Feasibility of Type 3 Polygraphy for Evaluating Leak Determinants in CPAP-Treated OSA Patients: A Step Toward Personalized Leak Management.

BACKGROUND: Unintentional leaks (ULs) are frequent adverse effects in CPAP-treated patients. We previously published a novel methodology for analyzing the determinants of UL using polysomnography. We now propose a simplified recording system using a type 3 polygraphic device (Somnolter; Nomics S.A.). RESEARCH QUESTION: (1) To describe individual UL determinants provided by the Somnolter software in automatic-CPAP-treated OSA patients; (2) To subsequently describe the clinical consensus of four physicians on how to manage each individual UL situation. STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS: Somnoler recordings performed under nasal automatic-CPAP were automatically analyzed with APIOS software. For each polygraphic recording, APIOS provided the OR and the CIs for potential determinants of UL: mouth opening, CPAP pressure, body position, and mandibular oscillation. Based on these results, each of four physicians was asked to choose one of four strategies: (1) increase or decrease therapeutic pressure; (2) change nasal mask for oro-nasal mask/chinstrap; (3) favor a nonsupine or supine position; (4) no action for individual leak management. Subsequently, a meeting was held to determine a consensus choice for each individual case. RESULTS: Seventy-eight consecutive patients underwent home-polygraphy with Somnolter. Fifty recordings were analyzed (16 females; 65 [57-75] years of age; BMI = 31.1 [27.4-35.3]). Individual diagnosis of UL was routinely feasible. The determinants of UL were heterogeneous in the population, and diagnosis of UL was not feasible in 10 patients. Based on the results from this analysis, we established consensus leak management strategies at the individual level. The average Cohen κ coefficient for the four raters was 0.58. Pressure modification was proposed in 36% of patients, no action in 24%, installation of a facial mask/chinstrap in 22%, and positional treatment in 18%. INTERPRETATION: The use of type 3 polygraphy for characterizing leak determinants in patients treated with nasal automatic-CPAP is feasible in routine practice. Leak determinants are patient specific. Interrater concordance for determining individual leak management strategies demonstrated a "fair" level of agreement. TRIAL REGISTRY: ClinicalTrials.gov; No.: NCT03381508; URL: www.clinicaltrials.gov).

Determinants of Unintentional Leaks During CPAP Treatment in OSA.

BACKGROUND: Unintentional leakage from the mouth or around the mask may lead to cessation of CPAP treatment; however, the causes of unintentional leaks are poorly understood. The objectives of this study were (1) to identify determining factors of unintentional leakage and (2) to determine the effect of the type of mask (nasal/oronasal) used on unintentional leakage. METHODS: Seventy-four polysomnograms from patients with OSA syndrome treated with auto-CPAP were analyzed (23 women; 56 ± 13 years; BMI, 32.9 kg/m2 (range, 29.0-38.0 kg/m2). Polysomnographic recordings were obtained under auto-CPAP, and mandibular behavior was measured with a magnetic sensor. After sleep and respiratory scoring, polysomnographic signals were computed as mean values over nonoverlapping 10-s intervals. The presence/absence of unintentional leakage was dichotomized for each 10-s interval (yes/no). Univariate and multivariate conditional regression models estimated the risk of unintentional leaks during an interval "T" based on the explanatory variables from the previous interval "T-1." A sensitivity analysis for the type of mask was then conducted. RESULTS: The univariate analysis showed that mandibular lowering (mouth opening), a high level of CPAP, body position (other than supine), and rapid eye movement (REM) sleep increased the risk of unintentional leaks and microarousal decreased it. In the multivariate analysis, the same variables remained independently associated with an increased risk of unintentional leakage. The sensitivity analysis showed that oronasal masks reduced the risk of unintentional leaks in cases of mouth opening and REM sleep. CONCLUSIONS: Mouth opening, CPAP level, sleep position, and REM sleep independently contribute to unintentional leakage. These results provide a strong rationale for the definition of phenotypes and the individual management of leaks during CPAP treatment.