Profiles of health literacy and digital health literacy in clusters of hospitalised patients: a single-centre, cross-sectional study.

OBJECTIVE: To investigate health literacy (HL) and digital health literacy (eHL) among patients hospitalised in surgical and medical wards using a cluster analysis approach. DESIGN: Cross-sectional study using Ward's hierarchical clustering method to measure cluster adequacy by evaluating distances between cluster centroids (a measure of cohesion). Different distances produced different cluster solutions. SETTING AND PARTICIPANTS: The study was conducted at a Norwegian university hospital. A total of 260 hospitalised patients were enrolled between 24 May and 6 June 2021. DATA COLLECTION: All data were collected by self-reported questionnaires. Data on HL and eHL were collected by the Health Literacy Questionnaire (HLQ) and the eHealth Literacy Questionnaire (eHLQ). We also collected data on background characteristics, health status and patient diagnosis. RESULTS: We found six HLQ clusters to be the best solution of the sample, identifying substantial diversity in HL strengths and challenges. Two clusters, representing 21% of the total sample, reported the lowest HLQ scores in eight of nine HLQ domains. Compared with the other clusters, these two contained the highest number of women, as well as the patients with the highest mean age, a low level of education and the lowest proportion of being employed. One of these clusters also represented patients with the lowest health status score. We identified six eHL clusters, two of which represented 31% of the total sample with the lowest eHLQ scores in five of seven eHLQ domains, with background characteristics comparable to patients in the low-scoring HLQ clusters. CONCLUSIONS: This study provides new, nuanced knowledge about HL and eHL profiles in different clusters of patients hospitalised in surgical and medical wards. With such data, healthcare professionals can take into account vulnerable patients' HL needs and tailor information and communication accordingly.

Poor Physical Function Trajectory Predicts Impaired Patient Survival in Older Recipients of Deceased Donor Kidneys: A Prospective Cohort Study.

Optimized health-related quality of life (HRQOL) at the time of kidney transplantation (KT) is associated with improved survival. In older KT recipients, we aimed to prospectively evaluate if HRQOL evolution during the first posttransplant year was associated with long-term patient survival. Methods: Recipients older than 65 y at KT who received an organ from a deceased brain-dead donor and survived >12 mo posttransplant were eligible. HRQOL was assessed pre-KT, at 10 wk, 6 mo, and 12 mo post-KT, using the Kidney Disease Quality of Life Short Form version 1.3 survey. A mixed-effect model was used to explore HRQOL evolution during the first posttransplant year in long-term survivors compared with nonsurvivors. Distinct HRQOL clusters were identified using a group-based trajectory modeling and their association with patient survival was investigated with Cox proportional hazard regression models. Results: We included 192 elderly recipients of deceased brain-dead donor kidneys who were transplanted from 2013 to 2020. Eleven died during the first year leaving 181 for evaluation (male, 125; mean age at KT, 72 y [65-84 y]). During a median observation time post-KT of 4.9 y (11.1-8.5 y), 57 recipients died. In survivors, all the generic and kidney-specific HRQOL domains substantially improved during the first year, whereas in nonsurvivors HRQOL deteriorated. Three longitudinal HRQOL trajectories indicating poor, fair, and good HRQOL evolution were identified. Poor physical function trajectory was significantly associated with higher mortality risk independent of covariates, as compared with good physical trajectory (hazard ratio, 2.38; 95% confidence interval, 1.15-5.01). Conclusions: In elderly KT recipients, detection of declining posttransplant physical function may imply impaired survival. Systematic HRQOL monitoring following KT provides added value when evaluating mortality and may guide therapeutic decisions.

A Comorbidity Index and Pretransplant Physical Status Predict Survival in Older Kidney Transplant Recipients: A National Prospective Study.

