Single agent vemurafenib or rituximab-vemurafenib combination for the treatment of relapsed/refractory hairy cell leukemia, a multicenter experience.

BACKGROUND: Hairy cell leukemia (HCL) is a rare mature B-cell malignancy that is primarily treated with purine analogues. However, relapse remains a significant challenge, prompting the search for alternative therapies. The BRAF V600E mutation prevalent in HCL patients provides a target for treatment with vemurafenib. PATIENTS AND METHODS: This multicenter retrospective study included nine patients with relapsed/refractory (R/R) HCL from six different centers. Patient data included demographics, prior treatments, clinical outcomes, and adverse events. RESULTS: Patients received different treatment regimens between centers, including vemurafenib alone or in combination with rituximab. Despite the differences in protocols, all patients achieved at least a partial response, with seven patients achieving a complete response. Adverse events were generally mild with manageable side effects. The absence of myelotoxic effects and manageable side effects make BRAF inhibitors attractive, especially for patients ineligible for purine analogues or those with severe neutropenia. CONCLUSION: Single agent vemurafenib or in combination with rituximab appears to be a promising therapeutic option for R/R HCL. Further research is needed to establish standardized treatment protocols and to investigate long-term outcomes.

Prognostic Impact of Bone Marrow Fibrosis and Effects of Tyrosine Kinase Inhibitors on Bone Marrow Fibrosis in Chronic Myeloid Leukemia.

BACKGROUND: Myelofibrosis is reported in around 40% of newly diagnosed chronic myeloid leukemia (CML) patients and have an important role in the pathobiology and prognosis of CML. This retrospective study aimed to evaluate the effects of bone marrow (BM) fibrosis on disease prognosis and the effects of specific tyrosine-kinase inhibitors (TKIs) on BM fibrosis in CML patients. METHODS: The study included 96 patients (>18 years) diagnosed with chronic phase (CP) CML. The clinical and demographic information were collected from the medical files. Post-treatment BM aspirate and core biopsy samples were analyzed for the presence of fibrosis and dysplasia. RESULTS: The mean age of the study patients was 52.69 years; 47.9% of the patients were female. At the onset, 53 (63.1%) patients had BM fibrosis. The difference in the overall survival of the patients with respect to BM fibrosis grades was significant (p = .001). Within the BM fibrosis grade groups, there were significant differences between grade 0 vs. grade 2, grade 0 vs. grade 3, and grade 1 vs. grade 3 (p = .005, p = .002, and p = .003 respectively) There was no significant association between the presence of BM fibrosis at the onset and not responding to first-line therapy (p = .724). Moreover, no significant association was found between the presence of BM fibrosis at the onset and molecular (p = .623) or cytogenetic response (p = .535) to first-line therapy. Additionally, the association between the type of second-line and third-line therapy and molecular response (p = .773 and p = .424, respectively) or cytogenetic response (p = .298 and p = .641) was not significant. CONCLUSION: Although BM fibrosis seems to be a crucial complication of CML with a poor prognosis, it can be reversed via TKI treatment which may result in improved survival. It might be considered to check the BM for this complication on a regular basis during therapies to test its prognostic influence in CML patients in prospective controlled trials. Further studies focused on this issue are required to utilize BM fibrosis as a candidate prognostic factor.

BNT162b2 or CoronaVac as the Third Dose against Omicron: Neutralizing Antibody Responses among Transplant Recipients Who Had Received Two Doses of CoronaVac.

