Evolution of Down Syndrome Prenatal Screening Clinical Practices in Québec.

OBJECTIVE: Prenatal screening for Down syndrome (DS) has evolved greatly over the last decades with the improvement of first- and second-trimester serum screening and the introduction of cell-free fetal DNA. This study aimed to estimate the impact of such changes on practices. METHODS: This retrospective cohort study included fetuses and newborns diagnosed with DS between 2005-2007 and 2015-2017 in the single obstetrical care centre in Québec City. Data were collected on the prenatal screening method, diagnosis, and delivery. The median was compared between the study periods. RESULTS: Complete clinical data were available for only 78 (66%) of 119 cases of DS. Significant changes were observed in screening methods, including an increase in the use of first-trimester serum, ultrasound, and cell-free fetal DNA. No significant changes were noted in terms of gestational age at diagnosis (median [interquartile range; IQR]: 17.0 [16.0-20.9] weeks in 2005-2007 vs. 17.9 [16.3-22.5] weeks in 2015-2017; P = 0.49) and delivery or termination of pregnancy (median 20.9 [IQR 18.0-23.3] weeks in 2005-2007 vs. 21.3 [18.4-23.4] weeks in 2015-2017; P = 0.46). The methods of diagnosis did not change significantly over the decade, with amniocentesis used 85% and 79% of the time, respectively (P = 0.19). CONCLUSION: The increased use of first-trimester screening and cell-free fetal DNA tests was not associated with earlier diagnosis of DS or earlier delivery or termination of pregnancy. The use of chorionic villus sampling should be encouraged for DS diagnosis when indicated because it could reduce the gestational age at diagnosis and termination if requested.

Use of Antenatal Corticosteroid Therapy: A Descriptive Study of Clinical Practice Trends.

OBJECTIVES: Antenatal corticosteroids (ACS) received within 7 days of delivery reduce perinatal morbidity and mortality associated with preterm birth. We aimed to describe the trends of ACS administration over the last decade. METHODS: A cohort study of women who received ACS in 2006, 2011, and 2016 at the CHU de Québec-Université Laval was conducted. The indication, GA at ACS, and GA at birth, were collected in 150 women randomly selected in each studied year. Our main endpoints were the frequency of ACS administration within 7 days of delivery and between 48 hours and 7 days before delivery. RESULTS: We included 447 women who received ACS at a median GA of 31.4 (range 23.6-39.0) weeks. No women received ACS after 35 weeks in 2006 and 2011. The administration of ACS for indicated delivery between 35 and 39 weeks occurred only in the last study period. Among women for whom ACS was initiated before 35 weeks, 31% received ACS in the 7 days before delivery, and only 13% received ACS between 48 hours and 7 days before birth (varying from 12% to 16%, P = 0.57). Threatened preterm labour or short cervix were the indication for ACS initiation in 39% women who received ACS before 35 weeks, but less than 5% of these women delivered between 2 and 7 days and more than 90% delivered after 14 days. CONCLUSIONS: Administration of ACS remains suboptimal. Threatened preterm labour and short cervix are poorly related to optimal use of ACS therapy.