Ewing sarcoma of the acetabulum in children: a "growth plate-based" surgical strategy.

BACKGROUND: Surgical strategy for Ewing sarcoma (ES) of the pelvis relies on Enneking classification. In adults, in case the acetabulum is involved, excision of the entire acetabulum is needed and often leads to loss of function. In children, the surgeon may adopt a strategy, such as in metaphyseal tumors of long bones where an unaffected growth plate allows a transepiphyseal resection, therefore sparing the joint. METHODS: We present a "triradiate cartilage strategy" for the excision of ES of the pubic component of the acetabulum, which allows a wide resection while preserving most of the socket. The approach is ilioinguinal. Osteotomies of the iliopubic and ischio pubicrami are performed, followed by hip arthrotomy and anterior dislocation. Transacetabular resection is achieved using osteotomes, under image intensifier guidance, with no further reconstruction. Cases are presented for 2 boys aged 6.5 and 9.5 years, treated with chemotherapy and transacetabular resection. RESULTS: Resections were all rated R0. Patient #1 remained asymptomatic, including during sport activities, and had normal hip range of motion at 12-year follow-up. Radiograph demonstrated mild protrusio acetabuli. Patient #2 had no complain at 3-year follow-up with normal hip range of motion, although he presented with an equinus gait. Radiographs demonstrated a well-covered femoral head without medial shift. CONCLUSIONS: A "growth plate-based" surgical strategy can be adapted to malignant pelvic tumors in skeletally immature children. This technique leaves intact the ilio ischiatic component of the triradiate cartilage, which, according to Ponseti, contributes the most to the growth of the acetabulum. Joint sparing improves the functional result and decreases the risk of complication. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: IV.

Prospective study comparing functional outcomes and revision rates between hip resurfacing and total hip arthroplasty: preliminary results for 2 years.

There is a need of independent prospective studies about modern generation of hip resurfacing implants. The aim of this propective observational study was to compare the functional outcomes and revision rates with hip resurfacing arthroplasty and total hip arthroplasty and to present the preliminary results at 2 years. Patients included were recruited prospectively in the Partial Pelvic Replacement Hip Project by a single surgeon between January 2007 and January 2010. Patients were assessed with the Harris Hip Score (HHS) and Postel-Merle d'Aubigné (MDA) score and Devane Score. The end point of the study was reoperation for any cause related to the prosthesis. At a mean follow up of 38.6 months there were a total of 142 patients with hip resurfacing (group 1) [100 Durom(®) (Zimmer Inc., Warsaw, IN, USA) and 42 Birmingham Hip Resurfacing(®) (Smith & Nephew, Memphis, TN, USA)] and 278 patients with total hip arthroplasty (group 2). The results showed significantly greater gain of HHS, MDA and Devane score with hip resurfacing procedures. However, considering all the complications, the rate was significantly higher in group 16.4% vs 1.79% in group 2 (P<0.0001). In group 1 we observed 6 complications only concerned males with Durom(®) implants. The follow up of this cohort is still on going and may deliver more information on the evolution of these results in time.