(1) Background: Three-dimensional (3D) volumetric assessment is receiving increased recognition in breast surgery. It is commonly used for preoperative planning and postoperative control with the patient standing in an upright position. Recently, intraoperative use was evaluated with patients in the supine position. The aim of this prospective study was to evaluate the volumetric changes in 3D surface imaging depending on the patient's position. (2) Methods: 3D volumetric analysis was performed using a Vectra-H2 device with patients in standing, sitting, and supine positions. A total of 100 complete datasets of female breasts were included in the study. The measured volumes of each evaluated breast (n = 200) were compared between the three positions. (3) Results: The mean difference between the 3D volumetric assessments of the sitting and standing positions per breast was 7.15 cc and, thus, statistically insignificant (p = 0.28). However, the difference between supine and standing positions, at 120.31 cc, was significant (p < 0.01). (4) Conclusions: The 3D volumetric assessment of breasts in the supine position did not statistically correlate with the validated assessment of breast volume in the standing position while breast volume in the sitting position is reliable and correlates with the assessment of a standing patient. We conclude that intraoperative volumetric assessment should be performed with patients in an upright sitting position.
Methods for assessing three-dimensional (3D) breast volume are becoming increasingly popular in breast surgery. However, the precision of intraoperative volumetric assessment is still unclear. Until now, only non-validated scanning systems have been used for intraoperative volumetric analyses. This study aimed to assess the feasibility, handling, and accuracy of a commercially available, validated, and portable device for intraoperative 3D volumetric evaluation. All patients who underwent breast surgery from 2020 to 2022 were identified from our institutional database. Intraoperative 3D volumetric assessments of 103 patients were included in this study. Standardized 3D volumetric measurements were obtained 3 months postoperatively to compare the intraoperatively generated volumetric assessment. All of the study participants were women with a mean age of 48.3 ± 14.7 years (range: 20-89). The mean time for intraoperative volumetric assessment was 8.7 ± 2.6 min. The postoperative 3D volumetric assessment, with a mean volume of 507.11 ± 206.29 cc, showed no significant difference from the intraoperative volumetric measurements of 504.24 ± 276.61 cc (p = 0.68). The mean absolute volume difference between the intraoperative simulations and postoperative results was 27.1 cc. Intraoperative 3D volumetric assessment using the VECTRA H2 imaging system seems to be a feasible, reliable, and accurate method for measuring breast volume. Based on this finding, we plan to investigate whether volumetric objective evaluations will help to improve breast symmetry in the future.
Among high-speed sports, an increased number of high-speed injuries have been observed in alpine downhill racing. We report the case of a young professional ski racer who sustained a shoulder dislocation with an avulsion of the axillary nerve during a World Cup race. After initial treatment was provided for the shoulder dislocation, the patient was left with abduction weakness and a sensory deficit in the region of the deltoid muscle. She underwent electrophysiological and clinical examinations and visited our centre with delay. We immediately performed surgical treatment with a nerve transfer and nerve transplantation. After only 11 months following her fall, she was able to resume her training program. This case report shows the importance of early diagnostic investigation, a visit to a centre of plastic surgery and the good outcome after surgical treatment in patients with peripheral nerve injuries.
Brachial Plexus , Nerve Transfer , Peripheral Nerve Injuries , Shoulder Dislocation , Humans , Female , Peripheral Nerve Injuries/diagnosis , Peripheral Nerve Injuries/surgery , Shoulder Dislocation/surgery , Shoulder/innervation , Brachial Plexus/injuries , Brachial Plexus/surgery
Several studies have attempted to identify the optimal anthropometric measurement for the aesthetically ideal positioning of the nipple-areolar complex. However, no standardised solutions and measurements for planning surgical procedures have been reached. The aim of this study is to identify the optimal anthropometric measurement between the suprasternal notch (SSN)-nipple distance and mid-clavicle (MC)-nipple distance for the aesthetic position of the nipple-areola complex (NAC) on the breast. A detailed online survey was sent to 300 board-certified plastic surgeons and residents of plastic surgery departments of hospitals in German, Austrian, and Swiss. A similar survey was also provided to 100 patients who had planned or had already undergone breast surgery. All participants were asked to rank the attractiveness of a series of women's breasts in images with different NAC position measurements. The images showed breasts from two different measurements and distances: all the breasts had equal dimensions and proportions and the same areola size. Complete datasets were obtained from 203 of the 300 board-certified plastic surgeons and residents of plastic surgery departments in German-speaking countries (recall 68%) and from 100 patients. The majority of doctors and patients find a symmetrical breast with a mirrored position of the nipple-areola complex more attractive than a non-symmetrical breast. In cases with minor measurement differences, such as 0.5 cm (SSN vs. MC), there is no relevant difference in the breast symmetry. However, at larger distances, the MC-to-nipple distance is superior for achieving aesthetically appealing symmetry compared with the SSN-to-nipple distance. Using the MC-to-nipple distance seems to be superior for correct nipple positioning than the SSN-to-nipple distance and is a valuable preoperative measurement option for breast symmetry with correct nipple height. Further studies on this topic involving a more general population should be conducted to confirm the improvements in perception with the preoperative measurements using the anatomical landmarks.
