Association of Relative Skeletal Immaturity of the Triradiate Cartilage with Increased Proximal Femoral Deformity in Prophylactic Fixation for Slipped Capital Femoral Epiphysis: A Radiographic Study.

INTRODUCTION: The purpose of this study was to describe proximal femoral deformity after contralateral hip prophylactic fixation of slipped capital femoral epiphysis (SCFE) in patients and the association of relative skeletal immaturity with this deformity. METHODS: A retrospective review of patients presenting with a SCFE was conducted from 2009 to 2015. Inclusion criteria were (1) radiographic evidence of a unilateral SCFE treated with in situ fixation, (2) contralateral prophylactic fixation of an unslipped hip, and (3) at least 3 years of follow-up. Measurements were made on radiographs and included greater trochanter height relative to the center of the femoral head, femoral head-neck offset, and femoral neck length. Skeletal maturity was evaluated by assessing the status of the proximal femoral physis and triradiate cartilage (TRC) of the hip, in addition to the length of time to closure of these physes. Values were compared from initial presentation to final follow-up. Statistical analysis included descriptive statistics and linear regression. RESULTS: Twenty-seven patients were included. Bivariable linear regression demonstrated that an increased relative trochanteric overgrowth was associated with TRC width (ß = 3.048, R = 0.585, P = 0.001) and an open TRC (ß = -11.400, R = 0.227, P = 0.012). Time to proximal femoral physis closure (ß = 1.963, R = 0.444, P = 0.020) and TRC closure (ß = 1.983, R = 0.486, P = 0.010) were predictive of increased deformity. In addition, multivariable elimination linear regression demonstrated that TRC width (ß = 3.048, R = 0.585, P = 0.001) was predictive of an increased relative trochanteric overgrowth. DISCUSSION: Patients with an open TRC and increased TRC width are associated with increased relative trochanteric overgrowth when undergoing prophylactic fixation for a unilateral SCFE. Increased caution should be exercised when considering contralateral hip prophylactic fixation in skeletally immature patients presenting with a unilateral SCFE. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level IV, case series.

Hardware Impingement Is Associated With Shorter Screw Length in Patients Treated With In Situ Screw Fixation for Slipped Capital Femoral Epiphysis: An In Vivo Arthroscopic Evaluation.

Purpose: To determine the incidence of screw impingement on dynamic exam during hip arthroscopy in patients undergoing treatment for femoroacetabular impingement after previous slipped capital femoral epiphysis fixation and to evaluate screw characteristics with hardware impingement. Methods: A retrospective review from 2008 to 2020 was performed of slipped capital femoral epiphysis (SCFE) patients that underwent arthroscopy for symptoms of hip impingement. Patients underwent a dynamic exam under direct arthroscopic visualization to assess for sources of impingement, including bony anatomy and fixation hardware. Slip angle was calculated on lateral radiographs prior to arthroscopy, and screw length was noted in the initial operative reports at treatment of SCFE and reported in millimeters. Normality of data was assessed using Shapiro-Wilk tests, with statistical analysis performed using independent sample t-tests, Mann-Whitney U-nonparametric tests, and multivariable logistic regression. An alpha level of <0.05 was used to indicate statistical significance. Results: Thirty-nine hips were included, with 13 (33.3%) having screw impingement on dynamic exam. Slip angle was found to be increased in the screw impingement group (42.4° vs 35.5°; P = .11). Screw length was noted to be significantly shorter in the screw impingement group (53.1 vs 61.6 mm; P = .021). The presence of screw impingement was found to be associated with shorter screw length (ß = -0.172, R 2 = 0.329; P = .036). Conclusions: Shorter screws (55 mm or less) are at greater risk of causing hardware hip impingement after in situ SCFE fixation. When considering hip arthroscopy for the treatment of femoroacetabular impingement in patients with a previous SCFE, hardware impingement and subsequent hardware removal should be considered in hips with shorter screws and in hips that show objective hardware impingement on dynamic exam. Level of Evidence: Level IV, therapeutic case series.

The location of the medial humeral epicondyle in children: position based on common radiographic landmarks.

