Association Between FEV1 Decline Rate and Mortality in Long-Term Follow-Up of a 21-Patient Pilot Clinical Trial of Inhaled Liposomal Cyclosporine Plus Standard-of-Care Versus Standard-of-Care Alone for Bronchiolitis Obliterans Syndrome After Lung Transplantation.

BACKGROUND The association between forced expiratory volume in 1 second (FEV1) trajectory and mortality in bronchiolitis obliterans syndrome (BOS) is not well defined. Using long-term data from a prior clinical trial of inhaled liposomal cyclosporine A (L-CsA-I) for lung transplant patients with BOS, this study examined the association between longitudinal FEV1 change and mortality. MATERIAL AND METHODS We analyzed long-term data from a clinical trial which randomized 21 patients with BOS (³20% decrease in FEV1 from personal maximum) to receive L-CsA-I plus standard-of-care (n=11) or standard-of-care (SOC) alone (n=10) for 24 weeks. A joint statistical model, combining a linear mixed model for FEV1 change and Cox regression for mortality, was utilized to examine the overall association between FEV1 trajectory and mortality during follow-up. RESULTS The 21 trial participants (10 single, 11 double lung recipients) had a mean FEV1 of 1.7±0.6 Liters at randomization. Median follow-up post-randomization was 35 months. In joint model analysis, 1 percent FEV1 decline predicted 1.076-fold increased mortality risk (95% confidence interval: -0.998 to 1.160, p=0.058). FEV1 decline was reduced by 2.6% per year in L-CsA-I patients compared to SOC (p=0.210), and overall survival at 1/3/5 years was 91%/64%/27% vs 90%/20%/0% for L-CsA-I versus SOC, respectively (p=0.164). CONCLUSIONS In BOS patients, greater longitudinal FEV1 decline predicts increased mortality. Trends towards prolonged stabilization of FEV1 and improved survival were observed with L-CsA-I receipt. Further analyses will aid in evaluating the utility of FEV1 change as a survival predictor, having implications in BOS management and future trial design.

Lung Transplantation in a New Era in the Field of Cystic Fibrosis.

Lung transplantation for people with cystic fibrosis (PwCF) is a critical therapeutic option, in a disease without a cure to this day, and its overall success in this population is evident. The medical advancements in knowledge, treatment, and clinical care in the field of cystic fibrosis (CF) rapidly expanded and improved over the last several decades, starting from early pathology reports of CF organ involvement in 1938, to the identification of the CF gene in 1989. Lung transplantation for CF has been performed since 1983, and CF now accounts for about 17% of pre-transplantation diagnoses in lung transplantation recipients. Cystic fibrosis transmembrane conductance regulator (CFTR) modulators have been the latest new therapeutic modality addressing the underlying CF protein defect with the first modulator, ivacaftor, approved in 2012. Fast forward to today, and we now have a growing CF population. More than half of PwCF are now adults, and younger patients face a better life expectancy than they ever did before. Unfortunately, CFTR modulator therapy is not effective in all patients, and efficacy varies among patients; it is not a cure, and CF remains a progressive disease that leads predominantly to respiratory failure. Lung transplantation remains a lifesaving treatment for this disease. Here, we reviewed the current knowledge of lung transplantation in PwCF, the challenges associated with its implementation, and the ongoing changes to the field as we enter a new era in the care of PwCF. Improved life expectancy in PwCF will surely influence the role of transplantation in patient care and may even lead to a change in the demographics of which people benefit most from transplantation.

Optimization of Hypoglossal Nerve Stimulation for Obstructive Sleep Apnea With Ultrasound Assessment of Tongue Movement.