BACKGROUND: Thanks to the rapid development of computer-based systems and deep-learning-based algorithms, artificial intelligence (AI) has long been integrated into the healthcare field. AI is also particularly helpful in image recognition, surgical assistance and basic research. Due to the unique nature of dermatology, AI-aided dermatological diagnosis based on image recognition has become a modern focus and future trend. Key scientific concepts of review: The use of 3D imaging systems allows clinicians to screen and label skin pigmented lesions and distributed disorders, which can provide an objective assessment and image documentation of lesion sites. Dermatoscopes combined with intelligent software help the dermatologist to easily correlate each close-up image with the corresponding marked lesion in the 3D body map. In addition, AI in the field of prosthetics can assist in the rehabilitation of patients and help to restore limb function after amputation in patients with skin tumors. THE AIM OF THE STUDY: For the benefit of patients, dermatologists have an obligation to explore the opportunities, risks and limitations of AI applications. This study focuses on the application of emerging AI in dermatology to aid clinical diagnosis and treatment, analyzes the current state of the field and summarizes its future trends and prospects so as to help dermatologists realize the impact of new technological innovations on traditional practices so that they can embrace and use AI-based medical approaches more quickly.
Three-dimensional Surface Imaging (3DSI) has become a valuable tool for planning and documenting surgical procedures. Although surface scanners have allowed for a better understanding of breast shape, size, and asymmetry during patient consultation, its use has not been included in intraoperative assessment so far. Validation of the reliability of the intraoperative use of a portable handheld 3DSI equipment as a tool to evaluate morphological changes during breast augmentation surgery. The patients who underwent bilateral subpectoral breast augmentation through an inframammary incision were included in this study. Intraoperative 3DSI was performed with the Artec Eva device, allowing for visualization of the surgical area before incision, after use of breast sizers and implant, and after wound closure. Intraoperatively manual measurements of breast distances and volume changes due to known sizer and implant volumes were in comparison with digital measurements calculated from 3DSI of the surgical area. Bilateral breasts of 40 patients were 3D photographed before incision and after suture successfully. A further 108 implant sizer uses were digitally documented. There was no significant difference between manual tape measurement and digital breast distance measurement. Pre- to postoperative 3D volume change showed no significant difference to the known sizer and implant volume.
Postoperative adhesions can deteriorate clinical outcomes in tendon repair surgery significantly. Thus, the use of artificial membranes as a tendon sheath substitute has become popular and well studied in the last years. We performed a case series of three patients using a novel synthetic membrane (Suprathel) for complex reconstructive surgery and traumatic tendon repair surgery. All patients recovered well with no significant adverse effects and showed good clinical function afterward. Therefore, we concluded that Suprathel might be another potential candidate to prevent postoperative peritendinous adhesions. Further studies will be necessary to determine the effect of this bioresorbable barrier membrane.
Facial measurements serve as a valuable tool in the treatment planning of facial plastic surgery. The aim of this study was to evaluate the accuracy and reliability of standard 3D anthropometric measurements of the face made with one low-cost handheld 3D scanner and one industrial-type mobile 3D scanner. There are clear potential benefits of using 3D measurements by means of new handheld mobile scanners. However, the Sense scanner from the class of inexpensive scanners showed significant limitations in more complex areas such as the lip and nose, whereas proportions could be measured satisfactorily.
