Quality of Life and Stress Levels in Patients under Home Mechanical Ventilation: What Can We Do to Improve Functioning Patients at Home? A Survey Study.

BACKGROUND: Home mechanical ventilation (HMV) is becoming more widely available in many countries. OBJECTIVES: The aim of this study was to measure the health-related quality of life and stress levels of patients ventilated mechanically at home. The relation between quality of life and stress levels was investigated including multiple regression analysis. METHODS: 100 patients treated with HMV in Poland were surveyed with the WHOQOL-BREF questionnaire and Perceived Stress Scale (PSS-10). RESULTS: 26% of patients assessed their quality of life as bad or very bad and 34% as good or very good. Stress levels measured with PSS-10 Scale were high level. For the group of patients with neurological disorders, stress levels were significantly higher than for the group of patients with pulmonological disorders. CONCLUSIONS: The higher the stress levels of patients, the lower the quality of life in particular domains. Improving the living conditions of HMV patients can influence improving their quality of life.

Dexmedetomidine Increases MMP-12 and MBP Concentrations after Coronary Artery Bypass Graft Surgery with Extracorporeal Circulation Anaesthesia without Impacting Cognitive Function: A Randomised Control Trial.

Postoperative neurological deficits remain a concern for patients undergoing cardiac surgeries. Even minor injuries can lead to neurocognitive decline (i.e., postoperative cognitive dysfunction). Dexmedetomidine may be beneficial given its reported neuroprotective effect. We aimed to investigate the effects of dexmedetomidine on brain injury during cardiac surgery anaesthesia. This prospective observational study analysed data for 46 patients who underwent coronary artery bypass graft surgery with extracorporeal circulation between August 2018 and March 2019. The patients were divided into two groups: control (CON) with typical anaesthesia and dexmedetomidine (DEX) with dexmedetomidine infusion. Concentrations of the biomarkers matrix metalloproteinase-12 (MMP-12) and myelin basic protein (MBP) were measured preoperatively and at 24 and 72 h postoperatively. Cognitive evaluations were performed preoperatively, at discharge, and 3 months after discharge using Addenbrooke's Cognitive Examination version III (ACE-III). The primary endpoint was the ACE-III score at discharge. Increased MMP-12 and MBP concentrations were observed in the DEX group 24 and 72 h postoperatively. No significant differences in ACE-III scores were observed between the groups at discharge; however, the values were increased when compared with initial values after 3 months (p = 0.000). The current results indicate that the administration of dexmedetomidine as an adjuvant to anaesthesia can increase MMP-12 and MBP levels without effects on neurocognitive outcomes at discharge and 3 months postoperatively.

Correction: Kwiatosz-Muc et al. Personality Traits and the Sense of Self-Efficacy among Nurse Anaesthetists. Multi-Centre Questionnaire Survey. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2021, 18, 9381.

There was an error in the original article [...].

Personality Traits and the Sense of Self-Efficacy among Nurse Anaesthetists. Multi-Centre Questionnaire Survey.

INTRODUCTION: Anaesthesia and intensive care units are specific workplaces. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the level of the sense of self-efficacy and the intensification of personality traits in a group of nurse anaesthetists and to develop a regression model explaining the sense of self-efficacy. METHOD: The population of the questionnaire survey included nurse anaesthetists from five hospitals in south-eastern Poland. The NEO-FFI was used in assessing their personality traits. The general self-efficacy scale was employed for the self-efficacy assessment. A total of 143 correctly filled surveys were analyzed. RESULTS: The respondents typically perceived their own self-efficacy level as upper moderate. The nurse anaesthetists participating in the study revealed a tendency to high scores in conscientiousness and extraversion, and low scores related to neuroticism. The persons characterized by high conscientiousness, extraversion and openness to experience revealed a tendency to high scores related to the sense of self-efficacy. The relationship between personality traits and experiencing the nuisance of selected stressful job factors was demonstrated. Regression analysis showed that conscientiousness and extraversion are most closely related to the sense of self-efficacy. CONCLUSIONS: It seems to be beneficial to implement occupational consulting for nurses, who are starting their work or/and taking into consideration working in anesthesiology and intensive care units. The importance of personality traits and self- efficacy in relation with well-being of medical personnel needs deeper investigations.

Home Mechanical Ventilation: A Patient's Perspective Survey Study.

BACKGROUND: An increasing number of patients included in home mechanical ventilation (HMV) care has been under observation for many years. The study aimed to assess the patients opinion concerning the expected and perceived quality of care in an HMV system and a patient's satisfaction with care. METHODS: In 2017, patients treated with HMV were surveyed in Poland with the modified SERVQUAL questionnaire. RESULTS: One hundred correctly completed surveys were analyzed. Patient Satisfaction Index was high. In every examined area, the expectations were statistically significant larger than the perception of the services. The biggest gap was in the tangibility dimension and the smallest gap was in the empathy dimension. Perceived respect and understanding for a patient's needs are close to the expectations. CONCLUSIONS: The level of satisfaction with health care among patients treated with HMV in majority of investigated components is high. Moreover, the difference between perceived and expected quality of health care in the HMV system was relatively small in the opinion of the patients themselves. Further investigations with alternative methods are needed.

