Monitoring Humoral Response Following BNT162b2 mRNA Vaccination against SARS-CoV-2 in Hematopoietic Stem-Cell Transplantation Patients: A Single-Center Prospective Study along with a Brief Review of Current Literature.

Data on antibody response (AR) after vaccination against SARS-CoV2 in hematopoietic stem-cell transplantation setting (HSCT) were initially scarce, mainly due to the exclusion of such patients from approval studies. Shortly after the worldwide application of vaccination against SARS-CoV-2 in vulnerable populations such as patients with hematologic malignancies, limited single-center trials, including HSCT patients, were published. However, there was a great heterogeneity between them regarding the type of underlying malignancy, co-current treatment, type of vaccine, method of AR measurement, and time point of AR measurement. Herein, we present the results of a prospective study on AR after vaccination for SARS-CoV-2 using the BNT162b2 vaccine in a cohort of 54 HSCT recipients-mostly autologous from a single Unit-along with a broad review of the current literature. In our cohort, the AR positivity rate at 1 month was 80.8% and remained positive in 85.7% of patients at 3 months after vaccination. There were only nine non-responders, who were more heavily pretreated and more frequently hypogammaglobulinemic compared to responders. High antibody titers (AT), [AT ≥ 1000 U/mL], were detected in 38.5% and 30.6% of the patients at m1 and m3, respectively. A significant decline in AT between m1 and m3 was demonstrated-p < 0.0001; median AT1 and AT3 were 480.5 and 293 U/mL, respectively. A novel finding of our study was the negative impact of IgA hypogammaglobulinemia on response to vaccination. Other negative significant factors were treatment with anti-CD20 antibody at vaccination and vaccination within 18 months from HSCT. Our data indicate that HSCT recipients elicit a positive response to the BNT162b2 vaccine against SARS-CoV-2 when vaccinated at 6 months post-transplant, and vaccination should be offered to this patient population even within the post-pandemic COVID-19 era.

Endothelialization and Inflammatory Reactions After Intracardiac Device Implantation.

BACKGROUND: Due to the advances in catheter-based interventional techniques, a wide range of heart diseases can now be treated with a purely interventional approach. Little is yet known regarding biological effects at the intracardiac implantation site or the effects on endothelialization and vascular inflammation in an in vivo environment. Detailed knowledge of ongoing vascular response, the process of endothelialization, and possible systemic inflammatory reactions after implantation is crucial for the clinical routine, since implants usually remain in the body for a lifetime. METHODS: For this narrative review, we conducted an extensive profound PubMed analysis of the current literature on the endothelialization processes of intracardially implanted devices, such as persistent foramen ovale (PFO) occluders, atrial septal defect (ASD) occluders, left atrial appendage (LAA) occluders, transcatheter aortic valve implantations (TAVIs), and leadless pacemakers. Additionally, the known biological activities of common metallic and synthetic components of intracardiac devices in an "in vivo" setting have been evaluated. RESULTS: Nitinol, an alloy of nickel and titanium, is by far the most commonly used material found in intracardiac devices. Although allergies to both components are known, implantation can be performed safely in the vast majority of patients. Depending on the device used, endothelialization can be expected within a time frame of 3-6 months. For those patients with a known allergy, gold coating may be considered as a viable alternative. CONCLUSION: Based on our analysis, we conclude that the vast majority of devices are made of a material that is both safe to implant and nontoxic in long-term treatment according to the current knowledge. The literature on the respective duration of endothelialization of individual devices however is highly divergent.

Bone metabolism markers and angiogenic cytokines as regulators of human hematopoietic stem cell mobilization.

Hematopoietic stem cell (HSC) mobilization involves cleavage of ligands between HSC and niche components. However, there are scarce data regarding the role of bone cells in human HSC mobilization. We studied biochemical markers of bone metabolism and angiogenic cytokines during HSC mobilization in 46 patients' sera with lymphoma and multiple myeloma, by ELISA. Significant changes between pre-mobilization and collection samples were found: (1) Bone alkaline phosphatase (BALP) increased, indicating augmentation of bone formation; (2) Receptor activator of Nf-κB ligand/osteoprotegerin ratio (RANKL/OPG) increased, showing osteoclastic differentiation and survival; however, there was no evidence of increased osteoclastic activity; and (3) Angiopoietin-1/Angiopoietin-2 ratio (ANGP-1/ANGP-2) decreased, consistent with vessel destabilization. Poor mobilizers had significantly higher carboxy-terminal telopeptide of collagen type I (CTX) and lower ANGP-1 at pre-mobilization samples, compared to good ones. CTX, amino-terminal telopeptide of collagen type I (NTX) and ANGP-1 pre-mobilization levels correlated significantly with circulating CD34+ peak cell counts. Our results indicate that bone formation and vessel destabilization are the two major events during human HSC mobilization. Osteoblasts seem to be the orchestrating cells, while osteoclasts are stimulated but not fully active. Moreover, ANGP-1, CTX and NTX may serve as predictors of poor mobilization.

Study of bone metabolism and angiogenesis in patients undergoing high-dose chemotherapy/autologous hematopoietic stem cell transplantation.

OBJECTIVES: As the interaction between hematopoietic stem cells (HSCs) and endosteal and endothelial niches in HSCs homing is essential, we aimed to study bone turnover and angiogenesis in 29 patients with lymphoma/multiple myeloma undergoing hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT). METHODS: Serum samples were collected before high-dose chemotherapy (HDT), at the end of HDT, after HSC infusion, at the nadir of myelotoxicity, and at engraftment. Bone metabolism (CTX, TRACP-5b, bALP, OC, DKK1, RANKL, OPG), and angiogenesis (Ang1, Ang2) markers were measured. These markers were also measured in 21 control patients before and after conventional chemotherapy. RESULTS AND CONCLUSIONS: Bone resorption declined during HSCT (decrease in TRACP-5b [P < .001] and CTX [P = .006]). Bone formation declined as well (decrease in bALP and OC [P < .001 for both]). RANKL/OPG ratio, an indicator of osteoclastic activation, did not change significantly (P = .5). Ang1/Ang2 ratio, a vessel equilibrium marker, decreased significantly (P < .001) suggesting endothelial destabilization. The changes observed in the control group were similar except of bALP and RANKL/OPG ratio. Moreover, Ang1/Ang2 ratio on the day after HSC infusion strongly correlated with time to neutrophil and platelet engraftment (P < .001 for both). Conclusively, bone turnover and vessel destabilization represent important events during HSCT probably reflecting the effect of chemotherapy.