Face , Imaging, Three-Dimensional , Face/diagnostic imaging , Humans , Imaging, Three-Dimensional/methods , Nose , Reproducibility of Results
Three-dimensional surface imaging (3DSI) has been shown to be a useful tool for plastic surgeons in the preoperative, intraoperative, and postoperative setting. The objective of this investigation was to compare the accuracy of facial surface distance measurements using both a handheld facial 3DSI device and a stationary whole-body 3DSI device. Users should be aware of deviations when obtaining 3DSI using the presented imaging devices but should not refrain from using them, as the absolute differences might be too small to play a role in both, clinical and research, settings.
Face , Imaging, Three-Dimensional , Face/diagnostic imaging , Face/surgery , Humans , Imaging, Three-Dimensional/methods
The demand for surgical and nonsurgical esthetic procedures in the nasal region has increased sharply in the past. Anatomic differences of the nose between different ethnicities need to be investigated thoroughly. The objective of this article is to analyze and compare morphometric features of the nose in a mixed Asian-Caucasian study population. The nasal length in Asians was statistically significantly greater than in Caucasians, also after having adjusted for facial height. The nasal dorsal bridge and the nasal base showed statistically significant differences. By keeping these anatomic differences in mind while treating patients, greater efficacy and safety can be achieved.
Rhinoplasty , Asian People , Esthetics , Humans , Nose/surgery , Rhinoplasty/methods , White People
Three-dimensional surface imaging systems (3DSI) provide an effective and applicable approach for the quantification of facial morphology. Several researchers have implemented 3D techniques for nasal anthropometry; however, they only included limited classic nasal facial landmarks and parameters. In our clinical routines, we have identified a considerable number of novel facial landmarks and nasal anthropometric parameters, which could be of great benefit to personalized rhinoplasty. Our aim is to verify their reliability, thus laying the foundation for the comprehensive application of 3DSI in personalized rhinoplasty. We determined 46 facial landmarks and 57 anthropometric parameters. A total of 110 volunteers were recruited, and the intra-assessor, inter-assessor, and intra-method reliability of nasal anthropometry were assessed through 3DSI. Our results displayed the high intra-assessor reliability of MAD (0.012-0.29, 0.003-0.758 mm), REM (0.008-1.958%), TEM (0-0.06), rTEM (0.001-0.155%), and ICC (0.77-0.995); inter-assessor reliability of 0.216-1.476, 0.003-2.013 mm; 0.01-7.552%, 0-0.161, and 0.001-1.481%, 0.732-0.985, respectively; and intra-method reliability of 0.006-0.598°, 0-0.379 mm; 0 0.984%, 0-0.047, and 0-0.078%, 0.996-0.998, respectively. This study provides conclusive evidence for the high reliability of novel facial landmarks and anthropometric parameters for comprehensive nasal measurements using the 3DSI system. Considering this, the proposed landmarks and parameters could be widely used for digital planning and evaluation in personalized rhinoplasty, otorhinolaryngology, and oral and maxillofacial surgery.
BACKGROUND: Three-dimensional surface imaging is established in many disciplines for objective facial acquisition regarding anthropometry. Former studies addressed the validation of landmark-based measurements for single race. In order to distinguish racial difference, the reproducibility of the landmark measurements must first be validated. OBJECTIVES: Our purpose is to validate the reproducibility of 46 facial soft-tissue landmarks on x, y, z axes to prove their reliability as 3D reference points. METHODS: The study included 80 European Caucasian and 80 Chinese volunteers. Standardized 3D surface imaging was performed using Vectra 3D system. Two raters identified and defined 46 landmarks (138 coordinates), then repeatedly 3D-imaged volunteers' facial region in separate sessions. Coordinates' reproducibility of landmarks is divided into three categories (< 0.5 mm, < 1 mm, and >1 mm) for intra- and inter-rater reproducibility assessments. RESULTS: Coordinates' reproducibility of 160 samples was distributed as follows: Intra-rater: < 0.5 mm (45%), < 1 mm (42%), >1 mm (13%); inter-rater: < 0.5 mm (31.2%), < 1 mm (42%), > 1 mm (26.8%). The reproducibility of landmarks in nasal tip region differs slightly between Caucasians and Asians. Compared to females, males typically have higher landmark reproducibility in lip and chin region. However, there were no differences in the reproducibility ranking of landmarks by gender. CONCLUSION: The majority of the 46 landmarks in the 3D plane are reproducible to 1 mm, which is clinically acceptable. All selected landmarks showed strong consistency across race and gender, suggesting their potential use as reference points in prospective clinical practice. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE IV: This journal requires that authors assign a level of evidence to each article. For a full description of these Evidence-Based Medicine ratings, please refer to the Table of Contents or the online Instructions to Authors www.springer.com/00266 .