Stress coping styles among anaesthesiology and intensive care unit personnel - links to the work environment and personal characteristics: a multicentre survey study.

BACKGROUND: High levels of stress among anaesthesiology and intensive care unit workers are commonly reported. Personnel in these units are prone to stress because of specific characteristics of their work. Their development of skills to cope with stress may affect their psychophysical condition and, consequently, patient safety. OBJECTIVES: The aim of this study was to define the coping styles of anaesthesiology and intensive care unit personnel and to evaluate the connections between the work environment as well as personal characteristics and the dominant coping styles. METHODS: Anaesthesiology and intensive care unit personnel from 15 selected Polish hospitals were surveyed using the Coping Inventory for Stressful Situations, which examines task-oriented coping, emotion-oriented coping and avoidance-oriented coping. The Perceived Stress Scale was used to assess stress levels. RESULTS: The analysis included 425 successfully completed surveys. The examined population was divided into two groups: Group N comprised 311 nurses (73.18%) and group P comprised 114 physicians (26.82%). For 167 participants (39.29%), the dominant coping style was defined. The most common style was the task-oriented coping style; it was dominant in 96 participants (22.58% of the entire examined population). This style was significantly predominant among men. The domination of some coping styles coexisted with marital status, number of children and financial situation. The occurrence of different coping styles did not significantly differ among workers at different-sized hospitals, with different job seniority or with different living locations. Perceived stress was correlated with all coping styles. CONCLUSIONS: Work-related stress among anaesthesiology and intensive care unit workers is an important problem. Further investigations of stress levels and the causes and effects of stress in this population are necessary.

Stress prevalence and stressors among anaesthesiology and intensive care unit workers: A multicentre survey study.

BACKGROUND: High stress levels have been commonly reported among ICU workers. Currently, anaesthesiology is safer for the patient but more stressful for the staff working in this branch of medicine. ICU and anaesthesiology personnel are prone to stress because of the specific character of their work. OBJECTIVES: Our objectives were to assess stress prevalence among anaesthesiology and ICU workers to compare this stress prevalence in relation to professional groups, sex, job seniority, and type of hospital and describe the importance of major stressors at work. METHODS: The ICU and anaesthesiology workers of 15 randomly selected Polish hospitals were surveyed. To assess stress prevalence, the Perceived Stress Scale (PSS-10) was used. The analysis included 544 surveys. RESULTS: The examined population was divided into two groups. Group N consisted of 406 nurses (74.60%) and group P of 138 physicians (25.40%). The mean result in the PSS-10 scale for the N group was 19.00 and for the P group 17.00. Both group results were related to a 6 sten score, which implied a medium level of stress. In the N group, the PSS-10 results were significantly higher than in the P group. Women showed higher levels of stress than men. CONCLUSIONS: Stress levels among ICU and anaesthesiology personnel were of a medium range. Nurses showed significantly higher levels of stress than physicians. Female personnel showed higher levels of stress than male personnel. Age, job seniority and type of hospital did not have an influence on stress levels. The most stressful circumstances for anaesthesiology and ICU personnel included night shifts and duty overload.

Emotional sequelae among survivors of critical illness: a long-term retrospective study.

CONTEXT: Treatment in an ICU can be stressful and traumatic for patients, and can lead to various physical, psychological and cognitive sequelae. OBJECTIVES: The aim of the study was to assess the influence of the social, economic and working status of individuals in regard to long-term anxiety and depression among ICU convalescents. DESIGN: Retrospective, cross-sectional, 5-year survey between 2005 and 2009. SETTING: The general ICUs of two hospitals in Lublin (Poland): the Teaching Hospital, Medical University of Lublin and the District Hospital. PATIENTS: All adults surviving an ICU stay of more than 24 h were eligible. In December 2010, 533 questionnaires were sent to discharged ICU survivors, and 195 (36.6%) were returned. One hundred and eighty-six patients were enrolled in the study. Patients with brain injuries were excluded. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: The questionnaire consisted of the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS); questions defining social, economic and working status before and after intensive care stay, health status before intensive care stay, as well as questions about memories and readmissions to intensive care were included. RESULTS: According to HADS, 34.4% patients had an anxiety disorder and 27.4% were depressed. There was a strong positive correlation between anxiety and depression (r = +0.726, P<0.001). Better material and housing conditions correlated with lower anxiety and depression rates. Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation II scores on admission positively correlated with both anxiety (r =+0.187; P=0.011) and depression (r = +0.239; P=0.001). A negative correlation between health status before intensive care admission and HADS scores was observed (anxiety rs = -0.193; P=0.008; depression rs = -0.227; P=0.002); better health resulted in less anxiety and depression disorders. CONCLUSION: Adverse social and economic status is associated with higher rates of anxiety and depression following ICU stay.