BACKGROUND: Medial humeral epicondyle fracture displacement in children is difficult to quantify, as current methods suffer from significant intraobserver and interobserver variability. The aim of this study was to create a systematic approach to determine medial epicondyle fracture displacement based upon easily identifiable radiographic landmarks of the elbow. METHODS: In this anatomic descriptive study, we evaluated 171 anteroposterior (AP) and lateral radiographs from children (4 to 15 years old) with a normal distal humerus. On the AP radiograph, the center of the medial epicondyle was compared with a line based upon the inferior olecranon fossa. On the lateral radiograph, the center of the medial epicondyle was compared with the posterior humeral line. RESULTS: On the AP radiograph, the average location of the center of the medial epicondyle was 0.5 mm inferior to the olecranon line (SD, 2.0 mm). On the lateral radiograph, the average location of the center of the medial epicondyle was 1.2 mm anterior to the posterior humeral line (SD, 1.2 mm). CONCLUSIONS: Our findings demonstrated a consistent radiographic position of the medial humeral epicondyle with little variation throughout skeletal maturation. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: This study may be helpful in assessing fracture displacement in pediatric medial epicondyle fractures.

Lower Extremity Assessment Project (LEAP)--the best available evidence on limb-threatening lower extremity trauma.

Lower Extremity Assessment Project (LEAP) study set out to answer many of the questions surrounding the decision of whether to amputate or salvage limbs in the setting of severe lower extremity trauma. A National Institutes of Health-funded, multicenter, prospective observational study, the LEAP study represented a milestone in orthopedic trauma research, and perhaps in orthopedics. The LEAP study attempted to define the characteristics of the individuals who sustained these injuries, the characteristics of their environment, the variables of the physical aspects of their injury, the secondary medical and mental conditions that arose from their injury and treatment, their ultimate functional status, and their general health. In the realm of evidence-based medicine, the LEAP studies provided a wealth of data, but still failed to completely determine treatment at the onset of severe lower extremity trauma.

Guided growth for pathological physes: radiographic improvement during realignment.

BACKGROUND: Children with rickets are prone to having deformities of the lower extremities that are bilateral and often symmetrical. Although initially attributed to pathological or "sick" physes, the deformities are eventually seen in the metaphyses and diaphyses of the long bones; if left untreated, they may result in bone pain and stress fractures. The orthopaedists' role in managing these children is to correct and maintain alignment. Alternatively, we have exploited the use of hemiepiphysiodesis or guided growth, using staples or, more recently, the 8-plate (Orthofix, Verona, Italy). While gradually normalizing the mechanical axis, we have noted improvement in the appearance and width of all of the ipsilateral physes, not only at the knee but at the hip and ankle as well. This report summarizes our observations of the effects on the pathological physes in a group of patients with rickets who were preferentially treated with guided growth, often starting at a young age. METHOD: This retrospective review approved by an institutional review board included 14 children with rickets, including 10 treated with staples and 4 with 8-plates, who collectively underwent a total of 68 hemiepiphysiodeses (guided growth) and 35 osteotomies. Each was under appropriate medical management during the entire course of treatment, before and after surgery. We measured the mechanical axis deviation and anatomic angles of the femur and proximal tibia, noting the width and appearance of their physes at the hips, knees, and ankles preoperatively and upon correction of the axis. RESULTS: Of the 10 stapled patients, we noted 24 (45%) of 53 migrations and 41% rebound deformity. Four patients with 15 deformities that corrected with 8-plates experienced no hardware migration; for them, it is too early to comment on rebound deformity. While gradually correcting the mechanical axis, we have noted improvement in the appearance and width, not only of the pan-genu physes but also of remote physes at the hip and ankle. We suspect that the improved quality of the physes reflects not only the normalization of the mechanical axis but also the corresponding resolution of the waddling (varus) or circumduction (valgus) gait pattern. CONCLUSION: We recommend early intervention, via guided growth, to restore and preserve a neutral axis so that the child can enjoy a normal lifestyle while maximizing the growth potential of his or her physes, not only of the knees but the hips and ankles as well. We believe that by correcting and maintaining alignment, secondary bony deformities may be ameliorated and osteotomies for angular correction deferred if not avoided altogether. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: IV (retrospective clinical series).