Face , Imaging, Three-Dimensional , Anatomic Landmarks , Asian People , Face/diagnostic imaging , Female , Humans , Imaging, Three-Dimensional/methods , Male , Prospective Studies , Reproducibility of Results
OBJECTIVE: To the knowledge of the authors, no data about the reproducibility and accuracy of 3-dimensional surface imaging of the face using a whole-body scanner are available. Thus, the objective of this investigation was to assess the reproducibility of facial scans acquired using a whole-body imaging device. MATERIAL AND METHODS: This investigation investigated 220 3-D scans of a total of 22 healthy volunteers (with a mean age of 29.36 years). Two consecutive 3-D images using a Vectra WB360 of the volunteers were obtained utilizing a whole-body imaging device. Predefined distances in the face were performed in each scan and compared. Furthermore, surface deviation between two consecutively captured scans was assessed. RESULTS: The distance with the smallest statistical significance was found to be at the nose with p = 0.998, while the biggest statistical significance was found in the midface with p = 0.658. The area with the biggest surface deviation between the superimposed scans was the neck with a root mean square (RMS) of 1.62 ± 1.71, and the area with the smallest surface deviation was the forehead with a RMS of 0.17 ± 0.05. CONCLUSION: The whole-body imaging device investigated in this study can be utilized to capture the face and provides enough accuracy to compare scans. Even though not directly investigated, it can be hypothesized that the error caused by repositioning the patient between a baseline and a follow-up scan will not be too big to consider measurements performed with the whole-body imaging device as impractical.
Imaging, Three-Dimensional , Photogrammetry , Adult , Face/diagnostic imaging , Forehead , Humans , Imaging, Three-Dimensional/methods , Reproducibility of Results
Whole-body three-dimensional surface imaging (3DSI) offers the ability to monitor morphologic changes in multiple areas without the need to individually scan every anatomical region of interest. One area of application is the digital quantification of leg volume. Certain types of morphology do not permit complete circumferential scan of the leg surface. A workflow capable of precisely estimating the missing data is therefore required. We thus aimed to describe and apply a novel workflow to collect bilateral leg volume measurements from whole-body 3D surface scans regardless of leg morphology and to assess workflow precision. For each study participant, whole-body 3DSI was conducted twice successively in a single session with subject repositioning between scans. Paired samples of bilateral leg volume were calculated from the 3D surface data, with workflow variations for complete and limited leg surface visibility. Workflow precision was assessed by calculating the relative percent differences between repeated leg volumes. A total of 82 subjects were included in this study. The mean relative differences between paired left and right leg volumes were 0.73 ± 0.62% and 0.82 ± 0.65%. The workflow variations for completely and partially visible leg surfaces yielded similarly low values. The workflow examined in this study provides a precise method to digitally monitor leg volume regardless of leg morphology. It could aid in objectively comparing medical treatment options of the leg in a clinical setting. Whole-body scans acquired using the described 3DSI routine may allow simultaneous assessment of other changes in body morphology after further validation.
