; 95% CI 1.63-7.24), age (HR per 10-year increase: 1.37; 95% CI 1.13-1.66) and first-degree family history of colorectal cancer (HR: 5.87; v 1.31-26.26), but not PIPs (HR: 1.17; 95% CI 0.63-2.17). CONCLUSIONS: After controlling for histologic activity, PIPs do not increase the risk of CRN in IBD patients. Histologic activity rather than PIPs should be considered in the risk assessment of CRN.
Asunto(s)
Colitis Ulcerosa , Pólipos del Colon , Neoplasias Colorrectales , Enfermedades Inflamatorias del Intestino , Humanos , Neoplasias Colorrectales/etiología , Neoplasias Colorrectales/epidemiología , Enfermedades Inflamatorias del Intestino/complicaciones , Colitis Ulcerosa/epidemiología , Pólipos del Colon/diagnóstico , Pólipos del Colon/complicaciones , Pólipos del Colon/epidemiología , Factores de Riesgo , Colonoscopía , Inflamación/complicacionesAsunto(s)
Enfermedad de Crohn , Enfermedades Inflamatorias del Intestino , Neoplasias , Humanos , Enfermedades Inflamatorias del Intestino/complicaciones , Enfermedades Inflamatorias del Intestino/diagnóstico , Enfermedades Inflamatorias del Intestino/terapia , Neoplasias/diagnóstico , Neoplasias/terapiaRESUMEN
BACKGROUND & AIMS: Patients with inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) are at increased risk of acute arterial events. Treatment with anti-tumor necrosis factor (anti-TNF) agents has been associated with a protective effect against the first occurrence of acute arterial events, but the impact of treatment with anti-TNF in patients with a previous history of acute arterial events remains unclear. We assessed the effect of anti-TNF and thiopurines on the risk of recurrent acute arterial events in patients with IBD in a nationwide cohort. METHODS: Based on the French nationwide health insurance database, patients with IBD and a previous history of an acute arterial event were followed up from January 1, 2009, until December 31, 2018. The risk of acute arterial event recurrence associated with anti-TNF and thiopurine exposure was assessed using marginal structural Cox proportional hazard models adjusted for baseline and time-varying covariates. RESULTS: A total of 27,185 patients were included. During 121,822 person-years (median follow-up period, 4.0 y), 6865 recurrent acute arterial events occurred (incidence rate per 1000 person-years, 56.4; 95% CI, 55.0-57.7). Exposure to both anti-TNF and thiopurines were associated with a decreased risk of recurrent acute arterial events compared with the absence of exposure to either treatment (hazard ratio, 0.75; 95% CI, 0.63-0.90 and hazard ratio, 0.76; 95% CI, 0.66-0.88, respectively). CONCLUSIONS: In a nationwide cohort study of patients with IBD and a previous history of an acute arterial event, exposure to both anti-TNF and thiopurines were associated with a decreased risk of recurrent acute arterial events.
Asunto(s)
Inmunosupresores , Enfermedades Inflamatorias del Intestino , Humanos , Inmunosupresores/efectos adversos , Estudios de Cohortes , Inhibidores del Factor de Necrosis Tumoral , Enfermedades Inflamatorias del Intestino/complicaciones , Factor de Necrosis Tumoral alfa , NecrosisRESUMEN
BACKGROUND AND AIMS: There is a need to evaluate the benefit-risk ratio of current therapies in inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) patients to provide the best quality of care. The primary objective of I-CARE (IBD Cancer and serious infections in Europe) was to assess prospectively safety concerns in IBD, with specific focus on the risk of cancer/lymphoma and serious infections in patients treated with anti-tumor necrosis factor and other biologic monotherapy as well as in combination with immunomodulators. METHODS: I-CARE was designed as a European prospective longitudinal observational multicenter cohort study to include patients with a diagnosis of Crohn's disease, ulcerative colitis, or IBD unclassified established at least 3 months prior to enrollment. RESULTS: A total of 10,206 patients were enrolled between March 2016 and April 2019, including 6169 (60.4%) patients with Crohn's disease, 3853 (37.8%) with ulcerative colitis, and 184 (1.8%) with a diagnosis of IBD unclassified. Thirty-two percent of patients were receiving azathioprine/thiopurines, 4.6% 6-mercaptopurine, and 3.2% methotrexate at study entry. At inclusion, 47.3% of patients were treated with an anti-tumor necrosis factor agent, 8.8% with vedolizumab, and 3.4% with ustekinumab. Roughly one-quarter of patients (26.8%) underwent prior IBD-related surgery. Sixty-six percent of patients had been previously treated with systemic steroids. Three percent of patients had a medical history of cancer prior to inclusion and 1.1% had a history of colonic, esophageal, or uterine cervix high-grade dysplasia. CONCLUSIONS: I-CARE is an ongoing investigator-initiated observational European prospective cohort study that will provide unique information on the long-term benefits and risks of biological therapies in IBD patients. (EudraCT, Number: 2014-004728-23; ClinicalTrials.gov, Number: NCT02377258).