Structural History of Human SRGAP2 Proteins.

In the development of the human brain, human-specific genes are considered to play key roles, conferring its unique advantages and vulnerabilities. At the time of Homo lineage divergence from Australopithecus, SRGAP2C gradually emerged through a process of serial duplications and mutagenesis from ancestral SRGAP2A (3.4-2.4 Ma). Remarkably, ectopic expression of SRGAP2C endows cultured mouse brain cells, with human-like characteristics, specifically, increased dendritic spine length and density. To understand the molecular mechanisms underlying this change in neuronal morphology, we determined the structure of SRGAP2A and studied the interplay between SRGAP2A and SRGAP2C. We found that: 1) SRGAP2A homo-dimerizes through a large interface that includes an F-BAR domain, a newly identified F-BAR extension (Fx), and RhoGAP-SH3 domains. 2) SRGAP2A has an unusual inverse geometry, enabling associations with lamellipodia and dendritic spine heads in vivo, and scaffolding of membrane protrusions in cell culture. 3) As a result of the initial partial duplication event (∼3.4 Ma), SRGAP2C carries a defective Fx-domain that severely compromises its solubility and membrane-scaffolding ability. Consistently, SRGAP2A:SRAGP2C hetero-dimers form, but are insoluble, inhibiting SRGAP2A activity. 4) Inactivation of SRGAP2A is sensitive to the level of hetero-dimerization with SRGAP2C. 5) The primal form of SRGAP2C (P-SRGAP2C, existing between ∼3.4 and 2.4 Ma) is less effective in hetero-dimerizing with SRGAP2A than the modern SRGAP2C, which carries several substitutions (from ∼2.4 Ma). Thus, the genetic mutagenesis phase contributed to modulation of SRGAP2A's inhibition of neuronal expansion, by introducing and improving the formation of inactive SRGAP2A:SRGAP2C hetero-dimers, indicating a stepwise involvement of SRGAP2C in human evolutionary history.

Selectivity of propeptide-enzyme interaction in cathepsin L-like cysteine proteases.

Cathepsin L-like endopeptidases of the papain family are synthesized as proenzymes. N-terminal proregions are essential for folding and latency of the enzyme unit. While selectivity has been reported for the inhibitory function of papain-family propeptides, there is no systematic investigation of the selectivity of their chaperone-like function to date. The chaperone-like cross-reactivity between the cathepsins S, K, and L were thoroughly quantified in trans-experiments, i.e., with isolated propeptides and mature enzymes, and compared to the inhibitory cross-reactivity. The three endopeptidases have been chosen due to only minimal evolutionary distance and nearly identical X-ray structures of their zymogenes. The intramolecular chaperone function of the proregion was found to be more selective than the inhibitory activity and significant differences were found between the selectivity profiles, underlining the assumption that the inhibitory and the chaperone-like propeptide functions are autonomous. Considering the data published on the intramolecular chaperone-like propeptide function within other protease classes as well, our data suggest that intrinsically structured propeptides are more selective than intrinsically unstructured propeptides, i.e., those adopting tertiary structure elements only in complex with their maternal enzyme.

Optimized folding and activation of recombinant procathepsin L and S produced in Escherichia coli.

Large scale production of the recombinant human cathepsins L and S was optimized. Final purity was nearly 100%, yield 65% and 41%, respectively. Cost-effective expression in Escherichia coli, inclusion body purification and solubilization followed modified standard protocols. Most contribution to the remarkable increase in over-all efficiency came from the subsequent steps: folding by dilution, selective HIC-capturing of the folded proenzymes, and auto-activation. The effort to optimize the process parameters for folding and activation was greatly reduced by central composite fractional factorial experimental design, considering curved responses as well as factor interactions. Theoretical and practical features of this powerful tool for experimental design are given. Yield in procathepsin S folding could be further increased by addition of an excess of its own native propeptide with known intramolecular chaperone function. This corroborates literature data on proenzyme folding and is broadly discussed in the light of the lower conformational stability of the prodomain compared to the catalytic unit. Auto-activation kinetics was largely different between the two related proenzymes; from its time course contribution of uni- and bimolecular events in proregion hydrolysis and rate constants were estimated.

[What can experimental research offer to rheumatology today--the viewpoint of molecular biology? Contribution of molecular biology to pathogenesis research in rheumatology using the example of rheumatoid arthritis]. / Was kann die experimentelle Forschung der Rheumatologie heute bieten--die Sichtweise der Molekularbiologie? Beitrag der Molekularbiologie zur Pathogeneseforschung in der Rheumatologie am Beispiel der Rheumatoiden Arthritis.

Molecular biology plays an increasing role for the development of innovative approaches to analyze the pathogenesis of rheumatic diseases and to improve diagnosis and therapy of these disorders. Some of these approaches/techniques have recently yielded important results, e.g. the analysis of 1) chromosomal aberrations (numerical and, in part, structural aberrations in synovial fibroblasts/macrophages from chronic joint inflammation); 2) cell clonality (oligoclonal expansion of synovial T-cells, B-cells, but also fibroblasts); 3) the importance of genetic factors (genome-wide screening for arthritis susceptibility genes); 4) mutations in key genes of cell cycle and/or function (mutations in p53 and proto-oncogenes in the inflamed synovial membrane); and 5) gene expression patterns (e.g. by high-density microarrays, custom arrays, in situ hybridization, and real-time PCR). It can be expected that these analyses will result in central new findings concerning the understanding of the pathogenetic basis of chronic inflammatory rheumatic diseases, with the potential to develop differential diagnostic criteria for these hitherto extremely heterogeneous diseases, and to create the basis for individual-oriented therapy.