We evaluated neutralizing antibodies against the Omicron variant and Anti-Spike IgG response in solid organ (SOT) or hematopoietic stem cell (HSTC) recipients after a third dose of BNT162b2 (BNT) or CoronaVac (CV) following two doses of CV. In total, 95 participants underwent SOT (n = 62; 44 liver, 18 kidney) or HSCT (n = 27; 5 allogeneic, 22 autologous) were included from five centers in Turkey. The median time between third doses and serum sampling was 154 days (range between 15 to 381). The vaccine-induced antibody responses of both neutralizing antibodies and Anti-Spike IgGs were assessed by plaque neutralizing assay and immunoassay, respectively. Neutralizing antibody and Anti-Spike IgG levels were significantly higher in transplant patients receiving BNT compared to those receiving CV (Geometric mean (GMT):26.76 vs. 10.89; p = 0.03 and 2116 Au/mL vs. 172.1 Au/mL; p < 0.001). Solid organ transplantation recipients, particularly liver transplant recipients, showed lower antibody levels than HSCT recipients. Thus, among HSCT recipients, the GMT after BNT was 91.29 and it was 15.81 in the SOT group (p < 0.001). In SOT, antibody levels after BNT in kidney transplantation recipients were significantly higher than those in liver transplantation recipients (GMT: 48.32 vs. 11.72) (p < 0.001). Moreover, the neutralizing antibody levels after CV were very low (GMT: 10.81) in kidney transplantation recipients and below the detection limit (<10) in liver transplant recipients. This study highlights the superiority of BNT responses against Omicron as a third dose among transplant recipients after two doses of CV. The lack of neutralizing antibodies against Omicron after CV in liver transplant recipients should be taken into consideration, particularly in countries where inactivated vaccines are available in addition to mRNA vaccines.

Gilteritinib (XOSPATA®) in Turkey: Early Access Program Results.

Background And Objectives: Gilteritinib (XOSPATA®, Astellas) is a type I oral FLT3 inhibitor, a tyrosine kinase AXL inhibitor, involved in both c-Kit and FMS-like tyrosine kinase 3 (FLT3) resistance. In the phase 3 ADMIRAL trial, gilteritinib was compared with the standard of care in (R/R) acute myeloid leukemia (AML) patients who harbored any FLT3 mutation and showed superior efficacy with regard to response and survival. Objectives: This research aimed to investigate the real-life efficacy and safety of gilteritinib in FLT3-positive R/R AML patients who were treated as a part of an early access program held in Turkey in April 2020 (NCT03409081). Results: The research included 17 R/R AML patients who had received gilteritinib from seven centers. The overall response rate was 100%. The most common adverse events were anemia and hypokalemia (7 patients, 41.2%). Grade 4 thrombocytopenia was observed in one patient only (5.9%), leading to permanent treatment discontinuation. Patients with peripheral edema had a 10.47 (95% CI: 1.64-66.82) times higher risk of death than those without peripheral edema (p<0.05). Conclusion: This research showed that patients with febrile neutropenia and peripheral edema were at a high risk of death when compared to patients without febrile neutropenia and peripheral edema.

Predictive Factors for Molecular Response in Chronic Myeloid Leukemia: Reduction Ratio and Halving Time of BCR::ABL1 IS Transcript Levels

Objective: Achieving an early molecular response (EMR) is crucial for improving the prognosis of patients with chronic myeloid leukemia (CML). The halving time (HT) and reduction ratio (RR) of BCR::ABL1 transcript levels have recently emerged as additional prognostic indexes besides the BCR::ABL1 International Scale (IS). We aimed to investigate the prognostic role of BCR::ABL1 transcript levels, HT, and RR on molecular response kinetics at 3 months in patients with newly diagnosed chronic-phase (CP)-CML. Materials and Methods: Forty patients with CP-CML who received first-line imatinib treatment were included in this study. BCR::ABL1 transcript levels and molecular responses at baseline and at 3, 6, 12, and 24 months of treatment were evaluated retrospectively. Major molecular response (MMR) at 12 months and event-free survival (EFS) were determined as primary endpoints and the effects of treatment kinetics on these parameters were examined. Results: Of the 40 patients, BCR::ABL1 IS was ≤10% at 3 months in 72.5%, representing EMR. The rate of event occurrence was 45.5% in patients with BCR::ABL1 IS of >10%, whereas it was 6.9% in those with BCR::ABL1 IS of ≤10% (p=0.004). MMR was detected in 62.1% of the patients with EMR and in 9.1% of those without EMR (p=0.003). The cut-off value for achieving MMR was 24 days for HT and 0.04 for RR. Deep molecular response (DMR) at 24 months was associated with HT of ≤24 days and RR of ≤0.04. EFS was found to be significantly better in the group with BCR::ABL1 IS of ≤10% and HT of ≤24 days (p=0.001) and in the group with BCR::ABL1 IS of ≤10% and RR of ≤0.04 (p=0.007) compared to others. Conclusion: Our findings revealed that MMR could be predicted via EMR as well as by HT and RR. Additionally, HT of ≤24 days and RR of ≤0.04 were more important than BCR::ABL1 IS of ≤10% in achieving DMR at 24 months, and the combination of BCR::ABL1 IS of ≤10% with both HT of ≤24 days and RR of ≤0.04 has the best predictive value for EFS.