Kidney transplantation (KT) is considered the best treatment for end-stage kidney disease (ESKD). In the increasing elderly ESKD population, KT should be reserved for carefully selected candidates who are expected to experience favorable outcomes. We aimed to prospectively evaluate pretransplant recipient factors that may predict patient survival and can eventually guide therapeutic decisions in elderly with ESKD. Methods: Recipient factors were evaluated in KT candidates aged ≥65 y. Comorbidity was assessed at waitlisting according to the Liu comorbidity index (LCI). Health-related quality of life outcomes were measured using the Kidney Disease Quality of Life Short Form, version 1.3. The Cox proportional hazard regression was used to evaluate predictors of patient survival. Results: We included 192 recipients, with a mean age of 72.1 (4.1) y, who were transplanted with kidneys from deceased brain-dead donors. During a median observation period of 4.6 (3.2-6.3) y, 66 recipients died. Elevated LCI consistently predicted poor patient survival. In recipients with LCI ≥4, dialysis >2 y comprised a 2.5-fold increase in mortality risk compared with recipients on dialysis ≤2 y. Self-reported pretransplant physical function was also proven to be a significant positive predictor of survival. Conclusion: The implementation of LCI and a physical function score during the evaluation of older kidney transplant candidates may improve the selection and thereby optimize posttransplant outcomes.

Health-Related Quality of Life in Older Kidney Transplant Recipients: A National Cohort Study of Short- and Longer-Term Outcomes.

RATIONALE & OBJECTIVE: Assessing the optimal therapy for older patients (aged ≥65 years) with end-stage kidney disease requires knowledge of longevity and health-related quality of life (HRQoL) outcomes. Kidney transplantation prolongs survival but its long-term impact on HRQoL in older recipients is not well defined. We aimed to prospectively evaluate HRQoL changes from enlisting until 3 years posttransplantation and examine pretransplantation predictors of posttransplantation outcomes. STUDY DESIGN: Prospective cohort study. SETTING & PARTICIPANTS: Patients 65 years and older enlisted at the Norwegian National Transplant Center between January 2013 and November 2016. PREDICTORS: Kidney transplantation, dialysis vintage, and pretransplantation comorbidity assessed using the Liu Comorbidity Index. OUTCOMES: HRQoL, assessed using the Kidney Disease Quality of Life Short Form, version 1.3. ANALYTICAL APPROACH: HRQoL scores obtained at 3 years posttransplantation were compared with those obtained pretransplantation and after 1 year using a paired-sample t test. Multivariable linear mixed-effect models were used to identify possible predictors of HRQoL changes over time. RESULTS: Among 289 patients included, 220 (mean age, 71.5 years) had undergone transplantation and 136 had completed the 3-year HRQoL follow-up by October 2020. Posttransplant HRQoL, both generic and kidney specific, substantially improved and the benefit persisted for 3 years. For wait-listed candidates remaining on dialysis, HRQoL gradually deteriorated, and recipients who died within 3 years posttransplantation experienced no improvement during the first year. Moderately elevated pretransplantation comorbidity scores and prolonged dialysis vintage independently predicted poor HRQoL outcomes posttransplantation. Recipients receiving dialysis for 1 year or longer with pretransplantation comorbidity scores ≥ 7 experienced a marked and sustained physical deterioration after transplantation. LIMITATIONS: Homogenous and highly selected population. CONCLUSIONS: Transplantation is associated with a sustained HRQoL improvement and should be the preferred treatment for selected older patients. The value of a pretransplant comorbidity score to predict posttransplantation outcomes warrants further evaluation and may improve the selection process.

Kidney transplantation: an attractive and cost-effective alternative for older patients? A cost-utility study.

BACKGROUND: In the elderly, kidney transplantation is associated with increased survival and improved health-related quality of life compared with dialysis treatment. We aimed to study the short-term health economic effects of transplantation in a population of elderly kidney transplant candidates. METHODS: Self-perceived health, quality-adjusted life years (QALYs) and costs were evaluated and compared 1 year before and 1 year after kidney transplantation in patients included in a single-centre prospective study of 289 transplant candidates ≥65 years of age. RESULTS: Self-perceived health and QALYs both significantly improved after transplantation. At 1 year, the costs per QALY were substantially higher for transplantation (€88 100 versus €76 495), but preliminary analyses suggest a favourable long-term health economic effect. CONCLUSIONS: Kidney transplantation in older kidney transplant recipients is associated with improved health but also with increased costs the first year after engraftment when compared with remaining on the waiting list. Any long-term cost-effectiveness needs to be confirmed in studies with longer observation times.

Evaluation of tools for annual capture of adherence to immunosuppressive medications after renal transplantation - a single-centre open prospective trial.

