Ventriculoatrial shunt remains a safe surgical alternative for hydrocephalus: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Hydrocephalus is a commonly encountered pathology in the neurosurgical practice. Since the first permanent ventriculo-subarachnoid-subgaleal shunt described by Mikulicz in 1893, there were multiple attempts to find solutions for draining the excess production/less reabsorption of the cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) from the brain. Nowadays, the most common technique is the ventriculoperitoneal shunt (VPS), whereas the ventriculoatrial shunt (VAS) is applied only in some rare conditions. To date there are still no specific guidelines or strong evidence in literature that guide the surgeon in the choice between the two methods, and the decision usually relies on the confidence and expertise of the surgeon. Considering the lack of established recommendations, this systematic review and meta-analysis aims to evaluate the effectiveness and safety of these two shunting techniques. This systematic review was conducted following the PRISMA protocol (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses). No chronological limits of study publications were included. Prospective and retrospective clinical studies, and reports of case series with at least five patients per group and reporting data on comparison between VAS and VPS techniques were eligible for inclusion. Nine studies reporting 3197 patients meeting the inclusion and exclusion criteria were identified and included in the quantitative synthesis. The risk of shunt dysfunction/obstruction was significantly lower in the VAS group [odds ratio (OR) 0.49, 95%-CI 0.34-0.70, I2 0%]. The risk of infection was not significantly different between the two groups (OR 1.02, 95%-CI 0.59-1.74, I2 0%). The risk of revision was not significantly different between the two groups; however, the heterogeneity between the studies was significant (OR 0.73, 95%-CI 0.36-1.49, I2 91%). Additionally, the risk of death was not significantly different between the two groups; however, the heterogeneity between the studies was high (OR 1.93, 95%-CI 0.81-4.62, I2 64%). VAS remains a safe surgical alternative for hydrocephalus. The results of this study highlight a lower risk of shunt dysfunction/obstruction variable in the VAS group, with no significant statistical differences regarding the occurrence of at least one infection-related complication. In consequence, the choice between these two techniques must be tailored to the specific characteristics of the patient.Protocol Registration: The review protocol was registered and published in Prospective Register of Systematic Reviews (PROSPERO) ( www.crd.york.ac.uk/PROSPERO ) website with registration number: CRD42023479365.

A case-based review on the neuroendoscopic management of intraventricular and subarachnoid basal neurocysticercosis.

OBJECTIVE: Extraparenchymal localization of neurocysticercosis (NCC) is rare in non-endemic areas. A case of mixed (intraventricular, IV, and subarachnoid basal, SAB) NCC was surgically treated using the neuroendoscope and a systematic review of the literature was performed with the aim to analyze the use of this instrument in the management of the extraparenchymal forms of the parasitic disease. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Medline and Embase databases were searched for studies where the neuroendoscope was used for the management of IV/SAB NCC cysts, either for the cerebrospinal fluid diversion or cyst removal. Cyst location, complete removal, cyst breakage during removal, intraoperative and postoperative complications, administration of antihelmintic therapy, outcome and follow-up period were extracted from the articles. RESULTS: 281 patients were treated by means of the neuroendoscope. 254 patients who were described in retrospective cohort studies, came all from endemic areas, with no significant difference between sexes. Mean age at surgery was 30.7 years. Of all cysts reported in retrospective studies, 37.9% were located in the fourth ventricle. An attempt of cyst removal was described in the 84.6% of cases and an endoscopic third ventriculostomy was performed in another 76.4%. A small number of complications were reported intraoperatively (9.1%) obtaining, but a good recovery was achieved at follow-up. Only 17 ventriculoperitoneal shunts were placed after the first procedure, defining a low risk of postoperative hydrocephalus even in case of partial cyst removal. CONCLUSION: Neuroendoscopic removal of an extraparenchymal NCC cyst is a safe procedure that should be preferred for lateral and third ventricle localization and, in a specialized centre, even for a localization in the fourth ventricle if feasible. It is also efficient because of the possibility of performing an internal CSF diversion concomitantly to cyst removal, avoiding the complication registered with VPS. The need for cysticidal treatment after surgery should be addressed in a prospective study.