Objective: To compare the success, failure rates and perinatal outcomes following emergency and elective cervical cerclage in singleton and twin pregnancies at a tertiary care perinatal centre over half a decade. Methods: All pregnant women, both with singleton and twin pregnancies, who had cervical cerclage between June 2014 and May 2019 were included in the retrospective study. Success rates, failure rates, maternal complications and perinatal outcomes were compared in both groups. Results: There were 129 women enrolled in the study, 48 in the emergency and 81 in the elective group. A significantly greater number of multiparous women were in the elective group (97.5% versus 68.7%; p-value < 0.001). Twins were nearly four times more in the emergency group as compared to the elective group. The mean cervical length at time of cerclage was 2.05 cm and 1.5 cm; (p-value < 0.001) respectively in the elective and emergency groups. Almost half of the women in the emergency group had bulging membranes. (52.2%). Following cerclage, mean gestational age at delivery was similar in both groups. However, more women in the elective group delivered at or beyond 34 weeks in comparison to the emergency groups (71% versus 53.3%. P-value 0.05). Preterm labour leading to preterm births was almost twice in the emergency group than elective group (49% versus 22%, P-value 0.002). Rates of maternal chorioamnionitis were similar in both groups. The overall live birth rates were comparable (81.3% versus 84.4% P-value 0.85) in both the groups. These results were also seen on doing subgroup analysis of elective versus emergency cerclage in singleton pregnancies only. Failure rates were also similar in both groups (18.7% versus 15.6%, P-value 0.85) Composite neonatal morbidity was more in the emergency group than in the elective group (35.5 versus 14%, P-value 0.01). Conclusion: Live birth rates and failure rates were comparable following elective and emergency cerclage both overall and in singleton pregnancies. Maternal chorioamnionitis and neonatal sepsis rates were similar in both the groups. However, composite neonatal morbidity was higher in the emergency cerclage group.
We studied the indications, success rate, perinatal outcomes and maternal complications following mid-trimester emergency cervical cerclage. All women undergoing mid-trimester emergency cerclage at our centre during 2014-2019 were included in this retrospective study.There were 46 women in our cohort. Mean cervical length was 1.5â cm (SD ± 0.7), and 52.1% of them had bulging membranes. The mean gestational age at cerclage was 23.35 weeks (SD ± 3.341). Three were loss to follow up.Out of 43 pregnancies (23 singletons and 20 twins) analyzed, 37/43, 86.4% had livebirths. Success rate in the singletons and twins were 91.3% and 80% respectively. Maternal complications were seen in 56.5% of patients. Composite neonatal morbidity was significantly more in the twin group (p-value 0.04).Overall live birth rate was 86.4% with similar success rates in singleton and multiple pregnancies. Although, evidence for beneficial effect of prophylactic cerclage in multiple gestation is lacking, emergency cerclage may have a role in twin gestation.
Cerclage, Cervical , Premature Birth , Female , Humans , Infant, Newborn , Pregnancy , Pregnancy Outcome , Pregnancy, Twin , Premature Birth/epidemiology , Premature Birth/prevention & control , Retrospective Studies , Tertiary Healthcare
BACKGROUND: Medical termination for missed miscarriage with the use of 800 µg of vaginal misoprostol as a single agent is recommended as a cheap option before 14 weeks of gestation in developing countries. A few studies have looked at its efficacy. METHODS: A prospective, observational study was done on women having medical termination with up to three doses of 800 µg vaginal misoprostol at 12 hourly intervals. The number of women who needed check curettage was collected. Ultrasound findings if done were collated. Follow-up was done telephonically at the end of first week, fourth week and sixth week. RESULTS: The cohort comprised 145 women. The primary outcome was the need for curettage after expulsion of products following medical management and this was 49/145 (37.8%) of women. The induction expulsion interval was 36 hours. The mean endometrial thickness of the 113/145 women who had an ultrasound was 11 mm. The mean endometrial thickness in women who had check curettage was 18 mm. Persistent spotting was the only significant symptom at follow-up. Resumption of cycle at the end of the sixth week was seen in 105/132 (80.15%) of women who were followed up. CONCLUSION: Findings of our study showed the check curettage rate of 37.8%. However, the regime which we used, that is, 800 µg vaginal misoprostol at 12 hourly intervals had a long induction to expulsion interval of 36 hours. In all, 80% of women resumed normal cycles at the end of the sixth week. No significant complications were noted on follow-up.