Annual assessment of adherence would strengthen long-term outcome assessments from registry data. The objective of this study was to evaluate tools suitable for annual routine capture of adherence data in renal transplant recipients. A single-centre open prospective trial included 295 renal transplant recipients on tacrolimus. Two-thirds of the patients were included 4 weeks post-transplant, randomized 1:1 to intensive or single-point adherence assessment in the early phase and 1-year post-transplant. One-third were included 1-year post-transplant during a cross-sectional investigation. Adherence was assessed using multiple methods: The "Basel Assessment of Adherence to Immunosuppressive Medication Scale" (BAASIS© ) questionnaire was used to assess self-reported adherence. The treating clinician scored patient's adherence and tacrolimus trough-concentration variability was calculated. In the analyses, the data from the different tools were dichotomized (adherent/nonadherent). The BAASIS© overall response rate was over 80%. Intensive BAASIS© assessment early after transplantation increased the chance of capturing a nonadherence event, but did not influence the 1-year adherence prevalence. The adherence tools generally captured different populations. Combining the tools, the nonadherence prevalence at 1 year was 38%. The different tools identified to a large degree different patients as nonadherent. Combining these tools is feasible for annual capture of adherence status.

Older kidney transplantation candidates' expectations of improvement in life and health following kidney transplantation: semistructured interviews with enlisted dialysis patients aged 65 years and older.

OBJECTIVE: The aim was to study the expectations of improvement in life and health following kidney transplantation (KTx) in a population of wait-listed patients ≥65 years with end-stage kidney disease. DESIGN: Qualitative research with individual in-depth interviews. SETTING: Patients on dialysis enlisted for a KTx from a deceased donor were included from an ongoing study of older patients' perspectives on KTx. Qualitative face-to-face interviews were conducted in a safe and familiar setting, and were analysed thematically using the theoretical framework of lifespan. INFORMANTS: Fifteen patients (median age 70 years, range 65-82) from all parts of Norway were interviewed. Informants were included consecutively until no new information was gained. RESULTS: Two main themes were evident: receiving a kidney is getting life back and grasp the chance. In addition, the themes 'hard to loose capacity and strength', 'reduced freedom' and 'life on hold' described the actual situation and thereby illuminated the informants' expectations. The informants tried to balance positive expectations and realism towards KTx, and they were hoping to become free from dialysis and to live a normal life. CONCLUSION: This study shows that older KTx candidates comprise a heterogeneous group of patients who take individual approaches that allow them to maintain autonomy and control while waiting for a transplant. This study provides new knowledge about the older KTx candidates relevant for clinicians, patients and researchers.

Improved Health-Related Quality of Life in Older Kidney Recipients 1 Year After Transplantation.

BACKGROUND: We aimed to evaluate changes in health-related quality of life (HRQoL) in patients 65 years or older from time of kidney transplantation (KTx) until 1 year postengraftment. METHODS: A single-center prospective study was conducted. HRQoL was measured pre-KTx and at 2, 6, and 12 months postengraftment using self-reported Kidney Disease and Quality of Life short-form version 1.3. Intraindividual scores before and after KTx were evaluated. Liu Comorbidity Index was registered at enlisting. short-form-36 scores were additionally compared with scores from an age-matched population. RESULTS: From January 1, 2013, until November 30, 2016, a total of 289 waitlisted patients were included. By September 1, 2017, 134 had reached 1 year postengraftment, and valid questionnaires were available in 120 (90%) patients. Mean age at KTx was 71.6 years (±4.3 years), 71% were male. Living donor was used in 21%, and preemptive KTx was performed in 30% of the recipients. Median waiting time for KTx from deceased donor was 16 months (range, 0.6-50.5 months). A total of 79 (66%) recipients had a Liu Comorbidity Index score of 3 or less.All HRQoL scores except the domain social function improved at 2 months postengraftment and remained stable or continued to improve at 1 year.HRQoL scores 12 months postengraftment were similar to those described in an age-matched general population except for the domain social function which remained at a significantly lower level. Time in dialysis was the most important variable associated with impaired HRQoL postengraftment. CONCLUSIONS: HRQoL scores showed clinically significant improvement in older KTx recipients 1 year posttransplant.

Exploring nurse managers' perception of using the RAFAELA system as a management tool in a Norwegian hospital setting.

Aim: The aim of the study, being part of a Norwegian evaluation project of the RAFAELA system, was to explore nurse managers' perception of the RAFAELA system as a management tool in a Norwegian hospital setting. Design: We applied an explorative qualitative design using focus group interviews. Methods: Two focus group interviews were performed with 12 nurses in different management positions during autumn 2013. The principles of qualitative content analysis were used for analysing data. Results: Three themes emerged. The informants experienced the RAFAELA system to be a basis for a precise and common langue. Furthermore, the informants considered it to be a system defining quality standards of nursing care. Finally, the RAFAELA system provided daily documentation of nursing intensity and thus was considered an important management tool for balancing patient needs with appropriate staff.

