Early improvement with cariprazine as a predictor of antidepressant, anxiolytic, and antimanic response in bipolar I mania and depression: A pooled post hoc analysis of randomized cariprazine trials.

BACKGROUND: Early symptomatic improvement may predict treatment response in bipolar I disorder. Cariprazine has demonstrated early treatment effects in bipolar I depression and mania studies; therefore, we assessed whether early improvement with cariprazine predicts eventual treatment response. METHODS: Post hoc analyses used pooled data from randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled bipolar I depression (NCT02670538, NCT02670551) and mania (NCT00488618, NCT01058096, NCT01058668) trials. In depression studies (cariprazine 1.5 mg/d, 3 mg/d, or placebo), early improvement in Montgomery-Åsberg Depression Rating Scale (MADRS) and Hamilton Anxiety Rating Scale (HAM-A) total scores (≥25 % improvement at day 15) and subsequent depressive/anxiety symptom response status (≥50 % improvement at week 6) were assessed. In mania studies (cariprazine 3-12 mg/d or placebo), early improvement in Young Mania Rating Scale (YMRS) total scores (≥25 % improvement at day 7) and manic symptom response status (≥50 % improvement at week 3) were assessed. RESULTS: Patients with bipolar I depression and early MADRS improvement were approximately 4- to 6-times as likely to achieve MADRS or HAM-A response than those without early improvement; patients with early HAM-A improvement were approximately 3- to 4-times as likely to achieve MADRS or HAM-A response. A subset of patients without early improvement with cariprazine 1.5 mg/d (20 %-31 %) subsequently responded following up-titration. Patients with mania and early YMRS improvement were approximately 5 times more likely to have manic symptom response than those without early improvement. LIMITATIONS: Post hoc analysis; relatively short study durations; flexible-dosing (mania studies). CONCLUSIONS: Early symptom improvement with cariprazine may inform therapeutic decisions for patients with bipolar I disorder.

Molecular Specializations Underlying Phenotypic Differences in Inner Ear Hair Cells of Zebrafish and Mice.

Hair cells (HCs) are the sensory receptors of the auditory and vestibular systems in the inner ears of vertebrates that selectively transduce mechanical stimuli into electrical activity. Although all HCs have the hallmark stereocilia bundle for mechanotransduction, HCs in non-mammals and mammals differ in their molecular specialization in the apical, basolateral and synaptic membranes. HCs of non-mammals, such as zebrafish (zHCs), are electrically tuned to specific frequencies and possess an active process in the stereocilia bundle to amplify sound signals. Mammalian cochlear HCs, in contrast, are not electrically tuned and achieve amplification by somatic motility of outer HCs (OHCs). To understand the genetic mechanisms underlying differences among adult zebrafish and mammalian cochlear HCs, we compared their RNA-seq-characterized transcriptomes, focusing on protein-coding orthologous genes related to HC specialization. There was considerable shared expression of gene orthologs among the HCs, including those genes associated with mechanotransduction, ion transport/channels, and synaptic signaling. For example, both zebrafish and mouse HCs express Tmc1, Lhfpl5, Tmie, Cib2, Cacna1d, Cacnb2, Otof, Pclo and Slc17a8. However, there were some notable differences in expression among zHCs, OHCs, and inner HCs (IHCs), which likely underlie the distinctive physiological properties of each cell type. Tmc2 and Cib3 were not detected in adult mouse HCs but tmc2a and b and cib3 were highly expressed in zHCs. Mouse HCs express Kcna10, Kcnj13, Kcnj16, and Kcnq4, which were not detected in zHCs. Chrna9 and Chrna10 were expressed in mouse HCs. In contrast, chrna10 was not detected in zHCs. OHCs highly express Slc26a5 which encodes the motor protein prestin that contributes to OHC electromotility. However, zHCs have only weak expression of slc26a5, and subsequently showed no voltage dependent electromotility when measured. Notably, the zHCs expressed more paralogous genes including those associated with HC-specific functions and transcriptional activity, though it is unknown whether they have functions similar to their mammalian counterparts. There was overlap in the expressed genes associated with a known hearing phenotype. Our analyses unveil substantial differences in gene expression patterns that may explain phenotypic specialization of zebrafish and mouse HCs. This dataset also includes several protein-coding genes to further the functional characterization of HCs and study of HC evolution from non-mammals to mammals.

Effects of cariprazine on reducing symptoms of irritability, hostility, and agitation in patients with manic or mixed episodes of bipolar I disorder.

