Efficacy of automated insulin delivery in pregnant women with type 1 diabetes: a meta-analysis and trial sequential analysis of randomized controlled trials.

BACKGROUND: Automated insulin delivery (AID) devices have shown to be a promising treatment to improve glycemic control in patients with type 1 diabetes mellitus (T1DM). However, its efficacy in pregnant women with T1DM remains uncertain. METHODS: PubMed, Scopus, Cochrane Central and ClinicalTrials.gov were systematically searched for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) comparing AID to standard care (SC), defined as use of sensor-augmented pump and multiple daily insulin injections. Outcomes included time in range (TIR), nocturnal TIR, time in hypoglycemic and hyperglycemic ranges, among others. Sensitivity and trial sequential analyses (TSA) were performed. PROSPERO ID: CRD42023474398. RESULTS: We included five RCTs with a total of 236 pregnant women, of whom 117 (50.6%) received AID. There was a significant increase in nocturnal TIR (mean difference [MD] 12.69%; 95% CI 8.74-16.64; p < 0.01; I2 = 0%) and a decrease in glucose variability (standard deviation of glucose; MD -2.91; 95% CI -5.13 to -0.69; p = 0.01; I2 = 0%). No significant differences were observed for TIR, HBGI, LGBI, mean glucose and time spent in hyperglycemia and hypoglycemia. Regarding TSA, the statistical significance obtained in nocturnal TIR was conclusive and with minimal risk of a type I error. CONCLUSION: Our findings suggest that AID systems can significantly improve nocturnal glycemic control and potentially reduce glycemic variability in pregnant women with T1DM, with no effect in the risk of hypoglycemia and hyperglycemia compared with current insulin treatments.

Continuous Glucose Monitoring Systems in Noninsulin-Treated People with Type 2 Diabetes: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials.

Introduction: Continuous glucose monitoring (CGM) has shown favorable outcomes in patients with type 2 diabetes (T2D) who are on insulin therapy. However, the efficacy of CGM in managing glucose levels in noninsulin-treated people with T2D remains controversial. Methods: PubMed, Cochrane, and Embase were searched for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) comparing CGM to self-monitoring of blood glucose (SMBG) in people with T2D not using insulin. We computed weighted mean differences (WMDs) and standard mean differences (SMD) for continuous outcomes, with 95% confidence intervals (CIs). Heterogeneity was assessed using I2 statistics. Statistical analyses were performed using R version 4.2.3. Results: We included six RCTs comprising 407 noninsulin-treated people with T2D of whom 228 were randomized to CGM. Diabetes duration ranged from 5.4 to 13.9 years. The mean age was 57.9 years and the mean body mass index was 30.8 kg/m2. Four trials used real-time CGM (rt-CGM) and two intermittent scanning CGM (is-CGM). Compared with SMBG, CGM significantly reduced the glycated hemoglobin level (WMD -0.31%; 95% CI -0.42 to -0.21; I2 = 0%), glucose level (WMD -11.16 mg/dL; 95% CI -19.94 to -2.39; I2 = 0%), time in hypoglycemia level 2 (WMD -0.28%; 95% CI -0.52 to -0.03; I2 = 91%), glucose time >180 mg/dL (WMD -7.75%; 95% CI -12.04 to -3.45; I2 = 0%), and the standard deviation of glucose variation (WMD -4.00 mg/dL; 95% CI -6.86 to -1.14; I2 = 0%). CGM also increased time in range (WMD 8.63%; 95% CI 4.54-12.71; I2 = 0%) and treatment satisfaction (SMD 0.79; 95% CI 0.54-1.05; I2 = 0%). Conclusion: In this meta-analysis, rt-CGM and is-CGM were associated with improvement in glycemic control in people with T2D not using insulin when compared to SMBG.

