Slow Conduction Corridors and Pivot Sites Characterize the Electrical Remodeling in Atrial Fibrillation.

OBJECTIVES: This study aimed to evaluate the progression of electrophysiological phenomena in a cohort of patients with paroxysmal atrial fibrillation (PAF) and persistent atrial fibrillation (PsAF). BACKGROUND: Electrical remodeling has been conjectured to determine atrial fibrillation (AF) progression. METHODS: High-density electroanatomic maps during sinus rhythm of 20 patients with AF (10 PAF, 10 PsAF) were compared with 5 healthy control subjects (subjects undergoing ablation of a left-sided accessory pathway). A computational postprocessing of electroanatomic maps was performed to identify specific electrophysiological phenomena: slow conductions corridors, defined as discrete areas of conduction velocity <50 cm/s, and pivot points, defined as sites showing high wave-front curvature documented by a curl module >2.5 1/s. RESULTS: A progressive decrease of mean conduction velocity was recorded across the groups (111.6 ± 55.5 cm/s control subjects, 97.1 ± 56.3 cm/s PAF, and 84.7 ± 55.7 cm/s PsAF). The number and density of slow conduction corridors increase in parallel with the progression of AF (8.6 ± 2.2 control subjects, 13.3 ± 3.2 PAF, and 20.5 ± 4.5 PsAF). In PsAF the atrial substrate is characterized by a higher curvature of wave-front propagation (0.86 ± 0.71 1/s PsAF vs 0.74 ± 0.63 1/s PAF; P = 0.003) and higher number of pivot points (25.1 ± 13.8 PsAF vs 9.5 ± 6.7 PAF; P < 0.0001). Slow conductions: corridors were mostly associated with pivot sites tending to cluster around pulmonary veins antra. CONCLUSIONS: The electrical remodeling hinges mainly on corridors of slow conduction and higher curvature of wave-front propagation. Pivot points associated to SC corridors may be the major determinants for functional localized re-entrant circuits creating the substrate for maintenance of AF.

Cavotricuspid isthmus is constantly a zone of slow conduction: Data from ultra-high-resolution mapping.

BACKGROUND: Whether cavotricuspid isthmus (CTI) is a region of conduction slowing during typical flutter has been discussed with conflicting results in the literature. We aimed to evaluate conduction velocity (CV) along the different portions of the typical flutter circuit with a recently proposed method by means of ultra-high-resolution (UHR) mapping. METHODS: Consecutive patients referred for typical atrial flutter (AFL) ablation underwent UHR mapping (Rhythmia, Boston Scientific). CVs were measured in the CTI as well as laterally and septally, respectively, from its lateral and septal borders. RESULTS: A total of 33 patients (mean age: 65 ± 13 years; right atrial volume: 134 ± 57 mL) were mapped either during ongoing counterclockwise (n = 25), or clockwise (n = 3) AFL (mean cycle length: 264 ± 38 ms), or during coronary sinus pacing at 400 ms (n = 1), 500 ms (n = 1), or 600 ms (n = 3). A total of 13 671 ± 7264 electrograms were acquired in 14 ± 9 min. CTI CV was significantly lower (0.56  ± 0.18 m/s) in comparison with the lateral CV (1.31 ± 0.29 m/s; P < .0001) and the septal border CV of the CTI (1.29 ± 0.31 m/s; P < .0001). CONCLUSION: UHR mapping confirmed that CTI CV was systematically twice lower than atrial conduction velocities outside the CTI.

How is Contact Force implemented in routine clinical practice? Results from a French National and Monaco Survey.

BACKGROUND: Combination of elementary parameters (force, time, power, impedance drop) has been proposed to optimize radiofrequency (RF) delivery. They have been partially validated in clinical studies. AIMS: The aim of this study was to assess contact-force (CF) implementation into clinical practice. METHODS: A 36-question electronic form was sent to 105 electrophysiologists (EP) including some general questions concerning the practice of catheter atrial fibrillation ablation and items concerning the parameters used for CF-guided ablation. RESULTS: Answers from 98 EP were collected (93% response rate). The CF-catheters used were Smart Touch, Biosense (52%), Tacticath, Saint-Jude Medical (12%), or both (27%) and no CF (9%). The power applied on the left atrial (LA) anterior (LAAW) and posterior (LAPW) wall was, respectively, 26-34 W (for 73% of the EP) and below 25 W (88% of the EP). Forty percent of the Visitag® users mostly used the nominal parameters. Seventy-five percent of the users did not use automatic display of the impedance drop. For the Tacticath users, 57% used a target value of 400 gs on the LAAW and 300 to 400 gs on the LAPW. Lesion Size Index was exceptionally used. CONCLUSIONS: The parameters used for CF-guided ablation are widely variable among the different operators. Further prospective studies are needed to validate the targets for automatic annotation of the RF applications.