BACKGROUND: Hypoglossal nerve stimulation (HGNS) is an Food and Drug Administration-approved therapy for obstructive sleep apnea. Initial programming of HGNS is based on the observation of anterior tongue movement, which may not reflect opening at the retroglossal airway. We developed an ultrasonographic technique to assess the base of tongue movement with HGNS to be used to optimize the initial voltage settings. STUDY QUESTION: This study aimed to investigate the use of ultrasound to assess tongue movement with HGNS and related this measure to the apnea hypopnea index (AHI) on subsequent home sleep apnea testing or in-laboratory polysomnography with therapy. STUDY DESIGN: Seventeen subjects (n = 17) implanted with HGNS were enrolled at least 1 month postimplantation. Ultrasonographic measures were then used to optimize HGNS voltage to produce observable base of tongue protrusion without producing discomfort. Responders were defined as a reduction in AHI > 50% and an AHI of <20 events/h. RESULTS: There were 17 subjects, 11 men and 6 women, with age = 64.6 ± 9.8 years, body mass index = 27.9 ± 2.7 kg/m2, and pretreatment AHI = 36.5 ± 14.4/h, T-90% = 10.7 ± 14.8%. The mean hyoid bone excursion (HBE) in responders = 1.0 ± 0.13 cm versus 0.82 ± 0.12 cm in nonresponders (P = 0.017). HBE was correlated with AHI during HGNS treatment (coef. -0.54, P = 0.03). Best subsets regression analysis using treatment-based AHI as the dependent variable and age, body mass index, baseline AHI, HBE, and HGNS voltage as independent variables showed that HBE (coef. -44.6, P = 0.044) was the only independent predictor of response. Receiver operator curve analysis showed that HBE > 0.85 cm had a sensitivity of 83.3% and specificity of 80.0% with a positive likelihood ratio of 4.17 to predict responder status. CONCLUSION: We demonstrated that ultrasound assessment of HBE during HGNS programming is a useful tool to optimize therapy.

Rapid Eye Movement Behavior Disorder and Other Parasomnias.

Rapid eye movement (REM) behavior disorder (RBD) is characterized by loss of skeletal muscle atonia that can lead to dream enactment. This condition can cause harm to patients and their bed partners if appropriate safety measures are not ensured. This condition is often the initial presenting symptom in a group of complex neurodegenerative processes. Definitive diagnosis requires a thorough history and an in-laboratory polysomnogram to look for evidence of REM sleep without atonia. Treatment options are limited but consist of sleep safety measures and pharmacotherapy. Patients diagnosed with idiopathic RBD associated with alpha-synucleinopathy are likely to have progression of disease.

Space invader: pleural penetration of a hypoglossal nerve stimulator sensor lead.

The mainstay of treatment for obstructive sleep apnea is positive airway pressure therapy, which may be difficult for some patients to tolerate leading to compromised adherence and requiring alternative therapies. Hypoglossal nerve stimulation has become an option for those who meet implantation criteria. Implantation of the device is an ambulatory surgical procedure and is generally well-tolerated, though rare adverse events have been reported. We report an unusual complication of hypoglossal nerve stimulation in a patient who had initial success with this therapy. After 3 years of treatment, the sensor lead penetrated into the pleural space. Components of the hypoglossal nerve stimulation were explanted, and a new sensor lead and generator were reimplanted. The new device was activated, and therapy was successfully resumed. This case demonstrates that there is a potential for a delayed complication of sensor lead penetration into the pleural space, which has only rarely been reported. CITATION: Lou B, Hahn S, Korotun M, Quintero L, Shikowitz M, Greenberg H. Space invader: pleural penetration of a hypoglossal nerve stimulator sensor lead. J Clin Sleep Med. 2021;17(11):2329-2332.

Advances in Treatment of Sleep-Disordered Breathing.