2023 UPDATE: Luso-Brazilian evidence-based guideline for the management of antidiabetic therapy in type 2 diabetes.

BACKGROUND: The management of antidiabetic therapy in people with type 2 diabetes (T2D) has evolved beyond glycemic control. In this context, Brazil and Portugal defined a joint panel of four leading diabetes societies to update the guideline published in 2020. METHODS: The panelists searched MEDLINE (via PubMed) for the best evidence from clinical studies on treating T2D and its cardiorenal complications. The panel searched for evidence on antidiabetic therapy in people with T2D without cardiorenal disease and in patients with T2D and atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease (ASCVD), heart failure (HF), or diabetic kidney disease (DKD). The degree of recommendation and the level of evidence were determined using predefined criteria. RESULTS AND CONCLUSIONS: All people with T2D need to have their cardiovascular (CV) risk status stratified and HbA1c, BMI, and eGFR assessed before defining therapy. An HbA1c target of less than 7% is adequate for most adults, and a more flexible target (up to 8%) should be considered in frail older people. Non-pharmacological approaches are recommended during all phases of treatment. In treatment naïve T2D individuals without cardiorenal complications, metformin is the agent of choice when HbA1c is 7.5% or below. When HbA1c is above 7.5% to 9%, starting with dual therapy is recommended, and triple therapy may be considered. When HbA1c is above 9%, starting with dual therapyt is recommended, and triple therapy should be considered. Antidiabetic drugs with proven CV benefit (AD1) are recommended to reduce CV events if the patient is at high or very high CV risk, and antidiabetic agents with proven efficacy in weight reduction should be considered when obesity is present. If HbA1c remains above target, intensification is recommended with triple, quadruple therapy, or even insulin-based therapy. In people with T2D and established ASCVD, AD1 agents (SGLT2 inhibitors or GLP-1 RA with proven CV benefit) are initially recommended to reduce CV outcomes, and metformin or a second AD1 may be necessary to improve glycemic control if HbA1c is above the target. In T2D with HF, SGLT2 inhibitors are recommended to reduce HF hospitalizations and mortality and to improve HbA1c. In patients with DKD, SGLT2 inhibitors in combination with metformin are recommended when eGFR is above 30 mL/min/1.73 m2. SGLT2 inhibitors can be continued until end-stage kidney disease.

2022: Position of Brazilian Diabetes Society on exercise recommendations for people with type 1 and type 2 diabetes.

INTRODUCTION: For individuals diagnosed with diabetes mellitus, the practice of properly oriented physical exercises brings significant benefits to the individual's health and is considered an indispensable tool for metabolic management. The individualization of exercise routines is an essential aspect for therapeutic success, despite the need to consider some general recommendations. This review is an authorized literal translation of the Brazilian Society of Diabetes (SBD) Guidelines 2021-2022, which is based on scientific evidence and provides guidance on physical activities and exercises aimed at individuals with type 1 and 2 diabetes. METHODS: SBD designated 9 specialists from its "Department of Diabetes, Exercise & Sports" to author chapters on physical activities and exercises directed to individuals with type 1 and 2 diabetes. The aim of these chapters was to highlight recommendations in accordance with Evidence Levels, based on what is described in the literature. These chapters were analyzed by the SBD Central Committee, which is also responsible for the SBD 2021-2022 guidelines. Main clinical inquiries were selected to perform a narrated review by using MEDLINE via PubMed. Top available evidence, such as high-quality clinical trials, large observational studies and meta-analyses related to physical activity and exercise advisory, were analyzed. The adopted MeSh terms were [diabetes], [type 1 diabetes], [type 2 diabetes], [physical activity] [physical exercise]. RESULTS: 17 recommendations were defined by the members. For this review, it was considered different Evidence Levels, as well as different Classes of Recommendations. As to Evidence Levels, the following levels were contemplated: Level A) More than one randomized clinical trial or a randomized clinical trial meta-analysis with low heterogeneity. Level B) Meta analysis with observational studies, one randomized clinical trial, sizeable observational studies and sub-groups analysis. Level C) Small non-randomized studies, cross-sectional studies, case control studies, guidelines or experts' opinions. In respect to Recommendation Classes, the following criteria were adopted: I. "Recommended": Meaning there was a consent of more than 90% of the panel; IIa. "Must be considered": meaning there is a general preference of the panel which 70-90% agrees; IIb. "Can be considered". 50-70% agrees; III Not recommended: There is a consensus that the intervention should not be performed. CONCLUSION: Physical exercise aids on the glycemic control of type 2 diabetes individuals while also decreasing cardiovascular risk in individuals with type 1 and 2 diabetes. Individuals diagnosed with diabetes should perform combined aerobic and resistance exercises in order to manage the disease. In addition, exercises focusing on flexibility and balance should be specially addressed on elderly individuals. Diabetes individuals using insulin as therapeutic treatment should properly monitor glycemia levels before, during and after exercise sessions to minimize health incidents, such as hypoglycemia.

