Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 4 de 4
Filtrar
Más filtros










Base de datos
Intervalo de año de publicación
1.
Int J Spine Surg ; 13(4): 378-385, 2019 Aug.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31531288

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: To evaluate charges, expenses, reimbursement, and hospital margins with noninstrumented posterolateral fusion in situ (PLF), posterolateral fusion with pedicle screws (PPS), and PPS with interbody device (PLIF) in degenerative spondylolisthesis with spinal stenosis. METHODS: A retrospective chart review was performed from 2010 to 2014 based on ICD-9 diagnoses of degenerative spondylolisthesis with spinal stenosis in patients undergoing single-level fusions. All charges, expenses, reimbursement, and margins were obtained through financial auditing. A multivariate linear regression model was used to compare demographics, charges, etc. A 1-way analysis of variance with Tukey post hoc analysis was used to analyze reimbursements and margins based upon insurances. RESULTS: Two hundred thirty-three patients met inclusion criteria. The overall charges and expenses for PLF were significantly less compared to both types of instrumented fusions (P < .0001). Medicare and private insurance were the most common insurance types; Medicare and private insurance mean reimbursements for PLF were $36,903 and $47,086, respectively; for PPS, $37,450 and $53,851, and for PLIF $40,171 and $51,640. Hospital margins for PPS and PLIF in Medicaid patients were negative (-$3,702 and -$6,456). Hospital margins were largest for both worker's compensation and private insurance patients in all fusion groups. Hospital margins with Medicare for PLF, PPS, and PLIF were $24,347, $19,205, and $23,046, respectively. Hospital margins for private insurance for PLF, PPS, and PLIF were $37,569, $36,834, and $33,134, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: As more instrumentation is used, the more it costs both the hospital and the insurance companies; hospital margins did not increase correspondingly. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: Improved understanding of related costs and margins associated with lumbar fusions to help transition to more cost effective spine centers.

2.
Arthroplast Today ; 4(2): 139-142, 2018 Jun.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29896541

RESUMEN

Total knee arthroplasty (TKA) is a common treatment option for end-stage osteoarthritis of the tibiofemoral and patellafemoral joints. Diagnosis and treatment of the painful TKA can pose a significant challenge. In this report, we present the unusual case of a patient 12 years after total knee replacement presenting with isolated proximal tibial-fibular osteoarthritis as a cause of lateral knee pain. Proximal tibiofibular osteoarthritis is not typically on the differential diagnosis for a painful TKA but can be a rare cause of lateral knee pain. Proximal tibiofibular fusion may provide relief of pain and restoration of function.

3.
J Arthroplasty ; 33(7): 2240-2245, 2018 07.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29572037

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Irrigation and debridement with modular component exchange (IDMCE) can treat prosthetic joint infection (PJI) after total knee arthroplasty (TKA). Compared to 2-stage revision, IDMCE is associated with lower morbidity but may carry higher infection recurrence rates. We aimed to identify prognostic factors associated with successful IDMCE in patients with PJI. METHODS: We identified 99 consecutive patients who underwent IDMCE following TKA PJI at a tertiary academic medical center from November 2009 through January 2016. Examined variables included age, gender, symptom duration, body mass index, Charlson comorbidity index, total protein, albumin, hemoglobin A1c, erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR), C-reactive protein, white blood cell count, gram stain results, final cultures, and use of long-term antibiotic suppression. Success was defined as no further operation on the ipsilateral knee. We used t tests and chi-square analyses to determine whether each preoperative factor was associated with IDMCE reoperation. RESULTS: At mean follow-up of 2.6 years, 64 patients who underwent IDMCE were defined as successful. Thirty-five patients required one or more additional procedures for recurrent infection; of these, 20 patients underwent 2-stage revision. Patients with symptom duration of less than 2 days avoided additional surgery in 88% of cases. Elevated ESR >47 mm/h was the only variable associated with reoperation (P = .005). There were no associations among the other examined variables. CONCLUSION: Using IDMCE for PJI after TKA required reoperation in 35% of cases. Elevated preoperative ESR laboratory values and duration of symptoms >2 days were associated with reoperation.


Asunto(s)
Artritis Infecciosa/cirugía , Artroplastia de Reemplazo de Rodilla/efectos adversos , Prótesis de la Rodilla/efectos adversos , Infecciones Relacionadas con Prótesis/cirugía , Reoperación/estadística & datos numéricos , Adulto , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Antibacterianos/uso terapéutico , Artritis Infecciosa/tratamiento farmacológico , Artritis Infecciosa/etiología , Sedimentación Sanguínea , Proteína C-Reactiva , Desbridamiento , Femenino , Humanos , Articulación de la Rodilla/cirugía , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Pronóstico , Infecciones Relacionadas con Prótesis/tratamiento farmacológico , Infecciones Relacionadas con Prótesis/etiología , Reoperación/efectos adversos , Resultado del Tratamiento
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA
...