Imaging, Three-Dimensional , Leg , Humans , Leg/diagnostic imaging , Whole Body Imaging , Workflow
BACKGROUND: The objective assessment of beauty remains challenging despite ongoing research efforts. A new method of objectively determining the aesthetic appeal of body features by analyzing gaze patterns and eye movements has recently been investigated. OBJECTIVES: The objective of this study was to assess, by means of objective eye-tracking technology, differences in the gaze patterns of observers presented with standardized 3-dimensional images showing different degrees of breast asymmetry. METHODS: A total of 83 Caucasian study participants with a mean age of 38.60 (19.8) years were presented with 5 images depicting varying degrees of breast asymmetry. In addition to the assessment of eye movements, participants were asked to rate the aesthetic appeal and the asymmetry of the breasts on a 5-point Likert scale. RESULTS: Overall, the data showed that participants' rating of the breasts' aesthetic appeal was inversely related to the level of asymmetry. The mean [standard deviation] time until fixation was shortest for the image depicting the greatest breast asymmetry (50 cc) at 0.77 [0.7] seconds (P < 0.001). In addition, the mammary region was also viewed longest in this image at 3.76 [0.5] seconds (P < 0.001). A volume difference of 35 cc between breasts deflected the observers' gaze significantly toward the larger of the asymmetric breasts (P < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Surgeons should focus on achieving symmetric breast volume (ie, differences <35 cc between breasts) to avoid noticeable asymmetry with regard to breast size.
Eye Movements , Eye-Tracking Technology , Adult , Beauty , Breast/diagnostic imaging , Esthetics , Humans
This case report shows the interdisciplinary treatment of a 28-year-old woman suffering from a pronounced frontal volume defect after severe craniocerebral trauma. The combination of cranioplasty using a polymethylmethacrylate (PMMA) implant, free gracilis muscle flap transfer for soft tissue coverage and serial autologous fat grafting into the muscle flap for subsequent contouring enabled both an adequate and aesthetic reconstruction. This example demonstrates the feasibility of treating increasingly complex composite defects in a multidisciplinary setting, when plastic surgeons are involved.
Free Tissue Flaps , Gracilis Muscle , Plastic Surgery Procedures , Adipose Tissue , Adult , Autografts , Female , Humans , Prostheses and Implants
The first case of a SARS-Cov-2 virus infection was confirmed on January 27th in Munich. For both, plastic and hand surgeons it is crucial to act responsible, minimize the transmission of the virus and aid in reasonable and adequate allocation of resources for the treatment of affected patients during this pandemia. This article aims to provide an overview over the latest developments and insights that affect plastic and hand surgeons. At the same time plastic and hand surgeons are required to participate actively in the discussion of new regulatory measures that on one hand aim to ensure a proper medical care of COVID-19 patients and on the other hand need to guarantee coverage of all other patients. Furthermore exit - strategies after the pandemia need to be discussed by our societies. Naturally, this manuscript provides insight into the current situation, which might undergo changes due to the swift progression of the pandemia.
Betacoronavirus , Coronavirus Infections , Hand/surgery , Pandemics , Pneumonia, Viral , Surgery, Plastic , COVID-19 , Coronavirus Infections/epidemiology , Humans , Pneumonia, Viral/epidemiology , SARS-CoV-2 , Surgery, Plastic/trends
Background An oncologic tumor resection of the scalp can result in complex wounds that result in challenging scalp reconstructions. This study aimed to evaluate the outcomes of microvascular-based scalp reconstructions (MSR) in oncologic patients and to propose an algorithmic treatment approach. Methods Within a 5-year period, 38 patients having undergone 41 MSR (15 anterolateral thigh (ALT), 15 gracilis muscle (GM), and 11 latissimus dorsi muscle (LDM) flaps) after extensive scalp tumor resections fulfilled inclusion criteria for this study. Results Malignant skin disease included superficial and/or deep infiltration of the calvarium in 26 and combined intracranial infiltration in 12 patients. In case of bone replacement (24 patients), MSR was done concomitant, otherwise MSR was performed after pathological confirmation of tumor-free margins. LDM flaps were used in cases with defect sizes of 400 to 1250cm 2 , whereas ALT- and GM flaps were chosen for defects ranging from 40 to 350cm 2 . The average length of the pedicle was comparable in ALT- and LDM flaps and longer than in GM flaps. Total flap loss with need for revision surgery and minor donor site morbidity occurred in four and three patients, respectively. Conclusion Microsurgical reconstruction of moderate-to-extensive scalp defects remains a reliable method with overall low risks and satisfactory aesthetic results, while, according to our experience, muscle flaps show the best functional and aesthetic results. However, in cases of central scalp defects and in situations when a long vascular pedicle of the flap is important, the ALT flap seems to be the best solution.