The 2021-2022 position of Brazilian Diabetes Society on insulin therapy in type 1 diabetes: an evidence-based guideline to clinical practice.

BACKGROUND: Insulin therapy regimens for people with type 1 diabetes (PWT1D) should mimic the physiological insulin secretion that occurs in individuals without diabetes. Intensive insulin therapy, whether by multiple daily injections (MDI) or continuous subcutaneous insulin infusion (CSII), constitutes the fundamental therapy from the initial stages of type 1 diabetes (T1D), at all ages. This review is an authorized literal translation of part of the Brazilian Diabetes Society (SBD) Guidelines 2021-2022. This evidence-based guideline supplies guidance on insulin therapy in T1D. METHODS: The methods were published elsewhere in earlier SBD guidelines and was approved by the Internal Institutional Steering Committee for publication. Briefly, the Brazilian Diabetes Society indicated fourteen experts to constitute the Central Committee, designed to regulate the method review of the manuscripts, and judge the degrees of recommendations and levels of evidence. SBD Type 1 Diabetes Department drafted the manuscript selecting key clinical questions to do a narrative review using MEDLINE via PubMed, with the best evidence available, including high-quality clinical trials, metanalysis, and large observational studies related to insulin therapy in T1D, by using the Mesh terms [type 1 diabetes] and [insulin]. RESULTS: Based on extensive literature review the Central Committee defined ten recommendations. Three levels of evidence were considered: A. Data from more than one randomised clinical trial (RCT) or one metanalysis of RCTs with low heterogeneity (I2 < 40%). B. Data from metanalysis, including large observational studies, a single RCT, or a pre-specified subgroup analysis. C: Data from small or non-randomised studies, exploratory analysis, or consensus of expert opinion. The degree of recommendation was obtained based on a poll sent to the panellists, using the following criteria: Grade I: when more than 90% of agreement; Grade IIa if 75-89% of agreement; IIb if 50-74% of agreement, and III, when most of the panellist recommends against a defined treatment. CONCLUSIONS: In PWT1D, it is recommended to start insulin treatment immediately after clinical diagnosis, to prevent metabolic decompensation and diabetic ketoacidosis. Insulin therapy regimens should mimic insulin secretion with the aim to achieve glycemic control goals established for the age group. Intensive treatment with basal-bolus insulin therapy through MDI or CSII is recommended, and insulin analogues offers some advantages in PWT1D, when compared to human insulin. Periodic reassessment of insulin doses should be performed to avoid clinical inertia in treatment.

Hypoglycemia incidence and awareness among insulin-treated patients with diabetes: the HAT study in Brazil.

BACKGROUND: Hypoglycemia affects patient safety and glycemic control during insulin treatment of both type 1 (T1DM) and type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM). The Hypoglycemia Assessment Tool study in Brazil aimed to determine the proportion of patients experiencing hypoglycemic events and to characterize patient awareness and fear about hypoglycemia, among insulin-treated T1DM or T2DM patients. METHODS: This was a non-interventional, multicenter study, with a 6-month retrospective and a 4-week prospective evaluation of hypoglycemic events. Patients completed a questionnaire at baseline and at the end of the study, and also a patient diary. The answers 'occasionally' and 'never' to the question 'Do you have symptoms when you have a low sugar level?' denoted impaired hypoglycemia awareness. Fear was reported on a 10-point scale, from 'not afraid at all' to 'absolutely terrified'. RESULTS: From 679 included patients, 321 with T1DM and 293 T2DM, median age of 33.0 and 62.0 years, 59% and 56% were female, and median diabetes duration was 15.0 and 15.0 years, respectively. Median time of insulin use was 14.0 and 6.0 years. During the prospective period, 91.7% T1DM and 61.8% T2DM patients had at least one hypoglycemic event. In the same period, 54.0% T1DM and 27.4% T2DM patients had nocturnal hypoglycemia, 20.6% T1DM and 10.6% T2DM patients had asymptomatic hypoglycemia, and severe events occurred in 20.0% and 10.3%, respectively. At baseline, 21.4% T1DM and 34.3% T2DM had hypoglycemia unawareness. The mean score of hypoglycemia fear was 5.9 ± 3.1 in T1DM and 5.4 ± 3.9 in T2DM. The most common attitude after hypoglycemic events were to increase calorie intake (60.3%) and blood glucose monitoring (58.0%) and to reduce or skip insulin doses (30.8%). CONCLUSIONS: Referred episodes of hypoglycemia were high, in both T1DM and T2DM insulin users. Patient attitudes after hypoglycemia, such as reduction in insulin and increase in calorie intake, can affect diabetes management. These findings may support clinicians in tailoring diabetes education and insulin treatment for patients with diabetes, in order to improve their glycemic control while reducing the risk of hypoglycemic events.