The Real-World Experience With Single Agent Ibrutinib in Relapsed/Refractory CLL.

INTRODUCTION/BACKGROUND: The emergence of novel agents targeting the B-cell receptor pathway and BCL-2 has significantly changed the therapeutic landscape of CLL. We evaluated the safety and efficacy of single-agent ibrutinib in relapsed/refractory CLL in real-world settings. PATIENTS/METHODS: A total of 200 relapsed/refractory CLL patients with a median age of 68 were included in this retrospective, multicenter, non-interventional study. Data of the study were captured from the patient charts of the participating centers. RESULTS: The median for lines of previous chemotherapy was 2 (1-6); 62 (31.8%) patients had del17p and/or p53 mutations (del17p+/p53mut). Of the study group, 146 (75%) patients achieved at least PR, while 16 (8.7%) patients discontinued ibrutinib due to TEA. The most common drug-related adverse events were neutropenia (n: 31; 17.4%) and thrombocytopenia (n: 40; 22.3%), which were ≥ grade 3 in 9 (5%) and 5 (3.9%) patients, respectively. Pneumonia (n: 42; 23.7%) was the most common nonhematologic TEA. Atrial fibrillation (n: 5; 2.8%) and bleeding (n: 11; 6.3%) were relatively rare during the study period. Within a median follow-up period of 17 (1-74) months, 42 (21%) patients died. The estimated median OS of the study cohort was 52 months. Only the response to ibrutinib (CR/PR vs. SD/PD) was significantly associated with OS. CONCLUSION: Our results indicate good safety and efficacy for single-agent ibrutinib in R/R CLL in daily practice.

Rate of blood pressure control and antihypertensive treatment approaches in diabetic patients with hypertension.

OBJECTIVES: Hypertension is a common co-morbidity in patients with type 2 diabetes. Management of hypertension is of paramount importance in reducing macro- and microvascular complications of diabetes. The aim of this study is to determine the rate of blood pressure control (<140/85 mmHg) in diabetic patients with hypertension, and to evaluate the prescribing pattern of antihypertensive medications. STUDY DESIGN: This was a prospective, cross-sectional, observational study conducted in a tertiary centre in Turkey. Of 707 patients with diabetes, 500 hypertensive patients were evaluated to determine control of hypertension and treatment attitudes. Logistic regression analysis was used to evaluate the likelihood of prescription of each class of antihypertensive medications for the presence of macro- and microvascular complications. RESULTS: Most of the patients (95%) were on antihypertensive therapy. Only 41% achieved target blood pressure values (<140/85 mmHg). Renin angiotensin system (RAS) blockers were the most frequently (82.4%) prescribed antihypertensive agents, and a combination of RAS blockers and diuretics were the most commonly preferred combination therapy. Most of the patients were on 1 antihypertensive drug or a combination of 2 drugs (39.5% and 44.7%, respectively). Patients with coronary artery disease were more likely to receive beta blockers (Odds ratio=3.6, 95% confidence interval=2.3-5.6; p<0.001). CONCLUSION: Although most of the diabetic hypertensive patients were on hypertensive therapy, more than half had uncontrolled blood pressure.