BACKGROUND: Sleep-disordered breathing, composed of obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) and central sleep apnea (CSA), affects millions of people worldwide carrying with it significant morbidity and mortality. Diagnosis is made by polysomnography, and severity of sleep apnea is determined by the apnea-hypopnea index (AHI). Positive airway pressure (PAP) therapy has been the gold standard in treating both OSA and CSA. PAP therapy can greatly reduce AHI burden as well as morbidity and mortality and improve quality of life. AREAS OF UNCERTAINTY: However, patients report difficulties adhering to PAP therapy because of discomfort with mask interface, sensation of excessive pressure, and claustrophobia. Although other options exist to treat sleep apnea, such as mandibular advancement oral appliance devices, positional therapy, and surgery, these additional therapeutic modalities as current options have limitations. Emerging technology is now available to overcome hindrances to standard therapy. DATA SOURCES: A literature search was performed from the following databases: PubMed, Cochrane Library (Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews), and Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, and FDA device database (clinicaltrial.gov). THERAPEUTIC ADVANCES: Other modalities of treating sleep-disordered breathing now include the hypoglossal nerve stimulator, which stimulates the hypoglossal nerve during sleep to alleviate airflow obstruction by contracting the genioglossus muscle thus treating OSA. Similarly, the phrenic nerve stimulator restores a more stable breathing pattern during sleep by stimulating the phrenic nerve to activate the diaphragm during CSA. Both nerve stimulators have been shown to reduce AHI severity and improve quality of life for patients suffering from sleep-disordered breathing. CONCLUSIONS: PAP therapy, although the gold standard, has limitations in the treatment of sleep apnea. New modalities such as hypoglossal nerve stimulator and phrenic nerve stimulator may help to overcome difficulties with adherence and offer new options for treatment of both obstructive and central sleep apnea.

Effect of Ascorbic Acid, Corticosteroids, and Thiamine on Organ Injury in Septic Shock: The ACTS Randomized Clinical Trial.

IMPORTANCE: The combination of ascorbic acid, corticosteroids, and thiamine has been identified as a potential therapy for septic shock. OBJECTIVE: To determine whether the combination of ascorbic acid, corticosteroids, and thiamine attenuates organ injury in patients with septic shock. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: Randomized, blinded, multicenter clinical trial of ascorbic acid, corticosteroids, and thiamine vs placebo for adult patients with septic shock. Two hundred five patients were enrolled between February 9, 2018, and October 27, 2019, at 14 centers in the United States. Follow-up continued until November 26, 2019. INTERVENTIONS: Patients were randomly assigned to receive parenteral ascorbic acid (1500 mg), hydrocortisone (50 mg), and thiamine (100 mg) every 6 hours for 4 days (n = 103) or placebo in matching volumes at the same time points (n = 102). MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES: The primary outcome was change in the Sequential Organ Failure Assessment (SOFA) score (range, 0-24; 0 = best) between enrollment and 72 hours. Key secondary outcomes included kidney failure and 30-day mortality. Patients who received at least 1 dose of study drug were included in analyses. RESULTS: Among 205 randomized patients (mean age, 68 [SD, 15] years; 90 [44%] women), 200 (98%) received at least 1 dose of study drug, completed the trial, and were included in the analyses (101 with intervention and 99 with placebo group). Overall, there was no statistically significant interaction between time and treatment group with regard to SOFA score over the 72 hours after enrollment (mean SOFA score change from 9.1 to 4.4 [-4.7] points with intervention vs 9.2 to 5.1 [-4.1] points with placebo; adjusted mean difference, -0.8; 95% CI, -1.7 to 0.2; P = .12 for interaction). There was no statistically significant difference in the incidence of kidney failure (31.7% with intervention vs 27.3% with placebo; adjusted risk difference, 0.03; 95% CI, -0.1 to 0.2; P = .58) or in 30-day mortality (34.7% vs 29.3%, respectively; hazard ratio, 1.3; 95% CI, 0.8-2.2; P = .26). The most common serious adverse events were hyperglycemia (12 patients with intervention and 7 patients with placebo), hypernatremia (11 and 7 patients, respectively), and new hospital-acquired infection (13 and 12 patients, respectively). CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE: In patients with septic shock, the combination of ascorbic acid, corticosteroids, and thiamine, compared with placebo, did not result in a statistically significant reduction in SOFA score during the first 72 hours after enrollment. These data do not support routine use of this combination therapy for patients with septic shock. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT03389555.