Brain concentrations of mGluR5 negative allosteric modulator MTEP in relation to receptor occupancy--Comparison to MPEP.

BACKGROUND: To verify relation between brain free levels, receptor occupancy in vivo and in vitro affinity at the target for mGluR5 negative allosteric modulator (NAM) MTEP. METHODS: We evaluated plasma and brain extra-cellular fluid (ECF) concentration of MTEP at behaviourally active dose (5mg/kg) using in vivo microdialysis. These values were compared it to the affinity in vitro (receptor binding and FLIPR) and to receptor occupancy in vivo. Another, related substance, MPEP was used for comparison. RESULTS: MTEP and MPEP respectively inhibited mGluR5 receptors function in vitro with an affinity of 25.4 and 12.3 nM respectively. Accordingly peak ECF (extracellular fluid) levels were 1.3 and 0.14 µM, and peak total plasma levels were 7-11 and 2.6 µM. The ED50 for in vivo receptor occupancy was for both agents in the range of 0.8-0.7 mg/kg. CONCLUSIONS: At behaviourally active dose MTEP produced complete mGluR5 receptor occupancy but over 50 times higher ECF concentrations than affinity for mGluR5 receptor in vitro. This difference is seems lower for other mGluR5 NAM compounds such as MPEP. A possibly explanation could be different distribution in body compartments of both agents leading to errors of estimation with the microdialysis technique or different pharmacological activity at the receptor.

Scaffold hopping approach towards various AFQ-056 analogs as potent metabotropic glutamate receptor 5 negative allosteric modulators.

The metabotropic glutamate receptor subtype 5 has evolved into a promising target for the treatment of various diseases of the central nervous system, such as Fragile X and L-DOPA induced dyskinesia. One of the most advanced clinical compound is Novartis' AFQ-056 (Mavoglurant), which served us as a template for a scaffold hopping approach, generating a structurally diverse set of potent analogs. Both the limited aqueous solubility and the relatively poor metabolic stability of AFQ-056 were improved with hexahydrocyclopenta[c]pyrrole derivative 54a, which proved to be a valuable candidate for further development.

Comparison of the mGlu(5) receptor positive allosteric modulator ADX47273 and the mGlu(2/3) receptor agonist LY354740 in tests for antipsychotic-like activity.

Recently, it has been proposed that activation of either metabotropic glutamate receptors e.g. mGlu(5) by positive allosteric modulators or stimulation of mGluR(2/3) receptors by agonists may offer new strategy in schizophrenia treatment. The aim of the present study was to compare the effect of mGlu(5) receptor positive allosteric modulator, ADX47273 (S-(4-Fluoro-phenyl)-{3-[3-(4-fluoro-phenyl)-[1,2,4]oxadiazol-5-yl]-piperidin-1-yl}-methanone), mGluR(2/3) agonist, LY354740 ((1S,2S,5R,6S)-2-aminobicyclo[3.1.0]hexane-2,6-dicarboxylate monohydrate) and selected neuroleptics in animal models for positive schizophrenia symptoms. ADX47273 (3 and 10mg/kgi.p.), the typical antipsychotic haloperidol (0.1 and 0.2mg/kgi.p.), the atypical antipsychotics aripiprazole (1.25-5mg/kgi.p.) and olanzapine (2.5 and 5mg/kgi.p.) all reduced amphetamine-induced hyperlocomotion in Sprague-Dawley rats, unlike the mGlu(2/3) receptor agonist LY354740 (1-10mg/kgi.p.). Interestingly, haloperidol (0.1 and 0.2mg/kgi.p.), aripiprazole (1.25-5mg/kgi.p.) and olanzapine (1.25-5mg/kgi.p.), but not ADX47273 (1-10mg/kgi.p.), all reduced spontaneous locomotion and rearings at doses effective against amphetamine-induced hyperlocomotion. This indicates that the effect of ADX47273 in combination with amphetamine may be specific, and also suggests a lack of sedative side effects. Moreover, ADX47273 (30mg/kgi.p.), haloperidol (0.1 and 0.2mg/kgi.p.) and aripiprazole (5 and 10mg/kgi.p.) reversed apomorphine (0.5mg/kgs.c.)-induced deficits of prepulse inhibition, whereas neither LY354740 (1-10mg/kgi.p.) nor olanzapine (1.25-5mg/kgi.p.) produced this effect. Lack of effect of olanzapine was unexpected and at present no convincing explanation can be provided. In conclusion, in selected rodent models for positive schizophrenia symptoms, ADX47273 showed better efficacy than LY354740.

Assessment of drug-drug interaction for silymarin.

Silymarin was assessed for drug-drug interaction by permeability studies with Caco-2 cells, for cytochrome P450 induction with human primary hepatocytes and for cytochrome P450 inhibition with human liver microsomes. Studies with Caco-2 cells revealed no interference of silymarin with the permeability of nifedipine. Silymarin did not induce cytochromes P450 2C9 and 3A4 at concentrations of 0.1; 1; and 100 microM, measured as silibinin. The inhibitory effect was tested on the nine major cytochromes P450 1A2, 2A6, 2B6, 2C8, 2C9, 2C19, 2D6, 2E1, and 3A4 at concentrations of 1 and 100 microM silymarin. At 1 microM concentration no or negligible inhibition of cytochromes P450 1A2, 2A6, 2B6, 2C8, 2C9, and 2E1, minor inhibition of 3A4 (<20%), and moderate inhibition of 2C19 and 2D6 (<40%) were observed. Inhibition constant Ki of silymarin was determined for cytochromes P450 3A4 with 12 microM, 2C19 with 2 microM, and 2D6 with 12 microM. Only at the high concentration of 100 microM silymarin, inhibition at >50% of the cytochromes P450 2B6, 2C8, 2C9, 2C19, 2D6, and 3A4 was observed, and no or moderate inhibition was for the cytochromes P450 1A2, 2A6, and 2E1. However, in view of the clinically relevant plasma concentration of approx. 0.2 microM measured as silibinin, it is evident that there is no drug-drug interaction problem with silymarin.

Characterization of the species-specificity of peroxisome proliferators in rat and human hepatocytes.

Peroxisome proliferation is a well-defined pleiotropic effect that is mediated by the ligand inducible transcription factor peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor (PPAR) alpha. Because marked peroxisome proliferation occurs in rodents but not in humans, we aimed to elucidate the molecular and cellular determinants of this species-specificity in hepatocytes. Analysis of peroxisomal marker enzyme activities confirmed that peroxisome proliferators induced acyl-CoA oxidase (ACOX) and to a lesser extent catalase in rat hepatocytes, but not in human hepatoma HepG2 cells. Transient transfection assays revealed that ciprofibrate and Wy 14,643 induced rat but not human PPARalpha-mediated reporter gene activity in rat FAO and primary hepatocytes on rat but not on human PPARalpha response elements (PPREs). In contrast, in human HepG2 and primary human hepatocytes, peroxisome proliferators did not induce either human or rat PPARalpha activity regardless of rat or human PPRE sequences. In addition, no induction of ACOX gene expression was observed in human hepatocytes independent of the expression level of human PPARalpha. Remarkably, no distinct peroxisome proliferation related responses were observed in human hepatocytes when rat PPARalpha was transfected, although human hepatocytes were responsive to PPARalpha-mediated induction of carnitine palmitoyl transferase-1A and 3-hydroxy-3-methylglutaryl-CoA synthase. These results confirmed that PPARalpha and PPREs are important determinants for the species-specificity of peroxisome proliferation. Nevertheless, our results showed that human hepatocytes limit the extent of peroxisome proliferation regardless of PPARalpha expression.