Bitewing radiography dosimetry of the PORTRAY stationary-intraoral tomosynthesis imaging system.

OBJECTIVE: This study measured effective (E) and equivalent doses from adult and child 3-dimensional (3D) and 2D posterior bitewing (PBW) examinations using the PORTRAY stationary-intraoral tomosynthesis radiography system. STUDY DESIGN: Adult and child phantoms and optically stimulated luminescent dosimeters were used to measure doses for adult-4 and child-2 projection PBW examinations acquired without (W/O) and with (W) a direct digital sensor in the beam path. Child doses without and with thyroid shielding were measured. RESULTS: Three-dimensional examination E values (µSv) W/O and W were 16.7 and 7.3 for adult, 9.2 and 3.5 for child, and 8.7 and 3.0 with thyroid shielding, respectively. Two-dimensional examination E values W/O and W were 4.3 and 1.5 for adult, 2.1 and 0.6 for child, and 2.0 and 0.5 with shielding, respectively. Sensor presence reduced E for all adult and child examinations (P = .0001). Child E was reduced compared with adult E for both sensor conditions in 3D (P < .0001) and 2D (P ≤ .0043) imaging. Adult and child 3D W/O and W equivalent thyroid doses did not differ (P ≥ .9996). However, child 2D W/O and W doses were lower (P ≤ .0002). Shielding produced no reduction (P ≥ .1128) for either 3D condition or 2D with the sensor (P = .6615) but reduced child 2D dose without the sensor. CONCLUSIONS: Inclusion of a sensor yielded significant reductions in adult and child E. Sensor presence impacted thyroid dose reduction more than shielding.

Bitewing radiography dosimetry of a stationary intraoral tomosynthesis imaging system.

OBJECTIVES: This study assessed effective doses (E) from conventional and stationary intraoral tomosynthesis (s-IOT) radiography for posterior bitewing (PBW) examinations and evaluated the effect of sensor attenuation. STUDY DESIGN: An adult human tissue-equivalent phantom and optically stimulated luminescent dosimeters were used. Series of 4 PBW radiographs were acquired with circular and rectangular collimation. s-IOT PBW radiographs were acquired with built-in rectangular collimation. Radiographs were acquired without and with a sensor in the beam path. RESULTS: E (in µSv) was 15.7 and 8.2 for conventional-circular, 4.6 and 1.1 for conventional-rectangular, and 11.9 and 5.9 for s-IOT in sensor-absent and sensor-present scenarios, respectively. For sensor-absent exposures, E for conventional-rectangular was 29.3% and E for s-IOT was 75.8% of the conventional-circular dose. With the sensor present, these values were 13.4% and 72.0%, respectively (P < .001). Sensor-present E was lower than sensor-absent E for all modalities (P < .001). Reductions in equivalent doses were similar to effective dose reductions. CONCLUSIONS: For PBW examinations, E for s-IOT was smaller than for conventional radiography with circular collimation, but larger than for conventional radiography with rectangular collimation. The presence of a sensor maintained these differences but reduced E for all modalities.