Penetration of topically applied diclofenac and ketorolac into the aqueous humour and subretinal fluid: randomized clinical trial.

OBJECTIVE: To determine the level of intraocular penetration of diclofenac sodium and ketorolac tromethamine into the aqueous humour and subretinal fluid. DESIGN: Prospective randomized clinical trial. PARTICIPANTS: Twenty eyes scheduled for retinal detachment surgery and 17 eyes scheduled for cataract surgery. METHODS: Patients with retinal detachment were randomly assigned to receive either topical ketorolac (n = 11) or topical diclofenac (n = 9). Subretinal fluid samples were collected 30-60 minutes after the administration of the last dose. In addition, 17 patients with cataract were randomly assigned to receive topical ketorolac (n = 9) or topical diclofenac (n = 8). The aqueous humour samples were collected 30 minutes after the administration of the last dose. Drug concentrations were determined by high-performance liquid chromatography fluorescence. RESULTS: The mean diclofenac concentration in the subretinal fluid was 42.31 (SD 24.89) ng/µL. Ketorolac was undetectable in the subretinal fluid in all patients who received it because ketorolac tromethamine levels were under the limit of detection. In the aqueous humour, mean diclofenac concentration was 4.98 (SD 4.56) ng/µL, and mean ketorolac concentration was 20.17 (SD 12.21) ng/µL. Topical administration of diclofenac sodium yielded 8.4 times greater drug concentration in the subretinal fluid than in the aqueous humour. Aqueous humour concentrations of ketorolac were higher than those of diclofenac (p = 0.019). CONCLUSIONS: The concentration in the subretinal fluid of topically applied diclofenac was higher than that of ketorolac; and topical ketorolac penetrated into the aqueous humour better than diclofenac did. This suggests that diclofenac can be used more effectively in events related to posterior segment and ketorolac in anterior segment events.

Macular edema and iridocorneal endothelial syndrome: a case report.

PURPOSE: To report a case of cystoid macular edema (CME) in iridocorneal endothelial syndrome. METHODS: Case report. RESULTS: The authors describe the clinical history and ocular examination of a 38-year-old woman with iridocorneal endothelial syndrome and CME. This association has never been reported before. The mechanism of CME is unknown. CONCLUSION: CME may cause visual deterioration in iridocorneal endothelial syndrome. We emphasize the importance of posterior segment examination in these cases.

Decompression retinopathy after Ahmed glaucoma valve implantation in a patient with congenital aniridia and pseudophakia.

We present the case of a 16-year-old adolescent boy with congenital aniridia and pseudophakia who developed decompression retinopathy in a glaucomatous eye after Ahmed glaucoma valve implantation combined with anterior vitrectomy. On the first postoperative day, dot and blot-shaped hemorrhages scattered in the posterior pole were observed. The hemorrhages resolved over 6 months, and the visual acuity returned to the preoperative level. Severe deterioration of the visual field was not observed in the late postoperative period. Despite the sudden visual acuity decrease postoperatively, decompression retinopathy is a benign condition and resolution of hemorrhages without sequelae is the natural course.

Outcome of complex retinal detachment surgery after silicone oil removal.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: To evaluate anatomical prognosis after silicone oil removal. PATIENT AND METHODS: Sixty-eight eyes which underwent silicone oil removal were enrolled into the study. The underlying ocular pathology for pars plana vitrectomy, surgical methods, and time of silicone oil removal were analysed. RESULTS: Sixteen of 68 eyes (23.5%) redetached following the removal of silicone oil. According to etiology redetachment rates: PVR C 9.5% (2/21), PVR D 25% (4/16), trauma without intraocular foreign body 27.3% (3/11), with intraocular foreign body 33.3% (2/6), giant retinal tear 37.5% (3/8), and proliferative diabetic retinopathy with tractional retinal detachment 33.3% (2/6). The rate of redetachment was 22% in patients with encircling band and 27.8% without encircling band. Retina was redetached in the first 10 days in 81.3% of patients after silicone oil removal. CONCLUSION: The residual vitreoretinal traction especially at the vitreous base is the most likely reason for retinal redetachment after silicone oil removal, which is most commonly seen during the first 10 days.

Intraocular intrusion of a scleral sponge implant.

A patient with intrusion of a scleral sponge implant after retinal reattachment surgery is described. Retinal incarceration occurred during primary retinal reattachment surgery and the patient underwent additional cryopexy and radial sponge implant. However, the retina remained detached and pars plana vitrectomy was performed with silicone oil endotamponade to reattach the retina. The interval between placement of the sderal buckle and development of intrusion was 3 months. The buckle was sutured to the sclera with mattress sutures. During the postoperative follow-up period, the intraocular pressure was elevated and controlled with topical antiglaucomatous medication. The encircling band was cut but left in place to avoid perforation, and the retina remained attached. Intrusion of a buckle after retinal reattachment surgery is a rare complication that usually does not require surgical intervention. Cutting the silicone band without removing it may be a treatment option.

Management of rhegmatogenous retinal detachment without detectable breaks.

PURPOSE: To evaluate the causes of failure to find retinal breaks, the anatomical and functional outcomes of patients with rhegmatogenous retinal detachment (RD) without detectable breaks (Group I), to compare the results with detectable breaks (Group II). METHODS: Forty-five out of 258 eyes that had RD without detectable breaks were analysed retrospectively. RESULTS: The causes of failure to find retinal breaks were aphakia/pseudophakia in 22 eyes, small pupil without any eye disease in four eyes, corneal opacity in two eyes, cataract in two eyes, vitreous haze in two eyes, choroidal detachment in one eye, and unknown cause in 12 eyes. After a single scleral buckling procedure, anatomical re-attachment of the retina successfully occurred in 62.2% of group I and 78.9% of group II patients. After repeated surgery, final anatomical success rates were 87.2% and 90.2%, respectively. The best corrected visual acuity was 6/60 or better in 53.9% in Group I and 52.5% in Group II. CONCLUSION: The main cause of failure to find the retinal break was aphakia or pseudophakia. Although the rates of retinal reattachment in eyes without detectable breaks in primary buckling surgery was lower than detectable breaks and reoperations were required more frequently, final success rates were satisfactory and similar in both groups.