Clinical usefulness of a new infrared videoendoscope system for diagnosis of early stage gastric cancer.

BACKGROUND: Infrared light can penetrate tissue more deeply than visible light. Therefore, an infrared video endoscope may be useful for assessment of gastric submucosal vessels. However, the resolution of currently available infrared video endoscope systems has been unsatisfactory. A new infrared video endoscope system was developed and its clinical utility assessed for diagnosis of early stage gastric cancer. METHODS: Twenty-five patients with early stage gastric cancer and 8 with gastric adenoma underwent endoscopy with the infrared video endoscope system after intravenous injection of indocyanine green. RESULT: Indocyanine green pooling did not appear in adenomas and some intramucosal gastric cancers, whereas it was noted in all submucosally invasive gastric cancers. Tumors not exhibiting indocyanine green pooling were intramucosal, well-differentiated adenocarcinomas of low height (flat-type cancers). CONCLUSION: These results suggest that our new infrared video endoscope provides valuable information about the submucosal aspect of early stage gastric cancer. Infrared video endoscopy may become a powerful technique for determining whether to perform endoscopic mucosal resection.

Newly designed soft prelooped cap for endoscopic mucosal resection of gastric lesions.

BACKGROUND: Endoscopic mucosal resection with a cap-fitted panendoscope is a useful, effective, and safe technique. The effectiveness and safety of a newly designed larger but softer cap was compared in this study with the conventional hard cap. The soft cap has a significantly larger diameter (18 mm) compared with that of the hard cap (16.5 mm). METHODS: Eighty-three patients who underwent mucosal resection of gastric lesions were included in analysis. The diameter, resection specimen depth, and the rate of en bloc resection were compared. The operability of the endoscope with the cap attached, patient tolerance, and safety of the procedure were analyzed. RESULTS: Mean diameter (+/- SEM) of specimens resected with the soft cap was larger: 22.1 (+/- 0.7) versus 15.8 (+/- 0.3) mm (p < 0.001). The specimen was also thicker: 1.54 (+/- 0.10) versus 1.08 (+/- 0.11) mm (p < 0.001). Use of the soft cap led to higher rate of en bloc resection: 66.7% versus 43.2% (p < 0.05). The operability of the endoscope with the larger, softer cap attached was similar to that when the hard cap was used. Both caps were equally safe. CONCLUSION: The soft cap is safe and useful for mucosal resection of larger gastric lesions. Its use increases the rate of en bloc resection.