Can we lower the platelet threshold of ≥ 50 × 109/L for performing a lumbar puncture safely in patients with hematological malignancies?

Lumbar punctures (LP) are routinely used to administer intrathecal chemotherapy for children and adults with hematologic malignancies. The current guidelines suggest a platelet threshold of ≥ 50 × 109/L prior to LP for intrathecal chemotherapy (ITC). This can be challenging in patients with hematological malignancies who are thrombocytopenic. We conducted a retrospective chart review of 900 LPs for ITC and compared adverse events in patients with a platelet count of ≥ 50 × 109/L and < 50 × 109/L. Cohort 1 included 682 LPs (75.8%) with a pre-procedure platelet count ≥ 50 × 109/L, and cohort 2 included 218 LPs (24.2%) with a pre-procedure platelet count < 50 × 109/L. Cohort 2 was further subdivided into pre-procedure platelet counts of 41 × 109/L-49 × 109/L (n = 43), 31 × 109/L-40 × 109/L (n = 77), 21 × 109/L-30 × 109/L (n = 84), and 11 × 109/L-20 × 109/L (n = 14). Among 900 LP procedures, a pre-procedure platelet count < 50 × 109/L did not demonstrate a higher rate of post-procedure adverse events (6.5% vs 6.8%, p = 0.8237). When cohort 2 was further stratified, the cohort with a pre-procedure platelet count of 21 × 109/L-30 × 109/L had the highest percentage of complications from LP (9.5%) and the highest rates of traumatic taps with observed LP RBC count > 200 (35.7%, p = 0.0015). The rate of red blood cells (RBC) in the CSF was significantly higher in the group with platelets < 50 × 109/L with observed LP RBC count ≥ 200 (31.2% vs 20.5%, p = 0.0016), ≥ 500 (27.1% vs 14.6%, p < 0.0001), and ≥ 1000 (23% vs 11.6%, p < 0.0001). No instances of epidural hematomas were seen. We found no significant difference in bleeding complications between patients undergoing LPs for ITC with a platelet count above or below 50 × 109/L.

Efficacy and safety of direct oral anticoagulants for secondary prevention of cancer associated thrombosis: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.

Direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) may be good alternatives to low molecular weight heparin (LMWH) or vitamin K antagonists (VKA) for treatment of cancer associated thrombosis (CAT). We conducted a meta-analysis of ten randomized clinical trials to evaluate the efficacy and safety of DOACs in patients with CAT. All had study populations composed in entirety or in part of patients with CAT. The primary outcome (efficacy) was recurrent VTE and the secondary outcomes (safety outcomes) included major bleeding, clinically relevant non-major bleeding (CRNMB), and all bleeding (major bleeding + CRNMB). Participants treated with DOACs had lower risk of recurrent VTE, overall (RR 0.63; 95% CI 0.51-0.79; p < 0.0001), compared to LMWH (RR 0.57; 95% CI 0.40-0.83; p = 0.003), but not compared to VKA (RR 0.69; 95% CI 0.44-1.06; p = 0.09). Compared to LMWH, DOACs showed no difference in major bleeding risk (RR 1.31; 95% CI 0.78-2.18; p = 0.31), though had higher risk of CRNMB (RR 1.60; 95% CI 1.13-2.26; p = 0.008) and all bleeding (RR 1.49; 95% CI 1.10-2.01; p = 0.010). These results indicate that DOACs are more effective than LMWH for prevention of recurrent VTE with CAT though carry an increased risk for non-major bleeding compared to standard of care, LMWH.