The development of the Early Intervention in Psychosis (EIP) outpatient unit of Eginition University Hospital into an EIP Network.

Over the past 25 years, in the field of psychosis there is an increased interest in early detection of symptoms and treatment provision for people who are either at Ultra High Risk (UHR) of developing psychosis or with First Episode Psychosis (FEP). Extensive research has proved, that by engaging quickly into treatment and addressing the needs of each case individually, clinical outcomes could be improved substantially. The above evidence-based argument has resulted in the establishment of specialized Early Intervention in Psychosis (EIP) services worldwide. Eginition University Hospital (EUH) in Athens has been providing care for Early Psychosis through a specialized outpatient EIP service since 2012, which receives all early psychosis cases. Initially clinical focus was mainly directed towards UHR cases, since EUH had long been providing standard care for FEP. However, over the last 4 years, the EIP Unit has evolved incrementally into a network of directly linked services, involving the EIP outpatient service, an Inpatient Unit for prompt hospitalization and a Day Clinic for partial hospitalization, to address acute treatment, follow-up and recovery/relapse prevention phases. Diagnostic evaluation is made through specialized instruments along with the typical psychiatric interview. The therapeutic approach follows the international guidelines for EIP, namely symptom-based and phase-specific treatment, which includes supportive counselling, coping strategies and psychoeducation both for subjects and family members, as well as pharmacotherapy when needed and preferably in low doses. Regarding our results, in the first 3 years (3/2012-3/2015) the EIP unit received 26 (60%) UHR subjects and 17 (40%) FEP patients. Over the last 4 years (3/2015-3/2019) the referrals rose to 167 with 35 (21%) UHR and 132 (79%) FEP cases. All of the UHR subjects were from the outset followed by the specialized outpatient EIP service for up to 3 years. As to the FEP patients, seventy-seven (60%) were acutely hospitalized for less than a month, and 10 (8%) attended the Day Clinic for 6 - 12 months, before being referred to the outpatient service. Concluding, the development of the EIP network of specialized services has cohesively enabled a broader therapeutic framework, shifting the clinical focus towards FEP, although UHR subjects are still being assessed systematically. However, there is still considerable work to be done, in order to enhance the full potential of all units and promote the interconnection with potential community settings.

[Childhood adverse traumatic experiences and schizophrenia].

Εpidemiological research during last decades has demonstrated the association of certain environmental variables with psychosis. Ιn parallel with understanding environmental contributors to schizophrenia, identification of those at high risk of psychosis has become a priority. These risk factors include adverse traumatic experiences, such as discrimination, social environment adversities, bullying, emigration and childhood trauma. For many years the possibility of a relationship of adverse traumatic experiences with schizophrenia was minimized in favor of a biological paradigm. However, there is evidence supporting that childhood adversities is one of the most significant environmental risk factors for psychosis, if not the most significant. Studies have demonstrated the validity and the reliability of retrospective reports of adverse traumatic experiences in psychotic patients. The question on the causal relationship between adverse traumatic experiences and psychosis has been raised for many years, but it has not yet been answered. Researchers have focused on the study of dysfunctional cognitive schemes being formed due to childhood adversities and interpreting the world as unfriendly and threatening. According to social defeat hypothesis, the patients do not experience more stressful life events but they experience them as less controllable. Furthermore, researchers study the mediator psychopathology associated directly with adverse traumatic experiences, such as anxiety, mood, dissociative and adaptation disorders, which possibly predispose to psychosis. Cannabis use and childhood adversities may interact to increase the risk of psychotic symptoms in adolescence, according to research findings. Several publications have positively linked the number of traumatic adverse experiences with the severity of mental health and possibly with high risk of psychosis in a dose-response relationship model. Taking note that it is important to have a plausible hypothesis of the biological mechanisms involved with the relationship between adverse traumatic experiences and psychosis, the putative systems being explored are: (1) the hypothalamus-pituitary-adrenal (HPA) axis because it mediates the principal adaptive response to perceived psychological or physiological stress and (2) the dopamine system, which is considered to be important in the development of psychosis. The biological and environmental risk factors are both important in the etiology of psychosis but the effects of some forms of childhood adversity act largely independently of pre-existing genetic liability to increase the risk of psychosis. A supposed differentiation of psychosis associated with adverse traumatic experiences from the classic neurodegenerative model possibly should be considered seriously by the clinician in order to design the best therapeutic plan.