Intraoperative awareness--comparison of its incidence in women undergoing general anaesthesia for caesarean section and for gynaecological procedures.

BACKGROUND: Intraoperative awareness (IA) is diagnosed when patients can recall their surroundings or an event related to the surgery that occurred while they were under general anaesthesia. The female gender and Caesarean section are considered to be contributing factors. The aim of the present study was to analyse the frequency of IA in patients undergoing general anaesthesia either for Caesarean section or gynaecological procedures. METHODS: ASA I and II women were included into the study. Patients were randomly allocated to 4 groups: A, B and C included patients qualified for elective gynaecological surgery, and group D comprised Caesarean section patients. Premedication was not given. Group A received total intravenous anaesthesia with TCI, and groups B, C and D received balanced anaesthesia. The depth of anaesthesia was monitored with an AEP monitor. Blinded structured interviews were conducted 2 hours after anaesthesia and on postoperative days 7 and 30. RESULTS: 337 patients were enrolled into the study. 45 patients reported diverse sensations connected to the anaesthesia (Group A - 7 patients, B - 9 patients, C - 2 patients, D - 28 patients). There were mainly dream sensations, but IA was present in 3 cases. In all of the cases, IA was recognised during the first interview. One episode of awareness appeared in group B, and the other two appeared in group D. One Caesarean section was complicated by intraoperative haemorrhage. The patient from group B had similar sensations during previous anaesthesia. Two women enrolled in the study reported awareness in the past, which did not occur this time. CONCLUSION: Awareness during general anaesthesia occurs occasionally. The frequency of occurrence in a group of patients undergoing general anaesthesia for uncomplicated Caesarean section is not higher than for other procedures. The anaesthesia for Caesarean section, as well as for other procedures, may be accompanied by pleasant dreams.

[Effects of choice of anaesthesia on the patients image of the anaesthesiologist]. / Czy rodzaj znieczulenia wplywa na wizerunek lekarza anesthzjologa?

BACKGROUND: The social status of physicians has been traditionally high in Poland, over recent years, we have noticed increased patient expectations in relation to the newest technology and the highest possible competence. The patient s image of medical personnel may influence his or her opinion about the quality of the service and of the medical centre. At the same time, we have noticed signs of decreasing trust, and an increased number of legal claims against doctors. The purpose of this study was to compare the image of anaesthesiologists, as perceived by patients who underwent Caesarean section either with general or spinal anaesthesia. METHODS: Five hundred and thirteen parturients were asked to complete a questionnaire about their view of the attending anaesthesiologist, assessing the doctors attitude with 7-degree visual-analogue scale. RESULTS: Four hundred and twelve valid forms were returned. Women who received spinal anaesthesia rated their anaesthesiologist higher than those who had general anaesthesia. Among the most important factors that influenced their opinion were: competence, calmness, trustfulness, accurate and detailed information, patience and kindness. Feelings of intimacy and privacy were less important, but the length of the preoperative visit was found to be a relevant factor. Anaesthesiologists providing spinal anaesthesia were rated higher, probably because they were spending more time with awake patients than those who had chosen general anaesthesia. The latter may also have been in a hurry, because of co-existing emergencies. CONCLUSION: We conclude that patients satisfaction depends mainly on the time spent with their doctors before anaesthesia and during the procedure. Regional anaesthesia may increase the patients trust and satisfaction, when compared with general anaesthesia.

[Costs of subarachnoid vs. general anaesthesia for caesarean section]. / Porównanie kosztów znieczulenia podpajeczynówkowego i ogólnego do ciecia cesarskiego.

BACKGROUND: Modern medicine is becoming increasingly aware of economic-organizational aspects. In the field of anaesthesiology, the number of agents used markedly increases due to continuous pharmacological progress. A high proportion of them are expensive. The aim of the study was to compare hospital costs of general vs. subarachnoid anaesthesia for Caesarean section. METHODS: Costs were assessed from the perspective of a service provider. Direct costs were measured using the micro-cost method based on detailed data of the resources used during anaesthetic procedures. Non-medical costs were calculated by the direct allocation method (costs of auxiliary units). Unit costs of hospitalization were determined using the "top-to-bottom" assessment. Costs related to anaesthetic staff work were calculated by the micro-cost method based on duration of anaesthesia. Sensitivity analysis was performed. RESULTS: Mean direct cost of general anaesthesia for Caesarean section was lower than of subarachnoid anaesthesia. Mean personnel cost of subarachnoid anaesthesia was found to be higher compared to general anaesthesia. Costs of pharmaceuticals for general anaesthesia were lower than for subarachnoid one. Costs of medical materials related to the method used were significantly higher in subarachnoid anaesthesia. CONCLUSIONS: Subarachnoid anaesthesia takes more time than general one, which results in higher costs of medical staff work. Avoiding inhalation anaesthetics (sevoflurane) makes indirect costs of general anaesthesia lower compared to subarachnoid anaesthesia.