BACKGROUND: Hostility, irritability, and agitation are common in patients with bipolar I disorder. Post hoc analyses evaluated the effect of cariprazine on these symptoms in patients with bipolar I mania. METHODS: Data were pooled from three randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled phase 3 cariprazine trials in adults with bipolar I manic/mixed episodes (NCT00488618, NCT01058096, NCT01058668); pooled cariprazine doses (3-12 mg/d) were analyzed. Patients were categorized into hostility/irritability and agitation subgroups by baseline scores: Young Mania Rating Scale (YMRS) irritability and disruptive-aggressive behavior items score ≥ 2; Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale (PANSS) hostility item ≥ 2; PANSS-Excited Component (PANSS-EC) total score ≥ 14 and score ≥ 4 on ≥ 1 individual item. Changes from baseline to week 3 in hostility/irritability- and agitation-related outcomes were evaluated. Adjustments were made for the presence of other manic symptoms, sedation, and akathisia. RESULTS: Most patients met subgroup inclusion criteria (YMRS hostility = 930; PANSS hostility = 841, PANSS-EC agitation = 486). In the YMRS subgroup, least squares mean differences in change from baseline were statistically significant for cariprazine versus placebo on YMRS hostility/irritability-related items (irritability [-0.93], disruptive-aggressive behavior [-0.79], combined [-1.75]; P ≤ 0.001 each), YMRS total score (-5.92, P ≤ 0.0001), and all individual YMRS items (-0.25 to -0.93, P ≤ 0.0001); differences remained significant after adjustment for other manic symptoms, sedation, and akathisia. Differences in PANSS hostility and PANSS-EC subgroups were significant for cariprazine versus placebo (P ≤ 0.001). LIMITATIONS: Post hoc analysis. CONCLUSION: Cariprazine demonstrated specific antihostility/irritability and anti-agitation effects in patients with manic/mixed episodes of bipolar I disorder and baseline hostility, irritability, or agitation.

Estimating Changes in Weight and Metabolic Parameters Before and After Treatment With Cariprazine: A Retrospective Study of Electronic Health Records.

PURPOSE: Weight gain and associated negative cardiometabolic effects can occur as a result of mental illness or treatment with second-generation antipsychotics (SGAs), leading to increased rates of morbidity and mortality. In this analysis, we evaluated the effect of the SGA cariprazine on weight and metabolic parameters in a real-world, retrospective, observational dataset. METHODS: Electronic health records from the Optum Humedica database (October 1, 2014-December 31, 2020) were analyzed during the 12-month period before starting cariprazine (baseline) and for up to 12 months following cariprazine initiation; approved and off-label indications were included. Body weight trajectories were estimated in the overall patient cohort and at 3-, 6-, and 12-month timepoints (primary objective). Changes in hemoglobin A1c (HbA1c), low-density lipoprotein (LDL), high-density lipoprotein (HDL), and triglycerides were also evaluated (secondary objectives). Percentages of patients with clinically relevant shifts in body weight, total cholesterol, and fasting triglycerides were also determined. Discontinuation rates for metabolic regulating medications were calculated. Average predicted values were estimated by linear mixed-effects regression models. FINDINGS: A total of 2,301 patients were included; average duration of follow-up was 133.7 days. Average predicted weight change for patients during the cariprazine overall follow-up period was +2.4 kg, with predicted weight changes of +0.8 kg (n = 811), +1.1 kg (n = 350), and +1.4 kg (n = 107) at months 3, 6, and 12, respectively. Overall, the majority of patients did not experience clinically significant (≥7%) weight gain (82.8%) or loss (90.5%) after starting cariprazine. Average predicted HbA1c levels (n = 189) increased during baseline (0.15%/year) and decreased during cariprazine treatment (-0.2%/year). Average predicted triglyceride levels (n = 257) increased during baseline (15.0 mg/dL/year) and decreased during cariprazine treatment (-0.7 mg/dL/year). Predicted LDL (n = 247) and HDL (n = 255) values decreased during baseline (-7.3 and -1.1 mg/dL/year, respectively); during cariprazine treatment, LDL increased by 5.6 mg/dL/year and HDL decreased by -0.6 mg/dL/year. During follow-up, most patients did not shift from normal/borderline to high total cholesterol (<240 to ≥240 mg/dL; 522 [90.2%]) or fasting triglyceride (<200 to ≥200 mg/dL; 143 [88.8%] patients) levels; shifts from high to normal/borderline levels occurred in 44 (61.1%) patients for total cholesterol and 38 (57.6%) patients for fasting triglycerides. After starting cariprazine, the discontinuation rate per 100 patient-years was 60.4 for antihyperglycemic medication and 87.4 for hyperlipidemia medication. IMPLICATIONS: These real-world results support short-term clinical trial findings describing a neutral weight and metabolic profile associated with cariprazine treatment and they expand the dataset to include long-term follow-up.