BACKGROUND: Three-dimensional Surface Imaging (3DSI) is a well-established method to objectively monitor morphological changes in the female breast in the field of plastic surgery. In contrast, in radiation oncology we are still missing effective tools, which can objectively and reproducibly assess and document adverse events in breast cancer radiotherapy within the framework of clinical studies. The aim of the present study was to apply structured-light technology as a non-invasive and objective approach for the documentation of cosmetic outcome and early effects of breast radiotherapy as a proof of principle. METHODS: Weekly 3DSI images of patients receiving either conventionally fractionated radiation treatment (CF-RT) or hypofractionated radiation treatment (HF-RT) were acquired during the radiotherapy treatment and clinical follow-up. The portable Artec Eva scanner (Artec 3D Inc., Luxembourg) recorded 3D surface images for the analysis of breast volumes and changes in skin appearance. Statistical analysis compared the impact of the two different fractionation regimens and the differences between the treated and the contralateral healthy breast. RESULTS: Overall, 38 patients and a total of 214 breast imaging sessions were analysed. Patients receiving CF-RT showed a significantly higher frequency of breast erythema compared to HF-RT (93.3% versus 34.8%, p = 0.003) during all observed imaging sessions. Moreover, we found a statistically significant (p < 0.05) volumetric increase of the treated breast of the entire cohort between baseline (379 ± 196 mL) and follow-up imaging at 3 months (437 ± 224 mL), as well as from week 3 of radiotherapy (391 ± 198 mL) to follow-up imaging. In both subgroups of patients undergoing either CF-RT or HF-RT, there was a statistically significant increase (p < 0.05) in breast volumes between baseline and 3 months follow-up. There were no statistically significant skin or volumetric changes of the untreated healthy breasts. CONCLUSIONS: This is the first study utilizing 3D structured-light technology as a non-invasive and objective approach for the documentation of patients receiving breast radiotherapy. 3DSI offers potential as a non-invasive tool to objectively and precisely monitor the female breast in a radiooncological setting, allowing clinicians to objectively distinguish outcomes of different therapy modalities.
Breast Neoplasms/radiotherapy , Imaging, Three-Dimensional/methods , Adult , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Breast Neoplasms/pathology , Dose Fractionation, Radiation , Female , Humans , Middle Aged , Radiation Dose Hypofractionation
BACKGROUND: The aim of this study was to compare accuracy and timing of two handheld, mobile three-dimensional surface imaging (3DSI) devices against an established non-portable medical imaging system, and to evaluate future intraoperative use for facial surgery. METHODS: Surface-to-Surface root mean square analysis was used to evaluate both a consumer device (Sense 3D) and a professional surface scanner (Artec Eva) against a reference imaging system (Vectra XT). Two assessors repeatedly 3D-imaged the facial region of an imaging phantom and 30 volunteers in two separate sessions. Using both mobile devices, intraoperative 3DSI of 10 rhinoplasty patients was compared with preoperative reference imaging. Intraclass Correlation Coefficient was calculated for repeated measurements. RESULTS: Artec Eva yielded mean deviations below 0.5 mm for the whole face and all subunits excluding the eye region. Sense 3D showed similar deviations for the whole face, but otherwise only in the central and lateral forehead unit and the medial cheek. Variability was low for both the non-portable Vectra XT and Artec Eva, whereas full-face assessment using Sense 3D resulted in high variability. When compared to the preoperative reference images, intraoperative rhinoplasty 3DSI revealed low deviations for Artec Eva and high deviations for Sense 3D. CONCLUSIONS: The 3D surfaces captured by Artec Eva showed a similarly desirable accuracy for facial imaging as Vectra XT reference images. This handheld device presents a suitable option for the objective documentation during rhinoplasty surgery. Sense 3D was unable to accurately capture complex facial surfaces and is therefore limited in its usefulness for intraoperative 3DSI.
Face/diagnostic imaging , Photogrammetry/instrumentation , Adult , Case-Control Studies , Cheek/diagnostic imaging , Equipment Design , Face/surgery , Female , Forehead/diagnostic imaging , Healthy Volunteers , Humans , Imaging, Three-Dimensional/instrumentation , Intraoperative Care/methods , Male , Manikins , Phantoms, Imaging , Rhinoplasty/methods