Changes in health-related quality of life in older candidates waiting for kidney transplantation.

AIM: There is limited available knowledge regarding health-related quality of life (HRQoL) in older patients with chronic kidney disease. We aimed to describe HRQoL in renal transplant candidates 65 years or older at transplant acceptance, and during the first year on the waiting list. METHODS: A nationwide prospective observational study in Norway was conducted. HRQoL was evaluated at baseline (wait listing) and after 6 and 12 months using the patient self-reported Kidney Disease and Quality of Life Short form version 1.3. Intra-individual scores at different times were evaluated. Generic HRQoL was compared with scores from an age-matched Norwegian population. RESULTS: From January 2013 to November 2016, 261 patients ≥65 years accepted for deceased donor kidney transplantation were included. Mean age at inclusion was 71.1 years, 67% male and 69% were on dialysis. HRQoL sum scores significantly decreased during the first year on the waiting list. Physical, mental and kidney disease component summary score reduced from 39.6 to 38.1 (P = 0.045), 48.8 to 44.7 (P < 0.001) and 72.1 to 70.2 (P = 0.03), respectively. When evaluating each domain separately, only the decrease in social function was clinically significant. Age and being on dialysis were the most important predictors for low HRQoL. Compared to the age-matched general population, males had significant lower HRQoL scores. Females were comparable to the general female population at baseline except in general health and vitality. CONCLUSIONS: HRQoL in older patients waiting for kidney transplantation decreases during the first year on the waiting list, but only the change in social function is clinically significant.

Should patients older than 65 years be offered a second kidney transplant?

BACKGROUND: Age and number of recipients in need of kidney re-transplantation are increasing. Re-transplantation practices and outcomes in elderly recipients are not previously explored. We aimed to retrospectively evaluate the outcomes of recipients 65 years and older receiving their second deceased donor allograft. METHODS: The study was designed as a retrospective registry based study. All recipients 65 years or older who received a deceased donor kidney transplant at Oslo University Hospital between 2000 and 2014 were included in the study. Survival outcomes were compared between recipients of first (TX1) and second (TX2) allograft. Survival analyses were performed using the Kaplan-Meier method and Cox proportional hazard models with patient survival, uncensored graft survival and death-censored graft survival as outcomes in the analyses. RESULTS: Seven hundred and thirty-tree recipients > 65 years received a first (n = 687) or second (n = 46) deceased donor kidney transplant. Five years uncensored graft survival rates were 64% in TX 2 and 67% in TX 1 (P= 0.789). Estimated five years graft survival rates censored for death with functioning graft were 88% in TX2 and 90% in TX1 (P=0.475). Adjusted hazard ratio for uncensored graft loss (TX2 vs. TX1) was 1.24 (95% CI 0.77 - 2.00). Adjusted hazard ratio for graft loss censored for death with functioning graft (TX2 vs. TX1) was 1.70 (0.72-4.02). CONCLUSIONS: Older recipients of second transplants have outcomes that are comparable to the outcomes of age-matched first transplant recipients, and far better than previously documented for older transplant candidates remaining on dialysis treatment. Advanced age by itself should not be a contraindication for re-transplantation. Best results are achieved with short time on dialysis before re-transplantation.

Are Octogenarians With End-Stage Renal Disease Candidates for Renal Transplantation?

BACKGROUND: Elderly patients are the fastest-growing group in need of renal transplantation. This study puts focus on renal transplant recipients in their 80th year or longer at time of engraftment. Is there evidence to support an absolute upper age limit for renal transplantation? METHODS: Recipients in their 80th year or longer, transplanted between 1983 and 2015, were included. Data were retrieved from the Norwegian Renal Registry in the end of October 2015. Graft and patient survivals were compared with recipients aged 70 to 79 years at transplantation. RESULTS: Forty-seven patients older than 79 years were transplanted in the defined period. Median age 80.1 years, 81% were men. Median time on dialysis before transplantation was 18.5 months. All patients received an allograft from a deceased donor (median donor age, 61.8 years). In the death-censored graft survival model, there was no statistical difference between the groups. We found improved patient and graft survivals after introduction of mycophenolate mofetil and induction with basiliximab. Patients transplanted before 2000 had increased risk of death compared with those transplanted after 2000 (hazard ratio, 3.2; 95% confidence interval, 1.2-8.7). Median uncensored graft survival for patients transplanted after the year 2000 was 5.0 year (95% confidence interval, 2.4-7.6). Median patient survival was 5.0 years (3.1-6.9) and 5-year patient survival was 55%. CONCLUSIONS: Age by itself should not be an absolute contraindication against renal transplantation. An estimated 5-year survival rate of 55% post-engraftment for an 80-year-old patient is in our opinion more than acceptable.