[Continuous subcutaneous insulin infusion in type 1 diabetic during pregnancy: case report and literature review]. / Infusão de insulina subcutânea contínua em gestante com diabetes tipo 1: relato de caso e revisão da literatura.

The type 1 diabetic patient pregnancy is subjected to various attempts to obtain good glycemic control, since the pre-conception period throughout the gestation. Continuous subcutaneous insulin infusion (CSII) is a therapeutic tool to achieve the glycemic targets. Here it is presented the case of a Type 1 diabetic woman, who was not under multiple insulin daily injections therapy, and whose insulin therapy started on CSII during the second trimester of gestation, obtaining successful therapeutic outcome.

Infusão de insulina subcutânea contínua em gestante com diabetes tipo 1: relato de caso e revisão da literatura / Continuous subcutaneous insulin infusion in type 1 diabetic during pregnancy: case report and literature review

A gestação em portadoras de diabetes tipo 1 é alvo de múltiplas tentativas para o bom controle glicêmico desde o período pré-concepcional, com a terapia com infusão de insulina subcutânea contínua apresentando opção terapêutica adicional na tentativa de alcançar as metas glicêmicas. Apresentamos o caso de uma paciente com diabetes tipo 1, não controlada com múltiplas injeções diárias, cuja instalação da bomba de insulina ocorreu durante o segundo trimestre de gestação, com sucesso terapêutico.

The type 1 diabetic patient pregnancy is subjected to various attempts to obtain good glycemic control, since the pre-conception period throughout the gestation. Continuous subcutaneous insulin infusion (CSII) is a therapeutic tool to achieve the glycemic targets. Here it is presented the case of a Type 1 diabetic woman, who was not under multiple insulin daily injections therapy, and whose insulin therapy started on CSII during the second trimester of gestation, obtaining successful therapeutic outcome.

[Diabetes ketoacidosis associated with Guillan-Barré syndrome]. / Cetoacidose diabética associada com síndrome de Guillain-Barré: relato de caso.

Guillain-Barré syndrome (GBS) is a disorder caused by exaggerated immune response to infectious process. Diabetes Melito (DM) is not recognized as one cause of this inflammatory polyradiculoneuropathy with just a few cases of this association been described in the literature so far. We report here the case of a 44 years-old female patient admitted with a history of polyuria, polydipsia, weight loss, asthenia, hyperglycemia (562 mg/dL) and ketoacidosis without any infectious focus. The patient progressed with poliradiculopathy, respiratory insufficiency and liquoric alteration completing the picture of Guillain-Barré syndrome. The patient fully recovered from the neurologic deficit and then stopped with insulin therapy.

Cetoacidose diabética associada com síndrome de Guillain-Barré: relato de caso / Diabetes ketoacidosis associated with Guillan-Barré syndrome

A síndrome de Guillain-Barré (GBS) é uma desordem causada por exacerbada resposta imune aos processos infecciosos. O diabetes melito (DM) não é reconhecido como uma causa desta polirradiculopatia inflamatória, com poucos casos relatados na literatura sobre tal associação. Apresentamos um caso de uma paciente do sexo feminino, 44 anos, admitida com história recente de poliúria, polidipsia, perda de peso e astenia, glicemia de 562 mg/dL, em cetoacidose, sem foco infeccioso. Posteriormente desenvolveu quadro de polirradiculopatia, insuficiência respiratória e alteração liquórica compondo o quadro de GBS. No presente relato, a paciente recuperou-se plenamente do déficit neurológico, assim como da hiperglicemia, configurando quadro de diabetes tipo 2, com tendência à cetoacidose, evoluindo sem insulino-dependência.

