Learning Needle Placement in Soft Tissue With Robot-assisted Navigation.

BACKGROUND/AIM: The aim of this phantom study was to evaluate the learning curves of novices practicing how to place a cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT)-guided needle using a novel robotic assistance system (RAS). MATERIALS AND METHODS: Ten participants performed 18 punctures each with random trajectories in a phantom setting, supported by a RAS over 3 days. Precision, duration of the total intervention, duration of the needle placement, autonomy, and confidence of the participants were measured, displaying possible learning curves. RESULTS: No statistically significant differences were observed in terms of needle tip deviation during the trial days (mean deviation day 1: 2.82 mm; day 3: 3.07 mm; p=0.7056). During the trial days, the duration of the total intervention (mean duration: day 1: 11:22 min; day 3: 07:39 min; p<0.0001) and the duration of the needle placement decreased (mean duration: day 1: 03:17 min; day 3: 02:11 min; p<0.0001). In addition, autonomy (mean percentage of achievable points: day 1: 94%; day 3: 99%; p<0.0001) and confidence of the participants (mean percentage of achievable points: day 1: 78%; day 3: 91%; p<0.0001) increased significantly during the trial days. CONCLUSION: The participants were already able to carry out the intervention precisely using the RAS on the first day of the trial. Throughout the trial, the participants' performance improved in terms of duration and confidence.

Robotic Assistance System for Cone-Beam Computed Tomography-Guided Percutaneous Needle Placement.

PURPOSE: The study aimed to evaluate a new robotic assistance system (RAS) for needle placement in combination with a multi-axis C-arm angiography system for cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) in a phantom setting. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The RAS consisted of a tool holder, dedicated planning software, and a mobile platform with a lightweight robotic arm to enable image-guided needle placement in conjunction with CBCT imaging. A CBCT scan of the phantom was performed to calibrate the robotic arm in the scan volume and to plan the different needle trajectories. The trajectory data were sent to the robot, which then positioned the tool holder along the trajectory. A 19G needle was then manually inserted into the phantom. During the control CBCT scan, the exact needle position was evaluated and any possible deviation from the target lesion measured. RESULTS: In total, 16 needle insertions targeting eight in- and out-of-plane sites were performed. Mean angular deviation from planned trajectory to actual needle trajectory was 1.12°. Mean deviation from target point and actual needle tip position was 2.74 mm, and mean deviation depth from the target lesion to the actual needle tip position was 2.14 mm. Mean time for needle placement was 361 s. Only differences in time required for needle placement between in- and out-of-plane trajectories (337 s vs. 380 s) were statistically significant (p = 0.0214). CONCLUSION: Using this RAS for image-guided percutaneous needle placement with CBCT was precise and efficient in the phantom setting.

Analysis of grasping strategies and function in hemiparetic patients using an instrumented object.

This paper validates a novel instrumented object, the iBox, dedicated to the analysis of grasping and manipulation. This instrumented box can be grasped and manipulated, is fitted with an Inertial Measurement Unit (IMU) and can sense the force applied on each side and transmits measured force, acceleration and orientation data wirelessly in real time. The iBox also provides simple access to data for analysing human motor control features such as the coordination between grasping and lifting forces and complex manipulation patterns. A set of grasping and manipulation experiments was conducted with 6 hemiparetic patients and 5 healthy control subjects. Measures made of the forces, kinematics and dynamics are developed, which can be used to analyse grasping and contribute to assessment in patients. Quantitative measurements provided by the iBox reveal numerous characteristics of the grasping strategies and function in patients: variations in the completion time, changes in the force distribution on the object and grasping force levels, difficulties to adjust the level of applied forces to the task and to maintain it, along with movement smoothness decrease and pathological tremor.