Barriers to accessing pain management services among veterans with bipolar disorder.

OBJECTIVE: To identify barriers veterans with bipolar disorder face to accessing chronic pain management services within a Veterans Affairs (VA) health care system. DATA SOURCES AND STUDY SETTING: Veterans (n = 15) with chronic pain and bipolar disorder and providers (n = 15) working within a mid-Atlantic VA health care system. Data were collected from August 2017-June 2018. STUDY DESIGN: Veteran interviews focused on their chronic pain experiences and treatment, including barriers that arose when trying to access pain management services. Provider interviews focused on whether they address chronic pain with veteran patients and, if so, what considerations arise when addressing pain in veterans with bipolar disorder and other serious mental illnesses. DATA COLLECTION: Veterans were at least 18 years old, had a confirmed bipolar disorder and chronic pain diagnosis, and engaged in outpatient care within the VA health care system. Clinicians provided direct care services to veterans within the same VA. Interviews lasted approximately 60 min and were transcribed and analyzed using a rapid analysis protocol. PRINCIPAL FINDINGS: Four major themes emerged from veteran and provider interviews: siloed care (unintegrated and uncoordinated mental and physical health care), mental health primacy (prioritization of mental health symptoms at expense of physical health symptoms), lagging expectations (unfamiliarity with comprehensive evidence-based pain management options), and provider-patient communication concerns (inefficient communication about pain concerns and treatment options). CONCLUSIONS: Veterans with co-occurring pain and bipolar disorder face unique barriers that compromise equitable access to evidence-based pain treatment. Our findings suggest that educating providers about bipolar disorder and other serious mental illnesses and the benefit of effective non-pharmacological pain interventions for this group may improve care coordination and care quality and reduce access disparities.

Increasing community engagement: Skills used by adults with schizophrenia participating in a psychosocial intervention.

OBJECTIVE: We present findings from a qualitative study aimed at understanding the experiences of Veterans with schizophrenia and negative symptoms who participated in trial of an intervention to increase social and community participation called Engaging in Community Roles and Experiences (EnCoRE). Our goal was to understand what participants (N = 36) perceived they learned in EnCoRE, how participants used what they learned in their daily lives, and if and how participants built on these experiences in ways that might lead to sustained change. METHOD: Our analysis approach was inductive (bottom up), drawing on interpretive phenomenological analysis (IPA; Conroy, 2003), plus some top-down examination of the role of EnCoRE elements in participants' accounts. RESULTS: We identified three themes: (a) Learning skills led to increased comfort talking to people and planning activities; (b) Increased comfort led to increased confidence to try new things; and (c) The group atmosphere offered support and accountability that helped participants practice and refine new skills. CONCLUSIONS AND IMPLICATIONS FOR PRACTICE: The process of learning skills, planning to use them, implementing them, and returning to the group for input helped many surmount feelings of low interest and low motivation. Our findings support having proactive discussions with patients about how building confidence can support improved social and community participation. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2023 APA, all rights reserved).

Barriers and Enablers to Implementing Peer Specialists in Veterans Health Administration Primary Care: a Qualitative Study.

BACKGROUND: Peer specialists (PSs) are increasingly deployed in a variety of settings to provide patient-centered care. In the Veterans Health Administration (VHA), efforts are underway to integrate PSs into primary care settings. Little is known about the barriers and enablers to implementing PS services in primary care. OBJECTIVE: To characterize barriers and enablers to implementing PSs in primary care. DESIGN: Qualitative study using semi-structured interviews. PARTICIPANTS: PSs and their supervisors from 25 VHA primary care settings. APPROACH: PSs and supervisors were interviewed about their experiences integrating PSs in primary care. Rapid analysis was conducted to identify barriers and enablers to PS integration, as well as to examine the role of external facilitation in implementation experiences. KEY RESULTS: Fifty-two interviews were completed (25 PSs from 19 sites and 27 supervisors from 24 sites). Barriers and enablers to PS integration in VHA primary care settings included PS role clarity and constraints, provider buy-in, supervision, leadership support, and primary care culture. The barriers and enablers were consistent across both external facilitation and control sites. CONCLUSIONS: Results describe how the characteristics of the innovation, the recipients, and the context impact successful implementation of PSs in primary care settings. The identification of barriers and enablers holds promise for improving future efforts to embed PSs in primary care. TRIAL REGISTRATION: This project is registered at ClinicalTrials.gov with number NCT02732600 (URL: https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT02732600 ).