Guillain-Barré syndrome (GBS) is a disorder caused by exaggerated immune response to infectious process. Diabetes Melito (DM) is not recognized as one cause of this inflammatory polyradiculoneuropathy with just a few cases of this association been described in the literature so far. We report here the case of a 44 years-old female patient admitted with a history of polyuria, polydipsia, weight loss, asthenia, hyperglycemia (562 mg/dL) and ketoacidosis without any infectious focus. The patient progressed with poliradiculopathy, respiratory insufficiency and liquoric alteration completing the picture of Guillain-Barré syndrome. The patient fully recovered from the neurologic deficit and then stopped with insulin therapy.

Perfil de expressão de genes modulados pela Pioglitazona em ilhotas pancreáticas murídeas / Gene expression profile modulated by pioglitazone in rat pancreatic islets

O receptor ativado do peroxissomo gama (PPAR-) é regulador do metabolismo e diferenciação do tecido adiposo, sendo um alvo conhecido das tiazolidinedionas (TZD), utilizadas para o tratamento do diabetes tipo 2 (DM2). As TZD agem como um agente sensibilizador da ação da insulina nos tecidos periféricos e tem sido especulado que as TZDs podem ter um papel na função da célula , prevenindo perda de massa e melhorando a sua viabilidade a longo prazo. Este efeito seria supostamente mediado pela transcrição de genes que favoreceriam a lipólise, diminuindo o conteúdo intracelular de triglicérides e, portanto, diminuindo a lipotoxicidade. Entretanto, alguns estudos também mostraram efeito nulo ou mesmo deletério das TZDs sobre as ilhotas pancreáticas. Na realidade, o papel de genes-alvo para o PPAR- nas ilhotas pancreáticas é ainda pouco conhecido. Estudamos o perfil de expressão gênica induzido pelo tratamento com Pioglitazona (Pio), uma TZD aprovada e disponível para uso clínico no tratamento do DM2, em ilhotas pancreáticas murídeas em cultura primária, com concentrações normal e suprafisiológica de glicose no meio de cultura. As ilhotas foram obtidas de ratos wistar machos de dois meses de idade e isoladas pelo método do gradiente de Ficoll e então cultivadas em 5,6 mM ou 23 mM de glicose por 24h, sendo tratadas com Pio 10 M ou DMSO 0,1% (veículo). A Pioglitazona foi cedida pela Takeda Farmacêutica, Osaka, Japão. O RNA foi extraído com Trizol e purificado com o kit RNeasy (Qiagen). As amostras foram marcadas e hibridizadas no microarranjo de cDNA Mouse Panchip 13k, usando-se cinco replicatas biológicas diferentes para cada condição. A análise estatística dos dados do microarranjo foi feita com o uso do programa significance analysis of microarrays (SAM) com uso de taxa de descobrimento falso (FDR) de 20%. A análise das vias acometidas foi feita com o Ingenuity Pathway Analysis (www.ingenuity.com...

Peroxisome proliferator-activator receptor-ã (PPAR-ã) is a target for thiazolidinedione (TZD) antidiabetic drugs and a regulator of adipose tissue differentiation and metabolism. TZD act as an insulin sensitizing agent on peripheral tissues. It has been speculated that TZD could play a role on beta-cell function, preventing loss and improving viability in the long-term. This effect is supposed to be mediated through a potential benefit against lipotoxicity, favouring lypolisis and decreasing intracellular tryglicerides content. Nevertheless some studies also showed a lack or even a potential deleterious effect of TZD on islets. The role of PPAR-ã target genes in pancreatic islets is actually still largely unclear. We studied the gene expression profile induced by the treatment with Pioglitazone (Pio), an approved TZD for T2DM therapy, on rat pancreatic islets primary culture both at normal and supraphysiological glucose medium concentrations. Islets were obtained from 2 month-old, male, wistar rats and isolated through the Ficoll gradient method and then cultured with 5.6 mM or 23 mM of glucose concentration for 24h, being treated with Pio 10 ìM or DMSO 0.1% (vehicle). Pioglitazone was provided by Takeda Pharmaceuticals, Osaka, Japan. RNA was extracted with Trizol (Sigma) and purified with RNeasy kit (Qiagen). Samples were labeled and then hybridized on the Mouse PanChip 13k cDNA microarray, using 5 different biological replicates for each test condition. Statistical Analysis of the microarray data was performed using significance analysis of microarrays (SAM) with a false discovery rate of 20%. Pathways assessment was performed through Ingenuity Pathway Analysis (www.ingenuity.com)...