Nursing intensity and costs of nurse staffing demonstrated by the RAFAELA system: liver vs. kidney transplant recipients.

AIM: To compare nursing intensity and nurse staffing costs for liver transplant (LTx) vs. kidney transplant (KTx) patients through the use of the RAFAELA system (the OPCq instrument). BACKGROUND: High-quality patient care correlates with the correct allocation of nursing staff. Valid systems for obtaining data on nursing intensity, in relation to actual patient care needs, are needed to ensure correct staffing. METHODS: A prospective, comparative study of 85 liver and 85 kidney transplant patients. Nursing intensity was calculated using the Oulu Patient Classification (OPCq) instrument. The cost per nursing intensity point was calculated by dividing annual total nursing wage costs with annual total nursing intensity points. RESULTS: The results showed significantly higher nursing intensity per day for liver transplant patients compared to kidney transplant patients. The length of stay was the most important variable in relation to nursing intensity points per day. CONCLUSIONS: The study demonstrated differences in nursing intensity and nurse staffing costs between the two patient groups. IMPLICATIONS FOR NURSING MANAGEMENT: When defending nurse staffing decisions, it is essential that nurse managers have evidence-based knowledge of nursing intensity and nurse staffing costs.

How to routinely collect data on patient-reported outcome and experience measures in renal registries in Europe: an expert consensus meeting.

Despite the potential for patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) and experience measures (PREMs) to enhance understanding of patient experiences and outcomes they have not, to date, been widely incorporated into renal registry datasets. This report summarizes the main points learned from an ERA-EDTA QUEST-funded consensus meeting on how to routinely collect PROMs and PREMs in renal registries in Europe. In preparation for the meeting, we surveyed all European renal registries to establish current or planned efforts to collect PROMs/PREMs. A systematic review of the literature was performed. Publications reporting barriers and/or facilitators to PROMs/PREMs collection by registries were identified and a narrative synthesis undertaken. A group of renal registry representatives, PROMs/PREMs experts and patient representatives then met to (i) share any experience renal registries in Europe have in this area; (ii) establish how patient-reported data might be collected by understanding how registries currently collect routine data and how patient-reported data is collected in other settings; (iii) harmonize the future collection of patient-reported data by renal registries in Europe by agreeing upon preferred instruments and (iv) to identify the barriers to routine collection of patient-reported data in renal registries in Europe. In total, 23 of the 45 European renal registries responded to the survey. Two reported experience in collecting PROMs and three stated that they were actively exploring ways to do so. The systematic review identified 157 potentially relevant articles of which 9 met the inclusion criteria and were analysed for barriers and facilitators to routine PROM/PREM collection. Thirteen themes were identified and mapped to a three-stage framework around establishing the need, setting up and maintaining the routine collection of PROMs/PREMs. At the consensus meeting some PROMs instruments were agreed for routine renal registry collection (the generic SF-12, the disease-specific KDQOL™-36 and EQ-5D-5L to be able to derive quality-adjusted life years), but further work was felt to be needed before recommending PREMs. Routinely collecting PROMs and PREMs in renal registries is important if we are to better understand what matters to patients but it is likely to be challenging; close international collaboration will be beneficial.

The RAFAELA system: a workforce planning tool for nurse staffing and human resource management.

The RAFAELA system was developed in Finland during the 1990s to help with the systematic and daily measurement of nursing intensity (NI) and allocation of nursing staff. The system has now been rolled out across almost all hospitals in Finland, and implementation has started elsewhere in Europe and Asia. This article describes the system, which aims to uphold staffing levels in accordance with patients' care needs, and its structure, which consists of three parts: the Oulu Patient Classification instrument; registration of available nursing resources; and the Professional Assessment of Optimal Nursing Care Intensity Level method, as an alternative to classical time studies. The article also highlights the benefits of using a systematic measurement of NI.