Implementation of peer specialist services in VA primary care: a cluster randomized trial on the impact of external facilitation.

BACKGROUND: Over 1100 veterans work in the Veterans Health Administration (VHA) as peer specialists (PSs)-those with formal training who support other veterans with similar diagnoses. A White House Executive Action mandated the pilot reassignment of VHA PSs from their usual placement in mental health to 25 primary care Patient Aligned Care Teams (PACTs) in order to broaden the provision of wellness services that can address many chronic illnesses. An evaluation of this initiative was undertaken to assess the impact of outside assistance on the deployment of PSs in PACTs, as implementation support is often needed to prevent challenges commonly experienced when first deploying PSs in new settings. METHODS: This study was a cluster-randomized hybrid II effectiveness-implementation trial to test the impact of minimal implementation support vs. facilitated implementation on the deployment of VHA PSs in PACT over 2 years. Twenty-five Veterans Affairs Medical Centers (VAMCs) were recruited to reassign mental health PSs to provide wellness-oriented care in PACT. Sites in three successive cohorts (n = 7, 10, 8) over 6-month blocks were matched and randomized to each study condition. In facilitated implementation, an outside expert worked with site stakeholders through a site visit and regular calls, and provided performance data to guide the planning and address challenges. Minimal implementation sites received a webinar and access to the VHA Office of Mental Health Services work group. The two conditions were compared on PS workload data and veteran measures of activation, satisfaction, and functioning. Qualitative interviews collected information on perceived usefulness of the PS services. RESULTS: In the first year, sites that received facilitation had higher numbers of unique veterans served and a higher number of PS visits, although the groups did not differ after the second year. Also, sites receiving external facilitation started delivering PS services more quickly than minimal support sites. All sites in the external facilitation condition continued in the pilot into the second year, whereas two of the sites in the minimal assistance condition dropped out after the first year. There were no differences between groups on veterans' outcomes-activation, satisfaction, and functioning. Most veterans were very positive about the help they received as evidenced in the qualitative interviews. DISCUSSION: These findings demonstrate that external facilitation can be effective in supporting the implementation of PSs in primary care settings. The lack of significant differences across conditions after the second year highlights the positive outcomes associated with active facilitation, while also raising the important question of whether longer-term success may require some level of ongoing facilitation and implementation support. TRIAL REGISTRATION: This project is registered at ClinicalTrials.gov with number NCT02732600 (URL: https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT02732600 ).

Relationships between chronic pain and mood symptoms among veterans with bipolar disorder.

BACKGROUND: Chronic pain is highly prevalent among individuals with mood disorders. While much is known about the relationship between pain and unipolar depression, little is known about pain experiences among people with bipolar disorder. This pilot study addresses this gap by examining pain and its relationship to mood and functioning in a sample of US military veterans with bipolar disorder. METHODS: Qualitative interviews were conducted with 15 veterans with bipolar disorder and chronic pain who were recruited from outpatient services within a Veterans Affairs medical center. RESULTS: Veterans reported a bidirectional relationship between pain and bipolar depression. When discussing manic episodes, individuals' experiences varied between notable reductions in pain (usually in euphoric states), increases in pain (usually in angry/irritable states), and feeling disconnected from pain. Many reported that increased activity when manic contributed to worse pain after an episode. Veterans clearly articulated how these connections negatively affected their functioning and quality of life. LIMITATIONS: This was a small, retrospective study that included a non-random sample of veteran participants from one VA medical center. All veterans were engaged in outpatient mental health care, so the majority reported that their mood has been well-stabilized through medications and/or psychotherapy. CONCLUSIONS: Chronic pain experiences appear to be related to depressive and manic mood states and significantly affects functioning and quality of life in Veterans with bipolar disorder. This study highlights the need to assess chronic pain among veterans with bipolar disorder, as changes in mood could have significant implications for functioning and pain management.